Oh, yeah...scientists know mmgw is bogus. It's freakin SCIENCE
-
Cal are all of the university reports on it just cherry picked science? I can see the UN being full of shit. Seems like a pretty big conspiracy for 99% of the scientific community to be in on.
-
Scientists are liberals. Therefore they are bad.
If you want to go barking up this tree Logic go ahead, you have my support. It is just a lost cause to try to debate this with cal (not that other things aren't).
-
Scientists are liberals. Therefore they are bad.
If you want to go barking up this tree Logic go ahead, you have my support. It is just a lost cause to try to debate this with cal (not that other things aren't).
Scientists are liberals. Therefore they are bad.
If you want to go barking up this tree Logic go ahead, you have my support. It is just a lost cause to try to debate this with cal (not that other things aren't).
I've found my energy is better spent elsewhere. This political board is really all about the e-peen so I've come to the conclusion I'd rather talk football than politics on the Browns Board. Less time spent banging ny head against the wall leads to fewer headaches.

-
Scientists are liberals. Therefore they are bad.
If you want to go barking up this tree Logic go ahead, you have my support. It is just a lost cause to try to debate this with cal (not that other things aren't).
I've found my energy is better spent elsewhere. This political board is really all about the e-peen so I've come to the conclusion I'd rather talk football than politics on the Browns Board. Less time spent banging ny head against the wall leads to fewer headaches.

A man's got to know his limitations.I've found my energy is better spent elsewhere. This political board is really all about the e-peen so I've come to the conclusion I'd rather talk football than politics on the Browns Board. Less time spent banging ny head against the wall leads to fewer headaches.


WSS
-
Sometimes ya gotta know when to hold em, and know when to fold em, eh?
I'd leave, too, if I was a non-conservative and woody started worshipping all my posts.
That's in lieu of woody having anything of genuine input to the board by himself.
You know, like history. Or politics.
-
You're like arguing with a donkey
(And not even a magic donkey)
-
I like arguing with the ignorant butt of this board, that's you.
Grow up and learn some freakin history.
-
Is this gonna be your new catch phrase now? The history bit? Just like at one point the "emotion" bit was in every post. Was someone on The Blaze talking about "liberals don't know history" or something?
-
Uh yeah, don't misinterpret my post as some sort of victory on your part. I'm not going to change my views from anything you say, and you aren't going to change yours from anything I say. Everyone wants to be last person to post in a thread so their e-peen gets bigger. The way Cal and WSS responded is proof of that. It's pointless in the grand scheme of things, cause e-peen won't put food on our table or improve your standing in life. You all want to fight to be kings of the outhouse, you go right ahead.

-
Wow, you would try to get the last word...
oh shit now i did!
Quick Cal, post something
-
I am king of the outhouse!
-
All hail king Cysko
wait.... fuck
-
Uh yeah, don't misinterpret my post as some sort of victory on your part. I'm not going to change my views from anything you say, and you aren't going to change yours from anything I say. Everyone wants to be last person to post in a thread so their e-peen gets bigger. The way Cal and WSS responded is proof of that. It's pointless in the grand scheme of things, cause e-peen won't put food on our table or improve your standing in life. You all want to fight to be kings of the outhouse, you go right ahead.

Uh yeah, don't misinterpret my post as some sort of victory on your part. I'm not going to change my views from anything you say, and you aren't going to change yours from anything I say. Everyone wants to be last person to post in a thread so their e-peen gets bigger. The way Cal and WSS responded is proof of that. It's pointless in the grand scheme of things, cause e-peen won't put food on our table or improve your standing in life. You all want to fight to be kings of the outhouse, you go right ahead.

Personally I was just fucking around with you sir. I believe you are one of the smartest guys here.
Even smarter if you caught the reference and from what movie... I think you know my opinion on man-made global warming. It probably won't change.

WSS
-
Uh yeah, don't misinterpret my post as some sort of victory on your part. I'm not going to change my views from anything you say, and you aren't going to change yours from anything I say. Everyone wants to be last person to post in a thread so their e-peen gets bigger. The way Cal and WSS responded is proof of that. It's pointless in the grand scheme of things, cause e-peen won't put food on our table or improve your standing in life. You all want to fight to be kings of the outhouse, you go right ahead.

