Skip to content

Squealing Steelers

The Browns Board
233 31 8.1k
  • Hate Ben and I truly believe he's a rapist. As an NFL QB, dude is legit. That throw into the right rear corner of the end zone last night was incredible....... He's still a rapist.

    @d-bone said:

    Hate Ben and I truly believe he's a rapist. As an NFL QB, dude is legit. That throw into the right rear corner of the end zone last night was incredible....... He's still a rapist.

    Made me laugh out loud. 🙂

  • @the-gipper said:

    I was truly surprised by this game. I thought the Carolina defense was supposed to be one of the best around. Apparently not.

    I guess the Greg Hardy suspension really messed them up more than any of the other suspensions that have occurred. I didn't see the game but I heard that the Panthers had very little pressure on BR, thus allowing him to connect with Antonio Brown on like 10 or 10 attempts. So clearly Joe Haden isn't the only guy that Brown gives fits to.

    And I guess Cam Newton was out much of the game....and DA had to play.

    How many Ints. did the Squibs have as a result?

    Hardy is a beast so they no doubt missed him. However the real reason I'm replying is to ask you if there is ever a point where you aren't talking out of your ass? Aren't you an attorney or something along those lines? Isn't it therefore your job to get the facts? Our offensive line is geling which kept Ben clean. The panther defense is still very solid but the steelers showed up on both sides of the ball. The talking out your ass part stems from your cam newton/Anderson comment. Newton played until the game was out of reach and that's when Anderson came in, its also when gradkowski came in for the steelers.

    @vagitron said:

    Hardy is a beast so they no doubt missed him. However the real reason I'm replying is to ask you if there is ever a point where you aren't talking out of your ass? Aren't you an attorney or something along those lines? Isn't it therefore your job to get the facts? Our offensive line is geling which kept Ben clean. The panther defense is still very solid but the steelers showed up on both sides of the ball. The talking out your ass part stems from your cam newton/Anderson comment. Newton played until the game was out of reach and that's when Anderson came in, its also when gradkowski came in for the steelers.

    Didn't see the game, as I was driving back from Cleveland. Credit where it's due- probably the upset of the week.

    OTOH- you're in deep shit if you have to resign a totally washed up Harrison, and Taylor is done for most of the year.

    Be thankful Gordon will still be suspended the next go-around, because I'd put the over\under for his receiving yardage against a beat up Steeler secondary at around 200.

  • @vagitron said:

    Hardy is a beast so they no doubt missed him. However the real reason I'm replying is to ask you if there is ever a point where you aren't talking out of your ass? Aren't you an attorney or something along those lines? Isn't it therefore your job to get the facts? Our offensive line is geling which kept Ben clean. The panther defense is still very solid but the steelers showed up on both sides of the ball. The talking out your ass part stems from your cam newton/Anderson comment. Newton played until the game was out of reach and that's when Anderson came in, its also when gradkowski came in for the steelers.

    Didn't see the game, as I was driving back from Cleveland. Credit where it's due- probably the upset of the week.

    OTOH- you're in deep shit if you have to resign a totally washed up Harrison, and Taylor is done for most of the year.

    Be thankful Gordon will still be suspended the next go-around, because I'd put the over\under for his receiving yardage against a beat up Steeler secondary at around 200.

    @hoorta said:

    OTOH- you're in deep shit if you have to resign a totally washed up Harrison...

    I actually think Harrison is a good, emergency move for them. While he is a great player anymore, he's an instant fit for the playbook, LeBeau will ring some plays out of him and James will bring a heap of the AWOL attitude back to the team.

  • @the-gipper said:

    Getting hit doesn't mean he got hurt. He got hit like the first/second play of the game. If he was hurt that bad he should have come out of the game. Maybe he should have, maybe he was a dumbass. If he was hurt so bad it may have been in the team's best interest to have him come out. He didn't play for shit much after that. So maybe he cost you the game.

    If he was hurt so bad, he would have come out. Since he didn't come out he was not hurt that bad. It is an easy equation to follow.

    Foam, foam, foam. Its all you do.

