Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Pettine: Not Ideal for Browns to draft QB at 4

Pettine: Not Ideal for Browns to draft QB at 4

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Browns Board
smokescreen
47 Posts 22 Posters 1.9k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • DieHardBrownsFanD DieHardBrownsFan

    If Manziel is still there at No. 4 we will most likely pick him.

    MLD Woody MLD WoodyM Dedicated Conversation Starter Very Popular First Post Collaborator Posting Machine Reacting Well One Month Later One Year In Week One Done
    • 33k Posts
    • 3k Reputation
    MLD WoodyM MLD Woody wrote on last edited by
    #4

    @diehardbrownsfan said:

    If Manziel is still there at No. 4 we will most likely pick him.

    Says who?

    Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody!
    1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • thenew23 thenew23T
      • 2k Posts
      • 233 Reputation
      thenew23T thenew23 wrote on last edited by
      #5

      He knows we need a QB, yet he would "prefer" not to draft one at #4. That doesn't mean squat b/c if you pass on all the QBs at #4 and you miss out on the next franchise guy, you're waiting another year to draft him and possibly another year for him to sit... that's not exactly "win-now." Unless Farmer thinks one of the later round picks is franchise QB material, you have to make sure you get one whether that be Bortles, Bridgewater, or Carr (who IMHO are the three guys with the best potential). Even if they draft Manziel I won't be that mad b/c at least we're taking a shot at QB... That position, above every other position in all of sports, is the ONE spot worth taking the gamble... Plus, if we pass on those guys and they're all gone by #26, then we almost HAVE to reach to get a QB with that pick - then we end up with another Brandon Weeden...

      "rather pick up an 'Impact position player' at no.4" ... what position is more impactful than QB???? Even if they have to sit for a year or so to be effective...

      #Justsayin'
      jcam222J miktoxicM Tour2maT 3 Replies Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • JAFBF JAFBFJ Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
        • 10k Posts
        • 2k Reputation
        JAFBFJ JAFBF wrote on last edited by
        #6

        Someone on here posted some info and videos on Jeff Mathews, a QB out of Cornell I believe - 6' 4" & 223lbs.

        The kid looks pretty good, presnap reads, throws, not staring down targets.

        He's currently projected to be about 5th-6th round.

        Wouldn't mind seeing us grab this guy - Brady was a 6th rounder if I recall correctly, and Russel Wilson was a 3rd round pick a few years back.

        'bout time we got lucky once, why not here?

        thenew23T 1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • JAFBFJ JAFBF

          Someone on here posted some info and videos on Jeff Mathews, a QB out of Cornell I believe - 6' 4" & 223lbs.

          The kid looks pretty good, presnap reads, throws, not staring down targets.

          He's currently projected to be about 5th-6th round.

          Wouldn't mind seeing us grab this guy - Brady was a 6th rounder if I recall correctly, and Russel Wilson was a 3rd round pick a few years back.

          'bout time we got lucky once, why not here?

          thenew23 thenew23T
          • 2k Posts
          • 233 Reputation
          thenew23T thenew23 wrote on last edited by
          #7

          @jafbf said:

          'bout time we got lucky once, why not here?

          Sure... let's take the most important position in all of sports and ... hope we "get lucky."

          #Justsayin'
          JAFBFJ 1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • SCDawg82 SCDawg82S
            • 170 Posts
            • 5 Reputation
            SCDawg82S SCDawg82 wrote on last edited by
            #8

            NO MORE PROJECTs! Either take one of the two big QBs, or wait till next year. If Watkins is there that the only other option, but I can't see jax and St. Louis passing on him.

            1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • thenew23T thenew23

              He knows we need a QB, yet he would "prefer" not to draft one at #4. That doesn't mean squat b/c if you pass on all the QBs at #4 and you miss out on the next franchise guy, you're waiting another year to draft him and possibly another year for him to sit... that's not exactly "win-now." Unless Farmer thinks one of the later round picks is franchise QB material, you have to make sure you get one whether that be Bortles, Bridgewater, or Carr (who IMHO are the three guys with the best potential). Even if they draft Manziel I won't be that mad b/c at least we're taking a shot at QB... That position, above every other position in all of sports, is the ONE spot worth taking the gamble... Plus, if we pass on those guys and they're all gone by #26, then we almost HAVE to reach to get a QB with that pick - then we end up with another Brandon Weeden...

