Rumor: Rubin may be the next cut
-
I said a fourth to sixth rounder or maybe we could trade him for a real fullback. All the same, fuck off.
I said a fourth to sixth rounder or maybe we could trade him for a real fullback. All the same, fuck off.
Maybe a bag of chips and a coke, or a bag of T-Rich's sperm?
We love ya PG- we're all waiting when Richardson has a beastly year.
I just had all kinds of beastly ideas involving Richardson, but I'll refrain in case the kids are reading. -
No. Not clear about that. I'd prefer Taylor any day, and honestly I think Winn and Bryant are equal to or better than Rubin. So, NO we're not clear about that at all...
Rubin holds and sheds lineman as well as Taylor but moves laterally better and gets up field better. Taylor relies heavily on his sheer size to clog up lanes. Overall Rubin is a much better lineman and adaptable to any front whereas Taylor is vastly more suited to the 3-4. Really not sure what you're thinking about Winn and Bryant. Winn is not even close yet to being as good as Rubin and Bryant is a 5 tech DE so I really don't know why you're mentioning him because he plays a different position. This is football 101 c'mon guys.
Rubin holds and sheds lineman as well as Taylor but moves laterally better and gets up field better. Taylor relies heavily on his sheer size to clog up lanes. Overall Rubin is a much better lineman and adaptable to any front whereas Taylor is vastly more suited to the 3-4. Really not sure what you're thinking about Winn and Bryant. Winn is not even close yet to being as good as Rubin and Bryant is a 5 tech DE so I really don't know why you're mentioning him because he plays a different position. This is football 101 c'mon guys.
ok now is this who you are?
disaster browns, mr. doomsday?
i loved DQ too, but ask his agent about that one. rubin hasn't been cut yet so calm the fuck down. let's see what happens before May whatever and our 4th pick. could be anything that you dream of. or a nightmare that you can't wake up from.
-
I said a fourth to sixth rounder or maybe we could trade him for a real fullback. All the same, fuck off.
Maybe a bag of chips and a coke, or a bag of T-Rich's sperm?
We love ya PG- we're all waiting when Richardson has a beastly year.
I just had all kinds of beastly ideas involving Richardson, but I'll refrain in case the kids are reading.Maybe a bag of chips and a coke, or a bag of T-Rich's sperm?
We love ya PG- we're all waiting when Richardson has a beastly year.
I just had all kinds of beastly ideas involving Richardson, but I'll refrain in case the kids are reading.and to follow manziel or carr.
oops i said it again.
i think you and walter white should go to the drive in and have a tug-a-thon.
-
Rubin holds and sheds lineman as well as Taylor but moves laterally better and gets up field better. Taylor relies heavily on his sheer size to clog up lanes. Overall Rubin is a much better lineman and adaptable to any front whereas Taylor is vastly more suited to the 3-4. Really not sure what you're thinking about Winn and Bryant. Winn is not even close yet to being as good as Rubin and Bryant is a 5 tech DE so I really don't know why you're mentioning him because he plays a different position. This is football 101 c'mon guys.
ok now is this who you are?
disaster browns, mr. doomsday?
i loved DQ too, but ask his agent about that one. rubin hasn't been cut yet so calm the fuck down. let's see what happens before May whatever and our 4th pick. could be anything that you dream of. or a nightmare that you can't wake up from.
. rubin hasn't been cut yet so calm the fuck down.
1) i'm calm bro thanks
2) I know he hasn't been cut, but he likely will be given that we cut DQ for the exact same reason.
3) I'm not so mad about us letting these vets go as I am that we didn't get anything for them. For us some us to say that we couldnt' have gotten any trade value for DQ is absurd and even more absurd for Rubin. Rubin has had high trade value for years. There are so many teams out there that would stab a ngr in the dick for our backup lineman let alone the top two in Rubin an Taylor.
-
. rubin hasn't been cut yet so calm the fuck down.
1) i'm calm bro thanks
2) I know he hasn't been cut, but he likely will be given that we cut DQ for the exact same reason.
3) I'm not so mad about us letting these vets go as I am that we didn't get anything for them. For us some us to say that we couldnt' have gotten any trade value for DQ is absurd and even more absurd for Rubin. Rubin has had high trade value for years. There are so many teams out there that would stab a ngr in the dick for our backup lineman let alone the top two in Rubin an Taylor.
youre wrong. Taylor would have a trade market, because hes on his rookie deal. Rubin and Jackson have ZERO trade value. Nobody is going to trade draft picks for overpaid players pushing 30.1) i'm calm bro thanks
2) I know he hasn't been cut, but he likely will be given that we cut DQ for the exact same reason.
3) I'm not so mad about us letting these vets go as I am that we didn't get anything for them. For us some us to say that we couldnt' have gotten any trade value for DQ is absurd and even more absurd for Rubin. Rubin has had high trade value for years. There are so many teams out there that would stab a ngr in the dick for our backup lineman let alone the top two in Rubin an Taylor.
-
rubin has more value staying with us as depth in case of an injury. let's hope the FO can work out something with this guy.
-
After meeting with Browns officials at the Combine, the agent for LE Ahtyba Rubin is confident the team will retain Rubin at his current salary.
After an up-and-down 2013 campaign, Rubin is owed a $6.6 million base salary and $300,000 workout bonus. "They're happy to have him on team, no changes to his salary," agent Alan Herman told the Cleveland Plain Dealer. Rubin turns 28 in July. The Browns don't necessarily need cap room -- they're $56.9 million under -- but could lower Rubin's figure by signing him to a long-term extension.
-
thank you. once again i am proven right.
just like in West Side Steve's movie review thread about the oscars.
man i should be the GM.
-
Same for DQ, we could have gotten a second rounder for DQ, at the least.
I don't know man.....his salaries the next several years were around 7 mil per year. I think that would be hard to trade.
I am sure we didn't go through this process of making the decision to release him without even considering trading him. Why would we not consider that? Answer: We did. Nobody was interested. Why trade for a guy when you think there is a good chance the other team is going to release him? If you really want him, you can always try to make the deal once the other team elects to keep him. Let them pay the massive bonus.
Had we traded for a guy like DQ and had to pay out 5 mil in bonus money, pay 7 mil a year for the 2 years remaining on his contract AND give up a 2nd round pick....LOL...how do you think that would fly?
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login