Do you see the no hesitation in McCoy? Take notes Trich
-
No. This oline is struggling badly without the two starting guards. Cousins was badly outmatched,
and again, made really stupid mistakes that cost 1, maybe 2 TD's. TR is a different back, quick, and
very, very powerful. Miami's front seven is serious business. That's from Joe Thomas before the game.
The subject of this thread is invalid. Obviously, TRich doesn't have the confidence that the OG's will make the holes.
Some folks would rather he just hit the hole that doesn't exist, like he doesn't have a clue? You watch, a lot of teams
will throw a lot more against Miami because of their front seven.
And, TR can fix any "dancing" problem when he does have a hole, in about a few seconds. No big deal.
-
No. This oline is struggling badly without the two starting guards. Cousins was badly outmatched,
and again, made really stupid mistakes that cost 1, maybe 2 TD's. TR is a different back, quick, and
very, very powerful. Miami's front seven is serious business. That's from Joe Thomas before the game.
The subject of this thread is invalid. Obviously, TRich doesn't have the confidence that the OG's will make the holes.
Some folks would rather he just hit the hole that doesn't exist, like he doesn't have a clue? You watch, a lot of teams
will throw a lot more against Miami because of their front seven.
And, TR can fix any "dancing" problem when he does have a hole, in about a few seconds. No big deal.
No. This oline is struggling badly without the two starting guards. Cousins was badly outmatched,
and again, made really stupid mistakes that cost 1, maybe 2 TD's. TR is a different back, quick, and
very, very powerful. Miami's front seven is serious business. That's from Joe Thomas before the game.
The subject of this thread is invalid. Obviously, TRich doesn't have the confidence that the OG's will make the holes.
Some folks would rather he just hit the hole that doesn't exist, like he doesn't have a clue? You watch, a lot of teams
will throw a lot more against Miami because of their front seven.
And, TR can fix any "dancing" problem when he does have a hole, in about a few seconds. No big deal.
John Greco would seem to be the one starting guard - the other two were in a competition for the second spot the second greco signed his new contract.
Anyway, Breaking Bad finishes soon, we should have Jesse Pinkman back.
-
What shocked me, cal, in my breakdown was just how bad a first half Greco had... It was not Cousins' bad... but it was bad. Nonetheless there were holes available... just not where they were supposed to be.... he was dancing where they were supposed to be.
=======================================
Elude defenders by running them over... LOL....
A run due to pressure from a pass rush counts as a read option run...
31 rushes at 3.3 per gets TR 102 yards... and we lose...
You can beat a dead horse all-day, but it still ain't getting up....
jrb... stop it, man... you're killing me...
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
What shocked me, cal, in my breakdown was just how bad a first half Greco had... It was not Cousins' bad... but it was bad. Nonetheless there were holes available... just not where they were supposed to be.... he was dancing where they were supposed to be.
=======================================
Elude defenders by running them over... LOL....
A run due to pressure from a pass rush counts as a read option run...
31 rushes at 3.3 per gets TR 102 yards... and we lose...
You can beat a dead horse all-day, but it still ain't getting up....
jrb... stop it, man... you're killing me...
What shocked me, cal, in my breakdown was just how bad a first half Greco had... It was not Cousins' bad... but it was bad. Nonetheless there were holes available... just not where they were supposed to be.... he was dancing where they were supposed to be.
=======================================
Elude defenders by running them over... LOL....
A run due to pressure from a pass rush counts as a read option run...
31 rushes at 3.3 per gets TR 102 yards... and we lose...
You can beat a dead horse all-day, but it still ain't getting up....
jrb... stop it, man... you're killing me...
It's funny cause you're killing me too. Failing to do basic math (47/13 is not 3.3 YPC) says about everything I need to know.
I'm done, but here's the definition of elude just for your reference: To evade or escape from, as by daring, cleverness, or skill. Of course breaking a tackle due to strength and size isn't skill or anything. Good grief.
