Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. NorrinRadd12 will be released by The Browns Board today

NorrinRadd12 will be released by The Browns Board today

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Browns Board
154 Posts 35 Posters 8.2k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • thenew23 thenew23T
    • 2k Posts
    • 233 Reputation
    thenew23T thenew23 wrote on last edited by
    #22

    I rescind some of my insults. NO we will not trade a 1st round pick for him. NO he is not worth $18-20 mil a year. BUT I guess the trade here is somewhat of a possibility. I HOPE we only give them a 3rd or 4th, and we re-structure Revis' deal b/c we can't afford to pay him $16 million this year if we want to still sign Whitner and other FAs. This would be pretty exciting if it happens

    #Justsayin'
    1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • Flyin J Flyin JF One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
      • 2k Posts
      • 114 Reputation
      Flyin JF Flyin J wrote on last edited by
      #23

      Giving a CB QB money is just dumb. I dont care how good he is. I love Revis as a player, but taking his ridiculous contract AND giving up valuable draft picks better not be happening.

      1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • NorrinRadd12 N
        • 11 Posts
        • 0 Reputation
        N NorrinRadd12 wrote on last edited by
        #24

        The trade is being finalized. It includes a first round pick. They're trying to work out the compensation for Alex Mack; the Buccaneers want him and he wants the Buccaneers. Instead of trying to come up with a contract that the Browns won't match they're trying to go about it a more civil way.

        Mr. Make-BelieveM miktoxicM 2 Replies Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • Flyin J Flyin JF One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
          • 2k Posts
          • 114 Reputation
          Flyin JF Flyin J wrote on last edited by
          #25

          Trade is happening only if Revis agrees to re-do his contract.

          1 Reply Last reply
          👍
          Quote Reply
          • N NorrinRadd12

            @the-gipper said:

            Revis's contract calls for a 16 million dollar salary. No team, including the Browns is going to trade for that.

            Revis could in fact be released and become a FA...and then any team can negotiate with him....at whatever price.

            (but he won't be getting 16 mill)

            His contract includes a provision to turn his base salary into a signing bonus, which can make his 2014 cap number $6.4M. On the open market Revis would get $18-20M a year.

            hoorta hoortaH Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
            • 20k Posts
            • 5k Reputation
            hoortaH hoorta wrote on last edited by
            #26

            @norrinradd12 said:

            His contract includes a provision to turn his base salary into a signing bonus, which can make his 2014 cap number $6.4M. On the open market Revis would get $18-20M a year.

            @clevelandmilidh said:

            Your insane, too many good corners available. Nobody would pay that

            @norrinradd12 said:

            And he would hang up on you.

            Are you his agent?

            1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • N NorrinRadd12

              The trade is being finalized. It includes a first round pick. They're trying to work out the compensation for Alex Mack; the Buccaneers want him and he wants the Buccaneers. Instead of trying to come up with a contract that the Browns won't match they're trying to go about it a more civil way.

              Mr. Make-Believe Mr. Make-BelieveM Very Popular Dedicated Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
              • 719 Posts
              • 122 Reputation
              Mr. Make-BelieveM Mr. Make-Believe wrote on last edited by Mr. Make-Believe
              #27

              @norrinradd12 said:

              The trade is being finalized. It includes a first round pick. They're trying to work out the compensation for Alex Mack; the Buccaneers want him and he wants the Buccaneers. Instead of trying to come up with a contract that the Browns won't match they're trying to go about it a more civil way.

              Mack is involved now too? Makes the deal just a little less exciting.

              bbedwardB 1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • N NorrinRadd12

                @the-gipper said:

                Revis's contract calls for a 16 million dollar salary. No team, including the Browns is going to trade for that.

                Revis could in fact be released and become a FA...and then any team can negotiate with him....at whatever price.

                (but he won't be getting 16 mill)

                His contract includes a provision to turn his base salary into a signing bonus, which can make his 2014 cap number $6.4M. On the open market Revis would get $18-20M a year.

                The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
                • 57k Posts
                • 4k Reputation
                The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
                #28

                @norrinradd12 said:

                His contract includes a provision to turn his base salary into a signing bonus, which can make his 2014 cap number $6.4M. On the open market Revis would get $18-20M a year.