              "rather pick up an 'Impact position player' at no.4" ... what position is more impactful than QB???? Even if they have to sit for a year or so to be effective...

              jcam222 jcam222J Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
              • 3k Posts
              • 873 Reputation
              jcam222J jcam222 wrote on last edited by jcam222
              #9

              @thenew23 said:

              He knows we need a QB, yet he would "prefer" not to draft one at #4. That doesn't mean squat b/c if you pass on all the QBs at #4 and you miss out on the next franchise guy, you're waiting another year to draft him and possibly another year for him to sit... that's not exactly "win-now." Unless Farmer thinks one of the later round picks is franchise QB material, you have to make sure you get one whether that be Bortles, Bridgewater, or Carr (who IMHO are the three guys with the best potential). Even if they draft Manziel I won't be that mad b/c at least we're taking a shot at QB... That position, above every other position in all of sports, is the ONE spot worth taking the gamble... Plus, if we pass on those guys and they're all gone by #26, then we almost HAVE to reach to get a QB with that pick - then we end up with another Brandon Weeden...

              "rather pick up an 'Impact position player' at no.4" ... what position is more impactful than QB???? Even if they have to sit for a year or so to be effective...

              Your entire philosophy is predicated on the fact that Bortles, Carr or Bridgewater are franchise quarterbacks. If they believe that to be true then damn right you have to take them at 4. If they are not sold on the fact they are then damn wrong, you wait and take one later. I agree with you that a great QB would be the most impact however when he says he would rather take an impact player at 4 (and assuming its not smokescreen) he would essentially be saying that none of the QBs are surefire impact players.

              1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • thenew23T thenew23

                He knows we need a QB, yet he would "prefer" not to draft one at #4. That doesn't mean squat b/c if you pass on all the QBs at #4 and you miss out on the next franchise guy, you're waiting another year to draft him and possibly another year for him to sit... that's not exactly "win-now." Unless Farmer thinks one of the later round picks is franchise QB material, you have to make sure you get one whether that be Bortles, Bridgewater, or Carr (who IMHO are the three guys with the best potential). Even if they draft Manziel I won't be that mad b/c at least we're taking a shot at QB... That position, above every other position in all of sports, is the ONE spot worth taking the gamble... Plus, if we pass on those guys and they're all gone by #26, then we almost HAVE to reach to get a QB with that pick - then we end up with another Brandon Weeden...

                "rather pick up an 'Impact position player' at no.4" ... what position is more impactful than QB???? Even if they have to sit for a year or so to be effective...

                miktoxic miktoxicM
                • 13k Posts
                • 1k Reputation
                miktoxicM miktoxic wrote on last edited by
                #10

                @thenew23 said:

                He knows we need a QB, yet he would "prefer" not to draft one at #4. That doesn't mean squat b/c if you pass on all the QBs at #4 and you miss out on the next franchise guy, you're waiting another year to draft him and possibly another year for him to sit... that's not exactly "win-now." Unless Farmer thinks one of the later round picks is franchise QB material, you have to make sure you get one whether that be Bortles, Bridgewater, or Carr (who IMHO are the three guys with the best potential). Even if they draft Manziel I won't be that mad b/c at least we're taking a shot at QB... That position, above every other position in all of sports, is the ONE spot worth taking the gamble... Plus, if we pass on those guys and they're all gone by #26, then we almost HAVE to reach to get a QB with that pick - then we end up with another Brandon Weeden...

                "rather pick up an 'Impact position player' at no.4" ... what position is more impactful than QB???? Even if they have to sit for a year or so to be effective...

                maybe he believes that if they fix the OL on the right side, grab a #2 WR, fill in the holes on D with a true #2 CB and an ILB that anyone can win under those circumstances.

                hell look at trent dilfer and brad johnson.

                thenew23T 1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • miktoxicM miktoxic

                  @thenew23 said:

                  He knows we need a QB, yet he would "prefer" not to draft one at #4. That doesn't mean squat b/c if you pass on all the QBs at #4 and you miss out on the next franchise guy, you're waiting another year to draft him and possibly another year for him to sit... that's not exactly "win-now." Unless Farmer thinks one of the later round picks is franchise QB material, you have to make sure you get one whether that be Bortles, Bridgewater, or Carr (who IMHO are the three guys with the best potential). Even if they draft Manziel I won't be that mad b/c at least we're taking a shot at QB... That position, above every other position in all of sports, is the ONE spot worth taking the gamble... Plus, if we pass on those guys and they're all gone by #26, then we almost HAVE to reach to get a QB with that pick - then we end up with another Brandon Weeden...