-
Size and strength are skills???
On the other hand, I had the TR avg YPC wrong. Thought 3.3 was his 2012 average (I was going for a bigger sample size), but it was 3.6... same as it was Sunday... So you only needed to find him 28 carries to get him to 100 yds... and we tie???
I'm all in on more TR touches... runs if they're working. I think we might agree that 4.0 YPC is still the measure of an effective run game... yes? But there was no sign Sunday that pounding the rock would have produced better results late than they did early.
And certainly more TR touches via the pass where he avg'd 15 ypc... and can use that "ellusive strength" in the 2ndary.... (sorry... could not resist...).
Till we meet again... when we may well agree... it's happened before.
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
Size and strength are skills???
On the other hand, I had the TR avg YPC wrong. Thought 3.3 was his 2012 average (I was going for a bigger sample size), but it was 3.6... same as it was Sunday... So you only needed to find him 28 carries to get him to 100 yds... and we tie???
I'm all in on more TR touches... runs if they're working. I think we might agree that 4.0 YPC is still the measure of an effective run game... yes? But there was no sign Sunday that pounding the rock would have produced better results late than they did early.
And certainly more TR touches via the pass where he avg'd 15 ypc... and can use that "ellusive strength" in the 2ndary.... (sorry... could not resist...).
Till we meet again... when we may well agree... it's happened before.
Size and strength are skills???
On the other hand, I had the TR avg YPC wrong. Thought 3.3 was his 2012 average (I was going for a bigger sample size), but it was 3.6... same as it was Sunday... So you only needed to find him 28 carries to get him to 100 yds... and we tie???
I'm all in on more TR touches... runs if they're working. I think we might agree that 4.0 YPC is still the measure of an effective run game... yes? But there was no sign Sunday that pounding the rock would have produced better results late than they did early.
And certainly more TR touches via the pass where he avg'd 15 ypc... and can use that "ellusive strength" in the 2ndary.... (sorry... could not resist...).
Till we meet again... when we may well agree... it's happened before.
If used well, yes they are. Anyone can have size and strength, just go to the local Gold's gym and you can see that. Using that strength and size is a skill in football. Guys like AP and to a lesser extent Michael Turner or Mike Tolbert have or had a lot of success but they had skills against smaller defenders. Anyone can be elusive, it's just commonly given to the Darren Sproles of the games. To me, if you're breaking tackles that makes you elusive. IDC how that goes.
The bottom line is you can't judge the guy based on 13 carries. Even if on the 14th carry he gets a 10 yard gain, we're getting to that 'benchmark' of 4.0 YPC. Trent had several nice runs early and it was totally abandoned in a close game for the second half. I'm willing to eat crow if given more touches in this system he still has mediocre numbers, but it's hard to judge when he's hardly getting the ball. I think Trent has all the skills to be a steady back, but we have to give the guy a chance.
-
our OL play was terrible, we all know that. but as one poster said above comparing TR to mccoy is laughable. mccoy has that burst of speed as soon as he gets the ball and quite frankly is past the Dline before they know what's going on. TR needs a hole or to get outside to gain his momentum. mccoy has it from the start.
and yes the browns look like they are playing HS football compared to most teams in the league.
i'd hate to see what our power ranking is right now.
chudzinski said the team 'will learn' from the loss to the fins. well i hope he and turner learn something too.
i would have fed TR 30 times that game. if anything you're wearing down the fins D and let him get outside where he can punish some DBs so they are less effective against our non-effective receiving corp. our semi-rookie TE is the only one that showed up.
-
Like I said, the announcers commented during replays on the 5 or so carries where T-Rich could've left it at one cut and got more yards than he did by cutting 4 or 5 times in a small space (and not at McCoy's pace, to be sure). He really needs to get his 4 or 5 and stop getting 2 because he's dancing.
