Skip to content

Browns want Edelman, Shields and Schaub

The Browns Board
41 23 2.1k
  • C Clevfan4life wrote on last edited by
    #3

    would be interesting if they got all those guys, specifically what it means for the draft. With Edelman, Gordon and Cameron....not sure we need to spend the #4 on a wide receiver. I would have to think they're going for a LB'er than. Doubtful Mack would come off the board before #4, but if he somehow would than Clowney would be the next logical pick if he's still around.

  • LBC mikeL LBC mike wrote on last edited by
    #4

    Free Agency will totally effect our draft options. We have too many holes to fill. I DO NOT want a QB in the 1st round. Would not mind BPA with the 1st pick. someone who comes in and makes an impact and improves the team.

  • miktoxicM miktoxic wrote on last edited by
    #5

    i call bullshit.

  • Free Agency will totally effect our draft options. We have too many holes to fill. I DO NOT want a QB in the 1st round. Would not mind BPA with the 1st pick. someone who comes in and makes an impact and improves the team.

    jcam222J jcam222 wrote on last edited by
    #6

    @lbc-mike said:

    Free Agency will totally effect our draft options. We have too many holes to fill. I DO NOT want a QB in the 1st round. Would not mind BPA with the 1st pick. someone who comes in and makes an impact and improves the team.

    This is the draft of all drafts to trade down in. I hope we trade down twice in the first round. I know I am in the minority but you can accumulate some serious talent in this draft with the number of 1st and 2nd round picks you would have with trade downs.

  • C CLEVELandMILIDH wrote on last edited by
    #7

    Shields signed with Green Bay

  • @lbc-mike said:

    Free Agency will totally effect our draft options. We have too many holes to fill. I DO NOT want a QB in the 1st round. Would not mind BPA with the 1st pick. someone who comes in and makes an impact and improves the team.

    This is the draft of all drafts to trade down in. I hope we trade down twice in the first round. I know I am in the minority but you can accumulate some serious talent in this draft with the number of 1st and 2nd round picks you would have with trade downs.

    darren15D darren15 wrote on last edited by
    #8

    @jcam222 said:

    This is the draft of all drafts to trade down in. I hope we trade down twice in the first round. I know I am in the minority but you can accumulate some serious talent in this draft with the number of 1st and 2nd round picks you would have with trade downs.

    I agree if Minnesota want to move up and grab our 4th for their 8th and 2nd rounder I am all for it ......

  • @jcam222 said:

    This is the draft of all drafts to trade down in. I hope we trade down twice in the first round. I know I am in the minority but you can accumulate some serious talent in this draft with the number of 1st and 2nd round picks you would have with trade downs.

    I agree if Minnesota want to move up and grab our 4th for their 8th and 2nd rounder I am all for it ......

    jcam222J jcam222 wrote on last edited by
    #9

    @darren15 said:

    I agree if Minnesota want to move up and grab our 4th for their 8th and 2nd rounder I am all for it ......

    lol in the simulator I traded down to 6 with Atlanta and then 8 with Minnesota and picked up 2 more 2nds and 2 more 3rds.

  • VagitronV Vagitron wrote on last edited by
    #10

    Why would the pats let edleman go?

  • @darren15 said:

    I agree if Minnesota want to move up and grab our 4th for their 8th and 2nd rounder I am all for it ......

    lol in the simulator I traded down to 6 with Atlanta and then 8 with Minnesota and picked up 2 more 2nds and 2 more 3rds.

    Tim Couch Pulls OutT Tim Couch Pulls Out wrote on last edited by
    #11

    @jcam222 said:

    lol in the simulator I traded down to 6 with Atlanta and then 8 with Minnesota and picked up 2 more 2nds and 2 more 3rds.

    And in real life that never happens.

  • B beare wrote on last edited by
    #12

    actually it could happen depending on what players are still sitting there

  • actually it could happen depending on what players are still sitting there

    VagitronV Vagitron wrote on last edited by
    #13

    @beare said:

    actually it could happen depending on what players are still sitting there

    In a draft this deep that is never going to happen.

