Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Good old brownies...

Good old brownies...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Browns Board
10 Posts 4 Posters 631 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • GuNNerGatSKi G Reacting Well Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
    • 331 Posts
    • 86 Reputation
    G GuNNerGatSKi wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Hiya everyone. I have been reading the forums here on the browns board for the last month or so and finally decided to make an account and join in on the discussions. I have really enjoyed reading the posts here and often get quite a laugh out of some of the more, shall we say, "vocal" members. Introduction aside, I have a not so original idea that I would like to float to the rest of you.

    With the considerable depth available in this draft, trading back is not such a bad idea. Now I know a large number of Brown's fans would like for us to stay where we are and either pick a qb/BPA with number four or trade up to get our pick of the whole lot. The more and more I study this draft and the available players and evaluate the "big three" quarterbacks coming out this year the greater my desire is for us to, as Farmer has hinted, throw some curveballs. I'm not saying that the Bottles, Bridgewater, abd manziel have nothing to offer us or are going to be busts (honestly who truely knows such things, all we have to go on is what we see with our eyes and hear with our ears). Quite frankly the more I listen to and watch manziel I find myself being sucked into the blackhole that is the JFF enigma. But the mass that sits between my ears is screaming don't take the bait! Trade back goddamnit! Thankfully I don't actually have to make these decisions. But lets picture this: trading down from the 4th overall and picking up a later 1st rounder and whatever else is packaged into the deal. With the amount of depth available at many positions (particularly WR) we could easily nail some extraordinary talent in the latter part of the first round as well as 2 and 3, likely even 4. So, if a guy like Mariota is more up Farmers alley, what could be better than stockpiling as many picks and grabbing as much potential talent as possible this year and then hold nothing back at the next draft, whatever it takes, to get us into a position (no.1 overall) to grab potentially a much more capable candidate for franchise qb (with a shit ton of talent to go with him if we trade down and grab more picks this year). We could easily pickup two great WR this year in the bottom 1st/2nd (np.2 and a kickass demon to work the slot). Couple that with one or two rb selections (hyde/seastrunk imo), some OL help, and a couple depth picks and come next draft we could pick a middling journeyman and still have some success. But if we bet the farm (kinda like Washington with RG3, but with weapons in place prior to doing so) next year and do take a guy like Mariota, we can have a chance at true long-term sucrss and stability. Just a thought.... I'm not even one hundred percent sold in this line of thinking myself, but the more I mull over it the more it makes sense. Or we can just say fuck it all and JFF HERE WE COME BABY! Hahaha wooo!

    Flyin JF 1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • miktoxic miktoxicM
      • 13k Posts
      • 1k Reputation
      miktoxicM miktoxic wrote on last edited by
      #2

      i agree with everything in your post except your last sentence.

      i have voiced that same opinions many times since this pre-draft started and then the promotion of farmer to GM.

      1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • G GuNNerGatSKi

        Hiya everyone. I have been reading the forums here on the browns board for the last month or so and finally decided to make an account and join in on the discussions. I have really enjoyed reading the posts here and often get quite a laugh out of some of the more, shall we say, "vocal" members. Introduction aside, I have a not so original idea that I would like to float to the rest of you.

        With the considerable depth available in this draft, trading back is not such a bad idea. Now I know a large number of Brown's fans would like for us to stay where we are and either pick a qb/BPA with number four or trade up to get our pick of the whole lot. The more and more I study this draft and the available players and evaluate the "big three" quarterbacks coming out this year the greater my desire is for us to, as Farmer has hinted, throw some curveballs. I'm not saying that the Bottles, Bridgewater, abd manziel have nothing to offer us or are going to be busts (honestly who truely knows such things, all we have to go on is what we see with our eyes and hear with our ears). Quite frankly the more I listen to and watch manziel I find myself being sucked into the blackhole that is the JFF enigma. But the mass that sits between my ears is screaming don't take the bait! Trade back goddamnit! Thankfully I don't actually have to make these decisions. But lets picture this: trading down from the 4th overall and picking up a later 1st rounder and whatever else is packaged into the deal. With the amount of depth available at many positions (particularly WR) we could easily nail some extraordinary talent in the latter part of the first round as well as 2 and 3, likely even 4. So, if a guy like Mariota is more up Farmers alley, what could be better than stockpiling as many picks and grabbing as much potential talent as possible this year and then hold nothing back at the next draft, whatever it takes, to get us into a position (no.1 overall) to grab potentially a much more capable candidate for franchise qb (with a shit ton of talent to go with him if we trade down and grab more picks this year). We could easily pickup two great WR this year in the bottom 1st/2nd (np.2 and a kickass demon to work the slot). Couple that with one or two rb selections (hyde/seastrunk imo), some OL help, and a couple depth picks and come next draft we could pick a middling journeyman and still have some success. But if we bet the farm (kinda like Washington with RG3, but with weapons in place prior to doing so) next year and do take a guy like Mariota, we can have a chance at true long-term sucrss and stability. Just a thought.... I'm not even one hundred percent sold in this line of thinking myself, but the more I mull over it the more it makes sense. Or we can just say fuck it all and JFF HERE WE COME BABY! Hahaha wooo!

