Skip to content
The Browns Board
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Steelers smoking the reefer

Steelers smoking the reefer

The Browns Board
79 26 3.2k
  • TopDawg31T TopDawg31 wrote on
    #44

    the stoolers are looking worse tonight than we did in our first two.

  • TopDawg31T TopDawg31

    the stoolers are looking worse tonight than we did in our first two.

    VagitronV Vagitron wrote on
    #45

    @topdawg31 said:

    the stoolers are looking worse tonight than we did in four first two.

    Force feeding certain receivers intentionally and you can't run a vanilla defense against the chip kelly offense. The steelers never run anything but straight vanilla in the preseason. If this were week 1 I'd be concerned. Its obviously not..

    AKA SNATCH98 or Rorbotron. The boards glorious admins decided to get cute and change my name to "homotron" Classy group of people. (Lost a bet with Columbus king and got banned for a month)
    Tour2maT 1 Reply
  • thenew23T thenew23 wrote on
    #46

    Starting D got scored on by Matt Barkley.

    Pro-biased Steelers announcers commenting on their WR corp, "I think they rival the best in the NFL." Literally LOL'd when I heard that.

    It's even fun to watch the Steelers stink in the preseason

    #Justsayin'
  • thenew23T thenew23 wrote on
    #47

    @douche-nozzle said:

    Why, because it gets you in shape to watch your team in the real season?

    Can you read?

    #Justsayin'
  • thenew23T thenew23 wrote on
    #48

    @douche-nozzle said:

    Sure ! Why?

    You should try it sometime.

    Maybe start with my post before you comment on it.

    #Justsayin'
  • chocoC choco wrote on
    #49

    Your team is getting thrashed.

    Why are you here trolling?

  • chocoC choco

    Your team is getting thrashed.

    Why are you here trolling?

    VagitronV Vagitron wrote on
    #50

    @choco said:

    Your team is getting thrashed.

    Why are you here trolling?

    Preseason. I don't care if the steelers go 0-4 or 4-0 so long as no one gets seriously hurt.

    AKA SNATCH98 or Rorbotron. The boards glorious admins decided to get cute and change my name to "homotron" Classy group of people. (Lost a bet with Columbus king and got banned for a month)
  • hoortaH hoorta wrote on
    #51

    @douche-nozzle said:

    I'm surprised that none of you have picked up on what this means to Gordon. (maybe someone has but I didn't find it)

    The NFL can't very well let a 10 time repeat offender off easy and then suspend a couple first time offenders.

    Don't think Gordon has hit double digits- yet. Got a feeling today is the day we find out.

  • chocoC choco wrote on
    #52

    Ah yes....so when the browns look bad in the first 2 preseason games, you mock and laugh.

    The steelers get throttled on both sides of the ball by the eagles second team in the dress rehearsal, and its just preseason.

    Got it...

    VagitronV 1 Reply
  • LogicIsForSquaresL LogicIsForSquares wrote on
    #53

    The Eagles defense is garbage and had pressure on Ben from the jump.

  • Kosar_For_PresidentK Kosar_For_President wrote on
    #54

    @douche-nozzle said:

    The Steelers fans are calling for a suspension by the Steelers of Bell and Blount because the Steelers have a reputation to uphold.

    Dude you are so full of fucking shit. You think that cause you're a faggot. I work with 3 of them and told you to shut the fuck up and find another ass to fuck.

    Luck is Tim Couch. Big, Dumb Goofy, slow thinking QB - Ghoolie, 2-28-12
  • LogicIsForSquaresL LogicIsForSquares wrote on
    #55

    @douche-nozzle said:

    The eagles defense is better than the Browns defense.....try again.

    In what world? The Eagles defense was 30th in the league last year. The d-line looked like they were on rollerskates in their playoff game against the Saints.

  • chocoC choco

    Ah yes....so when the browns look bad in the first 2 preseason games, you mock and laugh.

    The steelers get throttled on both sides of the ball by the eagles second team in the dress rehearsal, and its just preseason.

    Got it...

    VagitronV Vagitron wrote on
    #56

    @choco said:

    Ah yes....so when the browns look bad in the first 2 preseason games, you mock and laugh.

    The steelers get throttled on both sides of the ball by the eagles second team in the dress rehearsal, and its just preseason.

    Got it...

    I mocked and laughed? Please find where and repost it. I'll wait tough guy.

    AKA SNATCH98 or Rorbotron. The boards glorious admins decided to get cute and change my name to "homotron" Classy group of people. (Lost a bet with Columbus king and got banned for a month)
  • VagitronV Vagitron

    @topdawg31 said:

    the stoolers are looking worse tonight than we did in four first two.

