Browns - Bengals Game
-
Untrue. You were the one who first said the Bengals have "always been" bipolar. I stated that the browns have sucked ever since they came back. And you and me both know the very likely outcome of this game is a browns loss. Fair to say?Well, you are the one that brought up history. And honestly, there is no history relevent to this game, is there?
I mean, the most recent history of the Browns and Bengals playing a game in Cleveland had the Browns winning last year.
If you think that history is relevent then you must concede that the Browns are likely to win again....but I doubt you want to do that.
Fair to say?
Clowns Blow said:
Untrue. You were the one who first said the Bengals have "always been" bipolar. I stated that the browns have sucked ever since they came back. And you and me both know the very likely outcome of this game is a browns loss. Fair to say?
Chicken, egg.
The Bengals have been "bi-polar" throughout history. If they do have a winning season this year it will only be the second time in their history that they will have had 3 winning years in a row. The last being in 1975-1977.
And, yes, the Bengals I believe should be favored to win (haven't seen a line). Whether that is a "very" likely outcome, I don't know. Perhaps a somewhat likely outcome.
-
Clowns Blow said:
So he barely beat an 0-2 team with a god awful defense and lost by double digits to a playoff team when he had way more offensive talent around him than he does now. Don't get your point exactly.
The point is: he is capable of winning a game.
The Vikings were a playoff team last year too. So, in reality he is 1-1 against playoff teams.
And in you last statement you cut your own argument: If Hoyer had a lot more talent around him in AZ (an argument I don't necessarily buy), then more kudos to him for taking a team to a victory with little talent surrounding him.
And I am sorry, but the argument about playing a team with a bad defense doesn't wash much. You just barely beat the Packers whose defense is equally poorly rated as the Vikings is.
So he can win without talent around him but can't do it with it? Again, that point doesn't make sense.The point is: he is capable of winning a game.
The Vikings were a playoff team last year too. So, in reality he is 1-1 against playoff teams.
And in you last statement you cut your own argument: If Hoyer had a lot more talent around him in AZ (an argument I don't necessarily buy), then more kudos to him for taking a team to a victory with little talent surrounding him.
And I am sorry, but the argument about playing a team with a bad defense doesn't wash much. You just barely beat the Packers whose defense is equally poorly rated as the Vikings is.
And the packers defense having the bad statistical rankings is the product of playing 3 good (or usually good in the 49ers case) offensive teams. The Vikings just gave up more points to the browns than they had scored in their previous two games combined. Comparing our victory over the Packers to yours over the Vikings is laughable.
-
Clowns Blow said:
Untrue. You were the one who first said the Bengals have "always been" bipolar. I stated that the browns have sucked ever since they came back. And you and me both know the very likely outcome of this game is a browns loss. Fair to say?
Chicken, egg.
The Bengals have been "bi-polar" throughout history. If they do have a winning season this year it will only be the second time in their history that they will have had 3 winning years in a row. The last being in 1975-1977.
And, yes, the Bengals I believe should be favored to win (haven't seen a line). Whether that is a "very" likely outcome, I don't know. Perhaps a somewhat likely outcome.
Luckily for the Bengals there is always opportunity to create new history. I have a very good feeling about the Dalton-Green era. They have already done many things that history said they couldn't.Chicken, egg.
The Bengals have been "bi-polar" throughout history. If they do have a winning season this year it will only be the second time in their history that they will have had 3 winning years in a row. The last being in 1975-1977.
And, yes, the Bengals I believe should be favored to win (haven't seen a line). Whether that is a "very" likely outcome, I don't know. Perhaps a somewhat likely outcome.
-
Hahahahahaha just because he's had a couple good games and is the only person who can catch the ball on your team doesn't mean he's the next Jimmy Graham. Eifert hasn't put up huge stats because of all the weapons we have, but he's done very well when given opportunities. Had a 60+ yard catch against Pitt and was very good against the bears. Gresham is prone to the occasional fuck up, but is way more talented than Cameron in nearly every facet.Bernard is a good player I saw a lot of him at UNC, he can play. Eifert is OK, he hasn't done crap so far this year. Cameron is better than any TE the Bengals have. We are undermanned in several areas for sure, but that doesn't mean this will be a cake walk either.
