Robbers shot and killed, Families want to sue
-
I worked the majority of the year last year. I lost money through taxes there... I got my tax returns about a week ago. around $3400
I don't have much student loan debt at all. Like I have said before, I am fortunate enough that my dad is really good with money and saved up for me. I had/have a college fund.
-
Do you guys no how taxes work? How do you think I pay none? Lol
Who wants to make a bet that I pay taxes? Come on, who is interested? Only big money bets.
Do you guys no how taxes work? How do you think I pay none? Lol
Who wants to make a bet that I pay taxes? Come on, who is interested? Only big money bets.
I would bet that you have NO idea what the word KNOW means
-
Do you guys no how taxes work? How do you think I pay none? Lol
Who wants to make a bet that I pay taxes? Come on, who is interested? Only big money bets.
I would bet that you have NO idea what the word KNOW means
I would bet that you have NO idea what the word KNOW means
Lol, oops. Yep, typo. Now we'll have to see Cal freaking out about it...
-
I'm confused, didn't these robbers point their guns at the citizen? If so, the robbers threatened the man's life. It's too bad the robbers decided to pursue a criminal career because criminals tend do end up dead. Why is this even controversial? Os
***************************************
Good question. I think it has to do with political expediency at any cost. And, ulterior motives towards
complete gun bans - libs tend to hate what doesn't apply to them/things they can't relate to. Bickering over words/definitions,
and arguing straw men is just smokescreen.
-
Yes, liberals are the cause of all the bad in the world....
I did find this comment particularly hilarious though --- "libs tend to hate what doesn't apply to them/things they can't relate to" lol. Yeah Cal, that is totally only a liberal thing, hahaha. You also still seem to think a complete gun ban is a feasible thing, huh? That is you boogey man I guess. You get news from places that tell you it is going to happen and it scares you into listening to them. Brilliant.
Also, if you actually read the article, it said the two robbers did pull their guns on the citizen when he confronted them.
-
I'm confused, didn't these robbers point their guns at the citizen? If so, the robbers threatened the man's life. It's too bad the robbers decided to pursue a criminal career because criminals tend do end up dead. Why is this even controversial? Os
***************************************
Good question. I think it has to do with political expediency at any cost. And, ulterior motives towards
complete gun bans - libs tend to hate what doesn't apply to them/things they can't relate to. Bickering over words/definitions,
and arguing straw men is just smokescreen.
I'm confused, didn't these robbers point their guns at the citizen? If so, the robbers threatened the man's life. It's too bad the robbers decided to pursue a criminal career because criminals tend do end up dead. Why is this even controversial? Os
***************************************
Good question. I think it has to do with political expediency at any cost. And, ulterior motives towards
complete gun bans - libs tend to hate what doesn't apply to them/things they can't relate to. Bickering over words/definitions,
and arguing straw men is just smokescreen.
I wish you wouldn't jump to labels when explaining things, though.
Seriously, this statement "libs tend to hate what doesn't apply to them/things they can't relate to" would ring true if you replaced "libs" with "extremists". Many extremist conservatives tend to hate gays, blacks, Jews, Muslims, etc because they don't understand them, and even worse, they have an 'understanding' that is filtered through media sources that wish to promote such hate. Similarly, extremist liberals tend to hate the death penalty, guns, creationism and the concept of religion in general, and even worse, they have an 'understanding' that is filtered through media sources that wish to promote such hate. The worst of all, is once you hate something, you close off any possibility for understanding it. We'll all be better off if we shed the labels we use for ourselves and others and start thinking for ourselves.
-
I'm confused, didn't these robbers point their guns at the citizen? If so, the robbers threatened the man's life. It's too bad the robbers decided to pursue a criminal career because criminals tend do end up dead. Why is this even controversial? Os
***************************************
Good question. I think it has to do with political expediency at any cost. And, ulterior motives towards
complete gun bans - libs tend to hate what doesn't apply to them/things they can't relate to. Bickering over words/definitions,
and arguing straw men is just smokescreen.
I wish you wouldn't jump to labels when explaining things, though.