It's not hard to spot when it's replayed and commented on. I wouldn't draft ANY back that high in today's league... and I really don't think T-Rich was "The One" anyway. I think he's a good back. I think he's versatile and committed. But I don't really believe he'll win us a lot more games than Bernard Pierce would have (3rd rounder in 2012).
Honestly, I think the draft was obvious: Tannehill and then Martin, whom the Browns were said to love. But it didn't go that way and we can move on. It is going to cost us because as of right now, today, I'm no more convinced that Weeden is our long-term starter... and I'm betting Banner and Lombardi feel the same. It can change.
Like I said, the announcers commented during replays on the 5 or so carries where T-Rich could've left it at one cut and got more yards than he did by cutting 4 or 5 times in a small space (and not at McCoy's pace, to be sure). He really needs to get his 4 or 5 and stop getting 2 because he's dancing.
It's not hard to spot when it's replayed and commented on. I wouldn't draft ANY back that high in today's league... and I really don't think T-Rich was "The One" anyway. I think he's a good back. I think he's versatile and committed. But I don't really believe he'll win us a lot more games than Bernard Pierce would have (3rd rounder in 2012).
Honestly, I think the draft was obvious: Tannehill and then Martin, whom the Browns were said to love. But it didn't go that way and we can move on. It is going to cost us because as of right now, today, I'm no more convinced that Weeden is our long-term starter... and I'm betting Banner and Lombardi feel the same. It can change.
You keep saying we can move on from the draft...yet you bring it up in every single post.
I literally can copy and paste any one of your responses from any other thread...and it will look exactly the same as this one.
"I think the #3 spot was too high for a RB. Did you listen to the announcers? It's pretty obvious what they said is right, and I agree with it. I wish we had Tannehill and Martin, but we don't so no use in worrying about it. This is a passing league. Did it mention that I wish we would have drafted Tannehill and Martin? Oh well, it's too late now. We need a pass rush. It's too bad we can't get that from Tannehill and Martin. Tannehill passes and Martin catches the pass and then also rushes. It's perfect. But oh well, we don't have them so no use in bringing them up."
By the way, since everyone gushed about Martin's YPC last season (since that was really the only better stat he had than Richardson)... heres their 2013 comparisons.
Richardson
13 carries 47 yards 3.6 YPC 0 TD
Martin
24 carries 65 yards 2.7 YPC 1 TD
Keep in mind, that's against the vaunted Jets defense starting...nobody in their front 7.
-
-
Like I said, the announcers commented during replays on the 5 or so carries where T-Rich could've left it at one cut and got more yards than he did by cutting 4 or 5 times in a small space (and not at McCoy's pace, to be sure). He really needs to get his 4 or 5 and stop getting 2 because he's dancing.
It's not hard to spot when it's replayed and commented on. I wouldn't draft ANY back that high in today's league... and I really don't think T-Rich was "The One" anyway. I think he's a good back. I think he's versatile and committed. But I don't really believe he'll win us a lot more games than Bernard Pierce would have (3rd rounder in 2012).
Honestly, I think the draft was obvious: Tannehill and then Martin, whom the Browns were said to love. But it didn't go that way and we can move on. It is going to cost us because as of right now, today, I'm no more convinced that Weeden is our long-term starter... and I'm betting Banner and Lombardi feel the same. It can change.
I hear ya man, what a crappy pick. I remember when you were all for the pick and I couldn't understand why!! Doh!!
Go Trent, he da man.
Like I said, the announcers commented during replays on the 5 or so carries where T-Rich could've left it at one cut and got more yards than he did by cutting 4 or 5 times in a small space (and not at McCoy's pace, to be sure). He really needs to get his 4 or 5 and stop getting 2 because he's dancing.
It's not hard to spot when it's replayed and commented on. I wouldn't draft ANY back that high in today's league... and I really don't think T-Rich was "The One" anyway. I think he's a good back. I think he's versatile and committed. But I don't really believe he'll win us a lot more games than Bernard Pierce would have (3rd rounder in 2012).
