My Favorite Mock draft - and it isn't even my own ...
-
Brian Hoyer won't be starting by Week 8 of this season, so you can cut that right out.
There's a solid chance he won't start by Week 1.
@mike-h said:
The Browns have a proven All-Pro LT, #1 WR and money invested in OLBers. Drafting Mack to play MLB at No. 4 is dumb for two reasons: MLB value isn't there at four plus there is depth at OLB already and his best potential position is on the edge. I think that's been said a million times, but I have to keep saying it.
I'll agree with you there Mike. Asking Mack to move inside doesn't make much sense.
@mike-h said:
There are plenty of quality zone blocking OL in this draft in rounds 2 and 3.
Mitchell Schwartz also played much better in the second half of last season.
This all stems back to putting way too much faith in Brian Hoyer. A person no one barely even gave a shot to make the Browns roster, let alone become the QBoTF.
So what's your opinion of Su-a Filo say if he lasts until the second round? I agree, we have to draft a quarterback somewhere but how high?
Brian Hoyer won't be starting by Week 8 of this season, so you can cut that right out.
There's a solid chance he won't start by Week 1.
Great- throw your stud rookie in from the get-go, and hello 4-12 again.
-
Brian Hoyer won't be starting by Week 8 of this season, so you can cut that right out.
There's a solid chance he won't start by Week 1.
Brian Hoyer won't be starting by Week 8 of this season, so you can cut that right out.
There's a solid chance he won't start by Week 1.
dumb statement. we've got 4 weeks to go and haven't had one of these genious QBs everyone is talking about in for a private workout. hell, even belichick who doesn't do anything over the top is having manziel in.
i respect all you guys with this QB now talk, BUT just take a second to think how this team would look with another #1/2 WR, an OT to help the right side, a #2 CB that is truly a #1 in his own right, some type of help at LB and a spring chicken RB? sure throw in a garropollo (sp?) or a fales in round 3. throw in another TE. but to get QUALITY i think we'll have to use multiple picks at multiple times to move up and get that quality.
i'd give the ball to the toledo rockets QB with a team stacked with studs everywhere you look.
i guess i'm the only one that get's it.
i'm betting if hoyer stays healthy and we do make all those picks i suggested by week eight we'll have at LEAST 4 wins under our belt, same as we finished with last year.
next year they'll be another teddy, another johnny another bortles. why not hand the reigns over to them when we have a top 5 defense and a top ten offense waiting for the golden child?
-
Brian Hoyer won't be starting by Week 8 of this season, so you can cut that right out.
There's a solid chance he won't start by Week 1.
dumb statement. we've got 4 weeks to go and haven't had one of these genious QBs everyone is talking about in for a private workout. hell, even belichick who doesn't do anything over the top is having manziel in.
i respect all you guys with this QB now talk, BUT just take a second to think how this team would look with another #1/2 WR, an OT to help the right side, a #2 CB that is truly a #1 in his own right, some type of help at LB and a spring chicken RB? sure throw in a garropollo (sp?) or a fales in round 3. throw in another TE. but to get QUALITY i think we'll have to use multiple picks at multiple times to move up and get that quality.
i'd give the ball to the toledo rockets QB with a team stacked with studs everywhere you look.
i guess i'm the only one that get's it.
i'm betting if hoyer stays healthy and we do make all those picks i suggested by week eight we'll have at LEAST 4 wins under our belt, same as we finished with last year.
next year they'll be another teddy, another johnny another bortles. why not hand the reigns over to them when we have a top 5 defense and a top ten offense waiting for the golden child?
i'd give the ball to the toledo rockets QB with a team stacked with studs everywhere you look.
i guess i'm the only one that get's it.
i'm betting if hoyer stays healthy and we do make all those picks i suggested by week eight we'll have at LEAST 4 wins under our belt, same as we finished with last year.
next year they'll be another teddy, another johnny another bortles. why not hand the reigns over to them when we have a top 5 defense and a top ten offense waiting for the golden child?
