Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. Political Discussion
  3. Obamanomics 101

Obamanomics 101

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Political Discussion
13 Posts 9 Posters 919 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C Chicopee John

    Scott Player said:

    If this was the regular working class stiff they would be inprison for tax evasion.

    And Obama said the other day that this shouldn't matter because it is "undisputable and that he is the best man to fix our economy".

    So a tax scafflow (sp) is ready to become Secretary of the Treasury???????

    Hmmmmmmmmmmm.

    If the shoe was on the other foot. Then again, some believe Obama is super-human and can do no wrong.

    A very sad state IF this man gets accepted. Obama should revoke his nomination AND he should take himself out of contention.

    Legacy Fan Legacy FanL
    • 3k Posts
    • 197 Reputation
    Legacy FanL Legacy Fan wrote on last edited by
    #3

    @chicopee-john said:

    A very sad state IF this man gets accepted. Obama should revoke his nomination AND he should take himself out of contention.

    Agreed. And I'm all for the notion of hiring "reformed hackers to run IT security," but if Geithner got caught by the IRS he's not the best & brightest to fix anything.

    Even Wesley Snipes was able to slide under the radar for 6 or more years..

    Sure, luck means a lot in football. Not having a good quarterback is bad luck. -Don Shula
    1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • We need Tom Tupa W
      • 591 Posts
      • 11 Reputation
      W We need Tom Tupa wrote on last edited by
      #4

      He wasnt purposefully evading taxes. The stuff he missed wouldntve been caught by prompts in any of the most widely used tax software. And, no, other people would not have been put in prison for this; they wouldve been charged interest and a fine, just like Geithner was.

      If there is a lesson here, it's that our tax code is an absolute mess. Obama's best and brightest cant even figure out their personal tax liability. But dont worry, Obama has a plan to add more credits, raise more obscure rates, and introduce progessivity to more types of income tax.

      W ? D Legacy FanL 4 Replies Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • W We need Tom Tupa

        He wasnt purposefully evading taxes. The stuff he missed wouldntve been caught by prompts in any of the most widely used tax software. And, no, other people would not have been put in prison for this; they wouldve been charged interest and a fine, just like Geithner was.

        If there is a lesson here, it's that our tax code is an absolute mess. Obama's best and brightest cant even figure out their personal tax liability. But dont worry, Obama has a plan to add more credits, raise more obscure rates, and introduce progessivity to more types of income tax.

        Westside Steve W Dedicated Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Conversation Starter Week One Done One Year In One Month Later Very Popular
        • 39k Posts
        • 9k Reputation
        W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by Westside Steve
        #5

        @we-need-tom-tupa said:

        He wasnt purposefully evading taxes. The stuff he missed wouldntve been caught by prompts in any of the most widely used tax software. And, no, other people would not have been put in prison for this; they wouldve been charged interest and a fine, just like Geithner was.

        If there is a lesson here, it's that our tax code is an absolute mess.

        Probably planned that way.

        If anybody could figure this shit out they'd be even more pissed.

        😉

        WSS

        www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons
        1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • W We need Tom Tupa

          He wasnt purposefully evading taxes. The stuff he missed wouldntve been caught by prompts in any of the most widely used tax software. And, no, other people would not have been put in prison for this; they wouldve been charged interest and a fine, just like Geithner was.

          If there is a lesson here, it's that our tax code is an absolute mess. Obama's best and brightest cant even figure out their personal tax liability. But dont worry, Obama has a plan to add more credits, raise more obscure rates, and introduce progessivity to more types of income tax.

          Aloysius ?
          • Posts
          • 0 Reputation
          ? Aloysius wrote on last edited by
          #6

          @we-need-tom-tupa said:

          He wasnt purposefully evading taxes. The stuff he missed wouldntve been caught by prompts in any of the most widely used tax software. And, no, other people would not have been put in prison for this; they wouldve been charged interest and a fine, just like Geithner was.

          Ah, the voice of reason...

          If there is a lesson here, it's that our tax code is an absolute mess. Obama's best and brightest cant even figure out their personal tax liability. But dont worry, Obama has a plan to add more credits, raise more obscure rates, and introduce progessivity to more types of income tax.

          Damn you, Toop 😉

          W 1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • ? Guest

            @we-need-tom-tupa said:

            He wasnt purposefully evading taxes. The stuff he missed wouldntve been caught by prompts in any of the most widely used tax software. And, no, other people would not have been put in prison for this; they wouldve been charged interest and a fine, just like Geithner was.

            Ah, the voice of reason...

            If there is a lesson here, it's that our tax code is an absolute mess. Obama's best and brightest cant even figure out their personal tax liability. But dont worry, Obama has a plan to add more credits, raise more obscure rates, and introduce progessivity to more types of income tax.

            Damn you, Toop 😉

            We need Tom Tupa W
            • 591 Posts
            • 11 Reputation
            W We need Tom Tupa wrote on last edited by
            #7

            Aloysius said:

            Ah, the voice of reason...

            Damn you, Toop 😉

            I had to get a shot in. 🙂

            Regardless of what you think about the last sentence, the criticism of the tax code is certainly warranted.

