Skip to content

Cleveland Browns Next RB

The Browns Board
36 20 1.9k
  • Did not like the music either LOL He is projected 2nd- 3rd round. And Running backs are not a dime a dozen sorry. Is AP, Mccoy Dime Dozen players?? No, Now I am not saying you need a stud RB to win a SuperBowl, but this guy reminds me A LOT of Martin from Tampa

  • Joique Bell and Ben Tate are in free agency next spring. Or maybe trade for Pierce, Brown, or Moreno. Need to find that bigger back to share the backfield with Dion Lewis next year. Screw wasting a pick anywhere in the draft when u can EASILY find a guy to plug in.

  • How many trades are there in the NFL??? Just becasue we traded TRICH does not mean the NFL is becoming like the NBA where they trade everyone. Trades are very few

  • mike leshoure, ben tate, jacquizz rodgers. id be ecstatic with either of those

  • We should put Greg Little back there. I'm sure he could avg. at least what we're getting with Mcgimpy, what is it now, 2.1 ypc or something?

  • We should put Greg Little back there. I'm sure he could avg. at least what we're getting with Mcgimpy, what is it now, 2.1 ypc or something?

    @poeticg said:

    We should put Greg Little back there. I'm sure he could avg. at least what we're getting with Mcgimpy, what is it now, 2.1 ypc or something?

    He is really averaging 2.9 ypc because you can't really count the minnesota game. He had 1 day to prepare. Trent Richardson was averaging 3.0 ypc before we traded him to the colts. While the season is far from over, who wouldn't give up 0.1 ypc for a 1st round pick? cmon man!

  • We should put Greg Little back there. I'm sure he could avg. at least what we're getting with Mcgimpy, what is it now, 2.1 ypc or something?

    @poeticg said:

    We should put Greg Little back there. I'm sure he could avg. at least what we're getting with Mcgimpy, what is it now, 2.1 ypc or something?

    If T-Rich's first game doesn't count because he didn't have enough time to practice, then neither does McGahee's.

    In the last two games, McGahee has rushed 41 times for 118 yards and 1 TD, for an average of 2.9 YPC.

    In his last two games, Richardson has rushed 38 times for 116 yards and 1 TD, for an average of 3.0 YPC.

    So, essentially we got a first round pick at the cost of .1 YPC with a TD differential of 0.

    You'd be stupid not to make that trade. Which you are. So I understand why you are upset.

  • We should put Greg Little back there. I'm sure he could avg. at least what we're getting with Mcgimpy, what is it now, 2.1 ypc or something?

    @poeticg said:

    We should put Greg Little back there. I'm sure he could avg. at least what we're getting with Mcgimpy, what is it now, 2.1 ypc or something?

    not a bad idea. He was a rb in college. He can't catch shit but does decent with the ball in his hands.

  • @poeticg said:

    We should put Greg Little back there. I'm sure he could avg. at least what we're getting with Mcgimpy, what is it now, 2.1 ypc or something?

    If T-Rich's first game doesn't count because he didn't have enough time to practice, then neither does McGahee's.

    In the last two games, McGahee has rushed 41 times for 118 yards and 1 TD, for an average of 2.9 YPC.

    In his last two games, Richardson has rushed 38 times for 116 yards and 1 TD, for an average of 3.0 YPC.

    So, essentially we got a first round pick at the cost of .1 YPC with a TD differential of 0.

    You'd be stupid not to make that trade. Which you are. So I understand why you are upset.

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    If T-Rich's first game doesn't count because he didn't have enough time to practice, then neither does McGahee's.

    In the last two games, McGahee has rushed 41 times for 118 yards and 1 TD, for an average of 2.9 YPC.

    In his last two games, Richardson has rushed 38 times for 116 yards and 1 TD, for an average of 3.0 YPC.

    So, essentially we got a first round pick at the cost of .1 YPC with a TD differential of 0.

    You'd be stupid not to make that trade. Which you are. So I understand why you are upset.

    Because it doesn't fit the argument. Richardson needs more time because he whacks off to Richardsons picture. McGahee doesn't need more time to adjust to the Browns because he replaced his boyfriend.

    IF Richardson was worth the #3 overall pick, he would be tearing it up in Indy, IMMEDIATELY because that's what studs do. We put AP behind our offensive this weekend, I would bet my house that he would look no different than the stud that he is in Minnesota.

    Richardson is an average back, we fleeced the Colts.

  • @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    If T-Rich's first game doesn't count because he didn't have enough time to practice, then neither does McGahee's.

    In the last two games, McGahee has rushed 41 times for 118 yards and 1 TD, for an average of 2.9 YPC.

    In his last two games, Richardson has rushed 38 times for 116 yards and 1 TD, for an average of 3.0 YPC.

    So, essentially we got a first round pick at the cost of .1 YPC with a TD differential of 0.

    You'd be stupid not to make that trade. Which you are. So I understand why you are upset.

