New Browns Fans Introduce Yourselves
-
Slightly off topic, but can anyone explain why Bud Adams was able to take the Oilers and Houston was unable to name the new team "Oilers"? Also I understand that he even kept ownership of the Oilers records from the Luv Ya Blue days - even Earl Campbell's are displayed when no connection with Titans.
-
What constitutes the "team". The "team" known as the Cleveland Browns didn't go. And FYI, all the owners of that "team" didn't go there. Both Bob Gries and Al Lerner were minority owners of the Cleveland Browns at the time. In order for Modell to be able to be given the rights to the Ravens franchise he had to buy out both Gries and Lerner. Modell only owned 53% of the Browns. I believe he ended up owning 100% of the Ravens.So, in reality, even the ownership of the Ravens was NOT the same as the Browns. Obviously we know that the team history/colors/etc. didn't go. The coaches didn't go.
Some of the players went, yes, because they were under contract and their contracts were assigned to the new franchise.
Many didn't. At least one that I know (Steve Everitt) essentially refused to go....and he was either released or traded. A bunch of players were just let go. Sure, enough names went....Vinny and Craig Powell.
Let's just say that some remnants of the team moved....but certainly not the whole team.
What do you think constitutes a team in this scenario?
Are Jimmy Haslam and Ray Farmer strapping on pads and playing? No. They are part of the "team" in the broadest sense of the definition, but are they practicing during organized TEAM activities? Do they have lockers in the team locker room? No. They're not part of the team. They're management and ownership.
The team colors aren't the team. The owners aren't the team. The team history isn't the team. That's part of the franchise.
The team is the team. The players on the field. The actual team is the team. You know that, you're just arguing to be a difficult douchebag.
All of the players currently under contract were asked to go. Whether some of them refused is immaterial. They were still contractually obligated to go.
So, yes...the team went.
Stop trying to validate it.
The team moved. The franchise stayed. That's literally all there is to it.
Get over it already, it happened over a decade ago. Jesus fucking christ.
What do you think constitutes a team in this scenario?
Are Jimmy Haslam and Ray Farmer strapping on pads and playing? No. They are part of the "team" in the broadest sense of the definition, but are they practicing during organized TEAM activities? Do they have lockers in the team locker room? No. They're not part of the team. They're management and ownership.
The team colors aren't the team. The owners aren't the team. The team history isn't the team. That's part of the franchise.
The team is the team. The players on the field. The actual team is the team. You know that, you're just arguing to be a difficult douchebag.
No, I am arguing that all those things that you say aren't the team, in fact may be the most durable aspect of a team.
All of the players currently under contract were asked to go. Whether some of them refused is immaterial. They were still contractually obligated to go.
So, yes...the team went.
Stop trying to validate it.
Players, to an NFL team are nothing but fungible assets. They are nothing but cornseed. By your defintion then the Browns team of last year has now moved on almost as much as that team back in 1995. The Browns moved to Dallas because Weeden is now in Dallas, or they are in Denver because TJ Ward is in Denver, they moved to wherever DQJackson went...or to wherever Jason Campbell is now, where Sean Lauvao is now (Washington), they are in Indianapolis because that is where Trent Richardson is, Oakland because that is where Greg Little is.
Honestly, players are about as critical to what a "team" is as the dirty laundry bags full of uniforms that the equipment managers haul around. Perhaps that is where the team is: in the laundry hamper. Players are as fungible as those dirty unis.
The team moved. The franchise stayed. That's literally all there is to it.
Get over it already, it happened over a decade ago. Jesus fucking christ.
Well, if you want to fuck Jesus Christ, perhaps you need to be named Mary Magdelene.. All I am doing is setting the historical fact straight for some of the newbie JFF fans we have here. I mean, you wouldn't want them to believe that Texas won the Civil War, would you?
-
Slightly off topic, but can anyone explain why Bud Adams was able to take the Oilers and Houston was unable to name the new team "Oilers"? Also I understand that he even kept ownership of the Oilers records from the Luv Ya Blue days - even Earl Campbell's are displayed when no connection with Titans.
Slightly off topic, but can anyone explain why Bud Adams was able to take the Oilers and Houston was unable to name the new team "Oilers"? Also I understand that he even kept ownership of the Oilers records from the Luv Ya Blue days - even Earl Campbell's are displayed when no connection with Titans.
