Skip to content
The Browns Board
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. TCPO isn't that stupid

TCPO isn't that stupid

The Browns Board
28 10 1.0k
  • cvcanedyC cvcanedy wrote on
    #19

    @douche-nozzle said:

    I have always wondered what TCPO means? Is that a birth control method?

    I hope you are joking. But, looking back at your posts, you're probably not.

  • miktoxicM miktoxic wrote on
    #20

    @douche-nozzle said:

    Hey.....anyone who references Tim Couch as his user name probably needs help with birth control.

    Don't knock couch. I guarantee you if Ben would've got drafted to that team he would have been lucky to last that long.

  • Tim Couch Pulls OutT Tim Couch Pulls Out wrote on
    #21

    @douche-nozzle said:

    I have always wondered what TCPO means? Is that a birth control method?

    That's exactly what it means.

    I'm awesome, and I fuck dolphins. Ghoolie 12/2/2012: I have absolutely no skills, training or pride
  • Tim Couch Pulls OutT Tim Couch Pulls Out wrote on
    #22

    @douche-nozzle said:

    Can I assume then that he is pregnant with a little brownie .....since he got f#$%ed by them?

    I'd agree to that.

    I'm awesome, and I fuck dolphins. Ghoolie 12/2/2012: I have absolutely no skills, training or pride
  • Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on
    #23

    @douche-nozzle said:

    I get the point that the Browns have probably destroyed the career of many potential QB's but I think Ben would have shone through. Thank God we will never know 😁

    True... but depends how you define "potential"... something we've clearly had issues with in the past.

    You only went thru 12 between Bradshaw and Ben, right? In about 20 years?

    "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
  • Tour2maT Tour2ma

    @douche-nozzle said:

    I get the point that the Browns have probably destroyed the career of many potential QB's but I think Ben would have shone through. Thank God we will never know 😁

    True... but depends how you define "potential"... something we've clearly had issues with in the past.

    You only went thru 12 between Bradshaw and Ben, right? In about 20 years?

    hoortaH hoorta wrote on
    #24

    @tour2ma said:

    True... but depends how you define "potential"... something we've clearly had issues with in the past.

    You only went thru 12 between Bradshaw and Ben, right? In about 20 years?

    Bubby Brister, Aw shucks, that never happened.

  • hoortaH hoorta

    @tour2ma said:

    True... but depends how you define "potential"... something we've clearly had issues with in the past.

    You only went thru 12 between Bradshaw and Ben, right? In about 20 years?

    Bubby Brister, Aw shucks, that never happened.

    Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on
    #25

    @hoorta said:

    Bubby Brister, Aw shucks, that never happened.

    Not to mention Tomczak... Stewart (AKA "Slash")... Touchdown Tommy... Neil O'... Stoudt... Malone...

    That's 7... missing some...

    "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
  • Tour2maT Tour2ma

    @hoorta said:

    Bubby Brister, Aw shucks, that never happened.

    Not to mention Tomczak... Stewart (AKA "Slash")... Touchdown Tommy... Neil O'... Stoudt... Malone...

    That's 7... missing some...

    hoortaH hoorta wrote on
    #26

    @tour2ma said:

    Not to mention Tomczak... Stewart (AKA "Slash")... Touchdown Tommy... Neil O'... Stoudt... Malone...

    That's 7... missing some...

    Tour, you missed some of Ghoolie's classic posts about- as he put it- "Queerdell's" Gay tendencies.

  • The GipperT The Gipper wrote on
    #27

    @douche-nozzle said:

    True....but there are two very big differences between the Steelers and the Browns:

    1. The Steelers finally got their next hall of fame QB (something the Browns haven't had in 60 years)

    2. The Steelers were a winning team throughout those years with those QBs

    With O'Donnell. He should probably not be lumped in with the others. He was a pretty good QB.

  • The GipperT The Gipper wrote on
    #28

    @douche-nozzle said:

    I get the point that the Browns have probably destroyed the career of many potential QB's but I think Ben would have shone through. Thank God we will never know 😁

    The Browns destroyed the potential of these QBs? I think it is the other way around. Except for Couch, all these QBs destroyed the Browns potential for victory with their horrendous play.

    Who among the likes of Spergon Wynn, Luke McCown, Charlie Frye, Derek Anderson, Brady Quinn, Colt McCoy, Brandon Weeden do you think would have turned out to be a quality NFL starting QB had they begun their careers elsewhere? I mean, Jesus, they have all had such successful careers playing for other teams elsewhere, right?

    Even the veterans that were brought in here to perform, Dilfer, Garcia, Delhomme, Campbell....I mean they all went from here to lead teams to the playoffs......NOT. Maybe Garcia had a little success in Philly, but that is it. They were all on their last hurrahs.

    Had BR been taken here, I do think he would have flourished.

    I don't know if the Browns would have been to Super Bowls......as it is the Steelers defense that carried them quite a bit to that end, but he would have done well and the Browns easily could have won.

Log in to reply