Skip to content

Best description of Obamao

Political Discussion
43 10 837
  • Ultra right wingers bitch about race being brought into the discussion then immediately bring race into the discussion. They do the same thing with sexual preference.

  • Thank heavens that the voting majority of Americans remain Christian and are in no desperate need of a phony savior.

    And yet he won 2 presidential elections

    @browns149 said:

    Thank heavens that the voting majority of Americans remain Christian and are in no desperate need of a phony savior.

    And yet he won 2 presidential elections

    Shows how stupid most Americans are.

  • But in the most racially charged election in the history of the United States he has less in common with his main constituents than John McCain does with Putin.

    WSS

  • @browns149 said:

    Thank heavens that the voting majority of Americans remain Christian and are in no desperate need of a phony savior.

    And yet he won 2 presidential elections

    Shows how stupid most Americans are.

    @diehardbrownsfan said:

    Shows how stupid most Americans are.

    you guys keep claiming "most Americans are stupid" when you talk about Obama being elected TWICE. But none of you said that about Bush being elected TWICE.

    Why is that?

    Is it because Bush was SOOOO much better, Obama is SOOOO bad or because Bush was "your" choice and Obama was not?

    When you don't like something you claim people are stupid for liking what you don't.

  • 1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_American - " African Americans, also referred to as Black Americans or Afro-Americans, are citizens or residents of the United States who have total or partial antebellumancestry from any of the native populations of Sub-Saharan Africa.[3][4][5]"

    2. Electing Bush twice was not stupid. Electing a radical, frightened to make legit decisions, pretend

    smart man was stupid. No president has made more controversy while disputing the legitimacy

    of our Constitution and rule of law, as well as our way of life and our economic system.....

    comprehensively, while using racism, and the usual dem class warfare to divide people...

    than Buttock Obamao. Nooooobody.

    3. Libs railed about perceived and legit "failed policies" of Bush for years. But not one

    mention, or admission, of all of Buttock's failed policies.

    Very strange. And very indicative of blind, extreme cult-ish behavior.

  • The manipulations this guy is using are pretty obvious. Using his logic, every African American whose surname is similar to those used by white Americans must really be white. Arabic surnames are present among many different ethnicities, including Africans. That doesn't change what their ethnicity is.

    And really, only descendants of slaves qualify as African-American? So all the black people who immigrated here since the end of slavery don't count? Wow, just wow, I bet the NAACP might have something to say about that.

    I could go on but this article isn't worth taking seriously.

    Sorry Woody, I know how my incessant use of logic and common sense irks you. 🙂

    @osiris said:

    The manipulations this guy is using are pretty obvious. Using his logic, every African American whose surname is similar to those used by white Americans must really be white. Arabic surnames are present among many different ethnicities, including Africans. That doesn't change what their ethnicity is.

    And really, only descendants of slaves qualify as African-American? So all the black people who immigrated here since the end of slavery don't count? Wow, just wow, I bet the NAACP might have something to say about that.

    I could go on but this article isn't worth taking seriously.

    Sorry Woody, I know how my incessant use of logic and common sense irks you. 🙂

    So a white guy from south Africa who attains citizenship is or is not an african-american?

  • @diehardbrownsfan said:

    Shows how stupid most Americans are.

    you guys keep claiming "most Americans are stupid" when you talk about Obama being elected TWICE. But none of you said that about Bush being elected TWICE.

    Why is that?

    Is it because Bush was SOOOO much better, Obama is SOOOO bad or because Bush was "your" choice and Obama was not?

    When you don't like something you claim people are stupid for liking what you don't.

    @browns149 said:

    you guys keep claiming "most Americans are stupid" when you talk about Obama being elected TWICE. But none of you said that about Bush being elected TWICE.

    Why is that?

    Is it because Bush was SOOOO much better, Obama is SOOOO bad or because Bush was "your" choice and Obama was not?

    When you don't like something you claim people are stupid for liking what you don't.

    You guys? I voted for Obama once, not the other time. He failed in everything and lied. Bush was better, much better.

  • Of course if the election is based in large part on a minority of people who feel they have been discriminated against and use the slavery issue as an excuse for their underperformance over the last couple hundred years, yes identifying with someone who only looks like a descendant of slaves is...

    You choose the best description.

    PS you don't believe the NAACP speaks for you do you Osiris?

