Skip to content

Chris

Political Discussion
51 13 1.5k
  • Well, Walter needs to know how to voice his opinions

    in some kind of intelligent manner, they are mostly outrageous, and/or offensive,

    and lambasting when none is required...

    but, the articles around here aren't the same old articles. Liberal haters just don't want

    negativity about their side. A lot of things are going on, most of them very, very

    worrisome things.

    Liberals don't worry about the failures of democrats. They worry about anybody else's

    failures. Only the first part, denoting the failures of democrats, is "boring".

    If the reps take back the Senate, and get the presidency, "angry outrage"

    and "bitterness" over every waking moment of those reps will

    have them posting minute by minute.

    Ole Shep was "frightened" by

    the possible loss of their freedoms and economy for eight years because of "evil"

    Bush and Cheney, and "the man" - with way too much money.

    Of course, his hero Al Gore had "way too much money"... but that was different, eh?

    George Soros has WAY too much money. No worries about that, either.

    It's like "hating" Sarah Palin - far too many liberals just can not stand things not being

    the way they want them to be, they can't stand people who are different from

    them, and they only embrace diversity for the political power only.

    Diversity here? Why, they can't stand it and wish it would go away, if it means

    anything than they aren't, don't believe in.

    Lastly, liberals TEND to only be interested in what benefits them. They thrive on

    those benefits, because they thrive on emotionalism. The "me" generation seems

    to be the liberal part of the generation.

    to liberals, we should all be tolerant and inclusive. you think they are tolerant

    of the Tea Party folks ? Accepting of Sarah Palin? nah. They hate, all too often.

    Those libs during the eight years of Bush-Cheney NEVER left once. They left soon

    after Obamao was elected and started having scandals on a regular basis.

    They can't stand being the defender instead of the attacker. It's "boring" to admit

    they are wrong about anything.

    As with Obamao, he gloried in being the attacker, the criticizer.

    But as to doing the job himself? Just contradicted every single one

    of his feigned criticisms and promises he made.

    Those liberals never ONCE in EIGHT YEARS got "bored" with bashing Bush-Cheney over the "outing" of Plame, or gas prices, or Iraq, etc..

    Cept, it was never Bush-Cheney. They were "outraged" over drone use, over bomb use in Iraq.

    Now? Not one word from liberals about the "indiscrimate" use of bombs or drones. Just silence.

    They just don't like their preferred silence to be broken by anybody else, either.

    And so, they pout and get "bored" and leave.

    Until later and they can come back and have a field day again?

  • Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice...

  • You spake his name thrice

  • Furthermore, there are many, many ways to explain

    disagreements on the board, and with things going on,

    without the outrageous and offensive posts, and personal

    attacks.

  • Sorry, my posts would be very short if I weren't a

    higher speed typer....

  • Furthermore, there are many, many ways to explain

    disagreements on the board, and with things going on,

    without the outrageous and offensive posts, and personal

    attacks.

    @calfoxwc said:

    Furthermore, there are many, many ways to explain

    disagreements on the board, and with things going on,

    without the outrageous and offensive posts, and personal

    attacks.

    😮

    Chris one of the least offensive guys on the fucking board!

    WSS

  • Yes. I was referring to Walter, dammit. 😎

    However, Chris just called me Beetlejuice,

    so I'm offended by his personal attack.

    Although, he could just be admitting that

    I'm brilliantly hilarious....

    ... nah.

  • 3 times!

    !

    WSS

  • Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice...

    @gftchris said:

    Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice...

    I'm with Chris it is getting old. Backing off and lurking now and then is fine. A post titled "Today's Youth", and I have to look. A post titled "Liberals are bad" or "Black people deserve to get shot", yeah, fuck that. It's fucking stupid and it got old.

  • @gftchris said:

    Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice...

    I'm with Chris it is getting old. Backing off and lurking now and then is fine. A post titled "Today's Youth", and I have to look. A post titled "Liberals are bad" or "Black people deserve to get shot", yeah, fuck that. It's fucking stupid and it got old.

    @mld-woody said:

    I'm with Chris it is getting old. Backing off and lurking now and then is fine. A post titled "Today's Youth", and I have to look. A post titled "Liberals are bad" or "Black people deserve to get shot", yeah, fuck that. It's fucking stupid and it got old.

    Just to be sure you do find that behavior of those black kids indefensible do you not?

    I personally think it's unbelievably barbaric. Regardless of the glaring double standard.

    WSS

  • Also, and this goes for everyone, if you see a post with the word "Obamao" in the title I'm sure you could save yourself a great deal of discomfort by merely moving on to the next topic.

    If, in fact, those kind of posts bother you.

    One method I have used in reading posts by Xxxxxx Xxxxx is rolling my eyes and making the jerk off motion with my right hand. Works like a charm.

