Best description of Obamao
-
When it is used like "everyone that agrees wjth me is a patriot. If you don't you arent a real American" it is
-
nobody uses it that way.
nonsense.
The left ravages the Tea Party because they are
politically opposed to them.
Weird, because the Tea Party stands for "Taxed Enough Already"...
and our Constitution, and smaller gov,
I've been to a few Tea Party rallies, full of parents and kids, and American flags,
most signs were about too much taxation, and gov run amok.
That sounds sinister to anybody?
Of course not.
-
No one said it was sinister.
And the word "patriot" is used by yourself and in the articles you post like that on a regular basis lol
-
Is being a Patriot a bad thing? I guess so.
pa·tri·otˈpātrēət/noun- 1.a person who vigorously supports their country and is prepared to defend it against enemies or detractors.
Is being a Patriot a bad thing? I guess so.
pa·tri·ot
ˈpātrēət/
noun
-
1.
a person who vigorously supports their country and is prepared to defend it against enemies or detractors.
Yeah, but our founding fathers were mutineers, not Patriots.
And wouldn't a patriot defend the duly elected President of the United States against all detractors?
Just curious.
WSS
-
-
Is being a Patriot a bad thing? I guess so.
pa·tri·ot
ˈpātrēət/
noun
-
1.
a person who vigorously supports their country and is prepared to defend it against enemies or detractors.
Yeah, but our founding fathers were mutineers, not Patriots.
And wouldn't a patriot defend the duly elected President of the United States against all detractors?
Just curious.
WSS
Yeah, but our founding fathers were mutineers, not Patriots.
And wouldn't a patriot defend the duly elected President of the United States against all detractors?
Just curious.
WSS
Unless they consider POTUS as an enemy/detractor. But that's quite extreme, if you think Obama is incompetent, that's one thing, but to think he's an enemy of the USA, actively trying to bring down the country from within, that's probably a bit of a stretch.
-
-
Yeah, but our founding fathers were mutineers, not Patriots.
And wouldn't a patriot defend the duly elected President of the United States against all detractors?
Just curious.
WSS
Unless they consider POTUS as an enemy/detractor. But that's quite extreme, if you think Obama is incompetent, that's one thing, but to think he's an enemy of the USA, actively trying to bring down the country from within, that's probably a bit of a stretch.
Unless they consider POTUS as an enemy/detractor. But that's quite extreme, if you think Obama is incompetent, that's one thing, but to think he's an enemy of the USA, actively trying to bring down the country from within, that's probably a bit of a stretch.
Is it though? IS IT!?
OPEN YOUR EYES MAN!
-
Yeah, but our founding fathers were mutineers, not Patriots.
And wouldn't a patriot defend the duly elected President of the United States against all detractors?
Just curious.
WSS
Unless they consider POTUS as an enemy/detractor. But that's quite extreme, if you think Obama is incompetent, that's one thing, but to think he's an enemy of the USA, actively trying to bring down the country from within, that's probably a bit of a stretch.
I would agree with you. Of course if you think about it King George I was just putting the squeeze, tax wise, on the colonies to pay for a war with France. Since the colonists had basically nothing the richest Americans slapped together a revolution. And then? Started taxing the shit out of the constituents to pay for, well, whatever the fuck they wanted.Unless they consider POTUS as an enemy/detractor. But that's quite extreme, if you think Obama is incompetent, that's one thing, but to think he's an enemy of the USA, actively trying to bring down the country from within, that's probably a bit of a stretch.
I imagine there's a percentage of Americans who think the president is trying to destroy the country no matter who it is.
Probably the same in England? I did hear some pretty harsh rhetoric back in the days of the Iraq war.
WSS
-
nobody uses it that way.
nonsense.
The left ravages the Tea Party because they are
politically opposed to them.
Weird, because the Tea Party stands for "Taxed Enough Already"...
and our Constitution, and smaller gov,
I've been to a few Tea Party rallies, full of parents and kids, and American flags,
most signs were about too much taxation, and gov run amok.
That sounds sinister to anybody?
Of course not.
nobody uses it that way.
nonsense.
The left ravages the Tea Party because they are
politically opposed to them.
Weird, because the Tea Party stands for "Taxed Enough Already"...
and our Constitution, and smaller gov,
I've been to a few Tea Party rallies, full of parents and kids, and American flags,
most signs were about too much taxation, and gov run amok.
That sounds sinister to anybody?
Of course not.
No it doesn't sound sinister. But the 3 things you say the Tea Party stands for are what most people stand for.
That being said, why does the Tea party have such a hard time getting people elected?
I know the answer. Most American's are stupid, right?
-
There isn't any one reason.
The Republican bigshots want to play
games with principles, like dems do.
The Tea Party doesn't want to play games
with their principles.
They will have their wins and losses, but the Republican
bigshots want to keep control, and they have the big bucks.
So far. I don't like liars, and that goes for Obamao and Gore and Biden,
and Peelosi, etc...as well as McCain, McConnel, Lindsey Graham, etc.
Dishonest, unprincipled, liar sumbeeches.
-
There isn't any one reason.
The Republican bigshots want to play
games with principles, like dems do.
The Tea Party doesn't want to play games
with their principles.
They will have their wins and losses, but the Republican
bigshots want to keep control, and they have the big bucks.
So far. I don't like liars, and that goes for Obamao and Gore and Biden,
and Peelosi, etc...as well as McCain, McConnel, Lindsey Graham, etc.
Dishonest, unprincipled, liar sumbeeches.
There isn't any one reason.
The Republican bigshots want to play
games with principles, like dems do.
The Tea Party doesn't want to play games
with their principles.
They will have their wins and losses, but the Republican
bigshots want to keep control, and they have the big bucks.
So far. I don't like liars, and that goes for Obamao and Gore and Biden,
and Peelosi, etc...as well as McCain, McConnel, Lindsey Graham, etc.
Dishonest, unprincipled, liar sumbeeches.
Well that's the 2 major reasons the Tea party will never get the Oval Office. Those principles and lack of money will keep them out. If it was 1950 they could win, but in this day and age, it won't happen. People's principles have changed in this country. Not always for the better, but they have, and the winner of most elections has more money to spend.
-
They also stick to a lot conservative social views that the majority of Americans disagree with.
A platform of "things have changed since I was a kid in the '50s! Change it back!" Doesn't win elections
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login