Chip's Offense
-
Did you read anything I just said? His success is based on his ability to play to his team's strengths. He doesn't have a one size fits all gameplan. The guy's a tailor, and if he comes to Cleveland, I'd expect our offense to switch to a shotgun style spread, a la Oklahoma State.
That would make much more sense. (but then, if the reason to get this guy is for the kind of offense he runs...then why take him if he is not going to run that offense?)
That would make much more sense. (but then, if the reason to get this guy is for the kind of offense he runs...then why take him if he is not going to run that offense?)
But I don't think that is the reason we'd get him. We'd take him because of his ability to adapt to his talent.
-
Zombo said:
Naming the "best" Browns coaches since 1999 is akin to choosing the best boy bands, your favorite traffic jams, or the tops of all root canals.
Zombo
Backstreet Boys, going to Hilton Head in 2005 and October 2, 2011. Give me something hard to answer.
-
besides mangini, davis was the best coach since '99.
hey who knows chip kelly could be the best thing since sliced bread. i'm certainly not the owner of the browns or a great talent evaluator.
i just think a coach that runs a more conventional pro style NFL-like offense defense will step into being a NFL HC easier than one whose scheme is based on speed and gimmick.
besides mangini, davis was the best coach since '99.
hey who knows chip kelly could be the best thing since sliced bread. i'm certainly not the owner of the browns or a great talent evaluator.
i just think a coach that runs a more conventional pro style NFL-like offense defense will step into being a NFL HC easier than one whose scheme is based on speed and gimmick.
But on the other side of the coin, isn't a conventional offense going to meet the same type of conventional defense and vice versa. What Kelly is doing is disrupting the conventional. D's are being spread out all over the field. They are not being given a lot of time to adapt to the fast paced offense.
What did people think when they saw someone take a basketball and shoot it from over their head instead of chucking it from between their legs like you would a 3 year old? As someone stated earlier, the forward pass wasn't all that familiar at one time.
The only thing constant is change. A coach that can be an innovator and do something different whether it is 1 and 10 or 3rd and 1 has some value in my eye.
Did anyone catch the two point conversion right after that run back TD. What kind of formation is that? I didn't sit there like "What the hell was that? That's not game of football that my father and his father before me used to know... blah blah blah..." I was intrigued to see someone do something outside the norm. Now granted, the first time that Kelly does that in the NFL and loses by one point, he will be lead to the slaughter, but I am still intrigued by a guy who is will to go against the grain.
-
Zombo said:
Naming the "best" Browns coaches since 1999 is akin to choosing the best boy bands, your favorite traffic jams, or the tops of all root canals.
Zombo
funniest shit ever!
:lol: But on the other side of the coin, isn't a conventional offense going to meet the same type of conventional defense and vice versa. What Kelly is doing is disrupting the conventional. D's are being spread out all over the field. They are not being given a lot of time to adapt to the fast paced offense.
What did people think when they saw someone take a basketball and shoot it from over their head instead of chucking it from between their legs like you would a 3 year old? As someone stated earlier, the forward pass wasn't all that familiar at one time.
The only thing constant is change. A coach that can be an innovator and do something different whether it is 1 and 10 or 3rd and 1 has some value in my eye.
Did anyone catch the two point conversion right after that run back TD. What kind of formation is that? I didn't sit there like "What the hell was that? That's not game of football that my father and his father before me used to know... blah blah blah..." I was intrigued to see someone do something outside the norm. Now granted, the first time that Kelly does that in the NFL and loses by one point, he will be lead to the slaughter, but I am still intrigued by a guy who is will to go against the grain.
i like against the grain too. but you have to put into context what he's done and apply it to where and who he's done it against. do you think every player on every defense he's faced will make the NFL? of course not. only the fastest strongest and best make it to the next level. he won't be facing DCs from Kstate or wash state etc. etc. he'll be facing the likes of a lovie smith or a jim haslett who will break that offense down in the week they have to prepare. sure the offense washington has played this year is akin to a college option game but if not for the remarkable talent of RG3 it owuldn't be half as successful. we've all seen the run and shoot and the WildDawg go the way of the do do bird. now everyone is looking for the next big flash in the pan.
who ever they hire (and i really, truly don't care because i believe in haslam) i just hope they can finally bring a winner to cleveland.
-
I think Weeden could run it, and to have some of the weapons developing at WR and then having Trent being able to run into some of these "spaces" could be a lot of fun to watch.
really? then he'd have to grow a brain between now and then.
listen i don't watch oregon, i think their offense is gimmicky, i think west coast teams are over-rated and when did oregon ever have a bruising back under chip kelly? aren't they scat backs that run a 3.0 40? lol.
really? then he'd have to grow a brain between now and then.
listen i don't watch oregon, i think their offense is gimmicky, i think west coast teams are over-rated and when did oregon ever have a bruising back under chip kelly? aren't they scat backs that run a 3.0 40? lol.
Blount went to Oregon...he's not a scatback
-
really? then he'd have to grow a brain between now and then.
listen i don't watch oregon, i think their offense is gimmicky, i think west coast teams are over-rated and when did oregon ever have a bruising back under chip kelly? aren't they scat backs that run a 3.0 40? lol.
Blount went to Oregon...he's not a scatback
Blount went to Oregon...he's not a scatback
If Kelly does come here I think the one thing we don't want is for him to be stuck in the Shurmur/Murmur offensive style of "do it my way or the highway".
Kelly has said, and I take him at his word, that he could adapt his style of play to the talent on the field.
Does anyone think he could not have taken a Trent Richardson and done good things with him at Oregon?
