Skip to content

2014 Week 1 Game Impressions: Browns @ Steelers

The Browns Board
228 55 11.3k
  • great game, amazing adjustments to the 2nd half offense. defense just could not contain antonio brown. there is no way cudiff is making that 54 yd. field goal, he's no Automatic Phil.

    @browns1216 said:

    great game, amazing adjustments to the 2nd half offense. defense just could not contain antonio brown. there is no way cudiff is making that 54 yd. field goal, he's no Automatic Phil.

    Would have been nice if we paid that man.
  • Today is the first day I have actually considered removing my Browns License Plate (and I live in Nacogdoches, TX) Perhaps if I burn it, the curse will be browken. ha, ha

    @brownscurse said:

    Today is the first day I have actually considered removing my Browns License Plate (and I live in Nacogdoches, TX) Perhaps if I burn it, the curse will be browken. ha, ha

    really? pleez do it. because we don't like little limp pickled fairies here. we like big hard cocked punch your girl in her donkey hole MFers.

    while taking off that license plate on your bike please remove the doll basket from the front handlebars and the big 8' neon orange flag announcing your arrival from 50 yards.

    if i was to browken your face in texas would i be iiebell in NY? or could we trade a dead deer for a dead armadillo (you bustle of tumbleweed catcher)?

  • @the-italian-dawgpound said:

    With all due respect, this curse thing is bullshit.

    Was the cardiac kids also bullshit? I think not. That team could pull it out at the very end; you simply knew it was coming. Of course the curse is BS, I'm just trying to lighten the sadness. Un giornio, il Browns vinceranno

    @brownscurse said:

    Was the cardiac kids also bullshit? I think not. That team could pull it out at the very end; you simply knew it was coming. Of course the curse is BS, I'm just trying to lighten the sadness. Un giornio, il Browns vinceranno

    I hear ya, but we didn't always pull it out, and in fact we lost it that way once or twice (Vikings game comes to mind).

    With the new CBA, Teams can't practice like they used to back then - no two a days, three a days, and so forth.

    Hell, our O-LIne is still gelling, and the Players are still learning the Playbook (Offense).

    From what I've read and seen about this Offensive scheme is crazy complicated (18 words for a play?).

    I really didn't expect to see Hoyer come out and have success with the up tempo Offense in the 2nd half as I've read they're no where near being ready for it (had a miscue or two today in it).

    I'm tired of the loosing too, but at least I saw something today I haven't seen in some time.

  • @the-italian-dawgpound said:

    With all due respect, this curse thing is bullshit.

    Was the cardiac kids also bullshit? I think not. That team could pull it out at the very end; you simply knew it was coming. Of course the curse is BS, I'm just trying to lighten the sadness. Un giornio, il Browns vinceranno

    @brownscurse said:

    Un giornio, il Browns vinceranno

    Amen, brother. Amen. 😉

  • peroni, sopprasetta, forcheta, prosciutto...........

    brown's italian merit badge pleez.

  • peroni, sopprasetta, forcheta, prosciutto...........

    brown's italian merit badge pleez.

    @miktoxic said:

    peroni, sopprasetta, forcheta, prosciutto...........

    brown's italian merit badge pleez.

    Ah ah ah!

  • Today is the first day I have actually considered removing my Browns License Plate (and I live in Nacogdoches, TX) Perhaps if I burn it, the curse will be browken. ha, ha

    @brownscurse said:

    Today is the first day I have actually considered removing my Browns License Plate (and I live in Nacogdoches, TX) Perhaps if I burn it, the curse will be browken. ha, ha

    Please do.

  • @jrb12711 said:

    You know guys I'm just so damn tired of talking about the "moral victories" season after season. It sucks, they looked good sure but the game was there to win. The browns, per the usual, played not to lose and lost the game. My only hope is that becomes a mistake Pettine makes once.

    @brownscurse said:

    I absolutely do not understand how you do not try a 54 yd. game winning field goal with no wind and sunny skies 70 degrees to win the game with 4 minutes. Perhaps that is a head coach with a defensive mindset. Either way, if we pin them at the 1 yd line Big Ben will still burn one of your younger DB's to get into FG range.