Well, what occurred in Houston is not what occurred in Cleveland. There, the franchise, the team, the history, the colors, everything, the whole lock, stock and barrell were allowed to move, unlike here.
Here, the Cleveland Browns are a continuous franchise going back to their origins in the 1946 season in the AAFC.
The Tennessee Titans franchise however is one continuous franchise going back to the 1960 season in the AFL when they were begun as the Houston Oilers. The Titans/Oilers franchise moved and merely underwent a name change. In fact they used the name Oilers for a couple of years. Here is their team record:
http://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/oti/
Compare that to the Browns:
http://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/cle/
Or the Ravens:
-
Did Houston make some error in dealing at the time that prevented them being able to retain history, name, colors or was it not possible? Having trouble seeing why not same outcome.
-
Did Houston make some error in dealing at the time that prevented them being able to retain history, name, colors or was it not possible? Having trouble seeing why not same outcome.
Did Houston make some error in dealing at the time that prevented them being able to retain history, name, colors or was it not possible? Having trouble seeing why not same outcome.
The issue really came down to the fact that the City of Cleveland had a legal hammer over Modell's head that the city of Houston did not have: an ironclad lease. the Browns lease with the City...which owned Muni stadium, mandated that the team play all its home games in Muni stadium for an additional 3 years from the time Modell wanted to move. After Modell announced that he wanted to leave the city sued to bring specific performance of the terms of that least and won. The Browns could NOT move.
But not being able to moving is one thing. But, Modell could have deliberately caused enough mischief in the meantime to make the Browns an untenable NFL operation. (like selling off any decent players, fielding a team made of rookies and street free agents, letting the stadium go to seed....not that he didn't do that already, doing all their traveling via bus rides except to the West coast etc. etc. And he was just a big enough asshole to do those things. The NFL would not allow that and petitioned to intervene in the case...and to mediate a settlement, which they did.)
The Oilers lease at the Astrodome on the other hand was up. There was no lease. They could not enjoin a move or require specific performance. And, unlike Cleveland, quite frankly the government and the populace seemed overall apathetic to the prospect of losing the Oilers.
I personally don't like that the Oilers left. I think they should have remained Houston's team, but you get these greedy guys like Modell, Adams, Bidwill, Robert Irsay, Georgia Frontiere, Al Davis. If there are a few more bucks to be made elsewhere, to hell with the loyal fans.
The NFL didn't help so much when they expanded into "new cities" like Charlotte and Jacksonville where there were old time NFL cities wanting one of those expansion teams. The NFL chose Carolina and Jax over bids by St. Louis and Baltimore.
In retrospect, the choice of Jax may not have been a good one. They chose it merely because they like the prospective owner....Wayne Weaver, who was a good guy. But that cities bid I doubt was as good as Baltimore or St. Louis.
The NFL may have thought that the Baltimorons would simply switch allegiance to the Redskins, who, after all, were in their back yard playing in a Maryland suburb. But that didn't really happen.
-
Thanks for the refresher. I lived in Houston at the time and was a BIG Luv Ya Blue fan, as were almost all Houstonians. I also remember that Bud Adams was a big asshole and alienated a large percentage of the fans with his constant asking for more, more, more. If Houstonians appeared apathetic about the move, that would be the reason. When Adams died last fall, the Houston Chronicle called him (he still lived in Houston) the most hated man in Houston.
-
Slightly off topic, but can anyone explain why Bud Adams was able to take the Oilers and Houston was unable to name the new team "Oilers"? Also I understand that he even kept ownership of the Oilers records from the Luv Ya Blue days - even Earl Campbell's are displayed when no connection with Titans.
Slightly off topic, but can anyone explain why Bud Adams was able to take the Oilers and Houston was unable to name the new team "Oilers"? Also I understand that he even kept ownership of the Oilers records from the Luv Ya Blue days - even Earl Campbell's are displayed when no connection with Titans.
Having suffered the loss of that team as well...
As I remember it was "Butt" Adams' choice to change names. Held a contest in TN and everything...
-
My recollection is that the new Houston franchise requested to use the name Oilers, but Adams refused.
-
Thanks for the refresher. I lived in Houston at the time and was a BIG Luv Ya Blue fan, as were almost all Houstonians. I also remember that Bud Adams was a big asshole and alienated a large percentage of the fans with his constant asking for more, more, more. If Houstonians appeared apathetic about the move, that would be the reason. When Adams died last fall, the Houston Chronicle called him (he still lived in Houston) the most hated man in Houston.