                No way. 16.4 M maybe. If he were to only cost 6.4 then any number of bites on that fishhook would have been made.

                chocoC 1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • Mr. Make-BelieveM Mr. Make-Believe

                  @norrinradd12 said:

                  The trade is being finalized. It includes a first round pick. They're trying to work out the compensation for Alex Mack; the Buccaneers want him and he wants the Buccaneers. Instead of trying to come up with a contract that the Browns won't match they're trying to go about it a more civil way.

                  Mack is involved now too? Makes the deal just a little less exciting.

                  bbedward bbedwardB Conversation Starter Reacting Well Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                  • 9k Posts
                  • 1k Reputation
                  bbedwardB bbedward wrote on last edited by
                  #29

                  @mr.-make-believe said:

                  Mack is involved now too? Makes the deal just a little less exciting.

                  Sounds like Mack doesn't want to be here though.

                  Mr. Make-BelieveM 1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • John.R.Brown1968 John.R.Brown1968J
                    • 199 Posts
                    • 16 Reputation
                    John.R.Brown1968J John.R.Brown1968 wrote on last edited by
                    #30

                    I like the idea of Revis, and regardless of if there's potential truth to these rumors, I don't like it if it includes not only a 1st round pick, but also a key free agent. There's other parts to this rumor floating around, that Revis could be had for a mid to late round pick, so why on earth would they trade not only a 1st rounder, but Mack as well. It doesn't make any sense, even if the front office is trying to use "better than getting nothing for Mack" logic. Hell No.

                    hoortaH 1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • bbedwardB bbedward

                      @mr.-make-believe said:

                      Mack is involved now too? Makes the deal just a little less exciting.

                      Sounds like Mack doesn't want to be here though.

                      Mr. Make-Believe Mr. Make-BelieveM Very Popular Dedicated Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                      • 719 Posts
                      • 122 Reputation
                      Mr. Make-BelieveM Mr. Make-Believe wrote on last edited by
                      #31

                      @bbedward said:

                      Sounds like Mack doesn't want to be here though.

                      Yeah, I know... Flying fuck.

                      Revis would be great, but I'm having some trouble forging positivity for this offseason.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply
                      • gftChris gftChrisG
                        • 13k Posts
                        • 428 Reputation
                        gftChrisG gftChris wrote on last edited by
                        #32

                        They'll trade for Mack and then, what - his contract is up in about 4 hours.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Quote Reply
                        • CLEinCHI CLEinCHIC
                          • 201 Posts
                          • 15 Reputation
                          CLEinCHIC CLEinCHI wrote on last edited by
                          #33

                          browns could resign mack at a deal that the bucs want, and trade for revis with a condition that he would restructure....what would you rather have mack at 10 mil for one year and a draft pick or Revis for 11 m a year for the next 4 years? ( 11m and 4 years are guesses)

                          John.R.Brown1968J Mr. Make-BelieveM 2 Replies Last reply
                          Quote Reply
                          • CLEinCHIC CLEinCHI

                            browns could resign mack at a deal that the bucs want, and trade for revis with a condition that he would restructure....what would you rather have mack at 10 mil for one year and a draft pick or Revis for 11 m a year for the next 4 years? ( 11m and 4 years are guesses)

                            John.R.Brown1968 John.R.Brown1968J
                            • 199 Posts
                            • 16 Reputation
                            John.R.Brown1968J John.R.Brown1968 wrote on last edited by
                            #34

                            @cleinchi said:

                            browns could resign mack at a deal that the bucs want, and trade for revis with a condition that he would restructure....what would you rather have mack at 10 mil for one year and a draft pick or Revis for 11 m a year for the next 4 years? ( 11m and 4 years are guesses)

                            The Browns are also going to have to resign Haden. That's a lot of money to tie up in one position. And regardless of Revis having a good year last year, he's still not that far removed from a torn ACL, and he's aging.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            Quote Reply
                            • CLEinCHIC CLEinCHI

                              browns could resign mack at a deal that the bucs want, and trade for revis with a condition that he would restructure....what would you rather have mack at 10 mil for one year and a draft pick or Revis for 11 m a year for the next 4 years? ( 11m and 4 years are guesses)

                              Mr. Make-Believe Mr. Make-BelieveM Very Popular Dedicated Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                              • 719 Posts
                              • 122 Reputation
                              Mr. Make-BelieveM Mr. Make-Believe wrote on last edited by
                              #35

                              @cleinchi said:

                              browns could resign mack at a deal that the bucs want, and trade for revis with a condition that he would restructure....what would you rather have mack at 10 mil for one year and a draft pick or Revis for 11 m a year for the next 4 years? ( 11m and 4 years are guesses)

                              I'd rather not have to take so many steps back in order to go forward.