                  "rather pick up an 'Impact position player' at no.4" ... what position is more impactful than QB???? Even if they have to sit for a year or so to be effective...

                  maybe he believes that if they fix the OL on the right side, grab a #2 WR, fill in the holes on D with a true #2 CB and an ILB that anyone can win under those circumstances.

                  hell look at trent dilfer and brad johnson.

                  thenew23 thenew23T
                  • 2k Posts
                  • 233 Reputation
                  thenew23T thenew23 wrote on last edited by
                  #11

                  @miktoxic said:

                  maybe he believes that if they fix the OL on the right side, grab a #2 WR, fill in the holes on D with a true #2 CB and an ILB that anyone can win under those circumstances.

                  hell look at trent dilfer and brad johnson.

                  It's asinine to think they can't get a #2 WR, #2 CB, #2 ILB, and RG with a late 1st round pick, a 2nd round pick, and 2 3rd round picks in a draft that is deep as he** at all 4 of those positions. This is the perfect year to take a risk on a QB, if we're going to take one.

                  Also, Dilfer had "arguably" the best defense ever on his side, and the Bucs scored 21 points on defense in the SB the year Johnson won it... You're telling me we can have that type of defense by adding 2 players...??

                  #Justsayin'
                  miktoxicM 1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • thenew23T thenew23

                    @jafbf said:

                    'bout time we got lucky once, why not here?

                    Sure... let's take the most important position in all of sports and ... hope we "get lucky."

                    JAFBF JAFBFJ Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                    • 10k Posts
                    • 2k Reputation
                    JAFBFJ JAFBF wrote on last edited by JAFBF
                    #12

                    @thenew23 said:

                    Sure... let's take the most important position in all of sports and ... hope we "get lucky."

                    The rest of the story . . .

                    There's a lot of talk that with 10 picks (and maybe more), we're taking two QB's.

                    I'm not crazy about any of the "Top Tier" QB's, so Jeff Matthews as the second should be a good deal.

                    Pettine's recently said that he'd like to have whoever they get at QB to sit and learn, and unlike our (many) other HC's, there may well be a chance it happens this time based on what he's said.

                    http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2014/04/30/mike-pettine-ideal-situation-is-drafting-a-quarterback-later-than-fourth-pick/

                    Coach Mike Pettine will be one of the men involved in making the decision about when the Browns move for a quarterback and Pettine said Tuesday that he prefers to have a quarterback sit as a rookie before taking over as a starter. Pettine has experience coaching on teams quarterbacked by Kyle Boller, Joe Flacco, Mark Sanchez and E.J. Manuel as rookies from day one, which has left him with the feeling that it is “a rare guy that can handle that and he has to have a great supporting cast in order to do it.”

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • thenew23T thenew23

                      @miktoxic said:

                      maybe he believes that if they fix the OL on the right side, grab a #2 WR, fill in the holes on D with a true #2 CB and an ILB that anyone can win under those circumstances.

                      hell look at trent dilfer and brad johnson.

                      It's asinine to think they can't get a #2 WR, #2 CB, #2 ILB, and RG with a late 1st round pick, a 2nd round pick, and 2 3rd round picks in a draft that is deep as he** at all 4 of those positions. This is the perfect year to take a risk on a QB, if we're going to take one.

                      Also, Dilfer had "arguably" the best defense ever on his side, and the Bucs scored 21 points on defense in the SB the year Johnson won it... You're telling me we can have that type of defense by adding 2 players...??

                      miktoxic miktoxicM
                      • 13k Posts
                      • 1k Reputation
                      miktoxicM miktoxic wrote on last edited by
                      #13

                      @thenew23 said:

                      It's asinine to think they can't get a #2 WR, #2 CB, #2 ILB, and RG with a late 1st round pick, a 2nd round pick, and 2 3rd round picks in a draft that is deep as he** at all 4 of those positions. This is the perfect year to take a risk on a QB, if we're going to take one.