            1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • W We need Tom Tupa

              He wasnt purposefully evading taxes. The stuff he missed wouldntve been caught by prompts in any of the most widely used tax software. And, no, other people would not have been put in prison for this; they wouldve been charged interest and a fine, just like Geithner was.

              If there is a lesson here, it's that our tax code is an absolute mess. Obama's best and brightest cant even figure out their personal tax liability. But dont worry, Obama has a plan to add more credits, raise more obscure rates, and introduce progessivity to more types of income tax.

              damajuki D
              • 475 Posts
              • 0 Reputation
              D damajuki wrote on last edited by
              #8

              @we-need-tom-tupa said:

              He wasnt purposefully evading taxes. The stuff he missed wouldntve been caught by prompts in any of the most widely used tax software. And, no, other people would not have been put in prison for this; they wouldve been charged interest and a fine, just like Geithner was.

              If there is a lesson here, it's that our tax code is an absolute mess. Obama's best and brightest cant even figure out their personal tax liability. But dont worry, Obama has a plan to add more credits, raise more obscure rates, and introduce progessivity to more types of income tax.

              Great post, Toop. Good to have another voice of reason back to see if we can use this place again.

              And I'd like to add that if anyone else on here has ever tried to pay their SE tax on their own before and NOT screwed it up, you deserve kudos. And the right to throw the first stone at this guy.

              Otherwise, it is what it is. The guy screwed up and paid the price.

              1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • DieHardBrownsFan DieHardBrownsFanD Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Collaborator Posting Machine First Post One Month Later Week One Done One Year In
                • 28k Posts
                • 6k Reputation
                DieHardBrownsFanD DieHardBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
                #9

                I still think it is strange you are making the guy SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY when he made such a BIG mistake. Kind of strange that none of you except a few see it that way. Must be the kool aid?

                "You planning on having a long relationship with that glass or are you going to drink it? Drink up, man. Maybe we can get another.” - Janis Joplin, 1970.
                1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • SiperBowl S
                  • 328 Posts
                  • 5 Reputation
                  S SiperBowl wrote on last edited by
                  #10

                  It is the Kool-Aid there are some who are so partisan that they see the speck in your eye while there is log in their own.

                  Kordell Stewart & Big Ben have been the butt of gay jokes (pun intended) and it turns out his Steelers teammates feel the same way.
                  1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • W We need Tom Tupa

                    He wasnt purposefully evading taxes. The stuff he missed wouldntve been caught by prompts in any of the most widely used tax software. And, no, other people would not have been put in prison for this; they wouldve been charged interest and a fine, just like Geithner was.

                    If there is a lesson here, it's that our tax code is an absolute mess. Obama's best and brightest cant even figure out their personal tax liability. But dont worry, Obama has a plan to add more credits, raise more obscure rates, and introduce progessivity to more types of income tax.

                    Legacy Fan Legacy FanL
                    • 3k Posts
                    • 197 Reputation
                    Legacy FanL Legacy Fan wrote on last edited by Legacy Fan
                    #11

                    @we-need-tom-tupa said:

                    He wasnt purposefully evading taxes. The stuff he missed wouldntve been caught by prompts in any of the most widely used tax software. And, no, other people would not have been put in prison for this; they wouldve been charged interest and a fine, just like Geithner was.

                    "Geithner paid the back taxes plus interest for the years 2003 and 2004 after being audited by the Internal Revenue Service. But he did not pay taxes he owed for 2001 and 2002, even though he had made the same mistakes for those years, until shortly before he was nominated by Obama last November to be treasury secretary"

                    I'd like to know more about that part of the story before I absolve him of any wrongdoing.

                    And hopefully the Wesley Snipes bit indicated I wasn't completely serious.

                    Maybe I was too hard on Rev. Lowery. 😒

                    If there is a lesson here, it's that our tax code is an absolute mess. Obama's best and brightest cant even figure out their personal tax liability. But dont worry, Obama has a plan to add more credits, raise more obscure rates, and introduce progessivity to more types of income tax.

                    Agree totally.

                    Sure, luck means a lot in football. Not having a good quarterback is bad luck. -Don Shula
                    1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • We need Tom Tupa W
                      • 591 Posts
                      • 11 Reputation
                      W We need Tom Tupa wrote on last edited by
                      #12

                      Seriously?

                      http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01...tax-problem/?hp

                      President Obama’s pick for secretary of health and human services, Tom Daschle, filed amended tax returns and paid more than $100,000 in back taxes on Jan. 2, administration officials said on Friday...

                      An administration official said that Mr. Daschle had paid $31,462 in back taxes and interest for 2005, $35,546 for 2006 and $34,935 for 2007.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply
                      • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
                        • 64k Posts
                        • 8k Reputation
                        C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
                        #13

                        Unbelievable. Just... that.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Quote Reply

                        Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                        Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                        With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                        Register Login
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        Theme
                        • System
                        • Light
                        • Dark
                        The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                        The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Forums
                        • Recent
                        • Popular
                        • Users
                        • Donate