    Force feeding certain receivers intentionally and you can't run a vanilla defense against the chip kelly offense. The steelers never run anything but straight vanilla in the preseason. If this were week 1 I'd be concerned. Its obviously not..

    Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on
    #57

    @vagitron said:

    Force feeding certain receivers intentionally and you can't run a vanilla defense against the chip kelly offense. The steelers never run anything but straight vanilla in the preseason. If this were week 1 I'd be concerned. Its obviously not..

    Trying to involve Wheaton may have been a factor, but in general Ben looked off until late in his playing time against 2nd team. Then he did drop in a couple very pretty passes. Brown looked good, but otherwise the WRs did not impress. Surprised to see Bryant buried so deep in your chart. I thought he had the potential he showed late. The running game was AWOL.

    Defensively where was the run D? Timmons showed up for the first time this preseason. He's looked seriously lost in the prior games. Taylor looks to be in for a long season. Troy P is still flying.

    "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
  • The GipperT The Gipper wrote on
    #58

    @douche-nozzle said:

    See.....you really don't have to go into long posts explaining the history of history and tell us all how smart you are; you can just make a statement. I'm proud of you!

    I can do what I like. Long, short, in between. Every bit a gem.

  • MudflyM Mudfly wrote on
    #59

    @douche-nozzle said:

    I realize that 3 friends may represent your entire world but I have read on Steeler forums and talked to many Steeler fans who have suggested the Steelers should punish them regardless of what the NFL does.

    Grow up and get out of Cleveland once in a while.......you will be shocked if you are willing to let 2+2 =4

    Thats all fine, except it's not true, because it's considered double jeopardy by the CBA....

    You can cut a player from the team for any reason.....but a team can not fine, punish or suspend ANY player for an infraction ruled on by the NFL.....

    hoortaH Kosar_For_PresidentK 2 Replies
  • The GipperT The Gipper wrote on
    #60

    I did not see any of that Steelers/Eagles game....but isn't the 3rd preseason game supposed to be the "dress rehearsal" where teams play their starters for at least a full half, so you are supposed to have the first string vs. first string for at least half a game? At some point I saw where it was like 17-0, no? Not a good performance then apparently by the Steeler's first string.

    OK, well, sure, sometimes preseason means nothing. The year the Lions went 0-16 they went 4-0 in preseason.....and conversely I think the year the Pats went 16-0 they went like 0-4 in the preseason....or at least 1-3.

    We shall see.

    VagitronV 1 Reply
  • The GipperT The Gipper wrote on
    #61

    @douche-nozzle said:

    That fine.....as long as you don't care what you look like.

    It doesn't matter what I look like. It matters what I am. And compared to you, I am a God.

  • The GipperT The Gipper

    I did not see any of that Steelers/Eagles game....but isn't the 3rd preseason game supposed to be the "dress rehearsal" where teams play their starters for at least a full half, so you are supposed to have the first string vs. first string for at least half a game? At some point I saw where it was like 17-0, no? Not a good performance then apparently by the Steeler's first string.

    OK, well, sure, sometimes preseason means nothing. The year the Lions went 0-16 they went 4-0 in preseason.....and conversely I think the year the Pats went 16-0 they went like 0-4 in the preseason....or at least 1-3.

    We shall see.

    VagitronV Vagitron wrote on
    #62

    @the-gipper said:

    I did not see any of that Steelers/Eagles game....but isn't the 3rd preseason game supposed to be the "dress rehearsal" where teams play their starters for at least a full half, so you are supposed to have the first string vs. first string for at least half a game? At some point I saw where it was like 17-0, no? Not a good performance then apparently by the Steeler's first string.

    OK, well, sure, sometimes preseason means nothing. The year the Lions went 0-16 they went 4-0 in preseason.....and conversely I think the year the Pats went 16-0 they went like 0-4 in the preseason....or at least 1-3.

    We shall see.

    A dress rehearsal running very vanilla everything. One series it was three straight passes to Marcus Wheaton and not because he was wide open. Its convenient for you to make a big deal about last night but only the I'll informed think its anything more than a light sparring match with the guys from the main event. Defensively they also hardly blitzed and not one exotic blitz was used which is a staple of the lebeau defense. Anyone that puts a bunch of stock in the preseason is an idiot.

    AKA SNATCH98 or Rorbotron. The boards glorious admins decided to get cute and change my name to "homotron" Classy group of people. (Lost a bet with Columbus king and got banned for a month)
    The GipperT 1 Reply
  • The GipperT The Gipper wrote on
    #63

    @douche-nozzle said:

    Wow! you need professional help dude!

    Do you know anyone who can counsel a God? Imhotep? Bringem Young?

    For you, I would recommend like Joan Rivers.

Log in to reply