Clowns Blow said:
Hahahahahaha just because he's had a couple good games and is the only person who can catch the ball on your team doesn't mean he's the next Jimmy Graham. Eifert hasn't put up huge stats because of all the weapons we have, but he's done very well when given opportunities. Had a 60+ yard catch against Pitt and was very good against the bears. Gresham is prone to the occasional fuck up, but is way more talented than Cameron in nearly every facet.
Yeah Gresham is so good you had to draft Eifert. You freaking moved him to a FB because he screws up all the time. Cameron is better than any TE on the Bengals. Eifert may be better down the road, but not this year. Yeah he did so well with those 7 yards against the vaunted Packers defense, give me a break.
-
Luckily for the Bengals there is always opportunity to create new history. I have a very good feeling about the Dalton-Green era. They have already done many things that history said they couldn't.Chicken, egg.
The Bengals have been "bi-polar" throughout history. If they do have a winning season this year it will only be the second time in their history that they will have had 3 winning years in a row. The last being in 1975-1977.
And, yes, the Bengals I believe should be favored to win (haven't seen a line). Whether that is a "very" likely outcome, I don't know. Perhaps a somewhat likely outcome.
Clowns Blow said:
Luckily for the Bengals there is always opportunity to create new history. I have a very good feeling about the Dalton-Green era. They have already done many things that history said they couldn't.
Let me scoop you in on something Dalton isn't an elite QB, you will never go to the SB with him. We should know we have seen a lot of suck around here and I can tell you while Dalton is decent, he isn't great.
-
Clowns Blow said:
Hahahahahaha just because he's had a couple good games and is the only person who can catch the ball on your team doesn't mean he's the next Jimmy Graham. Eifert hasn't put up huge stats because of all the weapons we have, but he's done very well when given opportunities. Had a 60+ yard catch against Pitt and was very good against the bears. Gresham is prone to the occasional fuck up, but is way more talented than Cameron in nearly every facet.
Yeah Gresham is so good you had to draft Eifert. You freaking moved him to a FB because he screws up all the time. Cameron is better than any TE on the Bengals. Eifert may be better down the road, but not this year. Yeah he did so well with those 7 yards against the vaunted Packers defense, give me a break.
That was Orson Charles they moved to FB dipshit. They drafter Eifert to run the two TE formation as a base offense and because he was the BPA. Good teams draft BPA, bad ones draft Brandon Weeden in the 1st. And stats don't say everything. You're one of those guys who probably thinks Larry Fitz isn't elite any more right?Yeah Gresham is so good you had to draft Eifert. You freaking moved him to a FB because he screws up all the time. Cameron is better than any TE on the Bengals. Eifert may be better down the road, but not this year. Yeah he did so well with those 7 yards against the vaunted Packers defense, give me a break.
-
riddle me, the pack rams the ball down your throat for 186 rushing yards yet you boast about Harrison's intensity and your fantastic defense. were we watching the same game?
First off, who exactly do you think is going to take advantage of the bengals supposedly bad run defense? Willis McGahee? Laughable.
Second, that stat is inflated from two things. One was a run by franklin that accounted for about a third of that total. Second, the bengals focus on stopping the pass. They held the best quarterback in the nfl to his worst game in years, a QB rating of 64.5 and picked him off twice in a game for the first time in forever. You have Brian hoyer as your qb. What the hell could he possible do that Rodgers couldn't?
Clowns Blow said:
First off, who exactly do you think is going to take advantage of the bengals supposedly bad run defense? Willis McGahee? Laughable.
bunghole defense made the packers 3rd string rookie running back J Franklin look like Dorsey Levens. McGahee a two time Pro Bowler, may have lost a step or two but can still contribute. There is a good reason he has played 11 years in the league. He passed his physical and still has some game left.
