Who gets cut today?
-
cut all 75 and start over
-
really? i would think farmer feels pretty good with the depth we have in our D backfield (even though a lot of that depth is rookie players).
i'd be thinking OL, OL and OL. then WR all day long.
hey how about a QB?
I wouldnt disagree with that, but would say we've known all along that OL and WR need upgrades and more depth....the problem is we dont have quality "starters" .....and you rarely find starters on the waiver wire.....
On the other hand, we keep hearing about the depth on defense and our great DB's.....yet, the back ups are getting completely torched....so, if we are set with starters and only need back up depth, then odds are better that the waiver wire MIGHT provide an upgrade....
So, my point was that the players we CAN get off waivers aren't likely to improve our talent at "starting" positions....like RG or Wr......BUT, we might score a few players who can at least upgrade some back up positions that are lacking depth....
-
I don't see Crowell making the team. I mean shit he's had like 2 carries this preseason.
-
I don't see Crowell making the team. I mean shit he's had like 2 carries this preseason.
I don't see Crowell making the team. I mean shit he's had like 2 carries this preseason.
I agree....got him included on the list for first cut.....
-
I don't see Crowell making the team. I mean shit he's had like 2 carries this preseason.
I agree....got him included on the list for first cut.....
I agree....got him included on the list for first cut.....
I kinda thought they would try to slip him onto the PS.
-
I kinda thought they would try to slip him onto the PS.
......as far as I know, he hasn't shown anything but a couple brief flashes running the ball(can you say Ben Gay???).....
...but I did see a couple of his interviews and gotta say that he came off as a little bit......um, well, stupid....... And, in the NFL, stupid means you dont really grasp or understand blocking assignments, blitz packages and complicated offensive schemes....
...and if you can't block FIRST, that means you can't play rb in the NFL.....because you will get your QB smashed....
-
really? i would think farmer feels pretty good with the depth we have in our D backfield (even though a lot of that depth is rookie players).
i'd be thinking OL, OL and OL. then WR all day long.
hey how about a QB?
I wouldnt disagree with that, but would say we've known all along that OL and WR need upgrades and more depth....the problem is we dont have quality "starters" .....and you rarely find starters on the waiver wire.....
On the other hand, we keep hearing about the depth on defense and our great DB's.....yet, the back ups are getting completely torched....so, if we are set with starters and only need back up depth, then odds are better that the waiver wire MIGHT provide an upgrade....
So, my point was that the players we CAN get off waivers aren't likely to improve our talent at "starting" positions....like RG or Wr......BUT, we might score a few players who can at least upgrade some back up positions that are lacking depth....
I wouldnt disagree with that, but would say we've known all along that OL and WR need upgrades and more depth....the problem is we dont have quality "starters" .....and you rarely find starters on the waiver wire.....
On the other hand, we keep hearing about the depth on defense and our great DB's.....yet, the back ups are getting completely torched....so, if we are set with starters and only need back up depth, then odds are better that the waiver wire MIGHT provide an upgrade....
So, my point was that the players we CAN get off waivers aren't likely to improve our talent at "starting" positions....like RG or Wr......BUT, we might score a few players who can at least upgrade some back up positions that are lacking depth....
i know what you're saying but there is always a team that is rich with talent at one position and can't keep all potential starters on the roster. i mean it's not too far off to say someone else's cast-off at WR could be better than everyone on our roster except maybe hawkins and gordon. same goes with the right side of our OL where there is absolutely no depth and i would venture to say some rookie from another squad would be able to do better than schwartz right now.
-
I wouldnt disagree with that, but would say we've known all along that OL and WR need upgrades and more depth....the problem is we dont have quality "starters" .....and you rarely find starters on the waiver wire.....
On the other hand, we keep hearing about the depth on defense and our great DB's.....yet, the back ups are getting completely torched....so, if we are set with starters and only need back up depth, then odds are better that the waiver wire MIGHT provide an upgrade....
