Skip to content

Browns are on the board.

The Browns Board
47 19 1.5k
  • LOL....... they must have traded their 4 pick for a first round pick next year....?

  • SaMmy Watkins at #4 is probably the best bet here. Need more weapons. Qb? Sorry Browns don't make the playoffs with Peyton Manning last year. U know it is possible to have a playoff team without a monster qb.

  • The Browns are not on the clock. We have to see who the 3 teams ahead of them choose. Some of the guys you all want may be gone....then what?

  • Watkins is my top can't miss player... I take him...

    And just so people won't laugh I make him my #1 WR and make Gordon my #2... problem solved, TC.

  • Sammy Watkins

    Hoyer, Watkins, Gordon, Cameron and a new RB are good enough to win plenty of games.

  • Watkins and if the rumors are true cousins might be throwing the ball to him.

  • Watkins would be on my "most likely to succeed list"

    But I don't understand the fascination with cousins.

  • Watkins would be on my "most likely to succeed list"

    But I don't understand the fascination with cousins.

    @bbedward said:

    Watkins would be on my "most likely to succeed list"

    But I don't understand the fascination with cousins.

    I am not fascinated with him. seems that he is in the rumor mill.

  • Watkins is my top can't miss player... I take him...

    And just so people won't laugh I make him my #1 WR and make Gordon my #2... problem solved, TC.

    @tour2ma said:

    Watkins is my top can't miss player... I take him...

    And just so people won't laugh I make him my #1 WR and make Gordon my #2... problem solved, TC.

    That's the one scenario that I think would make people laugh harder.

  • @bbedward said:

    Watkins would be on my "most likely to succeed list"

    But I don't understand the fascination with cousins.

    I am not fascinated with him. seems that he is in the rumor mill.

    @lbc-mike said:

    I am not fascinated with him. seems that he is in the rumor mill.

    Got it. Hopefully the rumor mill is wrong. We already have a cousins of our own. His name is Hoyer 😉

  • @tour2ma said:

    Watkins is my top can't miss player... I take him...

    And just so people won't laugh I make him my #1 WR and make Gordon my #2... problem solved, TC.

    That's the one scenario that I think would make people laugh harder.

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    That's the one scenario that I think would make people laugh harder.

    Then my work is done...

  • @tour2ma said:

    Watkins is my top can't miss player... I take him...

    And just so people won't laugh I make him my #1 WR and make Gordon my #2... problem solved, TC.

    That's the one scenario that I think would make people laugh harder.

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    That's the one scenario that I think would make people laugh harder.

    naaa thats a great move. And who the fuck cares who's 1 and who's 2. This would be a matchup nightmare. Colt McCoy could succeed with that line-up.
  • @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    That's the one scenario that I think would make people laugh harder.

    naaa thats a great move. And who the fuck cares who's 1 and who's 2. This would be a matchup nightmare. Colt McCoy could succeed with that line-up.

    @cdl15 said:

    naaa thats a great move. And who the fuck cares who's 1 and who's 2. This would be a matchup nightmare. Colt McCoy could succeed with that line-up.

    Brilliant analysis.

  • @lbc-mike said:

    I am not fascinated with him. seems that he is in the rumor mill.

    Got it. Hopefully the rumor mill is wrong. We already have a cousins of our own. His name is Hoyer 😉

    @bbedward said:

    Got it. Hopefully the rumor mill is wrong. We already have a cousins of our own. His name is Hoyer 😉

    so gay. I hope the rumor mill is right. Hoyer and Cousins are nothing alike except for being young, hungry talent.
  • @cdl15 said:

    naaa thats a great move. And who the fuck cares who's 1 and who's 2. This would be a matchup nightmare. Colt McCoy could succeed with that line-up.

    Brilliant analysis.

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    Brilliant analysis.

    agreed
  • @bbedward said:

    Got it. Hopefully the rumor mill is wrong. We already have a cousins of our own. His name is Hoyer 😉

    so gay. I hope the rumor mill is right. Hoyer and Cousins are nothing alike except for being young, hungry talent.

    @cdl15 said:

    so gay. I hope the rumor mill is right. Hoyer and Cousins are nothing alike except for being young, hungry talent.

    They played in the exact same offense in college, both are unproven, both are pretty much the same size.

    Only difference is Brian hoyer had a good 3 games in 2013. Kirk cousins had a bad 3 games.

    I don't think people know much about him here except he beat the browns in 2012, so did 10 other QBs.

    I think he could be a good QB, but he hasn't proven it. We already have that question mark guy.

  • @cdl15 said:

    so gay. I hope the rumor mill is right. Hoyer and Cousins are nothing alike except for being young, hungry talent.

    They played in the exact same offense in college, both are unproven, both are pretty much the same size.

    Only difference is Brian hoyer had a good 3 games in 2013. Kirk cousins had a bad 3 games.

    I don't think people know much about him here except he beat the browns in 2012, so did 10 other QBs.

    I think he could be a good QB, but he hasn't proven it. We already have that question mark guy.

    @bbedward said:

    They played in the exact same offense in college, both are unproven, both are pretty much the same size.

    Only difference is Brian hoyer had a good 3 games in 2013. Kirk cousins had a bad 3 games.

    I don't think people know much about him here except he beat the browns in 2012, so did 10 other QBs.

    I think he could be a good QB, but he hasn't proven it. We already have that question mark guy.

    anyone u draft, pick up, or have other than Campbell or weeden is a question mark guy
  • Assuming we stay at 4 you are the GM and anyone possible you want is there, who is you no doubt absolute pick?

    The Browns are on the Clock

    With the 4th pick the Browns select John Manziel QB Texas A&M

    @represent said:

    Assuming we stay at 4 you are the GM and anyone possible you want is there, who is you no doubt absolute pick?

    Teddy Twatwater
  • @bbedward said:

    They played in the exact same offense in college, both are unproven, both are pretty much the same size.

    Only difference is Brian hoyer had a good 3 games in 2013. Kirk cousins had a bad 3 games.

    I don't think people know much about him here except he beat the browns in 2012, so did 10 other QBs.

    I think he could be a good QB, but he hasn't proven it. We already have that question mark guy.

    anyone u draft, pick up, or have other than Campbell or weeden is a question mark guy

    @cdl15 said:

    anyone u draft, pick up, or have other than Campbell or weeden is a question mark guy

    Yea I'm just saying. Why trade a pick for a guy who fits the mold of a guy we already have. You said they're nothing alike, but they couldn't be more alike.

  • @bbedward said:

    They played in the exact same offense in college, both are unproven, both are pretty much the same size.

    Only difference is Brian hoyer had a good 3 games in 2013. Kirk cousins had a bad 3 games.

    I don't think people know much about him here except he beat the browns in 2012, so did 10 other QBs.

    I think he could be a good QB, but he hasn't proven it. We already have that question mark guy.

    anyone u draft, pick up, or have other than Campbell or weeden is a question mark guy

    @cdl15 said:

    anyone u draft, pick up, or have other than ... weeden is a question mark guy

    Strikes me as a strong argument for Cousins... or anyone else...