Seriously, this statement "libs tend to hate what doesn't apply to them/things they can't relate to" would ring true if you replaced "libs" with "extremists". Many extremist conservatives tend to hate gays, blacks, Jews, Muslims, etc because they don't understand them, and even worse, they have an 'understanding' that is filtered through media sources that wish to promote such hate. Similarly, extremist liberals tend to hate the death penalty, guns, creationism and the concept of religion in general, and even worse, they have an 'understanding' that is filtered through media sources that wish to promote such hate. The worst of all, is once you hate something, you close off any possibility for understanding it. We'll all be better off if we shed the labels we use for ourselves and others and start thinking for ourselves.
I wish you wouldn't jump to labels when explaining things, though.
Seriously, this statement "libs tend to hate what doesn't apply to them/things they can't relate to" would ring true if you replaced "libs" with "extremists". Many extremist conservatives tend to hate gays, blacks, Jews, Muslims, etc because they don't understand them, and even worse, they have an 'understanding' that is filtered through media sources that wish to promote such hate. Similarly, extremist liberals tend to hate the death penalty, guns, creationism and the concept of religion in general, and even worse, they have an 'understanding' that is filtered through media sources that wish to promote such hate. The worst of all, is once you hate something, you close off any possibility for understanding it. We'll all be better off if we shed the labels we use for ourselves and others and start thinking for ourselves.
I applaud the effort but some folks are too invested in their camp. It makes it easier for them because they don't have to think. Just get mad and buy some more of whatever it is the news source is trying to sell.
-
the reason I don't put a lot of stock in the conservative or liberal labels: is because I don't adhere truly to either one and I am always right.
WSS
www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons -
Seriously, this statement "libs tend to hate what doesn't apply to them/things they can't relate to" would ring true if you replaced "libs" with "extremists". Many extremist conservatives tend to hate gays, blacks, Jews, Muslims, etc because they don't understand them, and even worse, they have an 'understanding' that is filtered through media sources that wish to promote such hate. Similarly, extremist liberals tend to hate the death penalty, guns, creationism and the concept of religion in general, and even worse, they have an 'understanding' that is filtered through media sources that wish to promote such hate. The worst of all, is once you hate something, you close off any possibility for understanding it. We'll all be better off if we shed the labels we use for ourselves and others and start thinking for ourselves. Os
************************************************************
I admit this is true. Liberals are fascist extremists....
Okay, but seriously, I was just referring to the anti-gun crowd, the old anti-SUV crowd. The anti-hunting crowd.
The anti-meat eating crowd. I don't really know the % of those who are extremist, vs just regular folks who are
honestly liberal on some issues for reasons they have.
Using labels is a quicker way of saying something, when time contraints cause me to be not as accurate.
I admit it. I'll work on it. Hafta go split a few tons of wild cherry tree sections....
-
I don't think I have ever heard you specify the "type" of liberal in your rants. Just that liberals, in general, are bad in some way and anyone that disagrees with you about anything is in fact a liberal. If you were truly meaning to say the things you said in your previous post, I think we would have seen it at some point by now.
-
the reason I don't put a lot of stock in the conservative or liberal labels: is because I don't adhere truly to either one and I am always right.
WSS
the reason I don't put a lot of stock in the conservative or liberal labels: is because I don't adhere truly to either one and I am always right.
WSS
I also don't adhere to either side. Neither side can be right all the time
-
My right side is always right. My left side is never right.
A lot like magnetism. Opposite poles attract, matching poles
repel.
Some things are just natural law. @@
-
My right side is always right. My left side is never right.
A lot like magnetism. Opposite poles attract, matching poles
repel.
Some things are just natural law. @@
My right side is always right. My left side is never right.
A lot like magnetism. Opposite poles attract, matching poles
repel.
Some things are just natural law. @@
If you are going off of opposites attract and likes repel, then that isn't helping your point.
Right (political) and "right" (being correct) are like words and would repel
Left (political) and "right" (being correct) are opposite words and would attract
This, based on your logic, would make the left side attracted to being correct, and the right side repelling being correct
just saying
or the whole "poles" thing is absolutely Retarded when you bring it up...
-
"He's not no thug or nothing like that...he's a good boy" - well...I kinda disagree. Good boys don't commit armed robbery.