        Flyin J Flyin JF One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
        • 2k Posts
        • 114 Reputation
        Flyin JF Flyin J wrote on last edited by
        #3

        GuNNerGatSKy said:

        Hiya everyone. I have been reading the forums here on the browns board for the last month or so and finally decided to make an account and join in on the discussions. I have really enjoyed reading the posts here and often get quite a laugh out of some of the more, shall we say, "vocal" members. Introduction aside, I have a not so original idea that I would like to float to the rest of you.

        With the considerable depth available in this draft, trading back is not such a bad idea. Now I know a large number of Brown's fans would like for us to stay where we are and either pick a qb/BPA with number four or trade up to get our pick of the whole lot. The more and more I study this draft and the available players and evaluate the "big three" quarterbacks coming out this year the greater my desire is for us to, as Farmer has hinted, throw some curveballs. I'm not saying that the Bottles, Bridgewater, abd manziel have nothing to offer us or are going to be busts (honestly who truely knows such things, all we have to go on is what we see with our eyes and hear with our ears). Quite frankly the more I listen to and watch manziel I find myself being sucked into the blackhole that is the JFF enigma. But the mass that sits between my ears is screaming don't take the bait! Trade back goddamnit! Thankfully I don't actually have to make these decisions. But lets picture this: trading down from the 4th overall and picking up a later 1st rounder and whatever else is packaged into the deal. With the amount of depth available at many positions (particularly WR) we could easily nail some extraordinary talent in the latter part of the first round as well as 2 and 3, likely even 4. So, if a guy like Mariota is more up Farmers alley, what could be better than stockpiling as many picks and grabbing as much potential talent as possible this year and then hold nothing back at the next draft, whatever it takes, to get us into a position (no.1 overall) to grab potentially a much more capable candidate for franchise qb (with a shit ton of talent to go with him if we trade down and grab more picks this year). We could easily pickup two great WR this year in the bottom 1st/2nd (np.2 and a kickass demon to work the slot). Couple that with one or two rb selections (hyde/seastrunk imo), some OL help, and a couple depth picks and come next draft we could pick a middling journeyman and still have some success. But if we bet the farm (kinda like Washington with RG3, but with weapons in place prior to doing so) next year and do take a guy like Mariota, we can have a chance at true long-term sucrss and stability. Just a thought.... I'm not even one hundred percent sold in this line of thinking myself, but the more I mull over it the more it makes sense. Or we can just say fuck it all and JFF HERE WE COME BABY! Hahaha wooo!

        too many picks as is. If we dont pick QB at 4 we should take the BPA thats not a reciever. We have plenty of ammo to get a third 1st or another 2nd.
        miktoxicM 1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • Flyin JF Flyin J

          GuNNerGatSKy said:

          Hiya everyone. I have been reading the forums here on the browns board for the last month or so and finally decided to make an account and join in on the discussions. I have really enjoyed reading the posts here and often get quite a laugh out of some of the more, shall we say, "vocal" members. Introduction aside, I have a not so original idea that I would like to float to the rest of you.

          With the considerable depth available in this draft, trading back is not such a bad idea. Now I know a large number of Brown's fans would like for us to stay where we are and either pick a qb/BPA with number four or trade up to get our pick of the whole lot. The more and more I study this draft and the available players and evaluate the "big three" quarterbacks coming out this year the greater my desire is for us to, as Farmer has hinted, throw some curveballs. I'm not saying that the Bottles, Bridgewater, abd manziel have nothing to offer us or are going to be busts (honestly who truely knows such things, all we have to go on is what we see with our eyes and hear with our ears). Quite frankly the more I listen to and watch manziel I find myself being sucked into the blackhole that is the JFF enigma. But the mass that sits between my ears is screaming don't take the bait! Trade back goddamnit! Thankfully I don't actually have to make these decisions. But lets picture this: trading down from the 4th overall and picking up a later 1st rounder and whatever else is packaged into the deal. With the amount of depth available at many positions (particularly WR) we could easily nail some extraordinary talent in the latter part of the first round as well as 2 and 3, likely even 4. So, if a guy like Mariota is more up Farmers alley, what could be better than stockpiling as many picks and grabbing as much potential talent as possible this year and then hold nothing back at the next draft, whatever it takes, to get us into a position (no.1 overall) to grab potentially a much more capable candidate for franchise qb (with a shit ton of talent to go with him if we trade down and grab more picks this year). We could easily pickup two great WR this year in the bottom 1st/2nd (np.2 and a kickass demon to work the slot). Couple that with one or two rb selections (hyde/seastrunk imo), some OL help, and a couple depth picks and come next draft we could pick a middling journeyman and still have some success. But if we bet the farm (kinda like Washington with RG3, but with weapons in place prior to doing so) next year and do take a guy like Mariota, we can have a chance at true long-term sucrss and stability. Just a thought.... I'm not even one hundred percent sold in this line of thinking myself, but the more I mull over it the more it makes sense. Or we can just say fuck it all and JFF HERE WE COME BABY! Hahaha wooo!

