"It's a passing league"
-
Cam, Kaep and Wilson are good QB, but it's NOT the reason why their teams have won recently.
The Panthers did well this year because of their DEFENSE.
The 49ers have done well the past 3 seasons because of their DEFENSE.
The Seahawks have an Elite DEFENSE and running game.
-
When's the last time a team won a Super Bowl with five first round offensive linemen?
When's the last time a team won a Super Bowl with five Pro Bowl offensive linemen?
First round picks don't win championships.
A well balance team with a solid coach does.
Just because a QB is drafted high or rated high doesn't mean it will translate into success. We've been beaten up by the steelers and ravens for years because of their defenses. The Bengals look like they might hang around for a while too. We just NEED TO LAND GOOD PLAYERS.
I agree with that. We need to be great in all aspects of the game.First round picks don't win championships.
A well balance team with a solid coach does.
Just because a QB is drafted high or rated high doesn't mean it will translate into success. We've been beaten up by the steelers and ravens for years because of their defenses. The Bengals look like they might hang around for a while too. We just NEED TO LAND GOOD PLAYERS.
But the cost-benefit ratio is much greater taking one of the top rated quarterbacks this year than taking a guard or RT in the first round.
If we didn't have the pieces in place, I wouldn't advocate taking a quarterback, but this is easily the most talented offense we've had since our return. We have two very viable receiving threats, two very good offensive linemen, and enough solid players to fill in the cracks.
If we could land either Manziel or Bortles, a solid runningback, and an interior lineman in he first three rounds, our offense would be on par with the better offenses in the league. We could address #2 CB and ILB as well, either with our next picks or through FA.
We'd have talent across the board with no glaring holes. We'd have a possible franchise quarterback to compete with Hoyer. We'd have a runningback.
Personally, I don't see the dichotomy as much between running QB's and non-running QB's in the NFL. Having mobility is just another bonus. As I stated earlier, both Wilson and Kaep are in the top ten in passer rating. Both have fantastic numbers through the air.
Having the ability to run isn't the same as being a running QB.
-
How does Kaep fit into that group? Just because he's a runner?
Kaep and Wilson still finished the regular season in the top ten in passer rating. Both of them threw nearly three times as many touchdowns and interceptions, and neither of them had double digit interceptions.
When I hear "pocket passer", I hear "old". Just because a guy can run doesn't mean he isn't a pocket passer. Wilson ran a designed bootleg in the NFC Championship and stayed behind the line and turned that play into a 30 yard passing gain. He had four blockers in front of him and could have picked up a first down, yet he didnt.
I think looking for quarterbacks with no mobility just to fill your "pocket passer" category severely limits he potential of the team.
That's what I'm saying TC- a mobile qb is fine, it's becoming more and more of a necessity. Manning and Brady may be the last of that genre. I'll take a Kapernic or a Wilson good @ 4- Manziel is not either of them. He might (possibly) have the passing ability, but IMHO he doesn't have the frame to stay healthy if he takes off running on a consistent basis.
Yeah- so how about Bortles @ 4, and Tre Mason with the second first rounder? I can even live with Watkins, and then Carr or Mason, and\or take Garrapolo in the second round. IMHO a stud run blocking OG should be high on the Browns shopping list- Pinkston and Lavaou suck.
That's what I'm saying TC- a mobile qb is fine, it's becoming more and more of a necessity. Manning and Brady may be the last of that genre. I'll take a Kapernic or a Wilson good @ 4- Manziel is not either of them. He might (possibly) have the passing ability, but IMHO he doesn't have the frame to stay healthy if he takes off running on a consistent basis.
Yeah- so how about Bortles @ 4, and Tre Mason with the second first rounder? I can even live with Watkins, and then Carr or Mason, and\or take Garrapolo in the second round. IMHO a stud run blocking OG should be high on the Browns shopping list- Pinkston and Lavaou suck.
Manziel is two inches taller and 5 pounds heavier than Wilson. My bet is he'll measure in at 6'0 3/4" and 212 lbs at the Combine.
I'm just as scared, but I'm warming up to Manziel. Obviously, I would love Bortles. But I can see the Manziel appeal now. People don't realize that Manziel has very similar strengths as Wilson, passing wise. He's not a schlub at throwing.
-
Cam, Kaep and Wilson are good QB, but it's NOT the reason why their teams have won recently.
The Panthers did well this year because of their DEFENSE.
The 49ers have done well the past 3 seasons because of their DEFENSE.
The Seahawks have an Elite DEFENSE and running game.
Yea but if we hold our QB standards to Peyton/Rodgers/Brady/Brees we'll never find our guy.Cam, Kaep and Wilson are good QB, but it's NOT the reason why their teams have won recently.
The Panthers did well this year because of their DEFENSE.
The 49ers have done well the past 3 seasons because of their DEFENSE.
The Seahawks have an Elite DEFENSE and running game.
Manziel is a good thrower too ^^^ he's accurate, makes pretty good decisions. At this point I don't care who they get as long as they don't trade big for him.