    Because it doesn't fit the argument. Richardson needs more time because he whacks off to Richardsons picture. McGahee doesn't need more time to adjust to the Browns because he replaced his boyfriend.

    IF Richardson was worth the #3 overall pick, he would be tearing it up in Indy, IMMEDIATELY because that's what studs do. We put AP behind our offensive this weekend, I would bet my house that he would look no different than the stud that he is in Minnesota.

    Richardson is an average back, we fleeced the Colts.

    @mark-o said:

    Because it doesn't fit the argument. Richardson needs more time because he whacks off to Richardsons picture. McGahee doesn't need more time to adjust to the Browns because he replaced his boyfriend.

    IF Richardson was worth the #3 overall pick, he would be tearing it up in Indy, IMMEDIATELY because that's what studs do. We put AP behind our offensive this weekend, I would bet my house that he would look no different than the stud that he is in Minnesota.

    Richardson is an average back, we fleeced the Colts.

    @mark-o said:

    Because it doesn't fit the argument. Richardson needs more time because he whacks off to Richardsons picture. McGahee doesn't need more time to adjust to the Browns because he replaced his boyfriend.

    IF Richardson was worth the #3 overall pick, he would be tearing it up in Indy, IMMEDIATELY because that's what studs do. We put AP behind our offensive this weekend, I would bet my house that he would look no different than the stud that he is in Minnesota.

    Richardson is an average back, we fleeced the Colts.

    cant really say anyone was fleeced because...that pick has not been made yet and we have not netted anything to show for it yet...so lets wait and see ,,,,

  • @poeticg said:

    We should put Greg Little back there. I'm sure he could avg. at least what we're getting with Mcgimpy, what is it now, 2.1 ypc or something?

    If T-Rich's first game doesn't count because he didn't have enough time to practice, then neither does McGahee's.

    In the last two games, McGahee has rushed 41 times for 118 yards and 1 TD, for an average of 2.9 YPC.

    In his last two games, Richardson has rushed 38 times for 116 yards and 1 TD, for an average of 3.0 YPC.

    So, essentially we got a first round pick at the cost of .1 YPC with a TD differential of 0.

    You'd be stupid not to make that trade. Which you are. So I understand why you are upset.

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    If T-Rich's first game doesn't count because he didn't have enough time to practice, then neither does McGahee's.

    In the last two games, McGahee has rushed 41 times for 118 yards and 1 TD, for an average of 2.9 YPC.

    In his last two games, Richardson has rushed 38 times for 116 yards and 1 TD, for an average of 3.0 YPC.

    So, essentially we got a first round pick at the cost of .1 YPC with a TD differential of 0.

    You'd be stupid not to make that trade. Which you are. So I understand why you are upset.

    While I agree, you literally restated my post word for word...

  • @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    If T-Rich's first game doesn't count because he didn't have enough time to practice, then neither does McGahee's.

    In the last two games, McGahee has rushed 41 times for 118 yards and 1 TD, for an average of 2.9 YPC.

    In his last two games, Richardson has rushed 38 times for 116 yards and 1 TD, for an average of 3.0 YPC.

    So, essentially we got a first round pick at the cost of .1 YPC with a TD differential of 0.

    You'd be stupid not to make that trade. Which you are. So I understand why you are upset.

    While I agree, you literally restated my post word for word...

    @bringbackbrownie2 said:

    While I agree, you literally restated my post word for word...

    @bringbackbrownie2 said:

    While I agree, you literally restated my post word for word...

    I don't think you know what "literally" means.

  • Joique Bell and Ben Tate are in free agency next spring. Or maybe trade for Pierce, Brown, or Moreno. Need to find that bigger back to share the backfield with Dion Lewis next year. Screw wasting a pick anywhere in the draft when u can EASILY find a guy to plug in.

    @cdl15 said:

    Joique Bell and Ben Tate are in free agency next spring. Or maybe trade for Pierce, Brown, or Moreno. Need to find that bigger back to share the backfield with Dion Lewis next year. Screw wasting a pick anywhere in the draft when u can EASILY find a guy to plug in.

    Bell's a great 3rd down back. I wouldn't be surprised if HOU held onto Tate t handcuff to Foster.

  • Oh, gawd... not again. Runningbacks are dime a dozen. We don't draft them anymore unless it's an AP clone and destined to break every rushing record known to NFL. We can easily pull guys off the couch and save draft picks to stockpile for more draft picks. DUH> 😕

    @poeticg said:

    Oh, gawd... not again. Runningbacks are dime a dozen. We don't draft them anymore unless it's an AP clone and destined to break every rushing record known to NFL. We can easily pull guys off the couch and save draft picks to stockpile for more draft picks. DUH> 😕

    Did the viagra wear off on your hard on for T Rich?

  • @bringbackbrownie2 said:

    While I agree, you literally restated my post word for word...

    @bringbackbrownie2 said:

    While I agree, you literally restated my post word for word...

    I don't think you know what "literally" means.