          too many picks as is. If we dont pick QB at 4 we should take the BPA thats not a reciever. We have plenty of ammo to get a third 1st or another 2nd.
          miktoxic miktoxicM
          • 13k Posts
          • 1k Reputation
          miktoxicM miktoxic wrote on last edited by miktoxic
          #4

          XxDaBuckeyexX said:

          too many picks as is. If we dont pick QB at 4 we should take the BPA thats not a reciever. We have plenty of ammo to get a third 1st or another 2nd.

          i can live with that also. i'm just not sold on any of these guys(QBs). i mean i lean towards some guys more than others. what i've watched of the combine so far today is more i've seen of any of these guys period. i mean i'm not going to youtube and watching highlight reels of every player who i'd like us to draft. i mean i liked what i saw out of a lot of QBs AND WRs and could see us drafting a number of them.

          can't wait to see the RBs.

          1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • GuNNerGatSKi G Reacting Well Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
            • 331 Posts
            • 86 Reputation
            G GuNNerGatSKi wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Yup and the more I hear from farmer the more I see him as a guy smart enough to understand and undertake the approach I outlined above. Logically, it makes so much sense to solidify the OL, receiver corp, and backfield before you bring in a franchise qb to get mutilated behind a unstable at best OL and an incomplete receiving group. Filling some holes in our defense will go a long long way as well. Therefore, if and when we go all in on a franchise qb (hopefully next year), we will have plenty of chess pieces in place for him to maximize his chances at being a prolific and consistent answer to pur qb woes.

            1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • jcam222 jcam222J Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
              • 3k Posts
              • 873 Reputation
              jcam222J jcam222 wrote on last edited by
              #6

              It will not surprise me at all if we move down but stay in the top 10 and as a result add an extra 2nd round pick. It will also not surprise me if we then somehow convert one of those 2nds and one of our 3rd to the 2015 draft.

              1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • GuNNerGatSKi G Reacting Well Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                • 331 Posts
                • 86 Reputation
                G GuNNerGatSKi wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Exactly jcam if we can secure another first rounder for 2015 we will have all the fucking ammo we need to bet the farm and go balls out for the no.1 overall pick and nab our qbotf

                1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • GuNNerGatSKi G Reacting Well Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                  • 331 Posts
                  • 86 Reputation
                  G GuNNerGatSKi wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  I'm just not enamored with any of the qb in this draft. That's not to say I'm not intrigued by any of them.... I just can't see myself handing the keys to the car to any of them without having some major doubts....

                  Flyin JF 1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • G GuNNerGatSKi

                    I'm just not enamored with any of the qb in this draft. That's not to say I'm not intrigued by any of them.... I just can't see myself handing the keys to the car to any of them without having some major doubts....

                    Flyin J Flyin JF One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                    • 2k Posts
                    • 114 Reputation
                    Flyin JF Flyin J wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    GuNNerGatSKy said:

                    I'm just not enamored with any of the qb in this draft. That's not to say I'm not intrigued by any of them.... I just can't see myself handing the keys to the car to any of them without having some major doubts....

                    join the club. But to be fair, I would say thats been the case for every QB to ever play the game minus a select few.
                    G 1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • Flyin JF Flyin J

                      GuNNerGatSKy said:

                      I'm just not enamored with any of the qb in this draft. That's not to say I'm not intrigued by any of them.... I just can't see myself handing the keys to the car to any of them without having some major doubts....

                      join the club. But to be fair, I would say thats been the case for every QB to ever play the game minus a select few.
                      GuNNerGatSKi G Reacting Well Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                      • 331 Posts
                      • 86 Reputation
                      G GuNNerGatSKi wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      XxDaBuckeyexX said:

                      join the club. But to be fair, I would say thats been the case for every QB to ever play the game minus a select few.

                      Yes and no. Yes you never say any draft pick is going to be a surefire thing. But there are certainly much better candidates than what's available this year. Guys who yes there are some concerns about but there minor. I have at least one major bone to pick with every qb in this draft.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply

                      Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                      Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                      With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                      Register Login
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      Theme
                      • System
                      • Light
                      • Dark
                      The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                      The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Forums
                      • Recent
                      • Popular
                      • Users
                      • Donate