-
I'm actually one that believe Manziel will struggle if he lands in Cleveland. In a team that has a better defense and coaching staff in place, i think he have a higher chance to succeed. The only QB in this draft that can come into Cleveland and be up and running quickly is Bridgewater simply because he's been running a pro-style offense for 2 years at Lousville. Would i like them to trade up to grab Bridgewater, NO. I would spread rumors of hyping Manziel and Bridgewater (no first round grade) and prays Bridgewater will fall to us at 4.
I'm also am not fond of Manziel's running style.
Yes, it's exciting but there's wrecknessless. His high INT is also a concern. He has a tendency to throw one up for grab.
-
I'm actually one that believe Manziel will struggle if he lands in Cleveland. In a team that has a better defense and coaching staff in place, i think he have a higher chance to succeed. The only QB in this draft that can come into Cleveland and be up and running quickly is Bridgewater simply because he's been running a pro-style offense for 2 years at Lousville. Would i like them to trade up to grab Bridgewater, NO. I would spread rumors of hyping Manziel and Bridgewater (no first round grade) and prays Bridgewater will fall to us at 4.
I'm also am not fond of Manziel's running style.
Yes, it's exciting but there's wrecknessless. His high INT is also a concern. He has a tendency to throw one up for grab.
I'm actually one that believe Manziel will struggle if he lands in Cleveland. In a team that has a better defense and coaching staff in place, i think he have a higher chance to succeed. The only QB in this draft that can come into Cleveland and be up and running quickly is Bridgewater simply because he's been running a pro-style offense for 2 years at Lousville.
That's assuming we run a pro style offense. I personally think Bortles would have the most success here simply because of his body style. He's a clone of Ben and could withstand the punishment of playing in the AFC North more than Manziel or Bridgewater.
-
I'm actually one that believe Manziel will struggle if he lands in Cleveland. In a team that has a better defense and coaching staff in place, i think he have a higher chance to succeed. The only QB in this draft that can come into Cleveland and be up and running quickly is Bridgewater simply because he's been running a pro-style offense for 2 years at Lousville.
That's assuming we run a pro style offense. I personally think Bortles would have the most success here simply because of his body style. He's a clone of Ben and could withstand the punishment of playing in the AFC North more than Manziel or Bridgewater.
That's assuming we run a pro style offense. I personally think Bortles would have the most success here simply because of his body style. He's a clone of Ben and could withstand the punishment of playing in the AFC North more than Manziel or Bridgewater.
Correct.
I would like them to take Bortles before Manziel...but not at the 4th spot. There are game changing players with elite skillset at the 4th spot.
Clowney & Barr have the potential be be defensive anchor players for the next 5-10 years. That's what we need in the AFC North.
And when i talk about pro-style offense, i'm taking about reading defenses and going through his progressions. There's a stat out there that i saw which indicated that Manziel threw 78% of his passes to his primary read. Bridgewater have a very high % of passes to his 2nd, 3rd and 4th option.
-
That's assuming we run a pro style offense. I personally think Bortles would have the most success here simply because of his body style. He's a clone of Ben and could withstand the punishment of playing in the AFC North more than Manziel or Bridgewater.
Correct.
I would like them to take Bortles before Manziel...but not at the 4th spot. There are game changing players with elite skillset at the 4th spot.
Clowney & Barr have the potential be be defensive anchor players for the next 5-10 years. That's what we need in the AFC North.
And when i talk about pro-style offense, i'm taking about reading defenses and going through his progressions. There's a stat out there that i saw which indicated that Manziel threw 78% of his passes to his primary read. Bridgewater have a very high % of passes to his 2nd, 3rd and 4th option.
Clowney is just as much of a risk as Manziel, with less benefit. Even the best DE/OLB is only a piece of the puzzle, defensively. Two or three sacks and 15 tackles is a lock for the HOF, and that's only half as valuable as what a franchise quarterback brings.Correct.
I would like them to take Bortles before Manziel...but not at the 4th spot. There are game changing players with elite skillset at the 4th spot.
Clowney & Barr have the potential be be defensive anchor players for the next 5-10 years. That's what we need in the AFC North.
I live in Gamecock country. My friends are alums. I've met Clowney. Ive watched him practice and play throughout high school and college. I know what he's capable of. I also know that he's just as capable of letting it get to his head and taking plays off. He gives 100% on three or four plays per extended drive and goes on autopilot the rest of the time.
He's not nearly as much of a sure prospect as some would have you believe.
-
I would gamble on a freak of nature (Clowney), than an undersize QB.
But that's just me.
-
I would gamble on a freak of nature (Clowney), than an undersize QB.
But that's just me.
I would gamble on a freak of nature (Clowney), than an undersize QB.
But that's just me.
I'd gamble on a twice nominated and once winning Heisman trophy quarterback over a defensive end.
But that's just me.
-
It's a "pass the dutchie" league ... since the only two states to legalize pot are going to the Super Bowl. Ohio better get to work.
Zombo
Zombo said:
It's a "pass the dutchie" league ... since the only two states to legalize pot are going to the Super Bowl. Ohio better get to work.