I don't know about the Rockets qb, but the qb NOW camp is forgetting that's exactly how the Steelers got to where they are- qb last. By all accounts the 2015 qb class will be at least as deep as this years- so the Browns wouldn't have to draft #1 overall- just top 10.
and that's assuming Hoyer flops- amazing on how many guys already have him thrown under the bus. Farmer and Pettine haven't.
-
Next years draft will trump this years. How about 1 guy with Teddy's football smarts and Bortles size/height anyways and Manziels legs.
-
Some would say he's better than all 3 at each. Watch and see if teams don't tank this year for him like the colts all over again.
-
Sure, let's get 11 Pro Bowl players on offense and 11 Pro Bowl players on defense.
Except for the fact that isn't possible.
Great players make those around them better. There's a reason the Patriots can keep shipping off their WR's to other teams but still manage to field one of the best offenses in the league no matter who's catching the ball.
That's what the "save a QB for last" camp doesn't get.
Sure, we can get two studly WR's like Atlanta. And we can also not make the Super Bowl like Atlanta.
And Mik, we had Bortles here yesterday.
I'm awesome, and I fuck dolphins. Ghoolie 12/2/2012: I have absolutely no skills, training or pride -
Mariota is the exact same size as Bridgewater, with Bortles footwork problems, and Manziels wrecklessness.
XxDaBuckeyexX said:
Mariota is the exact same size as Bridgewater, with Bortles footwork problems, and Manziels wrecklessness.
Except he's two inches taller and 15 pounds heavier...so you're wrong.
Mariota weighed in at almost 220 the other day.
I'm awesome, and I fuck dolphins. Ghoolie 12/2/2012: I have absolutely no skills, training or pride -
Brian Hoyer won't be starting by Week 8 of this season, so you can cut that right out.
There's a solid chance he won't start by Week 1.
dumb statement. we've got 4 weeks to go and haven't had one of these genious QBs everyone is talking about in for a private workout. hell, even belichick who doesn't do anything over the top is having manziel in.
i respect all you guys with this QB now talk, BUT just take a second to think how this team would look with another #1/2 WR, an OT to help the right side, a #2 CB that is truly a #1 in his own right, some type of help at LB and a spring chicken RB? sure throw in a garropollo (sp?) or a fales in round 3. throw in another TE. but to get QUALITY i think we'll have to use multiple picks at multiple times to move up and get that quality.
i'd give the ball to the toledo rockets QB with a team stacked with studs everywhere you look.
i guess i'm the only one that get's it.
i'm betting if hoyer stays healthy and we do make all those picks i suggested by week eight we'll have at LEAST 4 wins under our belt, same as we finished with last year.
next year they'll be another teddy, another johnny another bortles. why not hand the reigns over to them when we have a top 5 defense and a top ten offense waiting for the golden child?
I respect all you guys with this QB now talk, BUT just take a second to think how this team would look with another #1/2 WR, an OT to help the right side, a #2 CB that is truly a #1 in his own right, some type of help at LB and a spring chicken RB? sure throw in a garropollo (sp?) or a fales in round 3. throw in another TE. but to get QUALITY i think we'll have to use multiple picks at multiple times to move up and get that quality.
i'd give the ball to the toledo rockets QB with a team stacked with studs everywhere you look.
i guess i'm the only one that get's it.
I did what you said, and took a second to think how the team would look with all those improvements, and leaving the QB position alone... here's what I saw...
The 2013 GB Packers. 6-2 with Aaron Rodgers, 2-5-1 without him... hmmm... I actually like that 6-2 record a lot better...
#Justsayin' -
XxDaBuckeyexX said:
Mariota is the exact same size as Bridgewater, with Bortles footwork problems, and Manziels wrecklessness.
Except he's two inches taller and 15 pounds heavier...so you're wrong.