                      Also, Dilfer had "arguably" the best defense ever on his side, and the Bucs scored 21 points on defense in the SB the year Johnson won it... You're telling me we can have that type of defense by adding 2 players...??

                      ok show me your mock.

                      not trying to be a jerk.

                      i'd really like to see what you consider a GOOD #2 CB, WR, ILB and RG from 26 on being as we should take a QB at 4.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply
                      • PoeticG PoeticGP Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                        • 4k Posts
                        • 658 Reputation
                        PoeticGP PoeticG wrote on last edited by
                        #14

                        I'll bite.

                        Assuming we take Carr/Bortles/Manziel @4....

                        26)Xavier Su'a-Filo/Kelvin Benjamin/CJ Mosley/Kyle Fuller/ (or take a RT and move Schwartz inside)

                        ...WR's- Lee/Cook/Adams

                        36)Stanley Jean-Baptiste/Davonte Adams/Xavier Su'a-Filo

                        3rd Round)David Yankey/Chris Borland/Cyril Richardson/Dakota Dozier/Jarvis Landry

                        It could look something like this:

                        Bortles/Carr/Manziel

                        Xavier Su'a-Filo

                        Stanley Jean-Baptiste

                        Jarvis Landry

                        Chris Borland

                        ...That's QB/OG/CB#2/WR#2/ILB#2- BAM!

                        The secret of getting ahead is getting started. The secret of getting started is breaking your complex overwhelming tasks into small manageable tasks, and then starting on the first one. -Mark Twain- "It's not the size of the dog in the fight, it's the size of the fight in the dog." -Mark Twain-
                        miktoxicM 1 Reply Last reply
                        Quote Reply
                        • Canton Mike Canton MikeC
                          • 4k Posts
                          • 2k Reputation
                          Canton MikeC Canton Mike wrote on last edited by
                          #15

                          I'm starting to laugh at all the rumors & predictions based on what is said "pre draft". None of that BS means anything. Those that do make all these predictions or buy all these rumors may look silly as hell AFTER the draft. These media people & "draft insiders" are grasping at straws.

                          There are definitely players I like, but that's meaningless. I'm just watching, reading, & waiting for next week.

                          Mike

                          IN DORSEY I TRUST
                          gftChrisG 1 Reply Last reply
                          Quote Reply
                          • Remarker RemarkerR
                            • 132 Posts
                            • 5 Reputation
                            RemarkerR Remarker wrote on last edited by
                            #16

                            You've got that right C Mike. Farmer gives that same view about rumors in his current presser.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            Quote Reply
                            • PoeticGP PoeticG

                              I'll bite.

                              Assuming we take Carr/Bortles/Manziel @4....

                              26)Xavier Su'a-Filo/Kelvin Benjamin/CJ Mosley/Kyle Fuller/ (or take a RT and move Schwartz inside)

                              ...WR's- Lee/Cook/Adams

                              36)Stanley Jean-Baptiste/Davonte Adams/Xavier Su'a-Filo

                              3rd Round)David Yankey/Chris Borland/Cyril Richardson/Dakota Dozier/Jarvis Landry

                              It could look something like this:

                              Bortles/Carr/Manziel

                              Xavier Su'a-Filo

                              Stanley Jean-Baptiste

                              Jarvis Landry

                              Chris Borland

                              ...That's QB/OG/CB#2/WR#2/ILB#2- BAM!

                              miktoxic miktoxicM
                              • 13k Posts
                              • 1k Reputation
                              miktoxicM miktoxic wrote on last edited by
                              #17

                              @poeticg said:

                              I'll bite.

                              Assuming we take Carr/Bortles/Manziel @4....

                              26)Xavier Su'a-Filo/Kelvin Benjamin/CJ Mosley/Kyle Fuller/ (or take a RT and move Schwartz inside)

                              ...WR's- Lee/Cook/Adams

                              36)Stanley Jean-Baptiste/Davonte Adams/Xavier Su'a-Filo

                              3rd Round)David Yankey/Chris Borland/Cyril Richardson/Dakota Dozier/Jarvis Landry

                              It could look something like this:

                              Bortles/Carr/Manziel

                              Xavier Su'a-Filo

                              Stanley Jean-Baptiste

                              Jarvis Landry

                              Chris Borland

                              ...That's QB/OG/CB#2/WR#2/ILB#2- BAM!