    WSS

  • Also, and this goes for everyone, if you see a post with the word "Obamao" in the title I'm sure you could save yourself a great deal of discomfort by merely moving on to the next topic.

    If, in fact, those kind of posts bother you.

    One method I have used in reading posts by Xxxxxx Xxxxx is rolling my eyes and making the jerk off motion with my right hand. Works like a charm.

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    Also, and this goes for everyone, if you see a post with the word "Obamao" in the title I'm sure you could save yourself a great deal of discomfort by merely moving on to the next topic.

    If, in fact, those kind of posts bother you.

    One method I have used in reading posts by Xxxxxx Xxxxx is rolling my eyes and making the jerk off motion with my right hand. Works like a charm.

    WSS

    I'd strain my eyes and my arm would get tired

  • @westside-steve said:

    Also, and this goes for everyone, if you see a post with the word "Obamao" in the title I'm sure you could save yourself a great deal of discomfort by merely moving on to the next topic.

    If, in fact, those kind of posts bother you.

    One method I have used in reading posts by Xxxxxx Xxxxx is rolling my eyes and making the jerk off motion with my right hand. Works like a charm.

    WSS

    I'd strain my eyes and my arm would get tired

    @mld-woody said:

    I'd strain my eyes and my arm would get tired

    What does not kill us makes us stronger.

    WSS

  • @mld-woody said:

    I'm with Chris it is getting old. Backing off and lurking now and then is fine. A post titled "Today's Youth", and I have to look. A post titled "Liberals are bad" or "Black people deserve to get shot", yeah, fuck that. It's fucking stupid and it got old.

    Just to be sure you do find that behavior of those black kids indefensible do you not?

    I personally think it's unbelievably barbaric. Regardless of the glaring double standard.

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    Just to be sure you do find that behavior of those black kids indefensible do you not?

    I personally think it's unbelievably barbaric. Regardless of the glaring double standard.

    WSS

    There's not going to be any rational discussion when the thread includes "black people deserve to get shot" "animals" "apes" "savages". Yes, I'm sure whatever was in the OP was bad, but it just spirals from there onto the "I'm not racist, its a double standard, etc" but still totally racist comments.

    No thanks.

  • Well you probably won't be surprised that I find that kind of behavior barbaric. If that were Klansmen, or skinheads or any other white hate group doing that do blacks, Mexicans or Jews, I would call them animal and subhuman savages.

    Furthermore I would not blame the people that they viciously attacked for wanting to shoot them.

    And of course I believe had the races been reversed this would have been the biggest story of the year.

    WSS

  • Perhaps certain people should just start their own political threads

    of what interests them, and we could talk about those.

    The silence about this dirtbag in our WH is deafening.

    And it is not golden.

    I used to play this back in the day.

  • So if we can ignore the hijack, Chris, what would be Scotland's form of currency if they leave the UK? The Euro I assume but did they have their own specific dollar or pound in recent history? I am assuming they will stay in the EU right?

    WSS

  • Why does Scotland want to secede? Is that tantamount to a state seceding or does Scotland have some degree of sovereignty?

  • So if we can ignore the hijack, Chris, what would be Scotland's form of currency if they leave the UK? The Euro I assume but did they have their own specific dollar or pound in recent history? I am assuming they will stay in the EU right?

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    So if we can ignore the hijack, Chris, what would be Scotland's form of currency if they leave the UK? The Euro I assume but did they have their own specific dollar or pound in recent history? I am assuming they will stay in the EU right?

    WSS

    They have claimed they'll still use the GBP, which has been rejected by the chancellor, George Osborne. Obviously, they'd use that for a little while anyway, until they got their own money printed. Alternatively, the Euro makes sense, but for that they'd need admission to the EU, which has declared that a new sovereign state would not automatically be admitted to the EU, and would be subject to the same kinds of scrutiny as new joiners such as Croatia. That's not to say they wouldn't be allowed in, it just might not happen for the next 5 years or so.

    @the-cysko-kid said:

    Why does Scotland want to secede? Is that tantamount to a state seceding or does Scotland have some degree of sovereignty?

    Scotland has its own parliament, and a lot of powers have been devolved there in recent times, to the point where it's almost autonomous. It of course was a separate county up until the unification in the early 17th century, and there's always a lot of 'anti-English' sentiment going on, so it's not like the citizens of the two countries (plus Wales) have ever truly assimilated properly. I mean, you go across the UK, which is about the size of Ohio, roughly, and you get countless different accents and dialects of English for a start, showing the lack of assimilation throughout the centuries.

    Add in the fact that they have their own soccer, rugby & cricket teams (like wales and N. Ireland while we're at it) and it's very easy for the Scots to have a sense of Scottish identity, rather than British identity, and there's a feeling among a lot of the population (about half, judging by recent polls) that they want Scotland to be run by the scottish, not some 'English Toffs in London'