    @vagitron said:

    Foam, foam, foam. Its all you do.

    Yes, I give facts, tell the truth, and you can't handle it as it does not fit your delusion. Gotcha.

  • @vagitron said:

    Foam, foam, foam. Its all you do.

    Yes, I give facts, tell the truth, and you can't handle it as it does not fit your delusion. Gotcha.

    @the-gipper said:

    Yes, I give facts, tell the truth, and you can't handle it as it does not fit your delusion. Gotcha.

    No Gipper. You certainly act like you know what you are talking about. You definitely have conviction. The problem is far too often you are so off base or just flat out wrong anyone looking at your posts objectively can smell the bs from a mile away. Take away google and you're in trouble. Your post on the Carolina game was laughable and the rest of your so called football knowledge is so foggy its a wonder you can see directly in front of your face. Post up your browns trivia and just stick to that, at least there your m.o is believable.

  • @the-gipper said:

    Yes, I give facts, tell the truth, and you can't handle it as it does not fit your delusion. Gotcha.

    No Gipper. You certainly act like you know what you are talking about. You definitely have conviction. The problem is far too often you are so off base or just flat out wrong anyone looking at your posts objectively can smell the bs from a mile away. Take away google and you're in trouble. Your post on the Carolina game was laughable and the rest of your so called football knowledge is so foggy its a wonder you can see directly in front of your face. Post up your browns trivia and just stick to that, at least there your m.o is believable.

    @vagitron said:

    No Gipper. You certainly act like you know what you are talking about. You definitely have conviction. The problem is far too often you are so off base or just flat out wrong anyone looking at your posts objectively can smell the bs from a mile away. Take away google and you're in trouble. Your post on the Carolina game was laughable and the rest of your so called football knowledge is so foggy its a wonder you can see directly in front of your face. Post up your browns trivia and just stick to that, at least there your m.o is believable.

    So, you are basing the fact that I know nothing on the fact that I assumed that Newton didn't play as much in that game as I thought.

    That is the ONE and ONLY fact that I got wrong.....an assumption I made about a game that I said up front that I did not see.

    And I wasn't far wrong at that. I thought Newton had been taken out earlier in the game than he was.....that's it....that is the sum and substance of my error about that game.

    I will match the knowledge I have in the tip of my dick against the knowledge you have about football in your entire brain and vagina.

    The only thing you can say is that because I am sure that you spend 3 hours a day reading about the Steelers, that you know a little bit more than I do about their current happenings. And how do you get that info? You watch TV, you read a newspaper, you google......just like I do.

    You live in Ohio now. Not far from NEOhio where I live. We will go to a bar somewhere and we will have a neutral person ask questions about football.....and we will see who comes out the better. And bring a couple of hundred dollars in cash to pay me at the end of the night. I know you won't take up the offer because you are too big of a Vagitron to do so.

    Also...you will have to kiss the tip of my dick.....because I will only have to use the knowledge there to defeat you.

    As for the Trivia that is put on the Board here....maybe you could demonstrate your knowledge by trying your hand at it. We will all have to trust to your honor that you won't cheat. By your failure to try your hand, we will all assume that as tacit admission that you know shit about the history of the game.

  • Jesus, I should have known any Steelers thread would lead to Gipper and Vagitron arguing about Steelers/Browns or Pittsburgh/Cleveland.

  • Jesus, I should have known any Steelers thread would lead to Gipper and Vagitron arguing about Steelers/Browns or Pittsburgh/Cleveland.

    @gftchris said:

    Jesus, I should have known any Steelers thread would lead to Gipper and Vagitron arguing about Steelers/Browns or Pittsburgh/Cleveland.

    Yea, a Steeler thread about the Browns/Steelers. What else did you think? Talk about the Springboks vs. the All Blacks?

  • @gftchris said:

    Jesus, I should have known any Steelers thread would lead to Gipper and Vagitron arguing about Steelers/Browns or Pittsburgh/Cleveland.

    Yea, a Steeler thread about the Browns/Steelers. What else did you think? Talk about the Springboks vs. the All Blacks?