Zombo
Interesting that that is the case. I am sure that Kasich will get right on that...right after they pass the gay marriage act.
-
It's a "pass the dutchie" league ... since the only two states to legalize pot are going to the Super Bowl. Ohio better get to work.
Zombo
Zombo said:
It's a "pass the dutchie" league ... since the only two states to legalize pot are going to the Super Bowl. Ohio better get to work.
Zombo
Genius. Pass the law, and it's Browns vs. Bengals in the AFC Championship next year... And, fast food sales triple across the state...
-
I would gamble on a freak of nature (Clowney), than an undersize QB.
But that's just me.
I'd gamble on a twice nominated and once winning Heisman trophy quarterback over a defensive end.
But that's just me.
I'd gamble on a twice nominated and once winning Heisman trophy quarterback over a defensive end.
But that's just me.
For the 4th pick in the draft I personally would prefer we take Sammy Watkins. He looks to be as high reward low risk as it gets. I know that takes us out of contention for what most people consider the top 3 QB prospects but I think the for risk / reward Garropolo or Mettenberger developing behind Hoyer is a solid plan and achievable in the 2nd to 3rd round. I suspect Garropolo stock will continue to soar and might even make it to the bottom of the 1st?
-
I'd gamble on a twice nominated and once winning Heisman trophy quarterback over a defensive end.
But that's just me.
For the 4th pick in the draft I personally would prefer we take Sammy Watkins. He looks to be as high reward low risk as it gets. I know that takes us out of contention for what most people consider the top 3 QB prospects but I think the for risk / reward Garropolo or Mettenberger developing behind Hoyer is a solid plan and achievable in the 2nd to 3rd round. I suspect Garropolo stock will continue to soar and might even make it to the bottom of the 1st?
-
I'm actually one that believe Manziel will struggle if he lands in Cleveland. In a team that has a better defense and coaching staff in place, i think he have a higher chance to succeed. The only QB in this draft that can come into Cleveland and be up and running quickly is Bridgewater simply because he's been running a pro-style offense for 2 years at Lousville. Would i like them to trade up to grab Bridgewater, NO. I would spread rumors of hyping Manziel and Bridgewater (no first round grade) and prays Bridgewater will fall to us at 4.
I'm also am not fond of Manziel's running style.
Yes, it's exciting but there's wrecknessless. His high INT is also a concern. He has a tendency to throw one up for grab.
I'm also am not fond of Manziel's running style.
Yes, it's exciting but there's recklessness. His high INT is also a concern. He has a tendency to throw one up for grab.
The more I watch of Manziel, the more I agree with that. His running style sooner or later is going to land him with a big hit in the NFL. Or scrambling around right into a linebacker coming at him full tilt.
-
That's what I'm saying TC- a mobile qb is fine, it's becoming more and more of a necessity. Manning and Brady may be the last of that genre. I'll take a Kapernic or a Wilson good @ 4- Manziel is not either of them. He might (possibly) have the passing ability, but IMHO he doesn't have the frame to stay healthy if he takes off running on a consistent basis.
Yeah- so how about Bortles @ 4, and Tre Mason with the second first rounder? I can even live with Watkins, and then Carr or Mason, and\or take Garrapolo in the second round. IMHO a stud run blocking OG should be high on the Browns shopping list- Pinkston and Lavaou suck.
Manziel is two inches taller and 5 pounds heavier than Wilson. My bet is he'll measure in at 6'0 3/4" and 212 lbs at the Combine.
I'm just as scared, but I'm warming up to Manziel. Obviously, I would love Bortles. But I can see the Manziel appeal now. People don't realize that Manziel has very similar strengths as Wilson, passing wise. He's not a schlub at throwing.
Manziel is two inches taller and 5 pounds heavier than Wilson. My bet is he'll measure in at 6'0 3/4" and 212 lbs at the Combine.
I'm just as scared, but I'm warming up to Manziel. Obviously, I would love Bortles. But I can see the Manziel appeal now. People don't realize that Manziel has very similar strengths as Wilson, passing wise. He's not a schlub at throwing.
That's assuming he shows up. Combine? I don't need no damn combine, I'm JOHNNY FREAKING FOOTBALL
!!!! Or you forget he blew off Manning's Camp? If you're not concerned about off-field crap he's pulled, maybe you should be. -
I still think Manziel would be in the wrong division, wrong weather.
He can only do the things he does if he has a dome, or plays all
home games in nice weather.
I don't see it. He's a great, really great college qb at improvising.
But kinda like a lot of players have said - in the NFL, every single player
you face was also a "great" college player. I don't think Manziel is a good fit
for the Browns. But the chance he'd pull an "Eli" is pretty strong.
Hell, coaches don't want to come to the Browns now, some won't even interview.
Not a stretch that college players would rather play for a respectable NFL organization
without having a new coach every single year... .....Haslam... you listenin?
-
Zombo said:
It's a "pass the dutchie" league ... since the only two states to legalize pot are going to the Super Bowl. Ohio better get to work.
Zombo
Genius. Pass the law, and it's Browns vs. Bengals in the AFC Championship next year... And, fast food sales triple across the state...
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login