Skip to content

Why is Chud waiting to name a starter vs Bungles?

The Browns Board
31 17 1.3k
  • jrb12711J jrb12711 wrote on last edited by
    #6

    There's two scenarios I can live with, one obviously better than the other. Hoyer gets the start or Weeden is told he's on a very strict leash. Give the guy one half of football and if he doesn't produce put Hoyer in.

  • flyingfooldougF flyingfooldoug wrote on last edited by
    #7

    Give Weedon another week to heal. Hoyer starts and we talk about it next week.

  • Give Weedon another week to heal. Hoyer starts and we talk about it next week.

    F Fargofan wrote on last edited by
    #8

    @flyingfooldoug said:

    Give Weedon another week to heal. Hoyer starts and we talk about it next week.

    That right there!

  • PoeticGP PoeticG wrote on last edited by
    #9

    HOYER>Weeden

  • @miktoxic said:

    because you don't lose your job in the nfl as a starting QB due to injury unless your name is Drew Bledsoe.

    if he DOES name hoyer as the starter and weeden is 100% then we all the know the fate of weeden.

    gonezo.

    miktoxicM miktoxic wrote on last edited by
    #10

    @mohican said:

    @miktoxic said:

    because you don't lose your job in the nfl as a starting QB due to injury unless your name is Drew Bledsoe.

    if he DOES name hoyer as the starter and weeden is 100% then we all the know the fate of weeden.

    gonezo.

    yeah but wasn't bledsoe out for the year with his injury? and after the season they decided not to bring him back?

  • @mohican said:

    @miktoxic said:

    because you don't lose your job in the nfl as a starting QB due to injury unless your name is Drew Bledsoe.

    if he DOES name hoyer as the starter and weeden is 100% then we all the know the fate of weeden.

    gonezo.

    yeah but wasn't bledsoe out for the year with his injury? and after the season they decided not to bring him back?

    Flyin JF Flyin J wrote on last edited by
    #11

    @miktoxic said:

    yeah but wasn't bledsoe out for the year with his injury? and after the season they decided not to bring him back?

    He was ready to go in the playoffs. They weren't switching at that point. Rightfully so. You play the guy that gives you the best chance to win every game, who cares how you lost the job.
  • miktoxicM miktoxic wrote on last edited by
    #12

    well you can't say they made the wrong choice, that's for sure.

    wouldn't it be a bitch if KC makes it to the playoffs and SF doesn't?

    ouch.

  • well you can't say they made the wrong choice, that's for sure.

    wouldn't it be a bitch if KC makes it to the playoffs and SF doesn't?

    ouch.

    TopDawg31T TopDawg31 wrote on last edited by
    #13

    @miktoxic said:

    well you can't say they made the wrong choice, that's for sure.

    wouldn't it be a bitch if KC makes it to the playoffs and SF doesn't?

    ouch.

    Wouldn't be a bigger bitch to see KC go from garbage to playoffs when everyone knows its a 5 year plan.

  • well you can't say they made the wrong choice, that's for sure.

    wouldn't it be a bitch if KC makes it to the playoffs and SF doesn't?

    ouch.

    flyingfooldougF flyingfooldoug wrote on last edited by flyingfooldoug
    #14

    @miktoxic said:

    well you can't say they made the wrong choice, that's for sure.

    wouldn't it be a bitch if KC makes it to the playoffs and SF doesn't?

    ouch.

    It does look like RG3, Vick, and Colin will all be out this year. I think DC gonna regret that one for a long time and will spell Shanahan's downfall. Good kid but I don't see long term success with him.

  • letsgojacketsL letsgojackets wrote on last edited by
    #15

    I sure hope I'm done seeing weeden play QB this year.

  • Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
    #16

    This is Campbell's week... 😮

    No, seriously...

    Chud said in pressers last week that:

    1. Hoyer fit the Viking game plan.
    2. Wheezy's return to starter status was not a given.

    Based on the above I think Chud will announce the starter Wednesday after the game plan is complete and Wheezy's status is accessed.

    I think it should be Hoyer, but won't be surprised if it's Campbell.

  • This is Campbell's week... 😮

    No, seriously...

    Chud said in pressers last week that:

    1. Hoyer fit the Viking game plan.
    2. Wheezy's return to starter status was not a given.

    Based on the above I think Chud will announce the starter Wednesday after the game plan is complete and Wheezy's status is accessed.

    I think it should be Hoyer, but won't be surprised if it's Campbell.

    miktoxicM miktoxic wrote on last edited by
    #17

    @tour2ma said:

    This is Campbell's week... 😮

    No, seriously...

    Chud said in pressers last week that:

    1. Hoyer fit the Viking game plan.
    2. Wheezy's return to starter status was not a given.

    Based on the above I think Chud will announce the starter Wednesday after the game plan is complete and Wheezy's status is accessed.

    I think it should be Hoyer, but won't be surprised if it's Campbell.

    hell, if that happens i might have to just drink and smoke and go tothis website and trance out:

    http://www.zombo.com/

  • S sadbrownsfan wrote on last edited by
    #18

    The safe thing to do would be to name Hoyer the starter due to Wheedons injury and hope that Hoyer either shows that he deserves it for the rest of the year or that Wheedon should take the snaps. If you start Hoyer infront of Wheedon you are basically saying Wheedon is done, if you start Wheedon over Hoyer after any mistake/3 and out the fans will be chanting for Hoyer.