Thanks for the refresher. I lived in Houston at the time and was a BIG Luv Ya Blue fan, as were almost all Houstonians. I also remember that Bud Adams was a big asshole and alienated a large percentage of the fans with his constant asking for more, more, more. If Houstonians appeared apathetic about the move, that would be the reason. When Adams died last fall, the Houston Chronicle called him (he still lived in Houston) the most hated man in Houston.
Well, I see to recall that one of Adam's given reasons for moving to Tennessee was that "I love Country Music". I mean, can you not get sufficient country music in Houston? Absurd.
-
OK, so, now Adams is dead. What is going on with the ownership situation there? Are his kids taking over?
I know that Ralph Wilson's kid are not taking over. The Bills are being sold. But I haven't heard about the Tits.
-
What do you think constitutes a team in this scenario?
Are Jimmy Haslam and Ray Farmer strapping on pads and playing? No. They are part of the "team" in the broadest sense of the definition, but are they practicing during organized TEAM activities? Do they have lockers in the team locker room? No. They're not part of the team. They're management and ownership.
The team colors aren't the team. The owners aren't the team. The team history isn't the team. That's part of the franchise.
The team is the team. The players on the field. The actual team is the team. You know that, you're just arguing to be a difficult douchebag.
No, I am arguing that all those things that you say aren't the team, in fact may be the most durable aspect of a team.
All of the players currently under contract were asked to go. Whether some of them refused is immaterial. They were still contractually obligated to go.
So, yes...the team went.
Stop trying to validate it.
Players, to an NFL team are nothing but fungible assets. They are nothing but cornseed. By your defintion then the Browns team of last year has now moved on almost as much as that team back in 1995. The Browns moved to Dallas because Weeden is now in Dallas, or they are in Denver because TJ Ward is in Denver, they moved to wherever DQJackson went...or to wherever Jason Campbell is now, where Sean Lauvao is now (Washington), they are in Indianapolis because that is where Trent Richardson is, Oakland because that is where Greg Little is.
Honestly, players are about as critical to what a "team" is as the dirty laundry bags full of uniforms that the equipment managers haul around. Perhaps that is where the team is: in the laundry hamper. Players are as fungible as those dirty unis.
The team moved. The franchise stayed. That's literally all there is to it.
Get over it already, it happened over a decade ago. Jesus fucking christ.
Well, if you want to fuck Jesus Christ, perhaps you need to be named Mary Magdelene.. All I am doing is setting the historical fact straight for some of the newbie JFF fans we have here. I mean, you wouldn't want them to believe that Texas won the Civil War, would you?
What do you think constitutes a team in this scenario?
Are Jimmy Haslam and Ray Farmer strapping on pads and playing? No. They are part of the "team" in the broadest sense of the definition, but are they practicing during organized TEAM activities? Do they have lockers in the team locker room? No. They're not part of the team. They're management and ownership.
The team colors aren't the team. The owners aren't the team. The team history isn't the team. That's part of the franchise.
The team is the team. The players on the field. The actual team is the team. You know that, you're just arguing to be a difficult douchebag.
No, I am arguing that all those things that you say aren't the team, in fact may be the most durable aspect of a team.
All of the players currently under contract were asked to go. Whether some of them refused is immaterial. They were still contractually obligated to go.
So, yes...the team went.
Stop trying to validate it.
Players, to an NFL team are nothing but fungible assets. They are nothing but cornseed. By your defintion then the Browns team of last year has now moved on almost as much as that team back in 1995. The Browns moved to Dallas because Weeden is now in Dallas, or they are in Denver because TJ Ward is in Denver, they moved to wherever DQJackson went...or to wherever Jason Campbell is now, where Sean Lauvao is now (Washington), they are in Indianapolis because that is where Trent Richardson is, Oakland because that is where Greg Little is.
Honestly, players are about as critical to what a "team" is as the dirty laundry bags full of uniforms that the equipment managers haul around. Perhaps that is where the team is: in the laundry hamper. Players are as fungible as those dirty unis.
The team moved. The franchise stayed. That's literally all there is to it.
Get over it already, it happened over a decade ago. Jesus fucking christ.
