Skip to content

OTH, Weeden may still get "it"....he isn't so bad...

The Browns Board
6 5 556
  • C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Passing Rushing Sacked

    Opp QBRat Comp Att Pct Yds Y/G Y/A TD Int Rush Yds Y/G Avg TD Sack YdsL

    Weeden @BAL 83.8 21 33 63.6 227 227.0 6.9 0 0 2 7 7.0 3.5 0 5 39

    Rothlick @CIN 73.1 20 37 54.1 251 251.0 6.8 1 1 1 6 6.0 6.0 0 2 17

  • C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by calfoxwc
    #2

    So, both have oline problems, limited time to throw, not much running game, bad throws, drops...

    and Weeds has a whole new system, new coaches, and missing Gordon and Dion Lewis.

    Losing Dion Lewis was the killer. He was the key to change of pace rb, quick outlet pass in face

    of a blitz...

    BTW, notice that the Bengals used a 300 lb player as a fullback. The Browns could do that. Why the heyl not?

    Weeds isn't so bad. IOWs, it isn't all his fault. It's all Little's fault though. He has his head up his rear on and off the field.

    At least Weeds doesn't have to grow up, eh?

  • So, both have oline problems, limited time to throw, not much running game, bad throws, drops...

    and Weeds has a whole new system, new coaches, and missing Gordon and Dion Lewis.

    Losing Dion Lewis was the killer. He was the key to change of pace rb, quick outlet pass in face

    of a blitz...

    BTW, notice that the Bengals used a 300 lb player as a fullback. The Browns could do that. Why the heyl not?

    Weeds isn't so bad. IOWs, it isn't all his fault. It's all Little's fault though. He has his head up his rear on and off the field.

    At least Weeds doesn't have to grow up, eh?

    Flyin JF Flyin J wrote on last edited by
    #3

    @calfoxwc said:

    So, both have oline problems, limited time to throw, not much running game, bad throws, drops...

    and Weeds has a whole new system, new coaches, and missing Gordon and Dion Lewis.

    Losing Dion Lewis was the killer. He was the key to change of pace rb, quick outlet pass in face

    of a blitz...

    BTW, notice that the Bengals used a 300 lb player as a fullback. The Browns could do that. Why the heyl not?

    Weeds isn't so bad. IOWs, it isn't all his fault. It's all Little's fault though. He has his head up his rear on and off the field.

    At least Weeds doesn't have to grow up, eh?

    I think Sheard would be a nice lead blocker on short yardage plays.
  • @calfoxwc said:

    So, both have oline problems, limited time to throw, not much running game, bad throws, drops...

    and Weeds has a whole new system, new coaches, and missing Gordon and Dion Lewis.

    Losing Dion Lewis was the killer. He was the key to change of pace rb, quick outlet pass in face

    of a blitz...

    BTW, notice that the Bengals used a 300 lb player as a fullback. The Browns could do that. Why the heyl not?

    Weeds isn't so bad. IOWs, it isn't all his fault. It's all Little's fault though. He has his head up his rear on and off the field.

    At least Weeds doesn't have to grow up, eh?

    I think Sheard would be a nice lead blocker on short yardage plays.
    hoortaH hoorta wrote on last edited by
    #4

    XxDaBuckeyexX said:

    I think Sheard would be a nice lead blocker on short yardage plays.

    Nah- Phil Taylor. 🙂

  • Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
    #5

    Nah.. Bryant...

  • gftChrisG gftChris wrote on last edited by
    #6

    It surely couldn't hurt to see how Taylor, Bryant, Rubin, Winn etc fair at blocking - in goal-line situations, you could use a 325lb lump pushing people back!