That being said, they surely didn't deserve to die for their crimes.
Also, I love the completely unbiased write up in "USConcealedCarry.com" - I wonder which side of the argument they're coming down on!
That being said, they surely didn't deserve to die for their crimes.
I've been thinking about this a bit and I'm starting to change my mind a little. The guys pulled their guns on someone who asked them to stop - knowing full well that he might be carrying a weapon. He absolutely has the right to defend himself with the necessary force - in this case, his own gun.
On the other hand, the fact that the bystander managed to shoot both of them before either fired a retaliatory reply would seem to indicate that they didn't have the inclination to actually kill anyone - they just wanted to use the guns to threaten and intimidate anyone standing in their way, not to cause any physical harm. But that's just guesswork, obviously.
-
Deserve to die or not, it's at least a risk you should understand you are taking on when you decide to break the law.
Motorcyclist who refuse to wear helmets don't deserve head injuries but....
WSS
www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons -
My right side is always right. My left side is never right.
A lot like magnetism. Opposite poles attract, matching poles
repel.
Some things are just natural law. @@
If you are going off of opposites attract and likes repel, then that isn't helping your point.
Right (political) and "right" (being correct) are like words and would repel
Left (political) and "right" (being correct) are opposite words and would attract
This, based on your logic, would make the left side attracted to being correct, and the right side repelling being correct
just saying
or the whole "poles" thing is absolutely Retarded when you bring it up...
If you are going off of opposites attract and likes repel, then that isn't helping your point.
Right (political) and "right" (being correct) are like words and would repel
Left (political) and "right" (being correct) are opposite words and would attract
This, based on your logic, would make the left side attracted to being correct, and the right side repelling being correct
just saying
or the whole "poles" thing is absolutely Retarded when you bring it up...
He has got a bit of a point cal. What say you?
-
Deserve to die or not, it's at least a risk you should understand you are taking on when you decide to break the law.
Motorcyclist who refuse to wear helmets don't deserve head injuries but....
WSS
Deserve to die or not, it's at least a risk you should understand you are taking on when you decide to break the law.
Motorcyclist who refuse to wear helmets don't deserve head injuries but....
WSS
Indeed. Don't half assed threaten another person's life with no real intent. It is a good way to end up bleeding to death next to some Slim Jims and Funyuns.
-
Right (political) and "right" (being correct) are like words and would repel
Left (political) and "right" (being correct) are opposite words and would attract Woody************************************
Yes, you are unable to follow the joke, and no surprise, then
you went for the "Retarded" attack again.
No big deal. It's all you can do. And you are very wrong. Which makes sense,
since you are a leftie, and as such, have never been right.
Now, for instance, your claim that the two words are "like" words. They are only alike
in spelling, and pronunciation - which makes them NOT opposites. Their meanings are
quite different, but also not opposite.
As for "left" and "left" - the same holds true, they are spelled the same, same pronunciation, but have different meanings,
but are not opposites.
Furthermore, "left" and "right" are not opposites, if you went back to back with a person, then walked
to your left, and other to their right, and you walked far enough, you'd end up together. Different, but
to the same place. Which, is quite impossible, if they were true "opposites".
"Right" and "Right" are homonyms; you should be familiar with the first four letters, and "nym", which is a politically correct
spelling of "numb" as in, "you are a numbskull, woody".
It's simply an example of you thinking "linearly", while I think "comprehensively". the two words also
not being exact opposites. So, I bid you adieu, and must leave to go haul big chunks of wild cherry tree to the barn,
but in doing so, I will not have "left", because I am "right". @@
-
Lol , u mad.
Props for the detailed explanation of trying to talk out of that hole though, lol
"I have to do farmer stuff" is code for "Shit, let's end this quick before I look any worse" haha
-
You wish. I've been going to the old farmer's house and cutting down and cutting into pieces,
several really big old wild cherry trees for firewood next season. Then I split it and we stack
it all in the racks. I ran out again this cold winter, next year we will be good to go for a few years.
Ask Canton Mike if I talk fake. I don't. Too bad Steve has never made the trip here yet.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login