                              so you got QB @4

                              the top ranked G @26

                              the 10th ranked CB @35 (who 'experts' have mocked @76)

                              the 18th ranked WR @71 (who experts have @100)

                              the #2 ranked ILB @83 ( """" @50)

                              uhhhhh..

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              Quote Reply
                              • SCDawg82 SCDawg82S
                                • 170 Posts
                                • 5 Reputation
                                SCDawg82S SCDawg82 wrote on last edited by
                                #18

                                How Pick 4 goes well: Just my humble but accurate opinion lol.

                                A. Sammy Watkins: He's as close to a sure thing as there is in this draft. Really doubt he'll be there at 4 though, home run if he is.

                                B. JohnnyM: Shocks me how many people can't stand this QB. All he did was DOMINATE the best conference in the country (Yeah I'm an OSU fan too, but your being intellectually dishonest if you wanna argue the SEC hasn't been the strongest conference for a decade, Especially the West.) I mean, yeah, he could be bust. You want a sure thing at QB? Wait another 20 years for another Andrew Luck.

                                C. JC! NO WAY HE DROPS TO 4.....

                                How Pick 4 doesnt go well:

                                1. OL: There's three sick OT's in the draft, but you don't take a RT at NO.4! You just don't.

                                2. Mack: Great looking linebacker, but unless he's planning to play both ways, he doesn't fix the biggest problem. POINTS.

                                3. Carr: Christian Ponder level reach.

                                4. Bortles: Also a reach, smaller reach, but still a reach. You could trade back with someone who wants Mack to get him.

                                GO BROWNS!

                                RemarkerR 1 Reply Last reply
                                Quote Reply
                                • Bummie B
                                  • 164 Posts
                                  • 10 Reputation
                                  B Bummie wrote on last edited by Bummie
                                  #19

                                  If we don't go QB at 4 there's a very good chance they (4-5 of them) are gone by 26. If they pass at 4 they're basically saying they're okay with taking a mid-rounder. A few teams will resist the panic button when contemplating the QBs this year. With an aging Romo, the Titans passing on their team option this year, and the lack of young talent presently in the league, I wouldn't be suprised if there's a lot of reaching.

                                  With that, if we don't trade down:

                                  4. Watkins

                                  26. Depends on who was picked before us. Ideally, two of the top 5 corners remain, as well as Mosley. Take Mosley, all day. Him being here is a product of the reaching at QB.

                                  35. Take one of the remaining top 5 CBs. I think if there's 2 left at 26, one will fall to 35.

                                  Theres your #2 WR, ILB, & CB. Getting here would be a heck of a first 3 picks. Rather than trade up from the third for Yankee, I'd hold and take Gabe Jackson at 3a. If there's some major difference between him and Yankee, I guess a trade up would be justified. From here on I assume BPA. If they pass on a QB at 4, they'll have a mid rounder in mind. Take him when it's time.

                                  Just my thousght. That's how I could see a #2 WR, ILB, CB, and G happening, so long as they get the mid rounder they feel has the most upside at QB.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  Quote Reply
                                  • SCDawg82S SCDawg82

                                    How Pick 4 goes well: Just my humble but accurate opinion lol.

                                    A. Sammy Watkins: He's as close to a sure thing as there is in this draft. Really doubt he'll be there at 4 though, home run if he is.

                                    B. JohnnyM: Shocks me how many people can't stand this QB. All he did was DOMINATE the best conference in the country (Yeah I'm an OSU fan too, but your being intellectually dishonest if you wanna argue the SEC hasn't been the strongest conference for a decade, Especially the West.) I mean, yeah, he could be bust. You want a sure thing at QB? Wait another 20 years for another Andrew Luck.

                                    C. JC! NO WAY HE DROPS TO 4.....

                                    How Pick 4 doesnt go well:

                                    1. OL: There's three sick OT's in the draft, but you don't take a RT at NO.4! You just don't.

                                    2. Mack: Great looking linebacker, but unless he's planning to play both ways, he doesn't fix the biggest problem. POINTS.