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    I don't think you know what "literally" means.

    I wasn't trying to get in an argument. I was just curious as to why you restated every fact I had just posted. We obviously agree that the running game has not changed much without Richardson.

    @bringbackbrownie2 said:

    He is really averaging 2.9 ypc because you can't really count the minnesota game. He had 1 day to prepare. Trent Richardson was averaging 3.0 ypc before we traded him to the colts. While the season is far from over, who wouldn't give up 0.1 ypc for a 1st round pick? cmon man!

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    If T-Rich's first game doesn't count because he didn't have enough time to practice, then neither does McGahee's.

    In the last two games, McGahee has rushed 41 times for 118 yards and 1 TD, for an average of 2.9 YPC.

    In his last two games, Richardson has rushed 38 times for 116 yards and 1 TD, for an average of 3.0 YPC.

    So, essentially we got a first round pick at the cost of .1 YPC with a TD differential of 0.

    You'd be stupid not to make that trade. Which you are. So I understand why you are upset.

  • Honestly I like mcgahee better than trich. Sure inside the five trich gets paucity as well as anyone. But when the browns needed it the most at the end of games. Mcgahee seemed to "gash" the defense for 5-9 yrd runs. That's the type of thing u rarely see out of trich. Trich is more of a glorified Fullback. Not much difference in Him than Hillis

  • @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    I don't think you know what "literally" means.

    I wasn't trying to get in an argument. I was just curious as to why you restated every fact I had just posted. We obviously agree that the running game has not changed much without Richardson.

    @bringbackbrownie2 said:

    He is really averaging 2.9 ypc because you can't really count the minnesota game. He had 1 day to prepare. Trent Richardson was averaging 3.0 ypc before we traded him to the colts. While the season is far from over, who wouldn't give up 0.1 ypc for a 1st round pick? cmon man!

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    If T-Rich's first game doesn't count because he didn't have enough time to practice, then neither does McGahee's.

    In the last two games, McGahee has rushed 41 times for 118 yards and 1 TD, for an average of 2.9 YPC.

    In his last two games, Richardson has rushed 38 times for 116 yards and 1 TD, for an average of 3.0 YPC.

    So, essentially we got a first round pick at the cost of .1 YPC with a TD differential of 0.

    You'd be stupid not to make that trade. Which you are. So I understand why you are upset.

    @bringbackbrownie2 said:

    I wasn't trying to get in an argument. I was just curious as to why you restated every fact I had just posted. We obviously agree that the running game has not changed much without Richardson.

    Because I didn't scour the thread for what everyone else posted. I saw the stupidity of the post and I responded.

    You posted one fact, and it was that T-Rich's YPC before he was traded was .1 better than McGahee's.

    I posted one fact, and it was the T-Rich's YPC after he was traded is .1 better than McGahee's.

    But you can take the credit for my statement as well if it's that important to you.

  • Honestly I like mcgahee better than trich. Sure inside the five trich gets paucity as well as anyone. But when the browns needed it the most at the end of games. Mcgahee seemed to "gash" the defense for 5-9 yrd runs. That's the type of thing u rarely see out of trich. Trich is more of a glorified Fullback. Not much difference in Him than Hillis

    @cdl15 said:

    Honestly I like mcgahee better than trich. Sure inside the five trich gets paucity as well as anyone. But when the browns needed it the most at the end of games. Mcgahee seemed to "gash" the defense for 5-9 yrd runs. That's the type of thing u rarely see out of trich. Trich is more of a glorified Fullback. Not much difference in Him than Hillis

    Except Hillis was exciting, broke tackles, and had 227 more yards on 3 more carries than TR did. Not to mention he caught 80% of the balls thrown to him, compared to the 70% that TR caught, as well as got 110 more receiving yards and 1 more TD on 10 more receptions.

    But he also had 5 more fumbles.

    All in all, Hillis was much more efficient. Until he broke himself and became a shitbag.

  • @bringbackbrownie2 said:

    I wasn't trying to get in an argument. I was just curious as to why you restated every fact I had just posted. We obviously agree that the running game has not changed much without Richardson.

    Because I didn't scour the thread for what everyone else posted. I saw the stupidity of the post and I responded.

    You posted one fact, and it was that T-Rich's YPC before he was traded was .1 better than McGahee's.

    I posted one fact, and it was the T-Rich's YPC after he was traded is .1 better than McGahee's.

    But you can take the credit for my statement as well if it's that important to you.

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    Because I didn't scour the thread for what everyone else posted. I saw the stupidity of the post and I responded.

    You posted one fact, and it was that T-Rich's YPC before he was traded was .1 better than McGahee's.

    I posted one fact, and it was the T-Rich's YPC after he was traded is .1 better than McGahee's.

    But you can take the credit for my statement as well if it's that important to you.

    Come on guys- that's like saying my shit stinks less than your shit.

  • yes RBs ARE a dime a dozen. (not worthy of a first round pick dime).

    prove me wrong.