Skip to content

Ben Tate

Locked The Browns Board
75 25 3.8k
  • It got hijacked by the we-hate-Manziel-fans circle jerkers.

  • I posted this question earlier and the admins deleted it. Why are posts being locked when people still want to comment? The Ben Tate thread has almost 1500 views and yet some admin unilaterally decides to stop the discussion. Are the admins so afraid of differing viewpoints? The point of a forum is to have a discussion. If not, this place is pointless.

  • If you want to talk about Ben Tate, start a new Ben Tate thread. It's that easy.

    Admin

  • It seems an admin on this site keeps deleting posts they don't like. This unethical behavior makes me wonder they run a discussion forum in the first place.

  • I've posted some outlandish shit and they've let it stand. So I'm not sure what your talking about. It just depends doggy. There is only one area for Football specific talk in the here, usually dedicated to the most pressing issues and agendas. There is a topic on nearly everything, as long as your 94 posts are not redundant and annoying they would most likely let it stay. But if it's gay trollness cocksucking manlove... then well, well, it still might stand. For them to delete something it has to be a John Bobbit holding his chunk post op before the doc post to get it pulled homie.

  • I've posted some outlandish shit and they've let it stand. So I'm not sure what your talking about. It just depends doggy. There is only one area for Football specific talk in the here, usually dedicated to the most pressing issues and agendas. There is a topic on nearly everything, as long as your 94 posts are not redundant and annoying they would most likely let it stay. But if it's gay trollness cocksucking manlove... then well, well, it still might stand. For them to delete something it has to be a John Bobbit holding his chunk post op before the doc post to get it pulled homie.

    @poeticg said:

    I've posted some outlandish shit and they've let it stand. So I'm not sure what your talking about. It just depends doggy. There is only one area for Football specific talk in the here, usually dedicated to the most pressing issues and agendas. There is a topic on nearly everything, as long as your 94 posts are not redundant and annoying they would most likely let it stay. But if it's gay trollness cocksucking manlove... then well, well, it still might stand. For them to delete something it has to be a John Bobbit holding his chunk post op before the doc post to get it pulled homie.

    PoeticG, I respect you and thanks for the response but my posts had absolutely nothing wrong with them. My deleted posts were asking why the Ben Tate thread was locked when people were still commenting on it. Who decides what is annoying? If people want to have a discussion they should be able to do that. Those who don't like it can ignore it. But to silence those who don't share your view? Why even run a forum if you don't want ideas exchanged.

  • It's not so much about you or your post as much as people that have been around here for a long time have already been through a lot of these discussions that get "high jacked into a totally unrelated discussion", it turns out to be a 50 page slap fest that has nothing to do with the original post... people get fired up and then feelings get hurt and a rift is driven between the board. It's better to quell the side-quest and get back to the main mission.

    There's that... and then there's the battle between QB factions that have been raging since 99, most famous was the Anderson/Quinn feud. Now we are on the verge of a totally different QB battle between Hoyer/Manziel and it's likely a battle that will be long and bitter in the end...

    - Then there's the obligation to Ben Tate as well, the player and the person, he's a guy that has embraced Cleveland and it's been a breath of fresh air from other FAs that have come here and they just want to show the love by keeping Tate's discussion strictly Tatish... although, I think that this kid West is going to be better than Trent Richardson, well, better than I thought Trent would be. 😳

  • Yeah, I've seen the admins delete stuff too, or edit peoples posts because they don't like someone's opinion, but then leave racist posts completely untouched.

    What was the point of locking the Ben Tate thread only to say if people want a Ben Tate thread we can start another one? It just doesn't make a lot of sense.

    As for obligation to Ben Tate, he is a public figure earning millions to not only play football but to deal with what comes with being that football player. Free speech means people can disagree or agree with what he does or have different interpretations of it. That's no reason to lock or delete a thread.

  • I'm new here, but the administrators sure seem to let of shit slide. LOL

  • censorship has never been an issue in my time on the board. pretty much anything goes. it's not what you say...it's how you say it

    however, any overboard man-love for an unproven or certified piece of shit Browns QB will not be tolerated and dealt with in a firm and impartial manner

  • censorship has never been an issue in my time on the board. pretty much anything goes. it's not what you say...it's how you say it

    however, any overboard man-love for an unproven or certified piece of shit Browns QB will not be tolerated and dealt with in a firm and impartial manner

    @slowburn said:

    censorship has never been an issue in my time on the board. pretty much anything goes. it's not what you say...it's how you say it

    however, any overboard man-love for an unproven or certified piece of shit Browns QB will not be tolerated and dealt with in a firm and impartial manner

    So how does that explain locking the Ben Tate thread?

  • @slowburn said:

    censorship has never been an issue in my time on the board. pretty much anything goes. it's not what you say...it's how you say it

    however, any overboard man-love for an unproven or certified piece of shit Browns QB will not be tolerated and dealt with in a firm and impartial manner

    So how does that explain locking the Ben Tate thread?

    @osiris said:

    So how does that explain locking the Ben Tate thread?

    my best guess:

    Another thread hijacked by Faggie Aggies.

    Ben Tate is a breath of fresh air.Started connecting with Browns fans in an awesome way as soon as he signed, which was before the draft. Manziel homos have been turning every thread into a Johnny slurpfest.Johnny Manziel is really cool. Why are his fans so goddamn faggy, and why are they here?Going to start plucking FAs and sending them to the Quinn Board.Zombo
  • Also new here, but did my research beforehand and had an idea of what l was getting into. Got the distinct impression censorship wasn't an issue and kinda like the wide open atmosphere.

  • censorship has never been an issue in my time on the board. pretty much anything goes. it's not what you say...it's how you say it

    however, any overboard man-love for an unproven or certified piece of shit Browns QB will not be tolerated and dealt with in a firm and impartial manner

    @slowburn said:

    censorship has never been an issue in my time on the board. pretty much anything goes. it's not what you say...it's how you say it

    however, any overboard man-love for an unproven or certified piece of shit Browns QB will not be tolerated and dealt with in a firm and impartial manner

  • If you want to call someone a fag cocksucker you're in the right place. If you want to talk about our qbs or uniforms however over to the barking tard with you!

  • I will say that the mods don't fear free speech and you'd be hard pressed to find another sporting forum anywhere as lenient as here. So if you don't like it get the fuck out.

  • When something is censored or deleted, you wouldn't know it. Your comment on things that "will not be tolerated" indicates you're generally okay with censorship. That said, the posts in question had nothing to do with the things you mentioned.

  • Look if they were deleted they were probably pointless and had already been discussed at length. I agree with pog that I've posted plenty of outrageous shit here that flew just fine.

  • mines not to reason why. no, I don't dig censorship but having spent some time on the board, trolling or whatever, I have a sense of what rattles the admin cages.

    maybe a good douching will help rid the sand from their vags......jestsayin'

    this ain't the only game in town and as Cysko so eloquently posted.....take your fucking show on the road if you feel violated

  • Look if they were deleted they were probably pointless and had already been discussed at length. I agree with pog that I've posted plenty of outrageous shit here that flew just fine.

    @the-cysko-kid said:

    Look if they were deleted they were probably pointless and had already been discussed at length. I agree with pog that I've posted plenty of outrageous shit here that flew just fine.

    As I said, the posts that were deleted were asking why the Ben Tate thread was locked since people were still replying and it was an active discussion.