Mariota weighed in at almost 220 the other day.
didnt Bridgewater weigh in at 214? And do you really think hes 6'4? Doesnt look it....Except he's two inches taller and 15 pounds heavier...so you're wrong.
Mariota weighed in at almost 220 the other day.
-
But that is losing a starter. And look where Rodgers was drafted.Round one, pick 24.
So, why wouldn't the Browns wait til their 26 pick to draft a qb?
-
I respect all you guys with this QB now talk, BUT just take a second to think how this team would look with another #1/2 WR, an OT to help the right side, a #2 CB that is truly a #1 in his own right, some type of help at LB and a spring chicken RB? sure throw in a garropollo (sp?) or a fales in round 3. throw in another TE. but to get QUALITY i think we'll have to use multiple picks at multiple times to move up and get that quality.
i'd give the ball to the toledo rockets QB with a team stacked with studs everywhere you look.
i guess i'm the only one that get's it.
I did what you said, and took a second to think how the team would look with all those improvements, and leaving the QB position alone... here's what I saw...
The 2013 GB Packers. 6-2 with Aaron Rodgers, 2-5-1 without him... hmmm... I actually like that 6-2 record a lot better...
not fair, the Packers roster is bad. I think Dilfers Ravens squad is more what hes talkin.I did what you said, and took a second to think how the team would look with all those improvements, and leaving the QB position alone... here's what I saw...
The 2013 GB Packers. 6-2 with Aaron Rodgers, 2-5-1 without him... hmmm... I actually like that 6-2 record a lot better...
-
didnt Bridgewater weigh in at 214? And do you really think hes 6'4? Doesnt look it....Except he's two inches taller and 15 pounds heavier...so you're wrong.
Mariota weighed in at almost 220 the other day.
I thought he weighed in at 204. Maybe it was 214.XxDaBuckeyexX said:
didnt Bridgewater weigh in at 214? And do you really think hes 6'4? Doesnt look it....
Mariota is probably closer to 6'5", honestly. There was a picture of him standing next an OL who was 6'4 and he looked significantly taller.
-
But that is losing a starter. And look where Rodgers was drafted.Round one, pick 24.
So, why wouldn't the Browns wait til their 26 pick to draft a qb?
But that is losing a starter. And look where Rodgers was drafted.Round one, pick 24.
So, why wouldn't the Browns wait til their 26 pick to draft a qb?
Ohh sure... the consensus #1 QB drops to 24... let's just wait for that to happen again. We could do the same thing the Browns did that season and draft the top WR (Braylon Edwards) instead of the #1 QB... great choice...
XxDaBuckeyexX said:
not fair, the Packers roster is bad. I think Dilfers Ravens squad is more what hes talkin.
I get it. We'll just keep drafting until we have one of the top 5 defenses of ALL-TIME, and hand the ball off to our RB who gains 1600+ yards from scrimage and our backup RB will just add another 800+.... Why even bother with a QB, when we're obviously only a couple starters away from dominating a game just like that?
-
where in the draft will we fill the hole left by DQ? where in the draft will we get our #2 WR? where in the draft will we get our #2 CB? OL? TE? FB? RB?
that's 7 picks right there and we will prob only pick 5 or 6 guys because we will want to move up a couple of times.
oh, ok. we'll wait until next year and take one of those guys off the list because we HAVE to draft one of these guys from one of the weakest QB drafts in years.
if hoyer shits the bed, what did we lose? a guy that was hanging by a fingernail to stay in the league? or let's just throw in a rookie to the flames which is the AFCN defenses. that worked great with the last 2 QBs we drafted.
hell if i'm wrong at least it won't be an epic fail the likes of the TR pick. if you're wrong: EPIC FAIL.
-
and oh btw, i guess drafting r. wilson to an already stacked team was just dumb.
