Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Gerhart Please

Gerhart Please

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Browns Board
19 Posts 10 Posters 784 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Canton Mike Canton MikeC
    • 4k Posts
    • 2k Reputation
    Canton MikeC Canton Mike wrote on last edited by
    #5

    Young vet w/freshest legs that meets our need of a big back (just my opinion)....Gerhart, but I'm no pro GM.

    Mike

    IN DORSEY I TRUST
    1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • thomam3 thomam3T
      • 63 Posts
      • 27 Reputation
      thomam3T thomam3 wrote on last edited by
      #6

      Gerhart, Lewis, Baker at RB

      Don't draft a RB high, use that pic on some line help or D.

      1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • miktoxic miktoxicM
        • 13k Posts
        • 1k Reputation
        miktoxicM miktoxic wrote on last edited by
        #7

        touchdown tommy II.

        c'mon man!

        1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • Spectralcow S
          • 270 Posts
          • 12 Reputation
          S Spectralcow wrote on last edited by
          #8

          Nah, no thanks. If that's the plan, I'd rather just see them give some new young kid the rock for less money.

          1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • thomam3T thomam3

            Gerhart has starter potential. Why not? If we draft a running back fine. if we are going after a FA, I think Gerhart should be the choice over Tate.

            http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1950990-nfl-free-agency-minnesota-vikings-toby-gerhart-has-starter-potential

            Motley_trap M
            • 4 Posts
            • 0 Reputation
            M Motley_trap wrote on last edited by
            #9

            @thomam3 said:

            Gerhart has starter potential. Why not? If we draft a running back fine. if we are going after a FA, I think Gerhart should be the choice over Tate.

            http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1950990-nfl-free-agency-minnesota-vikings-toby-gerhart-has-starter-potential

            Gerhart's a productive backup. I don't know that he should be anyone's starter, though.

            jcam222J 1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • M Motley_trap

              @thomam3 said:

              Gerhart has starter potential. Why not? If we draft a running back fine. if we are going after a FA, I think Gerhart should be the choice over Tate.

              http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1950990-nfl-free-agency-minnesota-vikings-toby-gerhart-has-starter-potential

              Gerhart's a productive backup. I don't know that he should be anyone's starter, though.

              jcam222 jcam222J Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
              • 3k Posts
              • 873 Reputation
              jcam222J jcam222 wrote on last edited by
              #10

              @motley_trap said:

              Gerhart's a productive backup. I don't know that he should be anyone's starter, though.

              As a starter during AP's absence he did pretty damn good. What I cannot speak to is his run blocking. Anyone?

              M 1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • bbedward bbedwardB Conversation Starter Reacting Well Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                • 9k Posts
                • 1k Reputation
                bbedwardB bbedward wrote on last edited by
                #11

                Gerhart could be a good pickup. I'm still all for some fresh legs at RB though. There's quite a few guys I like that'll fall in the 4th/5th round probably.

                1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • jcam222J jcam222

                  @motley_trap said:

                  Gerhart's a productive backup. I don't know that he should be anyone's starter, though.

                  As a starter during AP's absence he did pretty damn good. What I cannot speak to is his run blocking. Anyone?

                  Motley_trap M
                  • 4 Posts
                  • 0 Reputation
                  M Motley_trap wrote on last edited by
                  #12

                  @jcam222 said:

                  As a starter during AP's absence he did pretty damn good.

                  Did he? In those five games he averaged 4.4 YPC and scored one rushing TD. That's all right, but I'm not exactly overwhelmed.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • Mr. Make-Believe Mr. Make-BelieveM Very Popular Dedicated Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                    • 719 Posts
                    • 122 Reputation
                    Mr. Make-BelieveM Mr. Make-Believe wrote on last edited by
                    #13

                    ...

                    I like this idea. I hope the Browns draft a solid option with their first pick in the second round and bring someone like Gerhart aboard as well.

                    As much as this was a 4-12 team this season, I DO believe that there is a strong foundation to build on. And a couple of pieces like this could prove to be a tipping point in their favor. Of course... That depends on Mack and Ward being re-signed.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • Clevfan4life C Banned Very Popular
                      • 24k Posts
                      • 1k Reputation
                      C Clevfan4life wrote on last edited by
                      #14

                      He runs like Hillis did for us, gets the ball and goes. He's more fluid than Hillis was but obviously probably won't be dragging entire front 7's with him for 3 or 4 yds. I like it. I think we should feature him and Lewis next year and let a late round draftee sit and watch for a year or get some reps if one of em gets hurt. There should be games where Gerhart gets 80% of the carries and Lewis 20%...and other games vice versa. Keep them both healthy throughout the whole season by basically giving them some games off with only a minor amount of carries just to keep em in the mix. This is how an NFL running attack should function these days. AP is likely the last RB we'll see for some time that can put that much work in on a season and remain healthy....let alone do it the next season after major knee surgery.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply
                      • Clevfan4life C Banned Very Popular
                        • 24k Posts
                        • 1k Reputation
                        C Clevfan4life wrote on last edited by
                        #15

                        but lets not forget that whoever is running for us next year HAS to have a bull infront of him like Vickers.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Quote Reply
                        • miktoxic miktoxicM
                          • 13k Posts
                          • 1k Reputation
                          miktoxicM miktoxic wrote on last edited by
                          #16

                          what did hillis do for us after his contract year, nothing cuz he wasn't here, i i doubt if he can be found on any team's depth chart except under fullback or #3 RB. last i heard he sucked for KC.