-
Clowns Blow said:
Luckily for the Bengals there is always opportunity to create new history. I have a very good feeling about the Dalton-Green era. They have already done many things that history said they couldn't.
Let me scoop you in on something Dalton isn't an elite QB, you will never go to the SB with him. We should know we have seen a lot of suck around here and I can tell you while Dalton is decent, he isn't great.
Trent Dilfer, Brad Johnson, Rex Grossman, Joe Flacco need I go on? Dalton is top ten in QBR right now and just outplayed Aaron Rodgers. He's more than good enough for what we need.Let me scoop you in on something Dalton isn't an elite QB, you will never go to the SB with him. We should know we have seen a lot of suck around here and I can tell you while Dalton is decent, he isn't great.
-
Clowns Blow said:
First off, who exactly do you think is going to take advantage of the bengals supposedly bad run defense? Willis McGahee? Laughable.
bunghole defense made the packers 3rd string rookie running back J Franklin look like Dorsey Levens. McGahee a two time Pro Bowler, may have lost a step or two but can still contribute. There is a good reason he has played 11 years in the league. He passed his physical and still has some game left.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA just listen to yourself. Franklin is ten times more explosive, quicker and elusive than McGahee's washed up ass. Ol bum knee just went for 9 whole yards on the fucking Vikings dude. He sucks.bunghole defense made the packers 3rd string rookie running back J Franklin look like Dorsey Levens. McGahee a two time Pro Bowler is more powerful and just as fast as franklin. There is a good reason he has played 11 years in the league. He passed his physical and still has some game left.
-
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA just listen to yourself. Franklin is ten times more explosive, quicker and elusive than McGahee's washed up ass. Ol bum knee just went for 9 whole yards on the fucking Vikings dude. He sucks.bunghole defense made the packers 3rd string rookie running back J Franklin look like Dorsey Levens. McGahee a two time Pro Bowler is more powerful and just as fast as franklin. There is a good reason he has played 11 years in the league. He passed his physical and still has some game left.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA just listen to yourself. Franklin is ten times more explosive, quicker and elusive than McGahee's washed up ass. Ol bum knee just went for 9 whole yards on the fucking Vikings dude. He sucks.
And Dalton is a soul less ginger. Don't ever trust one!
-
That was Orson Charles they moved to FB dipshit. They drafter Eifert to run the two TE formation as a base offense and because he was the BPA. Good teams draft BPA, bad ones draft Brandon Weeden in the 1st. And stats don't say everything. You're one of those guys who probably thinks Larry Fitz isn't elite any more right?Yeah Gresham is so good you had to draft Eifert. You freaking moved him to a FB because he screws up all the time. Cameron is better than any TE on the Bengals. Eifert may be better down the road, but not this year. Yeah he did so well with those 7 yards against the vaunted Packers defense, give me a break.
That was Orson Charles they moved to FB dipshit. They drafter Eifert to run the two TE formation as a base offense and because he was the BPA. Good teams draft BPA, bad ones draft Brandon Weeden in the 1st. And stats don't say everything. You're one of those guys who
Trent Dilfer, Brad Johnson, Rex Grossman, Joe Flacco need I go on? Dalton is top ten in QBR right now and just outplayed Aaron Rodgers. He's more than good enough for what we need.
I am glad you think that he is more than good enough because he is subpar. And if you think Dalton is better than Rogers you are serious brain damage.
-
That was Orson Charles they moved to FB dipshit. They drafter Eifert to run the two TE formation as a base offense and because he was the BPA. Good teams draft BPA, bad ones draft Brandon Weeden in the 1st. And stats don't say everything. You're one of those guys who
Trent Dilfer, Brad Johnson, Rex Grossman, Joe Flacco need I go on? Dalton is top ten in QBR right now and just outplayed Aaron Rodgers. He's more than good enough for what we need.
I am glad you think that he is more than good enough because he is subpar. And if you think Dalton is better than Rogers you are serious brain damage.