Honestly, I think the draft was obvious: Tannehill and then Martin, whom the Browns were said to love. But it didn't go that way and we can move on. It is going to cost us because as of right now, today, I'm no more convinced that Weeden is our long-term starter... and I'm betting Banner and Lombardi feel the same. It can change.
-
I liked the pick better than some of the alternatives... but my pick was Tannehill/Martin. But I figured with a rookie salary cap, you could afford to get a back's best five years and call it a relationship. Plenty of smart guys told me he might be the best player in the draft so my sense was, "Well, he isn't a cornerback. Go out and conquer the world."
But to use a #3 after a pricey trade-up, I've always said he better be great, not good. Good is all the fuck over the draft and after. Good is what most teams want at running back, with more good behind it. Great is for quarterbacks and pass rushers, if you're constructed right.
To be worth a #3 pick, you shouldn't need people making excuses for you. You should just get on with gaining 1,500 yards at 4.7 a clip, period. End of sentence. Same thing for Darren McFadden: Top 10 back, you need to start cutting against the grain and carrying your team, make life easier for your quarterback (who eventually has to win it for you).
-
I liked the pick better than some of the alternatives... but my pick was Tannehill/Martin. But I figured with a rookie salary cap, you could afford to get a back's best five years and call it a relationship. Plenty of smart guys told me he might be the best player in the draft so my sense was, "Well, he isn't a cornerback. Go out and conquer the world."
But to use a #3 after a pricey trade-up, I've always said he better be great, not good. Good is all the fuck over the draft and after. Good is what most teams want at running back, with more good behind it. Great is for quarterbacks and pass rushers, if you're constructed right.
To be worth a #3 pick, you shouldn't need people making excuses for you. You should just get on with gaining 1,500 yards at 4.7 a clip, period. End of sentence. Same thing for Darren McFadden: Top 10 back, you need to start cutting against the grain and carrying your team, make life easier for your quarterback (who eventually has to win it for you).
Tannehill just seems like another Chad Henne. How many interceptions did our secondary drop that hit them I'm the hands ... Three?I liked the pick better than some of the alternatives... but my pick was Tannehill/Martin. But I figured with a rookie salary cap, you could afford to get a back's best five years and call it a relationship. Plenty of smart guys told me he might be the best player in the draft so my sense was, "Well, he isn't a cornerback. Go out and conquer the world."
But to use a #3 after a pricey trade-up, I've always said he better be great, not good. Good is all the fuck over the draft and after. Good is what most teams want at running back, with more good behind it. Great is for quarterbacks and pass rushers, if you're constructed right.
To be worth a #3 pick, you shouldn't need people making excuses for you. You should just get on with gaining 1,500 yards at 4.7 a clip, period. End of sentence. Same thing for Darren McFadden: Top 10 back, you need to start cutting against the grain and carrying your team, make life easier for your quarterback (who eventually has to win it for you).
Z
-
I started to read your last post, it got weird and insulting so I stopped, but I'll continue to read your more meaningful stuff, which is great.
I started to read your last post, it got weird and insulting so I stopped, but I'll continue to read your more meaningful stuff, which is great.
I'm sorry, it was more geared towards humor than towards belittling. I enjoy our debates, you're one of the posters who actually understands what he's saying and why he's saying it.
I just knew this week would be miserable from the moment the final whistle blew.
-
The second guessing makes me want to post my superman post again. LOL
Look, if we had drafted Doug Martin, he would not have fared any better than TR.
It's the oline. Tannehill, same thing. The Browns were really looking good with Pinkston
and Lauvao in there, and I had reservations about Lauvao sp?
Now, as agonizing as it can be, they have the same problem - oline. Without Gordon, two OG's,
it's not an effective offense against a front seven as good as Miami's.
That's all. The best rb gets pounded at the los with no blocking. Comparing TR to McCoy with a healthy, big
oline, against a different defense no less....is just ...what? baloney? Invalid?