    WSS

  • @osiris said:

    The manipulations this guy is using are pretty obvious. Using his logic, every African American whose surname is similar to those used by white Americans must really be white. Arabic surnames are present among many different ethnicities, including Africans. That doesn't change what their ethnicity is.

    And really, only descendants of slaves qualify as African-American? So all the black people who immigrated here since the end of slavery don't count? Wow, just wow, I bet the NAACP might have something to say about that.

    I could go on but this article isn't worth taking seriously.

    Sorry Woody, I know how my incessant use of logic and common sense irks you. 🙂

    So a white guy from south Africa who attains citizenship is or is not an african-american?

    @the-cysko-kid said:

    So a white guy from south Africa who attains citizenship is or is not an african-american?

    I got to see this awkward situation play out while I was in college. The black kids didn't know how to deal with the situation of a white African-American kid wandering into the Cultural Affairs office and asking about scholarships.

  • The manipulations this guy is using are pretty obvious. Using his logic, every African American whose surname is similar to those used by white Americans must really be white. Arabic surnames are present among many different ethnicities, including Africans. That doesn't change what their ethnicity is.

    And really, only descendants of slaves qualify as African-American? So all the black people who immigrated here since the end of slavery don't count? Wow, just wow, I bet the NAACP might have something to say about that.

    I could go on but this article isn't worth taking seriously.

    Sorry Woody, I know how my incessant use of logic and common sense irks you. 🙂

    @osiris said:

    Sorry Woody, I know how my incessant use of logic and common sense irks you. 🙂

    Don't apologize. Its preferred.

  • @diehardbrownsfan said:

    Shows how stupid most Americans are.

    you guys keep claiming "most Americans are stupid" when you talk about Obama being elected TWICE. But none of you said that about Bush being elected TWICE.

    Why is that?

    Is it because Bush was SOOOO much better, Obama is SOOOO bad or because Bush was "your" choice and Obama was not?

    When you don't like something you claim people are stupid for liking what you don't.

    @browns149 said:

    you guys keep claiming "most Americans are stupid" when you talk about Obama being elected TWICE. But none of you said that about Bush being elected TWICE.

    Why is that?

    Is it because Bush was SOOOO much better, Obama is SOOOO bad or because Bush was "your" choice and Obama was not?

    When you don't like something you claim people are stupid for liking what you don't.

    Its clearly that. Their guy vs the other guy. Their guy win and Americans are smart. Other guy aubs and the majority if Americans are stupid.

    I'm sure if the next president is their guy, we'll see them taking his side on things they'd attack Obama for. Its all incredibly hypocritical. Yet somehow, they're blind to it

  • bs, woody.

    Even Lech Walesa of Poland is asking Obamao to start acting

    like a world leader.

    You';re saying that Bush and Obamao are pretty much the same, and

    partisan outlook is the only difference?

    Nobody, but noooobody buys that.

    http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/democrats-privately-calling-obama-detached-flat-footed-incompetent_793544.html

  • I'm saying a Dem president could do something, and you'd be yelling "scandal" and attacking him and posting TheBlaze, Breitbart, TopRightNews, etc articles agreeing with you

    A Rep president could do the exact same thing, and you'd be yelling "the liberal media is unfair!" and defending him and posting TheBlaze, Breitbart, TopRightNews, etc articles agreeing with you

    That would be one of the positives of a Rep president. We could see you flip your script on so many things, lol.

  • bs, woody.

    Even Lech Walesa of Poland is asking Obamao to start acting

    like a world leader.

    You';re saying that Bush and Obamao are pretty much the same, and

    partisan outlook is the only difference?

    Nobody, but noooobody buys that.

    http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/democrats-privately-calling-obama-detached-flat-footed-incompetent_793544.html

    @calfoxwc said:

    bs, woody.

    Even Lech Walesa of Poland is asking Obamao to start acting

    like a world leader.

    You';re saying that Bush and Obamao are pretty much the same, and

    partisan outlook is the only difference?

    Nobody, but noooobody buys that.

    http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/democrats-privately-calling-obama-detached-flat-footed-incompetent_793544.html

    No. I am saying in your eyes Bush did NO wrong and Obama has done NOTHING right. At least that is how you come off

  • No. I am saying in your eyes Bush did NO wrong and Obama has done NOTHING right.