Didn't say he was better. Said he outplayed him last Sunday. Which he did. And he's 10 times better than what you guys haveThat was Orson Charles they moved to FB dipshit. They drafter Eifert to run the two TE formation as a base offense and because he was the BPA. Good teams draft BPA, bad ones draft Brandon Weeden in the 1st. And stats don't say everything. You're one of those guys who
I am glad you think that he is more than good enough because he is subpar. And if you think Dalton is better than Rogers you are serious brain damage.Trent Dilfer, Brad Johnson, Rex Grossman, Joe Flacco need I go on? Dalton is top ten in QBR right now and just outplayed Aaron Rodgers. He's more than good enough for what we need.
-
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA just listen to yourself. Franklin is ten times more explosive, quicker and elusive than McGahee's washed up ass. Ol bum knee just went for 9 whole yards on the fucking Vikings dude. He sucks.
And Dalton is a soul less ginger. Don't ever trust one!
Can't talk about football because the browns suck so ya resort to insulting the players hahaha. Classic browns fans.And Dalton is a soul less ginger. Don't ever trust one!
-
Hoyer is the next Brady.
-
Can't talk about football because the browns suck so ya resort to insulting the players hahaha. Classic browns fans.And Dalton is a soul less ginger. Don't ever trust one!
Can't talk about football because the browns suck so ya resort to insulting the players hahaha. Classic browns fans.
No fool, you are calling our RB.."Bum Knee" I just replied so you understand. But I take a bad knee with a soul over a ginger any day.
-
Can't talk about football because the browns suck so ya resort to insulting the players hahaha. Classic browns fans.
No fool, you are calling our RB.."Bum Knee" I just replied so you understand. But I take a bad knee with a soul over a ginger any day.
His bum knee is relevant to his ability to at football. Dalton's hair color is not.No fool, you are calling our RB.."Bum Knee" I just replied so you understand. But I take a bad knee with a soul over a ginger any day.
-
Hoyer is the next Brady.
-
So he can win without talent around him but can't do it with it? Again, that point doesn't make sense.The point is: he is capable of winning a game.
The Vikings were a playoff team last year too. So, in reality he is 1-1 against playoff teams.
And in you last statement you cut your own argument: If Hoyer had a lot more talent around him in AZ (an argument I don't necessarily buy), then more kudos to him for taking a team to a victory with little talent surrounding him.
And I am sorry, but the argument about playing a team with a bad defense doesn't wash much. You just barely beat the Packers whose defense is equally poorly rated as the Vikings is.
And the packers defense having the bad statistical rankings is the product of playing 3 good (or usually good in the 49ers case) offensive teams. The Vikings just gave up more points to the browns than they had scored in their previous two games combined. Comparing our victory over the Packers to yours over the Vikings is laughable.
Clowns Blow said:
So he can win without talent around him but can't do it with it? Again, that point doesn't make sense.
Who/where was all this great talent around him on the Cardinals last year? Fitzgerald? OK. that is one guy. You idiots are the ones that said he had great talent in AZ. I was merely taking your premise for the sake of argument....not that I agreed with it.
And the packers defense having the bad statistical rankings is the product of playing 3 good (or usually good in the 49ers case) offensive teams. The Vikings just gave up more points to the browns than they had scored in their previous two games combined. Comparing our victory over the Packers to yours over the Vikings is laughable.
A win is a win is a win. It will count ALL the same at the end of the year.
Lets put it this way.....do you really think you are guaranteed to beat the Vikings this year?
Maybe the Vikings have actually faced more offensive juggernauts than the Packers have?
In fact...they have: they have played and lost to the Bears, Lions and Browns.
The Packers have played the Redskins, 49ers and Bengals.
-
No.
No.
Just no.
What kind of homo response is that? Are you a female? Hopefully.
-
No.
No.
Just no.
What kind of homo response is that? Are you a female? Hopefully.
What kind of homo response is that? Are you a female? Hopefully.
You're either the biggest homer alive, or actually Retarded. I haven't figured it out yet. Maybe it's both.
Either way, enjoy your 1-3 record come Sunday, along with your playoff miss and inevitable top 10 selection in the draft that you will waste.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login