    @the-gipper said:

    the Springboks vs. the All Blacks?

    Had to Google that

  • @the-gipper said:

    the Springboks vs. the All Blacks?

    Had to Google that

    @d-bone said:

    Had to Google that

    The great Rugby rivalry. South Africa vs. New Zealand. Dramatized in the movie with Morgan Freeman as Mandela and Matt Damon as the top SA rugby player. Can't recall the name of the movie.

  • @d-bone said:

    Had to Google that

    The great Rugby rivalry. South Africa vs. New Zealand. Dramatized in the movie with Morgan Freeman as Mandela and Matt Damon as the top SA rugby player. Can't recall the name of the movie.

    @the-gipper said:

    The great Rugby rivalry. South Africa vs. New Zealand. Dramatized in the movie with Morgan Freeman as Mandela and Matt Damon as the top SA rugby player. Can't recall the name of the movie.

    Invictus.

  • @the-gipper said:

    The great Rugby rivalry. South Africa vs. New Zealand. Dramatized in the movie with Morgan Freeman as Mandela and Matt Damon as the top SA rugby player. Can't recall the name of the movie.

    Invictus.

    @gftchris said:

    Invictus.

    OK gft, since you didn't want a Browns/Steelers debate on a Steelers thread, tell us all about that SA vs. NZ rivalry. Is it the best going in the Rugby world, or is there like a Euro rivalry you would want to promote over it. Or maybe NZ vs. Fiji or Samoa?

  • Had to Google that DBone

    ********************************

    Dammit, I had to google it as well.

    Vagi arguing with Gipper?

    Never heard vagi sound so hopeless and helpless...

  • Vag is like a 5 year old trying to argue with Einstein about chemistry.

  • @the-gipper said:

    the Springboks vs. the All Blacks?

    Had to Google that

    @d-bone said:

    Had to Google that

    You did not see the movie?

    @pumpkin-eater said:

    Vag is like a 5 year old trying to argue with Einstein about chemistry.

    Since Einstein was a Theoretical Physicist, Vag might do better than you'd think...

    I doubt it, but he might...

  • Vag is like a 5 year old trying to argue with Einstein about chemistry.

    @pumpkin-eater said:

    Vag is like a 5 year old trying to argue with Einstein about chemistry.

    I haven't read all the replies but you give Gipper entirely too much credit. It's part of the reason he posts like his sh.it doesn't stink.

  • @d-bone said:

    Had to Google that

    You did not see the movie?

    @pumpkin-eater said:

    Vag is like a 5 year old trying to argue with Einstein about chemistry.

    Since Einstein was a Theoretical Physicist, Vag might do better than you'd think...

    I doubt it, but he might...

    @tour2ma said:

    You did not see the movie?

    To be honest, I've never even heard of it until today. 😊

  • Vag is like a 5 year old trying to argue with Einstein about chemistry.

    @pumpkin-eater said:

    Vag is like a 5 year old trying to argue with Einstein about chemistry.

    Einstein was not a chemist....he was a physicist. 😉

  • @tour2ma said:

    You did not see the movie?

    To be honest, I've never even heard of it until today. 😊

    @d-bone said:

    To be honest, I've never even heard of it until today. 😊

    Good flick... but predictable.

    Unless you haven't gone to a movie in 25 years or so you should be able to guess who they tabbed to play Mandela in Invictus. 😉

    Good contrast to Stallone's sports movie, Victory... which was very bad... and predictable...

  • @pumpkin-eater said:

    Vag is like a 5 year old trying to argue with Einstein about chemistry.

    I haven't read all the replies but you give Gipper entirely too much credit. It's part of the reason he posts like his sh.it doesn't stink.

    @vagitron said:

    I haven't read all the replies but you give Gipper entirely too much credit. It's part of the reason he posts like his sh.it doesn't stink.

    Whether or not they are warranted in giving me too much credit, they are certainly warranted in giving you none at all.

    As for whether or not my shit stinks, you are one who should know. I have been feeding it to you along and you consume great mass quantities of it.

    (Also note that the Vag chicken assed out on the challenge)