    And had we tried and missed the FG and the Steelers scored after being given the short field what woulod the two of you be saying?

    I could not disagree more. Based upon what the D had done all 2nd half long... including the prior series where they had to shut down the Steelers twice due to the 4th down conversion n the fake punt... it was the right decision.

    If there was an error it was in not staying with what worked on both sides of the ball late in the game.

    @tour2ma said:

    And had we tried and missed the FG and the Steelers scored after being given the short field what woulod the two of you be saying?

    I could not disagree more. Based upon what the D had done all 2nd half long... including the prior series where they had to shut down the Steelers twice due to the 4th down conversion n the fake punt... it was the right decision.

    If there was an error it was in not staying with what worked on both sides of the ball late in the game.

    Gotta agree with you. Missing that field goal could swing momentum and gives them a short field. Pin them back and rely on D. Too bad they didn't get the ball stopped at the 1 yard line.

  • @jrb12711 said:

    You know guys I'm just so damn tired of talking about the "moral victories" season after season. It sucks, they looked good sure but the game was there to win. The browns, per the usual, played not to lose and lost the game. My only hope is that becomes a mistake Pettine makes once.

    @brownscurse said:

    I absolutely do not understand how you do not try a 54 yd. game winning field goal with no wind and sunny skies 70 degrees to win the game with 4 minutes. Perhaps that is a head coach with a defensive mindset. Either way, if we pin them at the 1 yd line Big Ben will still burn one of your younger DB's to get into FG range.

    And had we tried and missed the FG and the Steelers scored after being given the short field what woulod the two of you be saying?

    I could not disagree more. Based upon what the D had done all 2nd half long... including the prior series where they had to shut down the Steelers twice due to the 4th down conversion n the fake punt... it was the right decision.

    If there was an error it was in not staying with what worked on both sides of the ball late in the game.

    @tour2ma said:

    And had we tried and missed the FG and the Steelers scored after being given the short field what woulod the two of you be saying?

    I could not disagree more. Based upon what the D had done all 2nd half long... including the prior series where they had to shut down the Steelers twice due to the 4th down conversion n the fake punt... it was the right decision.

    If there was an error it was in not staying with what worked on both sides of the ball late in the game.

    Well I could not disagree more with you either. What you are describing is playing not to lose. The Browns have implemented that strategy about 40 times the past 6-7 seasons and lose almost every time. As Herm Edwards said "You play to win the game!". Punting there was playing not lose, period. If they miss that field I applaud that they had the balls to go for it, everytime.

  • New FO

    New Coaching Staff

    Huge Roster turnover

    Goofy Pre-Season "QB Competition"

    New Defensive Schemes

    New Complicated Offense

    I have to tell ya, I thought what we were seeing the 1st half was this year's version of the Browns - it wasn't pretty and I was questioning whether to even watch it

    2nd half . . . wow, haven't seen this Team come with adjustments and execution like that in more years than I care to admit.

    Need to cut back on some of the cutesy type plays a bit, and a few series like that last drive play selection (awful).

    I may be wrong, but it looks like we at least have a spark.

    If we can build on what was shown in the 2nd half of today's game, then this Team may well have just turned the corner.

    Need to see what we look like next week, but if we can come out of these first three games at least 1-3 we may be competitive this year.

    @jafbf said:

    I may be wrong, but it looks like we at least have a spark.

    ... and it did not even involve Johnny Sparkplug... 😉

    Speaking of which... I did not see him holding a clipboard all game. Does he still get a game check?

  • I actually enjoyed watching this game. There is a lot of hope from a lot of new players on this team. I expect the season to improve from here. I suspect we will see a lot more of the second half kind of play from the opening ko. The hurryup offense should be run from 1st possession on.

  • @vagitron said:

    Oh yea, you got it all figured out after week 1?

    You guys sure don't- sweating bullets in the second half? Hmmmmm? Once the Browns shook of fthe preseaon rust- you had a ballgame on your hands.

    @hoorta said:

    You guys sure don't- sweating bullets in the second half? Hmmmmm? Once the Browns shook of fthe preseaon rust- you had a ballgame on your hands.