Personally I was just fucking around with you sir. I believe you are one of the smartest guys here.
Even smarter if you caught the reference and from what movie... I think you know my opinion on man-made global warming. It probably won't change.

WSS
Personally I was just fucking around with you sir. I believe you are one of the smartest guys here.
Even smarter if you caught the reference and from what movie... I think you know my opinion on man-made global warming. It probably won't change.

WSS
Inspector Harry Callahan The Enforcer
-
I'm starting to tire of the 'clever' youtube responses to everything. I'm going to stop.
-
Uh yeah, don't misinterpret my post as some sort of victory on your part. I'm not going to change my views from anything you say, and you aren't going to change yours from anything I say. Everyone wants to be last person to post in a thread so their e-peen gets bigger. The way Cal and WSS responded is proof of that. It's pointless in the grand scheme of things, cause e-peen won't put food on our table or improve your standing in life. You all want to fight to be kings of the outhouse, you go right ahead.

Personally I was just fucking around with you sir. I believe you are one of the smartest guys here.
Even smarter if you caught the reference and from what movie... I think you know my opinion on man-made global warming. It probably won't change.

WSS
Personally I was just fucking around with you sir. I believe you are one of the smartest guys here.
Even smarter if you caught the reference and from what movie... I think you know my opinion on man-made global warming. It probably won't change.

WSS
Damn it I didn't want to be forced to post in this thread but now you lured me back in. I'm afraid though I am a fan of Clint's work, that's one of his movies I didn't see.
-
The human contribution to Co2 levels is .9 of 1%...a fart in a hurricane.
Pathetic how so many ignorant libtards support John Kerry, Obama, Al Gore and other alarmists propagating a god damned fart in a hurricane.... oblivious to the fact it is to advance a socialist world governance.
Obamas goal is to redistribute wealth throughout the world, and a climate change scare is the perfect way by which to accomplish this.
It is not we that are the "deniers" . We on the right know that global warming and cooling occurs, always has, always will, with or without mankind...rather it is you leftists that are the deniers. You either refuse to acknowledge the evidence of Obamas agenda that has been laid out in front of you...or you're simply too stupid to put 2+2 together.
“Man Made Global warming is phony science that was concocted to justify implementation of an international political agenda. The idea of using ‘man-caused global warming’ as a ‘surrogate for war’ and as a way to ‘destroy excess wealth’ originated in American and UN-related think tanks such as the Club of Rome back in the 60′s and 70′s. This pseudo-science is the centerpiece of a phony environmental movement by which the UN hopes to redistribute wealth in the world (toward the super-rich and away from the people) to de-industrialize the industrialized countries (via the UN Kyoto Protocol-type carbon taxes, cap and trade schemes, etc.), and radically reduce the human population.”
“The IPCC is essentially operating with pre-determined conclusions, namely that human activity and carbon emissions cause ‘global warming’ and other environmental and climate problems, even though there is little objective scientific evidence to demonstrate ‘global warming’ is in fact a real phenomenon,” Dr. Karlstrom says. Climate scientists working with the IPCC and other international bodies have been known to not only spin scientific data to fit their pre-determined conclusions, but also to outright fabricate “evidence” to support their idea of “man-made climate change.”
Who would benefit from this catastrophically expensive agenda? Only the political and politically connected elite—the Goldman Sachs outfits that would reap billions from trading carbon permits; the Al Gores and corporate and political insiders that would amass fortunes from their ties to a government-rigged energy market and investments in politically correct technologies. And think of the power that governments would have if they controlled energy consumption. By controlling energy, you control people. No wonder governments have spent tens of billions of dollars promoting this scenario and supporting political panels like the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) to disseminate the desired “findings.”
Even in wealthier countries, people who are affluent enough to afford the monetary costs could find their lives heavily regimented by government bureaucrats monitoring and limiting how many miles they may travel and what activities they may undertake. -
So again, did 99% of the science community go to a secret meeting where they all decided that they would come to the same conclusions? Because that sounds as crazy as all the 9/11 "truthers" who think that top down the government all planned it and no one slipped up and told the truth.
-
It never was 99%. It was politically motivated - because
many scientists had no voice in the decision to support it.
They were just included, and many wanted their names removed
from the support list. We've been over this before.
There are thousands of climate scientists whose names are added
to the pro-bogus mmgw list, who never had a thing to do with the list,
and want nothing to do with it.
-
Source?
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login