                              We lose Ward and Mack and pick up Revis? Part of me is excited. Most of me is pissed that we're no further ahead overall.

                              gftChrisG 1 Reply Last reply
                              Quote Reply
                              • Mr. Make-BelieveM Mr. Make-Believe

                                @cleinchi said:

                                browns could resign mack at a deal that the bucs want, and trade for revis with a condition that he would restructure....what would you rather have mack at 10 mil for one year and a draft pick or Revis for 11 m a year for the next 4 years? ( 11m and 4 years are guesses)

                                I'd rather not have to take so many steps back in order to go forward.

                                We lose Ward and Mack and pick up Revis? Part of me is excited. Most of me is pissed that we're no further ahead overall.

                                gftChris gftChrisG
                                • 13k Posts
                                • 428 Reputation
                                gftChrisG gftChris wrote on last edited by
                                #36

                                @mr.-make-believe said:

                                I'd rather not have to take so many steps back in order to go forward.

                                We lose Ward and Mack and pick up Revis? Part of me is excited. Most of me is pissed that we're no further ahead overall.

                                Word is we're signing Whitner.

                                Mr. Make-BelieveM 1 Reply Last reply
                                Quote Reply
                                • CLEinCHI CLEinCHIC
                                  • 201 Posts
                                  • 15 Reputation
                                  CLEinCHIC CLEinCHI wrote on last edited by
                                  #37

                                  now reports are dansby and whitner coming to the browns.... our new identity... bone crushing defense

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  Quote Reply
                                  • GoBrowns 0 GoBrowns 0G
                                    • 39 Posts
                                    • 1 Reputation
                                    GoBrowns 0G GoBrowns 0 wrote on last edited by
                                    #38

                                    Mack doesn't want to be here (my opinion). His agent is trying to produce a deal that the browns can't match.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    Quote Reply
                                    • John.R.Brown1968J John.R.Brown1968

                                      I like the idea of Revis, and regardless of if there's potential truth to these rumors, I don't like it if it includes not only a 1st round pick, but also a key free agent. There's other parts to this rumor floating around, that Revis could be had for a mid to late round pick, so why on earth would they trade not only a 1st rounder, but Mack as well. It doesn't make any sense, even if the front office is trying to use "better than getting nothing for Mack" logic. Hell No.

                                      hoorta hoortaH Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                      • 20k Posts
                                      • 5k Reputation
                                      hoortaH hoorta wrote on last edited by
                                      #39

                                      @john.r.brown1968 said:

                                      I like the idea of Revis, and regardless of if there's potential truth to these rumors, I don't like it if it includes not only a 1st round pick, but also a key free agent. There's other parts to this rumor floating around, that Revis could be had for a mid to late round pick, so why on earth would they trade not only a 1st rounder, but Mack as well. It doesn't make any sense, even if the front office is trying to use "better than getting nothing for Mack" logic. Hell No.

                                      Mack for Revis straight up is reasonable- throwing in picks on top of it? Bite me. They both would have to restructure.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      Quote Reply
                                      • gftChrisG gftChris

                                        @mr.-make-believe said:

                                        I'd rather not have to take so many steps back in order to go forward.

                                        We lose Ward and Mack and pick up Revis? Part of me is excited. Most of me is pissed that we're no further ahead overall.

                                        Word is we're signing Whitner.

                                        Mr. Make-Believe Mr. Make-BelieveM Very Popular Dedicated Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                        • 719 Posts
                                        • 122 Reputation
                                        Mr. Make-BelieveM Mr. Make-Believe wrote on last edited by
                                        #40

                                        @gftchris said:

                                        Word is we're signing Whitner.

                                        First I've heard of Hitner. I guess I have to be like everyone else and just be patient.

                                        Whitner would help temper my disappointment though.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        Quote Reply
                                        • CLEinCHI CLEinCHIC
                                          • 201 Posts
                                          • 15 Reputation
                                          CLEinCHIC CLEinCHI wrote on last edited by
                                          #41
                                          NOTSCCleveland ‏@NOTSCCleveland 35s

                                          Per source, IF Browns trade for Revis, they could send Alex Mack to TB in the deal. Basic swap of salaries after restructure w/Revis.




                                          that would be awesome


                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Quote Reply

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Register Login
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          Theme
                                          • System
                                          • Light
                                          • Dark
                                          The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                                          The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Forums
                                          • Recent
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Donate