    Rust? Terrance west and Cromwell were both fresh and running the ball well out of a no huddle. It was a nice second half for the browns but teams make adjustmemts from week to week. If ike Taylor could just catch the momentum would have shifted much earlier in the second half. Penalties and an effective no huddle by the browns made the game close. The browns base is the most jekyl and hide group in all of professional football

  • @jafbf said:

    I may be wrong, but it looks like we at least have a spark.

    ... and it did not even involve Johnny Sparkplug... 😉

    Speaking of which... I did not see him holding a clipboard all game. Does he still get a game check?

    @tour2ma said:

    ... and it did not even involve Johnny Sparkplug... 😉

    Speaking of which... I did not see him holding a clipboard all game. Does he still get a game check?

    I saw him a few times.

    In fact, when they came back from half time I saw him with his Helmet on warming up - thought he was going to play the 2nd half as bad as the 1st went.

    Had to step out for a minute and came back to see us running in for a TD.

  • @tour2ma said:

    And had we tried and missed the FG and the Steelers scored after being given the short field what woulod the two of you be saying?

    I could not disagree more. Based upon what the D had done all 2nd half long... including the prior series where they had to shut down the Steelers twice due to the 4th down conversion n the fake punt... it was the right decision.

    If there was an error it was in not staying with what worked on both sides of the ball late in the game.

    Well I could not disagree more with you either. What you are describing is playing not to lose. The Browns have implemented that strategy about 40 times the past 6-7 seasons and lose almost every time. As Herm Edwards said "You play to win the game!". Punting there was playing not lose, period. If they miss that field I applaud that they had the balls to go for it, everytime.

    @jrb12711 said:

    Well I could not disagree more with you either. What you are describing is playing not to lose. The Browns have implemented that strategy about 40 times the past 6-7 seasons and lose almost every time. As Herm Edwards said "You play to win the game!". Punting there was playing not lose, period. If they miss that field I applaud that they had the balls to go for it, everytime.

    I'm pretty sure Herm would have punted...

    So you're saying we disagree? I think if one says "could not disagree more" then it applies to the other automatically... but I digress...

    Other games, maybe I agree with you, but in this case... no. The D did their job... twice in fact in the same series due to the uncovered gunner. But the damage to field position from that botched ST play plus Sheard's "de-helmeting" penalty on the Steeler punt triggered something in the ensuing play-calling that got us away from what had been working.

  • @jrb12711 said:

    Well I could not disagree more with you either. What you are describing is playing not to lose. The Browns have implemented that strategy about 40 times the past 6-7 seasons and lose almost every time. As Herm Edwards said "You play to win the game!". Punting there was playing not lose, period. If they miss that field I applaud that they had the balls to go for it, everytime.

    I'm pretty sure Herm would have punted...

    So you're saying we disagree? I think if one says "could not disagree more" then it applies to the other automatically... but I digress...

    Other games, maybe I agree with you, but in this case... no. The D did their job... twice in fact in the same series due to the uncovered gunner. But the damage to field position from that botched ST play plus Sheard's "de-helmeting" penalty on the Steeler punt triggered something in the ensuing play-calling that got us away from what had been working.

    @tour2ma said:

    I'm pretty sure Herm would have punted...

    So you're saying we disagree? I think if one says "could not disagree more" then it applies to the other automatically... but I digress...

    Other games, maybe I agree with you, but in this case... no. The D did their job... twice in fact in the same series due to the uncovered gunner. But the damage to field position from that botched ST play plus Sheard's "de-helmeting" penalty on the Steeler punt triggered something in the ensuing play-calling that got us away from what had been working.

    And the 7 yard sack on first down that put them in 2nd and long and throws off the play calling considerably.

  • This game was so exciting and the stream I was watching it from was so terrible that I decided to go and get cable till the superbowl is over.

  • @hoorta said:

    You guys sure don't- sweating bullets in the second half? Hmmmmm? Once the Browns shook of fthe preseaon rust- you had a ballgame on your hands.