  • This is Campbell's week... 😮

    No, seriously...

    Chud said in pressers last week that:

    1. Hoyer fit the Viking game plan.
    2. Wheezy's return to starter status was not a given.

    Based on the above I think Chud will announce the starter Wednesday after the game plan is complete and Wheezy's status is accessed.

    I think it should be Hoyer, but won't be surprised if it's Campbell.

    DieHardBrownsFanD DieHardBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
    #19

    @tour2ma said:

    This is Campbell's week... 😮

    No, seriously...

    Chud said in pressers last week that:

    1. Hoyer fit the Viking game plan.
    2. Wheezy's return to starter status was not a given.

    Based on the above I think Chud will announce the starter Wednesday after the game plan is complete and Wheezy's status is accessed.

    I think it should be Hoyer, but won't be surprised if it's Campbell.

    I highly doubt it.

  • @miktoxic said:

    well you can't say they made the wrong choice, that's for sure.

    wouldn't it be a bitch if KC makes it to the playoffs and SF doesn't?

    ouch.

    It does look like RG3, Vick, and Colin will all be out this year. I think DC gonna regret that one for a long time and will spell Shanahan's downfall. Good kid but I don't see long term success with him.

    Browns149B Browns149 wrote on last edited by
    #20

    @flyingfooldoug said:

    It does look like RG3, Vick, and Colin will all be out this year. I think DC gonna regret that one for a long time and will spell Shanahan's downfall. Good kid but I don't see long term success with him.

    I agree. RG3 will be lucky to last 5 years the way he's going.

  • This is Campbell's week... 😮

    No, seriously...

    Chud said in pressers last week that:

    1. Hoyer fit the Viking game plan.
    2. Wheezy's return to starter status was not a given.

    Based on the above I think Chud will announce the starter Wednesday after the game plan is complete and Wheezy's status is accessed.

    I think it should be Hoyer, but won't be surprised if it's Campbell.

    letsgojacketsL letsgojackets wrote on last edited by
    #21

    @tour2ma said:

    This is Campbell's week... 😮

    No, seriously...

    Chud said in pressers last week that:

    1. Hoyer fit the Viking game plan.
    2. Wheezy's return to starter status was not a given.

    Based on the above I think Chud will announce the starter Wednesday after the game plan is complete and Wheezy's status is accessed.

    I think it should be Hoyer, but won't be surprised if it's Campbell.

    You wouldn't be surprised if Campbell was named starter??? I'll have what you're having.

  • S Shep wrote on last edited by
    #22

    It's Hoyer. Peter King's Offensive Player of the Week. Dilfer's Dime of the Week. Simms' comparisons to Luck, says he's watched Hoyer "50 times" in practice and knew he could seriously play. LaConfora called him "the best quarterback who hadn't had his shot yet." A lot of people seem to have known something about this kid, and I find that really interesting.

    Not a chance in hell the Browns sit Hoyer after a comeback victory TD pass and 326 yards. Not a prayer. Zero. None. Zilch. Don't overthink it, and I'm talking to all the fans as well as Chud (he ain't actually overthinkin' it).

    If Hoyer doesn't start, I'll drink domestic beer. I'm not kidding.

  • This is Campbell's week... 😮

    No, seriously...

    Chud said in pressers last week that:

    1. Hoyer fit the Viking game plan.
    2. Wheezy's return to starter status was not a given.

    Based on the above I think Chud will announce the starter Wednesday after the game plan is complete and Wheezy's status is accessed.

    I think it should be Hoyer, but won't be surprised if it's Campbell.

    hoortaH hoorta wrote on last edited by
    #23

    @tour2ma said:

    This is Campbell's week... 😮

    No, seriously...

    Chud said in pressers last week that:

    1. Hoyer fit the Viking game plan.
    2. Wheezy's return to starter status was not a given.

    Based on the above I think Chud will announce the starter Wednesday after the game plan is complete and Wheezy's status is accessed.

    I think it should be Hoyer, but won't be surprised if it's Campbell.

    The handwriting was on the wall 10 feet high when they traded Richardson for a 2014 pick- they have no confidence in Weeden as a long term solution. I don't know if Chud has time to read the glowing National reports about Hoyer's performance, but I'll bet Haslam and Banner do.

    The "you don't lose your starting job due to injury" is one dated concept, if the other guy comes in and lights it up, if you have an ounce of intelligence a a head coach, you play the guy with the hot hand. Weeden has had 17 games to prove he's mediocre at best- Hoyer should get at least two.

    I truly believe if Chud names Weeden the starter against the Bungles, they had better introduce the defense Sunday, because Weeden WILL get roundly booed. Not only then but after the first miscue, the chants "we want Hoyer" are going to be deafening.

  • W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by Westside Steve
    #24

    Ever notice that when a hot starting quarterback like, oh, Tom Brady gets a little ding he plays in spite of it? Whenever a quarterback that the front office or coaching staff has little or no confidence in gets a little ding he seems to be on the injured reserve for weeks on end.

    Anyway the game against the bung holes will go a lng way as far as providing insight as to everybody's opinion of Weeden.

    WSS

  • letsgojacketsL letsgojackets wrote on last edited by
    #25

    Hoyer named starter today. Mark it down...