  • miktoxicM miktoxic wrote on last edited by
    #14

    hey don't be surprised if farmer doesn't pull that out of his ass.

  • nickersN nickers wrote on last edited by
    #15

    I dont want Schaub..he blows

  • 7 7moses7 wrote on last edited by
    #16

    Schaub on my nob.

  • @jcam222 said:

    lol in the simulator I traded down to 6 with Atlanta and then 8 with Minnesota and picked up 2 more 2nds and 2 more 3rds.

    And in real life that never happens.

    jcam222J jcam222 wrote on last edited by
    #17

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    And in real life that never happens

    I know, it is however realistic to think we could pick up a 2nd round pick from Atlanta or Minnesota in a tradedown if their guy is on the board at 4 and that I would do in a heartbeat.

  • @beare said:

    actually it could happen depending on what players are still sitting there

    In a draft this deep that is never going to happen.

    jcam222J jcam222 wrote on last edited by
    #18

    @vagitron said:

    In a draft this deep that is never going to happen.

    There is a good chance Atlanta has a love affair with Clowney and Minnesota with one of the QB's. If either of them are there at 4 there is a good chance we pick up a 2nd rounder. I have no delusion of picking up two extra 2nds in real life.

  • hammertimeH hammertime wrote on last edited by
    #19

    we all know how those second rounders turn out.....

  • thenew23T thenew23 wrote on last edited by
    #20

    Edelman... no thanks. He's a product of Belichick/Brady

    Shields... re-signed in GB

    Schaub... I had to really think about this one before weighing in, but I'd be happy if he signed in Cleveland. He has been a starter 7 years in the NFL and racked up 4,000 yds 3 times, a career 130 - 84 TD-INT ratio, and solid passer ratings in 6 of those 7 years. Last year he struggled, but at 31 years old he's not done and he should have something left to offer.

    I wouldn't promise Schaub a starting job b/c I would still want him to beat out Hoyer in camp, but I'd love to have that security to get rid of Weeden and Campbell. Plus, this is Hoyer's last year under contract so if he proves to be worthless, we would have something else there AND if he proves to be the future QB, we have a good veteran backup and security to draft somebody who we can develop. Having said all that, I would not only offer Schaub a contract, but I would also draft one of those 1st round QBs. Imagine Schaub/Hoyer/Bortles... That would give us 2-3 years to develop our rookie, who has a very high ceiling... The other option is to keep Schaub/Hoyer this year, and draft your guy next year, but ANY team that is looking into "next year's draft" for their QB is not looking to win any time soon...

  • tml1138T tml1138 wrote on last edited by
    #21

    http://nfl.si.com/2014/03/11/matt-schaub-cleveland-browns-free-agency/

    Did a morning search on Browns news and found this, much to my dismay. I just see it as another Jake Delhomme situation. Meh!

  • http://nfl.si.com/2014/03/11/matt-schaub-cleveland-browns-free-agency/

    Did a morning search on Browns news and found this, much to my dismay. I just see it as another Jake Delhomme situation. Meh!

    Z Zombo wrote on last edited by
    #22

    @tml1138 said:

    http://nfl.si.com/2014/03/11/matt-schaub-cleveland-browns-free-agency/

    Did a morning search on Browns news and found this, much to my dismay. I just see it as another Jake Delhomme situation. Meh!

    Ya, it feels like Delhommo, he's 34 and coming off a terrible decline year.

    But ... he's a two time Pro Bowler with experience in Shanny's offense.

    He would compete with Hoyer to start (I think Hoyer beats him out) ... which means we would roll the dice on #4 QB, but instead grab a Sammy Watkins and hanve a veteran passer throwing to Watkins, Gordon, Cameron. That doesn't sound bad. The QB will come ... let's get competitive again for chrissakes.

    Zombo