So, my point was that the players we CAN get off waivers aren't likely to improve our talent at "starting" positions....like RG or Wr......BUT, we might score a few players who can at least upgrade some back up positions that are lacking depth....
i know what you're saying but there is always a team that is rich with talent at one position and can't keep all potential starters on the roster. i mean it's not too far off to say someone else's cast-off at WR could be better than everyone on our roster except maybe hawkins and gordon. same goes with the right side of our OL where there is absolutely no depth and i would venture to say some rookie from another squad would be able to do better than schwartz right now.
i know what you're saying but there is always a team that is rich with talent at one position and can't keep all potential starters on the roster. i mean it's not too far off to say someone else's cast-off at WR could be better than everyone on our roster except maybe hawkins and gordon. same goes with the right side of our OL where there is absolutely no depth and i would venture to say some rookie from another squad would be able to do better than schwartz right now.
Anyone know the story on Bowie.....is he out for the whole year?...a potential starting RT or just a project?....
-
If Royce Adams isn't the first name on that cut list the Browns are doing it wrong that's for sure.
-
i know what you're saying but there is always a team that is rich with talent at one position and can't keep all potential starters on the roster. i mean it's not too far off to say someone else's cast-off at WR could be better than everyone on our roster except maybe hawkins and gordon. same goes with the right side of our OL where there is absolutely no depth and i would venture to say some rookie from another squad would be able to do better than schwartz right now.
Anyone know the story on Bowie.....is he out for the whole year?...a potential starting RT or just a project?....
-
Cleveland Browns @Browns 9m
Cleveland Browns@BrownsThe Cleveland Browns make roster moves.
Visit http://t.co/gNLRRISyX8 for more information
The Cleveland Browns make roster moves. Visit http://www.ClevelandBrowns.com for more information pic.twitter.com/owZ5pmVZIs
Cleveland Browns@BrownsThe Cleveland Browns make roster moves.
Visit http://t.co/gNLRRISyX8 for more information -
Waived:
DB Royce Adams
RB Edwin Baker
OL Randall Harris
DB T.J. Heath
DL Cam Henderson
WR Jonathan Krause
OL Ryan Lee
LB Caleb McSurdy
OL Keavon Milton
LB Keith Pough
WR Tim Smith
OL Jeremiah Warren
TE Martell Webb
Contract terminated:
WR Anthony Armstrong
Per Browns app.
-
Cleveland Browns @Browns 9mCleveland Browns@BrownsThe Cleveland Browns make roster moves.
Visit http://t.co/gNLRRISyX8 for more informationThe Cleveland Browns make roster moves. Visit http://www.ClevelandBrowns.com for more information pic.twitter.com/owZ5pmVZIs
Cleveland Browns@BrownsThe Cleveland Browns make roster moves.
Visit http://t.co/gNLRRISyX8 for more informationThe Cleveland Browns make roster moves. Visit http://www.ClevelandBrowns.com for more information pic.twitter.com/owZ5pmVZIs
Good that young guy will make the roster over Armstrong.
I'm sure many are shocked that Mitchell Schwartz, survived the first wave.
Zombo
-
Kind of funny how my hope came literally true, I'll pretend it's not because they are in alphabetical order.
-
I like Armstrong, but in the long run giving the opportunity to Johnson, et al is better.
-
-
i know what you're saying but there is always a team that is rich with talent at one position and can't keep all potential starters on the roster. i mean it's not too far off to say someone else's cast-off at WR could be better than everyone on our roster except maybe hawkins and gordon. same goes with the right side of our OL where there is absolutely no depth and i would venture to say some rookie from another squad would be able to do better than schwartz right now.
Anyone know the story on Bowie.....is he out for the whole year?...a potential starting RT or just a project?....
Anyone know the story on Bowie.....is he out for the whole year?...a potential starting RT or just a project?....
Here is the story on Bowie.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login