Well, if you want to fuck Jesus Christ, perhaps you need to be named Mary Magdelene.. All I am doing is setting the historical fact straight for some of the newbie JFF fans we have here. I mean, you wouldn't want them to believe that Texas won the Civil War, would you?
The fact is that the team moved and the franchise stayed.
That is the fact.
Debating semantics just makes it seem like you're trying your best to cover up the fact that it happened or trying to justify it in your own mind.
The team, in this scenario, consists of the group of players that take the field. In a team-based sport, this is what is commonly thought of as "the team".
They moved. Whether Steve Everitt refused to play or some minority owners refused to go to Baltimore or not doesn't matter. The team of players were contractually obligated to do so, unless they demanded release or had their contracts expire.
The franchise, in this scenario representing everything that isn't personnel, stayed in Cleveland. The colors, the history, the name- all of which stayed in Cleveland.
So, once again, the team left and the franchise stayed.
I'm awesome, and I fuck dolphins. Ghoolie 12/2/2012: I have absolutely no skills, training or pride -
What do you think constitutes a team in this scenario?
Are Jimmy Haslam and Ray Farmer strapping on pads and playing? No. They are part of the "team" in the broadest sense of the definition, but are they practicing during organized TEAM activities? Do they have lockers in the team locker room? No. They're not part of the team. They're management and ownership.
The team colors aren't the team. The owners aren't the team. The team history isn't the team. That's part of the franchise.
The team is the team. The players on the field. The actual team is the team. You know that, you're just arguing to be a difficult douchebag.
No, I am arguing that all those things that you say aren't the team, in fact may be the most durable aspect of a team.
All of the players currently under contract were asked to go. Whether some of them refused is immaterial. They were still contractually obligated to go.
So, yes...the team went.
Stop trying to validate it.
Players, to an NFL team are nothing but fungible assets. They are nothing but cornseed. By your defintion then the Browns team of last year has now moved on almost as much as that team back in 1995. The Browns moved to Dallas because Weeden is now in Dallas, or they are in Denver because TJ Ward is in Denver, they moved to wherever DQJackson went...or to wherever Jason Campbell is now, where Sean Lauvao is now (Washington), they are in Indianapolis because that is where Trent Richardson is, Oakland because that is where Greg Little is.
Honestly, players are about as critical to what a "team" is as the dirty laundry bags full of uniforms that the equipment managers haul around. Perhaps that is where the team is: in the laundry hamper. Players are as fungible as those dirty unis.
The team moved. The franchise stayed. That's literally all there is to it.
Get over it already, it happened over a decade ago. Jesus fucking christ.
Well, if you want to fuck Jesus Christ, perhaps you need to be named Mary Magdelene.. All I am doing is setting the historical fact straight for some of the newbie JFF fans we have here. I mean, you wouldn't want them to believe that Texas won the Civil War, would you?
The fact is that the team moved and the franchise stayed.
That is the fact.
Debating semantics just makes it seem like you're trying your best to cover up the fact that it happened or trying to justify it in your own mind.
The team, in this scenario, consists of the group of players that take the field. In a team-based sport, this is what is commonly thought of as "the team".
They moved. Whether Steve Everitt refused to play or some minority owners refused to go to Baltimore or not doesn't matter. The team of players were contractually obligated to do so, unless they demanded release or had their contracts expire.
The franchise, in this scenario representing everything that isn't personnel, stayed in Cleveland. The colors, the history, the name- all of which stayed in Cleveland.
So, once again, the team left and the franchise stayed.
The fact is that the team moved and the franchise stayed.
That is the fact.
Debating semantics just makes it seem like you're trying your best to cover up the fact that it happened or trying to justify it in your own mind.
The team, in this scenario, consists of the group of players that take the field. In a team-based sport, this is what is commonly thought of as "the team".
They moved. Whether Steve Everitt refused to play or some minority owners refused to go to Baltimore or not doesn't matter. The team of players were contractually obligated to do so, unless they demanded release or had their contracts expire.
The franchise, in this scenario representing everything that isn't personnel, stayed in Cleveland. The colors, the history, the name- all of which stayed in Cleveland.
So, once again, the team left and the franchise stayed.
Of course the team left and the franchise stayed. No doubt about it. We had to build a new 'team' from scratch.