And didn't Josh Gordon play in a similar style as Oregon in his (brief) time at Baylor?
Travis Benjamin seems like a fit for his style, doesn't he? Or any adapted style he chooses to run.
And Weeden certainly can run a spread offense. Maybe not a spread option where he has to run...but his wide open offense at OK State allowed him to get the better of both RGIII and Andrew Luck shootouts in college.
OK, so he lost to both of them this year as a pro....but how much was that him?
(Against Indy....the Murmur offense was at work. Against DC...the Browns defense didn't show up well)
-
Blount went to Oregon...he's not a scatback
If Kelly does come here I think the one thing we don't want is for him to be stuck in the Shurmur/Murmur offensive style of "do it my way or the highway".
Kelly has said, and I take him at his word, that he could adapt his style of play to the talent on the field.
Does anyone think he could not have taken a Trent Richardson and done good things with him at Oregon?
And didn't Josh Gordon play in a similar style as Oregon in his (brief) time at Baylor?
Travis Benjamin seems like a fit for his style, doesn't he? Or any adapted style he chooses to run.
And Weeden certainly can run a spread offense. Maybe not a spread option where he has to run...but his wide open offense at OK State allowed him to get the better of both RGIII and Andrew Luck shootouts in college.
OK, so he lost to both of them this year as a pro....but how much was that him?
(Against Indy....the Murmur offense was at work. Against DC...the Browns defense didn't show up well)
If Kelly does come here I think the one thing we don't want is for him to be stuck in the Shurmur/Murmur offensive style of "do it my way or the highway".
Kelly has said, and I take him at his word, that he could adapt his style of play to the talent on the field.
Does anyone think he could not have taken a Trent Richardson and done good things with him at Oregon?
And didn't Josh Gordon play in a similar style as Oregon in his (brief) time at Baylor?
Travis Benjamin seems like a fit for his style, doesn't he? Or any adapted style he chooses to run.
And Weeden certainly can run a spread offense. Maybe not a spread option where he has to run...but his wide open offense at OK State allowed him to get the better of both RGIII and Andrew Luck shootouts in college.
OK, so he lost to both of them this year as a pro....but how much was that him?
(Against Indy....the Murmur offense was at work. Against DC...the Browns defense didn't show up well)
I love the idea of having a coach who is that innovative and imaginative in his offensive schemes. There's no question he's aggressive and he will probably get burned a few times but how many of us wouldn't rather have aggressive over the boring offense that Shurmur has been running?
-
First off, I'm not saying I want Chip Kelly but with a lot of people already shooting him down for his college offense I would like to say this. Here goes
Chip Kelly is a good "coach" and were looking for a "head coach". Not an offensive coordinator(everyone's assuming he is the offensive coordinator if he gets named head coach). So all these people saying that he isn't the guy for HEAD COACH, I say your wrong. He gets his teams into bowl games every year, he is an established (1)winner and (2)game planner. Him coming to Cleveland would bring those two crucial elements of a head coach. You guys are looking past the basics of a team and already evaluating his offense if he were in Cleveland. Look at the bottom line the guy has football knowledge pouring out of him and a developed winner.
That's all I want as a Browns fan, someone who see's talent, understands & evaluates talent, and gets the W at the end of the day.
-
Zombo said:
Naming the "best" Browns coaches since 1999 is akin to choosing the best boy bands, your favorite traffic jams, or the tops of all root canals.
Zombo
funniest shit ever!
:lol: But on the other side of the coin, isn't a conventional offense going to meet the same type of conventional defense and vice versa. What Kelly is doing is disrupting the conventional. D's are being spread out all over the field. They are not being given a lot of time to adapt to the fast paced offense.
What did people think when they saw someone take a basketball and shoot it from over their head instead of chucking it from between their legs like you would a 3 year old? As someone stated earlier, the forward pass wasn't all that familiar at one time.
The only thing constant is change. A coach that can be an innovator and do something different whether it is 1 and 10 or 3rd and 1 has some value in my eye.
Did anyone catch the two point conversion right after that run back TD. What kind of formation is that? I didn't sit there like "What the hell was that? That's not game of football that my father and his father before me used to know... blah blah blah..." I was intrigued to see someone do something outside the norm. Now granted, the first time that Kelly does that in the NFL and loses by one point, he will be lead to the slaughter, but I am still intrigued by a guy who is will to go against the grain.
i like against the grain too. but you have to put into context what he's done and apply it to where and who he's done it against. do you think every player on every defense he's faced will make the NFL? of course not. only the fastest strongest and best make it to the next level. he won't be facing DCs from Kstate or wash state etc. etc. he'll be facing the likes of a lovie smith or a jim haslett who will break that offense down in the week they have to prepare. sure the offense washington has played this year is akin to a college option game but if not for the remarkable talent of RG3 it owuldn't be half as successful. we've all seen the run and shoot and the WildDawg go the way of the do do bird. now everyone is looking for the next big flash in the pan.
who ever they hire (and i really, truly don't care because i believe in haslam) i just hope they can finally bring a winner to cleveland.
who ever they hire (and i really, truly don't care because i believe in haslam) i just hope they can finally bring a winner to cleveland.[/b]
And that is the entire point right there, we want a winner. And I believe that Haslam is going to stress that point to whomever is offered and accepts the job, and that this is not a stepping stone position for anyone here in Cleveland anymore. This is not a place where coaches and players come to die. Based on Haslam's presses, he wants to win and win soon, while trying to make Cleveland a top destination for players and making Cleveland a more attractive team.
-
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login