                          glad we didn't give him the money. the days of larry czonka are done. everyone knows how to key on a RB. look at lynch's #'s in the SB. wah. but denver knew they had to stop them and dared wilson to beat them throwing the ball.......and he did, besides the points the defense scored for them.

                          C 1 Reply Last reply
                          Quote Reply
                          • miktoxicM miktoxic

                            what did hillis do for us after his contract year, nothing cuz he wasn't here, i i doubt if he can be found on any team's depth chart except under fullback or #3 RB. last i heard he sucked for KC.

                            glad we didn't give him the money. the days of larry czonka are done. everyone knows how to key on a RB. look at lynch's #'s in the SB. wah. but denver knew they had to stop them and dared wilson to beat them throwing the ball.......and he did, besides the points the defense scored for them.

                            Clevfan4life C Banned Very Popular
                            • 24k Posts
                            • 1k Reputation
                            C Clevfan4life wrote on last edited by
                            #17

                            @miktoxic said:

                            what did hillis do for us after his contract year, nothing cuz he wasn't here, i i doubt if he can be found on any team's depth chart except under fullback or #3 RB. last i heard he sucked for KC.

                            glad we didn't give him the money. the days of larry czonka are done. everyone knows how to key on a RB. look at lynch's #'s in the SB. wah. but denver knew they had to stop them and dared wilson to beat them throwing the ball.......and he did, besides the points the defense scored for them.

                            Holmgren fucked our running game by getting rid of Vickers and bringing in Shurmur who's west coast ball was terrible for running. The O line under Mangini was coached by the guy who built the Dallas O line when Larry Allen was there which is considered one of the best o lines of all time. When he went the o line went back to being marginal at best. Can't blame it all on Hillis, the running game was sucked out from underneath him. Yeah he hasn't done shit after he left here but so what? Some players flourish in certain specific circumstances.

                            miktoxicM 1 Reply Last reply
                            Quote Reply
                            • C Clevfan4life

                              @miktoxic said:

                              what did hillis do for us after his contract year, nothing cuz he wasn't here, i i doubt if he can be found on any team's depth chart except under fullback or #3 RB. last i heard he sucked for KC.

                              glad we didn't give him the money. the days of larry czonka are done. everyone knows how to key on a RB. look at lynch's #'s in the SB. wah. but denver knew they had to stop them and dared wilson to beat them throwing the ball.......and he did, besides the points the defense scored for them.

                              Holmgren fucked our running game by getting rid of Vickers and bringing in Shurmur who's west coast ball was terrible for running. The O line under Mangini was coached by the guy who built the Dallas O line when Larry Allen was there which is considered one of the best o lines of all time. When he went the o line went back to being marginal at best. Can't blame it all on Hillis, the running game was sucked out from underneath him. Yeah he hasn't done shit after he left here but so what? Some players flourish in certain specific circumstances.

                              miktoxic miktoxicM
                              • 13k Posts
                              • 1k Reputation
                              miktoxicM miktoxic wrote on last edited by
                              #18

                              @clevfan4life said:

                              Holmgren fucked our running game by getting rid of Vickers and bringing in Shurmur who's west coast ball was terrible for running. The O line under Mangini was coached by the guy who built the Dallas O line when Larry Allen was there which is considered one of the best o lines of all time. When he went the o line went back to being marginal at best. Can't blame it all on Hillis, the running game was sucked out from underneath him. Yeah he hasn't done shit after he left here but so what? Some players flourish in certain specific circumstances.

                              not disagreeing at all, just saying gerhardt is built in the same mold as touchdown tommy and hillis.

                              if they'd settle on being a fullback then yeah, no probs. but a feature back? uh, no.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              Quote Reply
                              • thomam3 thomam3T
                                • 63 Posts
                                • 27 Reputation
                                thomam3T thomam3 wrote on last edited by
                                #19

                                No way. Gerhart is more of a running back then a fullback. Gerhart makes quit cuts while keeping shoulder up-field the whole time. He makes less contact then Hillis did.

                                Hillis was a head case.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                Quote Reply

                                Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                With your input, this post could be even better đź’—

                                Register Login
                                Reply
                                • Reply as topic
                                Log in to reply
                                • Oldest to Newest
                                • Newest to Oldest
                                • Most Votes


                                Theme
                                • System
                                • Light
                                • Dark
                                The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                                The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                0
                                • Forums
                                • Recent
                                • Popular
                                • Users
                                • Donate