Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. Political Discussion
  3. Obamao released prisoners? Now one says he's going to war with us.

Obamao released prisoners? Now one says he's going to war with us.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Political Discussion
its time to impeach ObaMao
13 Posts 6 Posters 420 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • White Dog W
    • 144 Posts
    • 9 Reputation
    W White Dog wrote on last edited by
    #3

    cicero-on-treason.jpg

    1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • MLD Woody MLD WoodyM Dedicated Conversation Starter Very Popular First Post Collaborator Posting Machine Reacting Well One Month Later One Year In Week One Done
      • 33k Posts
      • 3k Reputation
      MLD WoodyM MLD Woody wrote on last edited by
      #4

      His middle name is Hussein, and that does sound pretty scary... That pretty much settles it

      Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody!
      W 1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • MLD WoodyM MLD Woody

        His middle name is Hussein, and that does sound pretty scary... That pretty much settles it

        Westside Steve W Dedicated Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Conversation Starter Week One Done One Year In One Month Later Very Popular
        • 39k Posts
        • 9k Reputation
        W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by Westside Steve
        #5

        @mld-woody said:

        His middle name is Hussein, and that does sound pretty scary... That pretty much settles it

        Actually Woody despite the fact white dawg is an asshole and will probably get booted again at some point this was really a terrible decision by the present. I don't know how even you could support releasing 5 obviously dangers terrorists to secure to return of an apparent deserter and possible traitor.

        Even many of Obamas most hard core acolytes question this. And I don't think you have been one of those in most cases.

        WSS

        www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons
        1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • VaporTrail VaporTrailV Dedicated Reacting Well Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
          • 6k Posts
          • 1k Reputation
          VaporTrailV VaporTrail wrote on last edited by
          #6

          When these Taliban were in Gitmo, their very presence served to undermine American authority (Democrat/Republican doesn't matter), as they've been a talking point of the opposition since as long as the prison was implemented. Furthermore, its presence is used as a recruiting tool for all sorts of anti-American types. We can't kill them, we can't put them on trial.

          Given the above, do you:

          A - Continue to hold them at Gitmo just like we did for the last 13 years. The promise of it being shut down still unfulfilled, you'll continue to get hammered for it by your political opponents, and it'll still be used as a recruiting tool for your enemies.

          or

          B - Release them in exchange for an American POW, knowing exactly when and where they'll be dropped off, and with an entire network of drones and spies to follow them back to Taliban hubs.

          I'll bet that these guys are dead within a year.

          1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
            • 64k Posts
            • 8k Reputation
            C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
            #7

            Well, I hope they were injected with some kind of beacon, then.

            But probably like the guns obamao sent free and clear to the drug cartels...

            probably not.

            1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • Pumpkin Eater P
              • 4k Posts
              • 297 Reputation
              P Pumpkin Eater wrote on last edited by
              #8

              How can he just ignore the rules and bypass congress? That's an impeachable offense.

              :neutral_face:
              VaporTrailV 1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • P Pumpkin Eater

                How can he just ignore the rules and bypass congress? That's an impeachable offense.

                VaporTrail VaporTrailV Dedicated Reacting Well Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                • 6k Posts
                • 1k Reputation
                VaporTrailV VaporTrail wrote on last edited by
                #9

                @pumpkin-eater said:

                How can he just ignore the rules and bypass congress? That's an impeachable offense.

                It's a military decision and he's the commander-in-chief.

                P 1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
                  • 64k Posts
                  • 8k Reputation
                  C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
                  #10

                  He still isn't above the law. Nobody is.

                  Military UCMJ doesn't grant favors and immunity to

                  rank or race.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • VaporTrailV VaporTrail

                    @pumpkin-eater said:

                    How can he just ignore the rules and bypass congress? That's an impeachable offense.

                    It's a military decision and he's the commander-in-chief.

                    Pumpkin Eater P
                    • 4k Posts
                    • 297 Reputation
                    P Pumpkin Eater wrote on last edited by
                    #11

                    @vaportrail said:

                    It's a military decision and he's the commander-in-chief.

                    Checks and balances exist for a reason. I don't know how even the staunchest Obama supporter can agree with his actions.

                    :neutral_face:
                    VaporTrailV 1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • P Pumpkin Eater

                      @vaportrail said:

                      It's a military decision and he's the commander-in-chief.

                      Checks and balances exist for a reason. I don't know how even the staunchest Obama supporter can agree with his actions.

                      VaporTrail VaporTrailV Dedicated Reacting Well Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                      • 6k Posts
                      • 1k Reputation
                      VaporTrailV VaporTrail wrote on last edited by
                      #12

                      @pumpkin-eater said:

                      I don't know how even the staunchest Obama supporter can agree with his actions.

                      For the same reason people were okay when Reagan conducted a prisoner exchange with Iran.

                      W 1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply
                      • VaporTrailV VaporTrail

                        @pumpkin-eater said:

                        I don't know how even the staunchest Obama supporter can agree with his actions.

                        For the same reason people were okay when Reagan conducted a prisoner exchange with Iran.

                        Westside Steve W Dedicated Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Conversation Starter Week One Done One Year In One Month Later Very Popular
                        • 39k Posts
                        • 9k Reputation
                        W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by
                        #13

                        @vaportrail said:

                        For the same reason people were okay when Reagan conducted a prisoner exchange with Iran.

                        I think the allegation was missiles not terrorists.

                        I might be wrong but that's how I recall it.

                        WSS

                        www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons
                        1 Reply Last reply
                        👍
                        Quote Reply

                        Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                        Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                        With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                        Register Login
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        Theme
                        • System
                        • Light
                        • Dark
                        The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                        The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Forums
                        • Recent
                        • Popular
                        • Users
                        • Donate