    At least that is how you come off 140

    *******************************************************

    bs. I never said anything like Bush never did any wrong. He blew it

    on immigration, that's my biggest gripe. You go ahead and analyze them.

    Tell us what Bush did that was bad, and what Obamao did that was bad.

    My guess is, it will be about Bush 3, Obamao 18.

    Yet you equate the two. You think that electing Bush twice was stupid, yet you get

    annoyed that we're saying it was stupid to have elected Obamao twice.

    Guess who is president right now? Guess who has bashed out Constitution. Obamao. Not Bush.

    Guess who got caught gun running to the drug cartels in Mexico, to justify bashing our 2nd Amendment

    with serious restrictions? Obamao. Not Bush. Guess who is racially dividing out country? Obamao. Not Bush.

    Guess who is using class warfare and dividing our country? Obamao. Not Bush.

    Guess who favors UNLIMITED anything goes abortion? Obamao. NOT Bush.

    Guess who did NOTHING about the murders in Benghazi, then tried to cover it up?

    OBAMAO. NOT BUSH. Guess who lied about supporting real marriage? Obamao. NOT BUSH.

    Guess who has condoned the illegal targeting of conservative groups by the IRS ? OBAMAO. NOT BUSH.

    Guess who is considered a milktoast, lillylivered president who can make a decision and is NOT a leader ! OBAMAO. NOT BUSH.

    Guess who voted many, many, many times "present" as a senator, showing his neuroses about making

    any kind of decision? Obamao. Not Bush.and that is just for starters.

    Guess who lied about going to be "post-partisan, and bring all Americans together? Ha.Obamao. Not Bush.

    Guess who had his party totally in control of both houses of Congress, and still couldn't do squat? Obamao. Not Bush.

    THAT is just part of freakin why it was STUPID to elect this marxist loser into our WH twice.

  • Well you guys better win this time then.

    Watch a third candidate run as a Tea Party member. He gets all the votes of the crazy people like Cal and splits the vote with the "liberal" Republican. Then, the Dem wins handedly.

    That would be fucking funny.

  • @walterwhite said:

    Any of you who think an election or political action is going to change this country is a complete fucking clown.

    Both parties have spent time in the majority position (house, senate, and oval office) but the problems remain the same:

    inflation, rising health care cost, shrinking middle class, lack of quality education and an outdated system, IRS scandals, high tax rates, spying, Corporotism, NDAA, Patriot Act, etc.

    This is very true. And it will continue until we are all long gone

    But according to some people here, ANYONE but Obama can fix ALL of it. Especially if there is a R in front of that persons name.

  • Well you guys better win this time then.

    Watch a third candidate run as a Tea Party member. He gets all the votes of the crazy people like Cal and splits the vote with the "liberal" Republican. Then, the Dem wins handedly.

    That would be fucking funny.

    @mld-woody said:

    Well you guys better win this time then.

    Watch a third candidate run as a Tea Party member. He gets all the votes of the crazy people like Cal and splits the vote with the "liberal" Republican. Then, the Dem wins handedly.

    That would be fucking funny.

    This is EXACTLY what is going to happen. The Republicans are a splintered group. Just read this article and you can see why they are having trouble. They can't even agree with each other.

    https://uk.news.yahoo.com/younger-members-split-gop-social-issues-150151163.html#OJtWuIl

  • It'd be nice if you Tea Party critics knew anything but what Democrat propagandists tell you.

    But save for a few, the media can't let go of Obama's dick and those who only watch The Daily Show (or only parrott The lefties they want to impress) really don't know much of anything. Even worse than Glenn Beck website that pisses them off.

    WSS

  • It'd be nice if you Tea Party critics knew anything but what Democrat propagandists tell you.

    But save for a few, the media can't let go of Obama's dick and those who only watch The Daily Show (or only parrott The lefties they want to impress) really don't know much of anything. Even worse than Glenn Beck website that pisses them off.

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    It'd be nice if you Tea Party critics knew anything but what Democrat propagandists tell you.

    But save for a few, the media can't let go of Obama's dick and those who only watch The Daily Show (or only parrott The lefties they want to impress) really don't know much of anything. Even worse than Glenn Beck website that pisses them off.

    WSS

    What exactly does the tea party stand for? It is hard to tell.