I usually just attribute the second-guessing to venting after a loss. But the reality is, the Browns still need
a blue chippie wr that catches everything, gets yacs, and gets off the line and gets open fast.
Both Brady and Peyton love Welker. That's why - Welker does exactly that. Bess is the best bet to fil that role,
but without Gordon and Little dropping passes, and, not to forget, Weeden throwing inaccurately, it's
not working. It all starts up front with the protections.
I'm really, really hoping Cousins has a great day next week. but until the OG's get right, the Browns
will be hoping and praying Pinkston and Lauvao come back asap, along with Gordon.
BTW, if Little bonks one, okay, two more pass(es), not the qb's fault, I'd bench him and put Gurley in.
I'm getting tired of Little. He went to court, and he also had invalid license plates? Seriously?
Little appears to be a knucklehead, one who won't get it, until he gets traded to another team, and only then realizes
he needs to get serious.
-
haha. The first thing that came into my mind when I was watching that game is 'the same old browns misery posters will say Trent was a wasted pick and the Eagles are Jesus'. Read carefully to what I'm about to say:
1) McCoy had 31 carries. Let me repeat that in case you missed it. 31 CARRIES. I would have loved to see Trent even get to 20 last game but he didn't.
2) The Eagles offense is predicated on the read-option run. To compare what the Eagles were doing to what the Browns did Sunday is just plain stupid. Jesus, Mike Vick could have called his mom and talked about how good he was doing before he threw the ball. McCoy had holes big enough that fatass Cousins would have racked up 100 yards. It's easy to cut and hit a hole full speed with no hesitation when ya know, there actually is one.
3) Trent for better or worse is a downhill runner that makes people miss with his size and strength. Clearly that is an effective model (see AP) but even AP gets stuffed when there's no line push. The reason the Vikings are good is because their identity, just like the Eagles, is the run game. I hate to say it but last week looked like another game of Browns football where the coaches had no idea WTF to do on offense. I'd love to see what Trent could do with 25-30 carries consistently.
I get it, top 3 pick on a RB was high. But the guy dances at the line because there's nowhere to go. I just don't get what you all expect the man to do when 3 guys get penetration in the backfield and the lineman are getting no push.
3) Trent for better or worse is a downhill runner that makes people miss with his size and strength. Clearly that is an effective model (see AP) but even AP gets stuffed when there's no line push. The reason the Vikings are good is because their identity, just like the Eagles, is the run game. I hate to say it but last week looked like another game of Browns football where the coaches had no idea WTF to do on offense. I'd love to see what Trent could do with 25-30 carries consistently.
I get it, top 3 pick on a RB was high. But the guy dances at the line because there's nowhere to go. I just don't get what you all expect the man to do when 3 guys get penetration in the backfield and the lineman are getting no push.
Sorry- at this point comparing Richardson to Peterson is laughable. Peterson has a top gear & explosion TR can only dream about having. Sorry if I don't buy the "he was hurt all last year" mantra. Was he hurt his entire college career while we're at it? He got caught from behind several times at Alabama, Peterson and Sanders NEVER seemed to have that problem. Richardson has exceptional field vision- I'll grant him that- too bad he uses it to dance around, to try and find a non-existent hole. If you're a power runner, and the hole is marginal, blast through it dumbass. Saw you do it last year- "Richardson Rule".
#3 pick on TR was a waste, based on what I saw of his 'Tide years, doubly that Heckert stupidly gave up picks to do so. (excuse me putting on the rearview goggles if there happened to be a once in a generation OG (think he might be a tad better than Cousins?) and a pretty decent CB on the board for the taking) I didn't see Peterson good, Tomlinson good, Barry Sanders good, Jim Brown good, Bo Jackson good (Jackson ran a 4.2 @ 232 pounds, FYI). That, in today's NFL my friend is the only reason to take a running back that high. Trent will not be a "once in a generation" back- MHO is he's going to struggle mightily to even be Ray Rice good- and the comparison starts this coming Sunday.
Oh well what's done is done. 6-10 here we come.