    Rust? Terrance west and Cromwell were both fresh and running the ball well out of a no huddle. It was a nice second half for the browns but teams make adjustmemts from week to week. If ike Taylor could just catch the momentum would have shifted much earlier in the second half. Penalties and an effective no huddle by the browns made the game close. The browns base is the most jekyl and hide group in all of professional football

    @vagitron said:

    Rust? Terrance west and Cromwell were both fresh and running the ball well out of a no huddle. It was a nice second half for the browns but teams make adjustmemts from week to week. If ike Taylor could just catch the momentum would have shifted much earlier in the second half. Penalties and an effective no huddle by the browns made the game close. The browns base is the most jekyl and hide group in all of professional football

    They were running the ball down your throats early in the 3rd against a defense that wasn't on the field much in the 1st half.

    I'll yield you the 4th qtr, maybe. But that 3rd your Dline just got walked on.

  • @jrb12711 said:

    Well I could not disagree more with you either. What you are describing is playing not to lose. The Browns have implemented that strategy about 40 times the past 6-7 seasons and lose almost every time. As Herm Edwards said "You play to win the game!". Punting there was playing not lose, period. If they miss that field I applaud that they had the balls to go for it, everytime.

    I'm pretty sure Herm would have punted...

    So you're saying we disagree? I think if one says "could not disagree more" then it applies to the other automatically... but I digress...

    Other games, maybe I agree with you, but in this case... no. The D did their job... twice in fact in the same series due to the uncovered gunner. But the damage to field position from that botched ST play plus Sheard's "de-helmeting" penalty on the Steeler punt triggered something in the ensuing play-calling that got us away from what had been working.

    @tour2ma said:

    Other games, maybe I agree with you, but in this case... no. The D did their job... twice in fact in the same series due to the uncovered gunner. But the damage to field position from that botched ST play plus Sheard's "de-helmeting" penalty on the Steeler punt triggered something in the ensuing play-calling that got us away from what had been working.

    That's always the story with the browns though. It made sense at the time if only A, B, and C would have happened differently! That's the same sad story the Browns say every time they make decisions to play not to lose. Football is a game where you take what you have in front of you, IMO. I trust my kicker to make a long FG and put the Browns over the hump with momentum. I try and take the lead instead of hoping for the best. The "right" and "safe" calls burn the Browns year after year, game after game and I'm tired of it. I'll admit, at least they played damn well in the 2nd half and I feel like this team can win. But a FG attempt there quite possibly puts us away from the "moral victory" to the actual W. Nothing you could say would change my mind there, but hindsight is always 20/20.

  • @tour2ma said:

    Other games, maybe I agree with you, but in this case... no. The D did their job... twice in fact in the same series due to the uncovered gunner. But the damage to field position from that botched ST play plus Sheard's "de-helmeting" penalty on the Steeler punt triggered something in the ensuing play-calling that got us away from what had been working.

    That's always the story with the browns though. It made sense at the time if only A, B, and C would have happened differently! That's the same sad story the Browns say every time they make decisions to play not to lose. Football is a game where you take what you have in front of you, IMO. I trust my kicker to make a long FG and put the Browns over the hump with momentum. I try and take the lead instead of hoping for the best. The "right" and "safe" calls burn the Browns year after year, game after game and I'm tired of it. I'll admit, at least they played damn well in the 2nd half and I feel like this team can win. But a FG attempt there quite possibly puts us away from the "moral victory" to the actual W. Nothing you could say would change my mind there, but hindsight is always 20/20.

    @jrb12711 said:

    Nothing you could say would change my mind there, but hindsight is always 20/20.

    Not even if I should offer you say.... $1,000,000*???

    ________________________________________________

    * terms and conditions apply... not an actual offer... valid only if pigs fly up a camel's ass as it passes through the eye of a needle on or before 7 September, 2014...

  • @jrb12711 said:

    Nothing you could say would change my mind there, but hindsight is always 20/20.

    Not even if I should offer you say.... $1,000,000*???

    ________________________________________________

    * terms and conditions apply... not an actual offer... valid only if pigs fly up a camel's ass as it passes through the eye of a needle on or before 7 September, 2014...

    @tour2ma said:

    Not even if I should offer you say.... $1,000,000*???

    ________________________________________________

    * terms and conditions apply... not an actual offer... valid only if pigs fly up a camel's ass as it passes through the eye of a needle on or before 7 September, 2014...

    Well, I'd tell you what I'd do with that money: