Skip to content
The Browns Board
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Kiko Alonso

Kiko Alonso

The Browns Board
44 17 2.0k
  • Z Zombo

    @topdawg31 said:

    I rooted for DA and Weeden to get injured

    Because their backups were so awesome?

    Z

    Zombo said:

    Because their backups were so awesome?

    Z

    Lol. Well Campbell did play significantly better than weeds
    The GipperT 1 Reply

  • I recall when the crowd cheered when DA went down..especially on the dawg pound end. I cringed in that moment.

  • On the other end was the utter silence after Hoyer was out. My initial reaction was anger towards Kiko. Then I saw the replay later of Hoyer's slide like a 10-year old fat kid in little league.

  • ComeonmanC Comeonman

    Zombo said:

    Because their backups were so awesome?

    Z

    Lol. Well Campbell did play significantly better than weeds

    @comeonman said:

    Lol. Well Campbell did play significantly better than weeds

    Not really. Slightly better at best would be more accurate:

    Campbell: 180/317 56.8% 2015 yds 6.4 ypa, 213.1 ypg, 11 TDs 3.5 TD%, 8 ints, 2.5% int.%, 76.9 rating

    Weeden: 141/267 52.8% 1731 yds 6.5 ypa 173.1 ypg, 9 TDs 3.4 TD%, 9 Ints, 3.4 int.%, 70.3 rating

  • The GipperT The Gipper

    @comeonman said:

    Lol. Well Campbell did play significantly better than weeds

    Not really. Slightly better at best would be more accurate:

    Campbell: 180/317 56.8% 2015 yds 6.4 ypa, 213.1 ypg, 11 TDs 3.5 TD%, 8 ints, 2.5% int.%, 76.9 rating

    Weeden: 141/267 52.8% 1731 yds 6.5 ypa 173.1 ypg, 9 TDs 3.4 TD%, 9 Ints, 3.4 int.%, 70.3 rating

    @the-gipper said:

    Not really. Slightly better at best would be more accurate:

    Campbell: 180/317 56.8% 2015 yds 6.4 ypa, 213.1 ypg, 11 TDs 3.5 TD%, 8 ints, 2.5% int.%, 76.9 rating

    Weeden: 141/267 52.8% 1731 yds 6.5 ypa 173.1 ypg, 9 TDs 3.4 TD%, 9 Ints, 3.4 int.%, 70.3 rating

    Sorry Gip, but numbers do not always tell the complete story.

    It wasn't just how many mistakes Weeden made, it was WHEN and HOW those mistakes were made.

    Campbell was unsatisfactory overall. Weeden was downright atrocious.

    C'mon, you watched the games.

    Z

  • Z Zombo

    @the-gipper said:

    Not really. Slightly better at best would be more accurate:

    Campbell: 180/317 56.8% 2015 yds 6.4 ypa, 213.1 ypg, 11 TDs 3.5 TD%, 8 ints, 2.5% int.%, 76.9 rating

    Weeden: 141/267 52.8% 1731 yds 6.5 ypa 173.1 ypg, 9 TDs 3.4 TD%, 9 Ints, 3.4 int.%, 70.3 rating

    Sorry Gip, but numbers do not always tell the complete story.

    It wasn't just how many mistakes Weeden made, it was WHEN and HOW those mistakes were made.

    Campbell was unsatisfactory overall. Weeden was downright atrocious.

    C'mon, you watched the games.

    Z

    Zombo said:

    Sorry Gip, but numbers do not always tell the complete story.

    It wasn't just how many mistakes Weeden made, it was WHEN and HOW those mistakes were made.

    Campbell was unsatisfactory overall. Weeden was downright atrocious.

    C'mon, you watched the games.

    Z

    Yes, and I saw Campbell be almost as atrocious at times as Weeden, and I saw Weeden play well almost as much as Campbell.

    Look: at what point does one players suckage exceed another players suckage?

    Z ComeonmanC 2 Replies
  • The GipperT The Gipper

    Zombo said:

    Sorry Gip, but numbers do not always tell the complete story.

    It wasn't just how many mistakes Weeden made, it was WHEN and HOW those mistakes were made.

    Campbell was unsatisfactory overall. Weeden was downright atrocious.

    C'mon, you watched the games.

    Z

    Yes, and I saw Campbell be almost as atrocious at times as Weeden, and I saw Weeden play well almost as much as Campbell.

    Look: at what point does one players suckage exceed another players suckage?

    @the-gipper said:

    Yes, and I saw Campbell be almost as atrocious at times as Weeden, and I saw Weeden play well almost as much as Campbell.

    Look: at what point does one players suckage exceed another players suckage?

    At this point.

  • The GipperT The Gipper

    Zombo said:

    Sorry Gip, but numbers do not always tell the complete story.

    It wasn't just how many mistakes Weeden made, it was WHEN and HOW those mistakes were made.

    Campbell was unsatisfactory overall. Weeden was downright atrocious.

    C'mon, you watched the games.

    Z

    Yes, and I saw Campbell be almost as atrocious at times as Weeden, and I saw Weeden play well almost as much as Campbell.

    Look: at what point does one players suckage exceed another players suckage?

    @the-gipper said:

    Yes, and I saw Campbell be almost as atrocious at times as Weeden, and I saw Weeden play well almost as much as Campbell.

    Look: at what point does one players suckage exceed another players suckage?

    Gip, when Campbell walked on the field, there was a feeling of 'so your saying there's a chance' insert Jim Carey voice. When weeds stepped on the field, there was a collective 'mother fucker' going through all Browns fans minds. Exept yours apparently.
  • ComeonmanC Comeonman

    @the-gipper said:

    Yes, and I saw Campbell be almost as atrocious at times as Weeden, and I saw Weeden play well almost as much as Campbell.

    Look: at what point does one players suckage exceed another players suckage?

    Gip, when Campbell walked on the field, there was a feeling of 'so your saying there's a chance' insert Jim Carey voice. When weeds stepped on the field, there was a collective 'mother fucker' going through all Browns fans minds. Exept yours apparently.

    @comeonman said:

    Gip, when Campbell walked on the field, there was a feeling of 'so your saying there's a chance' insert Jim Carey voice. When weeds stepped on the field, there was a collective 'mother fucker' going through all Browns fans minds. Exept yours apparently.

    I am saying that I did not have a particularly warm and fuzzy feeling when either of them were on the field. With one you felt like you were kicked in the balls, with the other you felt like you were kicked in the kneecap. Neither was a good feeling.

    So? Which would you prefer? Balls or kneecap?

  • The GipperT The Gipper

    @comeonman said:

    Gip, when Campbell walked on the field, there was a feeling of 'so your saying there's a chance' insert Jim Carey voice. When weeds stepped on the field, there was a collective 'mother fucker' going through all Browns fans minds. Exept yours apparently.

    I am saying that I did not have a particularly warm and fuzzy feeling when either of them were on the field. With one you felt like you were kicked in the balls, with the other you felt like you were kicked in the kneecap. Neither was a good feeling.

    So? Which would you prefer? Balls or kneecap?

    @the-gipper said:

    So? Which would you prefer? Balls or kneecap?

    Kneecap by a mile...

    Damn, I love these surveys...

    "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196

  • kneecap, no doubt..

  • Weeden was the balls, no doubt.

    Z

Log in to reply