                                    3. Carr: Christian Ponder level reach.

                                    4. Bortles: Also a reach, smaller reach, but still a reach. You could trade back with someone who wants Mack to get him.

                                    GO BROWNS!

                                    Remarker RemarkerR
                                    • 132 Posts
                                    • 5 Reputation
                                    RemarkerR Remarker wrote on last edited by
                                    #20

                                    @scdawg82 said:

                                    How Pick 4 goes well: Just my humble but accurate opinion lol.

                                    A. Sammy Watkins: He's as close to a sure thing as there is in this draft. Really doubt he'll be there at 4 though, home run if he is.

                                    B. JohnnyM: Shocks me how many people can't stand this QB. All he did was DOMINATE the best conference in the country (Yeah I'm an OSU fan too, but your being intellectually dishonest if you wanna argue the SEC hasn't been the strongest conference for a decade, Especially the West.) I mean, yeah, he could be bust. You want a sure thing at QB? Wait another 20 years for another Andrew Luck.

                                    C. JC! NO WAY HE DROPS TO 4.....

                                    How Pick 4 doesnt go well:

                                    1. OL: There's three sick OT's in the draft, but you don't take a RT at NO.4! You just don't.

                                    2. Mack: Great looking linebacker, but unless he's planning to play both ways, he doesn't fix the biggest problem. POINTS.

                                    3. Carr: Christian Ponder level reach.

                                    4. Bortles: Also a reach, smaller reach, but still a reach. You could trade back with someone who wants Mack to get him.

                                    GO BROWNS!

                                    Well, Tebow lite up the SEC to higher record proportions, for more years, helped his team win a NFL playoff game and we know how that turned out. He's a NFL pariah

                                    Just because Mr. Football lite up the SEC don't mean shit. Just like Tebow, Johnney had a good supporting cast too.

                                    SCDawg82S 1 Reply Last reply
                                    Quote Reply
                                    • Canton MikeC Canton Mike

                                      I'm starting to laugh at all the rumors & predictions based on what is said "pre draft". None of that BS means anything. Those that do make all these predictions or buy all these rumors may look silly as hell AFTER the draft. These media people & "draft insiders" are grasping at straws.

                                      There are definitely players I like, but that's meaningless. I'm just watching, reading, & waiting for next week.

                                      Mike

                                      gftChris gftChrisG
                                      • 13k Posts
                                      • 428 Reputation
                                      gftChrisG gftChris wrote on last edited by
                                      #21

                                      @canton-mike said:

                                      I'm starting to laugh at all the rumors & predictions based on what is said "pre draft". None of that BS means anything. Those that do make all these predictions or buy all these rumors may look silly as hell AFTER the draft. These media people & "draft insiders" are grasping at straws.

                                      There are definitely players I like, but that's meaningless. I'm just watching, reading, & waiting for next week.

                                      Mike

                                      Last year all the talk was about whether there would be an opportunity to trade down if there was one of the top LTs on the board. Instead, Miami went up from, what, 12 to 3, to pick dion jordan. Who the hell saw that coming? Nobody has a damn clue about the draft and in particular trades.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      Quote Reply
                                      • DieHardBrownsFanD DieHardBrownsFan

                                        If Manziel is still there at No. 4 we will most likely pick him.

                                        Kosar_For_President Kosar_For_PresidentK
                                        • 6k Posts
                                        • 221 Reputation
                                        Kosar_For_PresidentK Kosar_For_President wrote on last edited by
                                        #22

                                        @diehardbrownsfan said:

                                        If Manziel is still there at No. 4 we will most likely pick him.

                                        You're Johnny gay.

                                        Luck is Tim Couch. Big, Dumb Goofy, slow thinking QB - Ghoolie, 2-28-12
                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        Quote Reply
                                        • miktoxic miktoxicM
                                          • 13k Posts
                                          • 1k Reputation
                                          miktoxicM miktoxic wrote on last edited by miktoxic
                                          #23

                                          don't be surprised if we do take manziel. a couple of weeks ago carr was mentioned a million times with the browns. now i'm hearing the same thing a week away from the draft and the name that gets most mentioned most with the browns is manziel and @4.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Quote Reply

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Register Login
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          Theme
                                          • System
                                          • Light
                                          • Dark
                                          The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                                          The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Forums
                                          • Recent
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Donate