-
where in the draft will we fill the hole left by DQ? where in the draft will we get our #2 WR? where in the draft will we get our #2 CB? OL? TE? FB? RB?
that's 7 picks right there and we will prob only pick 5 or 6 guys because we will want to move up a couple of times.
oh, ok. we'll wait until next year and take one of those guys off the list because we HAVE to draft one of these guys from one of the weakest QB drafts in years.
if hoyer shits the bed, what did we lose? a guy that was hanging by a fingernail to stay in the league? or let's just throw in a rookie to the flames which is the AFCN defenses. that worked great with the last 2 QBs we drafted.
hell if i'm wrong at least it won't be an epic fail the likes of the TR pick. if you're wrong: EPIC FAIL.
where in the draft will we fill the hole left by DQ? where in the draft will we get our #2 WR? where in the draft will we get our #2 CB? OL? TE? FB? RB?
We replaced DQ with Dansby, but if you want a ILB2 - 3rd or 4th round (Borland, Bradford, Jones, Skov, Smallwood)
WR2 - #26 or 2nd round (Benjamin, Beckham, Cooks, Robinson, Matthews)
CB2 - #26 or 2nd round (Fuller, Roby, Roberson, McGill, Jean-Baptiste)
OL - 3rd or 4th round (Yankey, Thomas, Dozier, Mewhort)
TE - Do we really need another one?
FB - Are we really going to use one?
RB - 3rd or 4th round (Sims, Williams, Grice, Carey)
If I get Bortles/Bridgewater at #4, I still filled all your holes, and have 4 picks left in case you think we'll draft a TE or FB, or to use in trade ups...
-
Sure, let's get 11 Pro Bowl players on offense and 11 Pro Bowl players on defense.
Except for the fact that isn't possible.
Great players make those around them better. There's a reason the Patriots can keep shipping off their WR's to other teams but still manage to field one of the best offenses in the league no matter who's catching the ball.
That's what the "save a QB for last" camp doesn't get.
Sure, we can get two studly WR's like Atlanta. And we can also not make the Super Bowl like Atlanta.
And Mik, we had Bortles here yesterday.
Sure, let's get 11 Pro Bowl players on offense and 11 Pro Bowl players on defense.
Except for the fact that isn't possible.
Great players make those around them better. There's a reason the Patriots can keep shipping off their WR's to other teams but still manage to field one of the best offenses in the league no matter who's catching the ball.
That's what the "save a QB for last" camp doesn't get.
Sure, we can get two studly WR's like Atlanta. And we can also not make the Super Bowl like Atlanta.
And Mik, we had Bortles here yesterday.
Who's saying that TC? the Steelers certainly didn't have a complete pro bowl roster. They did have a good defense solid O-line and a couple really good receivers- sort of like what the Browns could have after this year.
I've said if you think you see a Brady or Rodgers this year- draft them. (I do think Bridgewater reminds me of Randall Cunningham) It's just a likely the real stud in this qb class could be Garrapolo, and not any of the top 4.
-
where in the draft will we fill the hole left by DQ? where in the draft will we get our #2 WR? where in the draft will we get our #2 CB? OL? TE? FB? RB?
that's 7 picks right there and we will prob only pick 5 or 6 guys because we will want to move up a couple of times.
oh, ok. we'll wait until next year and take one of those guys off the list because we HAVE to draft one of these guys from one of the weakest QB drafts in years.
if hoyer shits the bed, what did we lose? a guy that was hanging by a fingernail to stay in the league? or let's just throw in a rookie to the flames which is the AFCN defenses. that worked great with the last 2 QBs we drafted.
hell if i'm wrong at least it won't be an epic fail the likes of the TR pick. if you're wrong: EPIC FAIL.
hell if i'm wrong at least it won't be an epic fail the likes of the TR pick. if you're wrong: EPIC FAIL.
And if we draft Clowney and he's the next Gerard Warren?
We draft Evans/Watkins and they're the next Braylon?
We draft Mack and he's the next Wimbley?
Those wouldn't be EPIC fails??
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login