-
3) Trent for better or worse is a downhill runner that makes people miss with his size and strength. Clearly that is an effective model (see AP) but even AP gets stuffed when there's no line push. The reason the Vikings are good is because their identity, just like the Eagles, is the run game. I hate to say it but last week looked like another game of Browns football where the coaches had no idea WTF to do on offense. I'd love to see what Trent could do with 25-30 carries consistently.
I get it, top 3 pick on a RB was high. But the guy dances at the line because there's nowhere to go. I just don't get what you all expect the man to do when 3 guys get penetration in the backfield and the lineman are getting no push.
Sorry- at this point comparing Richardson to Peterson is laughable. Peterson has a top gear & explosion TR can only dream about having. Sorry if I don't buy the "he was hurt all last year" mantra. Was he hurt his entire college career while we're at it? He got caught from behind several times at Alabama, Peterson and Sanders NEVER seemed to have that problem. Richardson has exceptional field vision- I'll grant him that- too bad he uses it to dance around, to try and find a non-existent hole. If you're a power runner, and the hole is marginal, blast through it dumbass. Saw you do it last year- "Richardson Rule".
#3 pick on TR was a waste, based on what I saw of his 'Tide years, doubly that Heckert stupidly gave up picks to do so. (excuse me putting on the rearview goggles if there happened to be a once in a generation OG (think he might be a tad better than Cousins?) and a pretty decent CB on the board for the taking) I didn't see Peterson good, Tomlinson good, Barry Sanders good, Jim Brown good, Bo Jackson good (Jackson ran a 4.2 @ 232 pounds, FYI). That, in today's NFL my friend is the only reason to take a running back that high. Trent will not be a "once in a generation" back- MHO is he's going to struggle mightily to even be Ray Rice good- and the comparison starts this coming Sunday.
Oh well what's done is done. 6-10 here we come.
Sorry- at this point comparing Richardson to Peterson is laughable. Peterson has a top gear & explosion TR can only dream about having. Sorry if I don't buy the "he was hurt all last year" mantra. Was he hurt his entire college career while were at it? He got caught from behind several times at Alabama, Peterson and Sanders NEVER seemed to have that problem. Richardson has exceptional field vision- I'll grant him that- too bad he uses it to dance around, to try and find a non-existent hole. If you're a power runner, and the hole is marginal, blast through it dumbass. Saw you do it last year- "Richardson Rule".
Oh well what's done is done. 6-10 here we come.
Woah calm down man, you're misreading what I said. Trent is never going to be AP (no one is). The point I'm making here is that you can be a damn good runner without be the shifty LeSean McCoy, C.J. Spiller type back. I'll have to take your word on him being caught from behind, I can't really think of a time but I can't say it hasn't happened.
I really don't disagree with you as I've said about Trent going at #3. I thought it was a reach at the time too but the Browns DESPERATELY needed an offensive weapon. From the start I never saw Trent as the next Sanders, but it's clear he's got the skills to be an above average back. We have to get Trent the ball more than 13 times though, I think we can all agree on that.
-
3) Trent for better or worse is a downhill runner that makes people miss with his size and strength. Clearly that is an effective model (see AP) but even AP gets stuffed when there's no line push. The reason the Vikings are good is because their identity, just like the Eagles, is the run game. I hate to say it but last week looked like another game of Browns football where the coaches had no idea WTF to do on offense. I'd love to see what Trent could do with 25-30 carries consistently.
I get it, top 3 pick on a RB was high. But the guy dances at the line because there's nowhere to go. I just don't get what you all expect the man to do when 3 guys get penetration in the backfield and the lineman are getting no push.
Sorry- at this point comparing Richardson to Peterson is laughable. Peterson has a top gear & explosion TR can only dream about having. Sorry if I don't buy the "he was hurt all last year" mantra. Was he hurt his entire college career while we're at it? He got caught from behind several times at Alabama, Peterson and Sanders NEVER seemed to have that problem. Richardson has exceptional field vision- I'll grant him that- too bad he uses it to dance around, to try and find a non-existent hole. If you're a power runner, and the hole is marginal, blast through it dumbass. Saw you do it last year- "Richardson Rule".
#3 pick on TR was a waste, based on what I saw of his 'Tide years, doubly that Heckert stupidly gave up picks to do so. (excuse me putting on the rearview goggles if there happened to be a once in a generation OG (think he might be a tad better than Cousins?) and a pretty decent CB on the board for the taking) I didn't see Peterson good, Tomlinson good, Barry Sanders good, Jim Brown good, Bo Jackson good (Jackson ran a 4.2 @ 232 pounds, FYI). That, in today's NFL my friend is the only reason to take a running back that high. Trent will not be a "once in a generation" back- MHO is he's going to struggle mightily to even be Ray Rice good- and the comparison starts this coming Sunday.
Oh well what's done is done. 6-10 here we come.
Sorry- at this point comparing Richardson to Peterson is laughable. Peterson has a top gear & explosion TR can only dream about having. Sorry if I don't buy the "he was hurt all last year" mantra. Was he hurt his entire college career while we're at it? He got caught from behind several times at Alabama, Peterson and Sanders NEVER seemed to have that problem. Richardson has exceptional field vision- I'll grant him that- too bad he uses it to dance around, to try and find a non-existent hole. If you're a power runner, and the hole is marginal, blast through it dumbass. Saw you do it last year- "Richardson Rule".
#3 pick on TR was a waste, based on what I saw of his 'Tide years, doubly that Heckert stupidly gave up picks to do so. (excuse me putting on the rearview goggles if there happened to be a once in a generation OG (think he might be a tad better than Cousins?) and a pretty decent CB on the board for the taking) I didn't see Peterson good, Tomlinson good, Barry Sanders good, Jim Brown good, Bo Jackson good (Jackson ran a 4.2 @ 232 pounds, FYI). That, in today's NFL my friend is the only reason to take a running back that high. Trent will not be a "once in a generation" back- MHO is he's going to struggle mightily to even be Ray Rice good- and the comparison starts this coming Sunday.
Oh well what's done is done. 6-10 here we come.
Trent is a 3rd down back who will be out of football in 2 years..mark it down...
-
Sorry- at this point comparing Richardson to Peterson is laughable. Peterson has a top gear & explosion TR can only dream about having. Sorry if I don't buy the "he was hurt all last year" mantra. Was he hurt his entire college career while we're at it? He got caught from behind several times at Alabama, Peterson and Sanders NEVER seemed to have that problem. Richardson has exceptional field vision- I'll grant him that- too bad he uses it to dance around, to try and find a non-existent hole. If you're a power runner, and the hole is marginal, blast through it dumbass. Saw you do it last year- "Richardson Rule".
#3 pick on TR was a waste, based on what I saw of his 'Tide years, doubly that Heckert stupidly gave up picks to do so. (excuse me putting on the rearview goggles if there happened to be a once in a generation OG (think he might be a tad better than Cousins?) and a pretty decent CB on the board for the taking) I didn't see Peterson good, Tomlinson good, Barry Sanders good, Jim Brown good, Bo Jackson good (Jackson ran a 4.2 @ 232 pounds, FYI). That, in today's NFL my friend is the only reason to take a running back that high. Trent will not be a "once in a generation" back- MHO is he's going to struggle mightily to even be Ray Rice good- and the comparison starts this coming Sunday.
Oh well what's done is done. 6-10 here we come.
Trent is a 3rd down back who will be out of football in 2 years..mark it down...
Trent is a 3rd down back who will be out of football in 2 years..mark it down...
c'mon man! give the guy a chance. if we ever have a 'complete' OLine things could and will be different.
i blame his lack of production more on weeden cuz other teams are just daring him to throw the screen.
pick six everytime.