"You planning on having a long relationship with that glass or are you going to drink it? Drink up, man. Maybe we can get another.” - Janis Joplin, 1970. -
I no longer live in Houston and try to avoid the Titans whenever possible, so don't know what's going on with them.
-
What do you think constitutes a team in this scenario?
Are Jimmy Haslam and Ray Farmer strapping on pads and playing? No. They are part of the "team" in the broadest sense of the definition, but are they practicing during organized TEAM activities? Do they have lockers in the team locker room? No. They're not part of the team. They're management and ownership.
The team colors aren't the team. The owners aren't the team. The team history isn't the team. That's part of the franchise.
The team is the team. The players on the field. The actual team is the team. You know that, you're just arguing to be a difficult douchebag.
No, I am arguing that all those things that you say aren't the team, in fact may be the most durable aspect of a team.
All of the players currently under contract were asked to go. Whether some of them refused is immaterial. They were still contractually obligated to go.
So, yes...the team went.
Stop trying to validate it.
Players, to an NFL team are nothing but fungible assets. They are nothing but cornseed. By your defintion then the Browns team of last year has now moved on almost as much as that team back in 1995. The Browns moved to Dallas because Weeden is now in Dallas, or they are in Denver because TJ Ward is in Denver, they moved to wherever DQJackson went...or to wherever Jason Campbell is now, where Sean Lauvao is now (Washington), they are in Indianapolis because that is where Trent Richardson is, Oakland because that is where Greg Little is.
Honestly, players are about as critical to what a "team" is as the dirty laundry bags full of uniforms that the equipment managers haul around. Perhaps that is where the team is: in the laundry hamper. Players are as fungible as those dirty unis.
The team moved. The franchise stayed. That's literally all there is to it.
Get over it already, it happened over a decade ago. Jesus fucking christ.
Well, if you want to fuck Jesus Christ, perhaps you need to be named Mary Magdelene.. All I am doing is setting the historical fact straight for some of the newbie JFF fans we have here. I mean, you wouldn't want them to believe that Texas won the Civil War, would you?
The fact is that the team moved and the franchise stayed.
That is the fact.
Debating semantics just makes it seem like you're trying your best to cover up the fact that it happened or trying to justify it in your own mind.
The team, in this scenario, consists of the group of players that take the field. In a team-based sport, this is what is commonly thought of as "the team".
They moved. Whether Steve Everitt refused to play or some minority owners refused to go to Baltimore or not doesn't matter. The team of players were contractually obligated to do so, unless they demanded release or had their contracts expire.
The franchise, in this scenario representing everything that isn't personnel, stayed in Cleveland. The colors, the history, the name- all of which stayed in Cleveland.
So, once again, the team left and the franchise stayed.
The fact is that the team moved and the franchise stayed.
That is the fact.
Debating semantics just makes it seem like you're trying your best to cover up the fact that it happened or trying to justify it in your own mind.
The team, in this scenario, consists of the group of players that take the field. In a team-based sport, this is what is commonly thought of as "the team".
They moved. Whether Steve Everitt refused to play or some minority owners refused to go to Baltimore or not doesn't matter. The team of players were contractually obligated to do so, unless they demanded release or had their contracts expire.
The franchise, in this scenario representing everything that isn't personnel, stayed in Cleveland. The colors, the history, the name- all of which stayed in Cleveland.
So, once again, the team left and the franchise stayed.
Once again to be absolutely accurate, remnants, some portion, of the team moved. I have won and lost cases or made settlements on matters more semantical that this. As a jurist I have decided cases on matters more semantical than this.
-
The fact is that the team moved and the franchise stayed.
That is the fact.
Debating semantics just makes it seem like you're trying your best to cover up the fact that it happened or trying to justify it in your own mind.
The team, in this scenario, consists of the group of players that take the field. In a team-based sport, this is what is commonly thought of as "the team".
They moved. Whether Steve Everitt refused to play or some minority owners refused to go to Baltimore or not doesn't matter. The team of players were contractually obligated to do so, unless they demanded release or had their contracts expire.
The franchise, in this scenario representing everything that isn't personnel, stayed in Cleveland. The colors, the history, the name- all of which stayed in Cleveland.
So, once again, the team left and the franchise stayed.
Of course the team left and the franchise stayed. No doubt about it. We had to build a new 'team' from scratch.
Of course the team left and the franchise stayed. No doubt about it. We had to build a new 'team' from scratch.
