Skip to content
The Browns Board
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Josh Gordon news

Josh Gordon news

The Browns Board
71 33 3.2k

  • Lol

  • JAFBFJ JAFBF

    @mudfly said:

    He came into the league with 2 strikes....lots of players do.....he knew it and we knew it.....and THATS the reason we got him cheap.....

    You may not like it. But thats been the deal all along. We took a chance on him, when every other team passed once, and we got what we got....

    Its not over. The DUI will be #5.....

    College was three violations between two schools, but they don't count for NFL.

    NFL only has two violations that Gordon has been hit for, and he's Stage 3 because of the deal he did on the Codeine to reduce the number of weeks he'd be out.

    So I say again - what are the three violations ?

    EDIT :

    . . . and at 10 weeks, the Browns are the ones getting shafted since his contract will be active this year . . . plus with being out 10 games, what's the point in coming back?

    @jafbf said:

    College was three violations between two schools, but they don't count for NFL.

    Yes. College does count. And that has been clear the whole time. Any college player arrested, charged or dismissed for drugs or "associate behavior" enters the league with strikes and they are automatically placed in the drug program....

    Again....it's the same rules for ever and not a conspiracy against JG....and you can hate them all you want, but they've been there the whole time.....

    And the NEW rules which just got ratified(by the players) are gonna get him again in October when the DUI comes alive....

  • "Blow me, pal" was good. She just got some cred.

    Zombo

  • Z Zombo

    "Blow me, pal" was good. She just got some cred.

    Zombo

    Zombo said:

    "Blow me, pal" was good. She just got some cred.

    Zombo

    😁

    Too bad it's a fake account

    Z 1 Reply

  • What I don't understand is obviously Gordon was included in the retroactive part of this. There was no fourth step in the old policy so unless he is being retroactively put into this new policy it should be a whole season. But it shouldn't be anything at all. If his new suspension is following the rules of the new policy then the drug test should have followed the rules of the new policy. Meaning the 16ng test would have been negative and therefore no suspension. Fuck the NFL and this bullshit.

  • JAFBFJ JAFBF

    Zombo said:

    "Blow me, pal" was good. She just got some cred.

    Zombo

    😁

    Too bad it's a fake account

    @jafbf said:

    😁

    Too bad it's a fake account

    Oh, I didn't read that part! Too bad, I would love if one of these writers snapped.

    Zombo

  • Z Zombo

    @jafbf said:

    😁

    Too bad it's a fake account

    Oh, I didn't read that part! Too bad, I would love if one of these writers snapped.

    Zombo

    Zombo said:

    Oh, I didn't read that part! Too bad, I would love if one of these writers snapped.

    Zombo

    Yeah, thought it would be a good ideal to give the board a laugh since we were getting shafted so bad . . .

  • DieHardBrownsFanD DieHardBrownsFan

    Gordon fucked up. Whatever happens happens. Fuck him.

    @diehardbrownsfan said:

    Gordon fucked up. Whatever happens happens. Fuck him.

    Hey in general he needs to make better decisions and hang around better people yes but come on , this level he "failed" on is a fucking joke. Add to it that fact the B bottle tested negative and its further ignorance. Then on top all of that they now adjust the level to something that actually makes sense and he is nowhere near that level. This should be a MAXIMUM four games even if they count it as a fail. Frankly it should be thrown out.

    Goodell is really all over the place in application of the league rules and policies. Hell he gave Rice two games, took heat and implement a new policy that said 6 games for a first offence and lifetime for a 2nd. Then he turned around after "he watched the video he never saw" and suspended him indefinitely on a FIRST. I am not by any means defending Rice but its a perfect example of how out of control this Nazi is. For the Gordon deal if they are reducing it to 10 games under the new rules for a fail does that not indicate they are applying the new rules to his case? If they are applying the new rules his level is below the threshold of a fail. There is simply no consistency in any of the rules and punishments being handed down by the NFL.

    Gordon should have his attorney push for 4 games or less or sue. I think honestly he has simply been waiting for this all to play out before the suit if filed anyway.

    I am really starting to hate Nazi Roger but luckily between Rice, Peterson and the soon to be bombshell DEA investigation in the NFL painkiller use he is fucked.

  • M Momszer

    I guess we're just picking and choosing what part of the revised policy is retro and which isn't. To be consistent it's either 3 violations 4 game suspension since he would not have failed based on revised policy or he's out for the whole year. This is total BS. And fire Goodel already. I hope Pepsi drops the NFL so bye bye to the $1B.

    @momszer said:

    I guess we're just picking and choosing what part of the revised policy is retro and which isn't.

    That is the maddening part of the decision... it is devoid of logic.

    "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196

  • Grossi might have done it.

    πŸ˜‰

    WSS

    www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons

  • This just in...

    NFL, NFLPA No Drug Policy Agreement Yet

    ESPN β€Ž- 4 minutes ago

    NFL, NFLPA No Drug Policy Agreement Yet. ESPN's Chris Mortensen breaks down the latest developments between the NFL and NFLPA

    http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/11515179/nfl-players-union-votes-accept-revised-drug-policy

    So much for "done deal"...

    "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196

  • As always, until this thing is final & official, I treat media input as gossip & speculation. IF true that the tolerances have changed & Gordon was below, that SHOULD negate any "10 game suspension" as he would not be at that level.

    We'll see.

    Mike

    INΒ DORSEY I TRUST

  • Agree, Mike... especially when the likes of Schefter is reporting. Adam seems to throw just about anything against the wall to be first and hopes it sticks.

    "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
  • Tour2maT Tour2ma

    Agree, Mike... especially when the likes of Schefter is reporting. Adam seems to throw just about anything against the wall to be first and hopes it sticks.

    @tour2ma said:

    Agree, Mike... especially when the likes of Schefter is reporting. Adam seems to throw just about anything against the wall to be first and hopes it sticks.

    That guy sucks. Just like you said, he just reports rumors. He also said no suspension , then said 4 games, then said 8 games, now says 10 games, said they were voting tues, then weds, then thurs, then friday. He's an ass and did this same shit when the appeal was being heard. And he was wrong on everything he reported then too.

  • I agree. I'll just wait until it's official to overreact. Mainly due to the fact that 10 games doesn't make sense at all. If marijuana offenses have their own "scale" now, Gordon technically hasn't had ANY marijuana offense in the NFL. Certainly not the four that it would take to get 10 games. Even if you suppose being put into the drug program out of college was one offense, the codeine pop as one, and this latest "failed" test, it'd still only be three. Although with the newest rules, none of those are failed marijuana tests. So, I'm not quite believing the 10 games thing just yet.

Log in to reply