-
Trent is a 3rd down back who will be out of football in 2 years..mark it down...
c'mon man! give the guy a chance. if we ever have a 'complete' OLine things could and will be different.
i blame his lack of production more on weeden cuz other teams are just daring him to throw the screen.
pick six everytime.
c'mon man! give the guy a chance. if we ever have a 'complete' OLine things could and will be different.
i blame his lack of production more on weeden cuz other teams are just daring him to throw the screen.
pick six everytime.
No offense,,,I dont hate the kid...Im just not seeing it,,,
-
3) Trent for better or worse is a downhill runner that makes people miss with his size and strength. Clearly that is an effective model (see AP) but even AP gets stuffed when there's no line push. The reason the Vikings are good is because their identity, just like the Eagles, is the run game. I hate to say it but last week looked like another game of Browns football where the coaches had no idea WTF to do on offense. I'd love to see what Trent could do with 25-30 carries consistently.
I get it, top 3 pick on a RB was high. But the guy dances at the line because there's nowhere to go. I just don't get what you all expect the man to do when 3 guys get penetration in the backfield and the lineman are getting no push.
Sorry- at this point comparing Richardson to Peterson is laughable. Peterson has a top gear & explosion TR can only dream about having. Sorry if I don't buy the "he was hurt all last year" mantra. Was he hurt his entire college career while we're at it? He got caught from behind several times at Alabama, Peterson and Sanders NEVER seemed to have that problem. Richardson has exceptional field vision- I'll grant him that- too bad he uses it to dance around, to try and find a non-existent hole. If you're a power runner, and the hole is marginal, blast through it dumbass. Saw you do it last year- "Richardson Rule".
#3 pick on TR was a waste, based on what I saw of his 'Tide years, doubly that Heckert stupidly gave up picks to do so. (excuse me putting on the rearview goggles if there happened to be a once in a generation OG (think he might be a tad better than Cousins?) and a pretty decent CB on the board for the taking) I didn't see Peterson good, Tomlinson good, Barry Sanders good, Jim Brown good, Bo Jackson good (Jackson ran a 4.2 @ 232 pounds, FYI). That, in today's NFL my friend is the only reason to take a running back that high. Trent will not be a "once in a generation" back- MHO is he's going to struggle mightily to even be Ray Rice good- and the comparison starts this coming Sunday.
Oh well what's done is done. 6-10 here we come.
Sorry- at this point comparing Richardson to Peterson is laughable. Peterson has a top gear & explosion TR can only dream about having. Sorry if I don't buy the "he was hurt all last year" mantra. Was he hurt his entire college career while we're at it? He got caught from behind several times at Alabama, Peterson and Sanders NEVER seemed to have that problem. Richardson has exceptional field vision- I'll grant him that- too bad he uses it to dance around, to try and find a non-existent hole. If you're a power runner, and the hole is marginal, blast through it dumbass. Saw you do it last year- "Richardson Rule".
#3 pick on TR was a waste, based on what I saw of his 'Tide years, doubly that Heckert stupidly gave up picks to do so. (excuse me putting on the rearview goggles if there happened to be a once in a generation OG (think he might be a tad better than Cousins?) and a pretty decent CB on the board for the taking) I didn't see Peterson good, Tomlinson good, Barry Sanders good, Jim Brown good, Bo Jackson good (Jackson ran a 4.2 @ 232 pounds, FYI). That, in today's NFL my friend is the only reason to take a running back that high. Trent will not be a "once in a generation" back- MHO is he's going to struggle mightily to even be Ray Rice good- and the comparison starts this coming Sunday.
Oh well what's done is done. 6-10 here we come.
I thought the same thing, Ray Rice will end up having a better career than TR.
I hope we go 6-10, If our O Line doesn't shape up, expect our average 2-4 win season. No QB or RB can play decent if our O Line continues to suck it up.
.jpg.a1a2b9a0c33008fdaf4097d8fe2cfd64.jpg "Riffer X"){kind=avatar}
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login