Perhaps, but that is a different issue on whether the entire "team" moved to Baltimore. TCPO believes the team consists only of the players.....and like I said, then the team we are going to put on the field this fall must not be the Cleveland Browns. Lots and lots and lots of the players on last years roster....last year's "team" are no longer here, so this next year the team must not be the Cleveland Browns....so what are they, The Cleveland Ecrus?
And yea, tell us about how much the players are "the team". Tell that to player Elhadji Ndiaye, signed Thursday, cut yesterday.
Anthony Dima, signed last Tuesday, Cut yesterday. About 3 or 4 other "team members" had that distinction of being "the team known as the Cleveland Browns"....for about a week.
Cornseed.
-
Thanks for the refresher. I lived in Houston at the time and was a BIG Luv Ya Blue fan, as were almost all Houstonians. I also remember that Bud Adams was a big asshole and alienated a large percentage of the fans with his constant asking for more, more, more. If Houstonians appeared apathetic about the move, that would be the reason. When Adams died last fall, the Houston Chronicle called him (he still lived in Houston) the most hated man in Houston.
Well, I see to recall that one of Adam's given reasons for moving to Tennessee was that "I love Country Music". I mean, can you not get sufficient country music in Houston? Absurd.
Is the horse dead yet?
I mean, can you not get sufficient country music in Houston? Absurd.
Not since Gilley's burned down.. (arson was never proved)
-
Of course the team left and the franchise stayed. No doubt about it. We had to build a new 'team' from scratch.
Perhaps, but that is a different issue on whether the entire "team" moved to Baltimore. TCPO believes the team consists only of the players.....and like I said, then the team we are going to put on the field this fall must not be the Cleveland Browns. Lots and lots and lots of the players on last years roster....last year's "team" are no longer here, so this next year the team must not be the Cleveland Browns....so what are they, The Cleveland Ecrus?
And yea, tell us about how much the players are "the team". Tell that to player Elhadji Ndiaye, signed Thursday, cut yesterday.
Anthony Dima, signed last Tuesday, Cut yesterday. About 3 or 4 other "team members" had that distinction of being "the team known as the Cleveland Browns"....for about a week.
Cornseed.
Perhaps, but that is a different issue on whether the entire "team" moved to Baltimore. TCPO believes the team consists only of the players.....and like I said, then the team we are going to put on the field this fall must not be the Cleveland Browns. Lots and lots and lots of the players on last years roster....last year's "team" are no longer here, so this next year the team must not be the Cleveland Browns....so what are they, The Cleveland Ecrus?
And yea, tell us about how much the players are "the team". Tell that to player Elhadji Ndiaye, signed Thursday, cut yesterday.
Anthony Dima, signed last Tuesday, Cut yesterday. About 3 or 4 other "team members" had that distinction of being "the team known as the Cleveland Browns"....for about a week.
Cornseed.
No, they will be the Browns. They will be the 2014 Cleveland Browns, composed of some of the 2013 Cleveland Browns. Just as the 1996 Ravens were composed of some of the 1995 Cleveland Browns.
Being a judge makes you no less wrong, it just means you're good at nitpicking. You're debating something for no reason other than to debate it, like you always do.
I'm awesome, and I fuck dolphins. Ghoolie 12/2/2012: I have absolutely no skills, training or pride -
@everlastingxxx said:
Well why i was asking about the word organized. Browns have the most clubs. My original point was about dealing with popularity which clearly the Cowboys are #1. A number of polls prove that point while Browns are down in the 20s. Regardless, at the end of the day i would trade a Super Bowl trophy over popularity.
Polls:
http://www.sportsbusinessdaily.com/Daily/Issues/2013/10/16/Research-and-Ratings/Harris-Poll.aspx
Tiny Canadian Pussy Douche is more popular than the Beatles so you know put that in your pipe and smoke it.
Early man walked away as modern man took control. Their minds weren't all the same and to conquer was their goal. So He built his great empires and he slaughtered his own kind, and he died a confused man and killed himself in his own mind... -
@mike-h said:
Welcome to thunder dome bitch
http://thunderblogsports.files.wordpress.com/2013/12/cleveland-to-baltimore.jpg
Haha!
-
The Cowboys had an era once too. These days I'd bet money the 49ers are actually more popular, because popularity is usually a gay bandwagon attribute.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login