Skip to content
The Browns Board
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. RAC is the Main candidate for KC Defensive Coordinator Job

RAC is the Main candidate for KC Defensive Coordinator Job

The Browns Board
8 7 841
  • Mr. TM Mr. T wrote on
    #1
    "Clancy Pendergast accepted a job on the Chiefs' coaching staff without a specific title. The Chiefs were vague with the titles of the assistant coaches they have hired is because there is a chance Romeo Crennel might become the Chiefs' defensive coordinator. Pendergast and other defensive coaches accepted jobs as "defensive assistant coaches.'' NFL.com's Adam Schefter confirms that the Chiefs will implement a 3-4 defense under new GM Scott Pioli and head coach Todd Haley."

    If he takes the job will he have to relieve the Browns of paying off his old contract?

    Head or Gut?
  • Mr. TM Mr. T
    "Clancy Pendergast accepted a job on the Chiefs' coaching staff without a specific title. The Chiefs were vague with the titles of the assistant coaches they have hired is because there is a chance Romeo Crennel might become the Chiefs' defensive coordinator. Pendergast and other defensive coaches accepted jobs as "defensive assistant coaches.'' NFL.com's Adam Schefter confirms that the Chiefs will implement a 3-4 defense under new GM Scott Pioli and head coach Todd Haley."

    If he takes the job will he have to relieve the Browns of paying off his old contract?

    GeechG Geech wrote on
    #2

    @mr.-t said:

    If he takes the job will he have to relieve the Browns of paying off his old contract?

    Lerner will still have to pay him, minus what he earns with the Chiefs. That's usually how it works.

    -Al

  • Y YtownBrownsBacker wrote on
    #3

    If it does happen, then I can't see them taking Curry. Converting to the 3-4 means a lot of player changes because current guys won't fit. Beside needing a lot on offense, they need to find a NT get rid of their DEs find some 3-4 DEs and they would be looking for a pass rusher, an OLB instead of a ILB.

    ? 1 Reply
  • Mr. TM Mr. T wrote on
    #4

    If RAC goes to KC, then we can ship off Sean Smith to them.

    maybe for a washing machine. 😁

    Head or Gut?
  • Mr. TM Mr. T

    If RAC goes to KC, then we can ship off Sean Smith to them.

    maybe for a washing machine. 😁

    nickersN nickers wrote on
    #5

    @mr.-t said:

    If RAC goes to KC, then we can ship off Sean Smith to them.

    maybe for a washing machine. 😁

    Hell lets trade Andre Davis to them and Maybe Wille too...

    Nickers...."There are no old running QB's in the NFL "~Sam Rutigliano~
  • GipsG Gips wrote on
    #6

    Interesting that KC could possibly want romeo as they convert to a 3-4?

    Never the less switching defenses ups our chances a bit of getting curry at #5...

    We have been rebuilding since 1964, Why stop now? GO BROWNS!
  • Y YtownBrownsBacker

    If it does happen, then I can't see them taking Curry. Converting to the 3-4 means a lot of player changes because current guys won't fit. Beside needing a lot on offense, they need to find a NT get rid of their DEs find some 3-4 DEs and they would be looking for a pass rusher, an OLB instead of a ILB.

    ? Aloysius wrote on
    #7

    @ytownbrownsbacker said:

    If it does happen, then I can't see them taking Curry. Converting to the 3-4 means a lot of player changes because current guys won't fit. Beside needing a lot on offense, they need to find a NT get rid of their DEs find some 3-4 DEs and they would be looking for a pass rusher, an OLB instead of a ILB.

    Don't see why. It's one thing if you assume Raji's the guy, but his rumored character issues may not make him a "Patriot Way" type.

    There isn't a DE in the draft worth the 3rd pick in the draft, and the available OLB's are the same guys we don't seem to be comfortable taking at 5. If so, why would Pioli want to take one of them?

    Curry's the closest thing to a sure bet in this draft. And if you've got a defense with a lot of holes, why wouldn't solidifying one of the ILB spots be a smart move?

  • ? Guest

    @ytownbrownsbacker said:

    If it does happen, then I can't see them taking Curry. Converting to the 3-4 means a lot of player changes because current guys won't fit. Beside needing a lot on offense, they need to find a NT get rid of their DEs find some 3-4 DEs and they would be looking for a pass rusher, an OLB instead of a ILB.

    Don't see why. It's one thing if you assume Raji's the guy, but his rumored character issues may not make him a "Patriot Way" type.

    There isn't a DE in the draft worth the 3rd pick in the draft, and the available OLB's are the same guys we don't seem to be comfortable taking at 5. If so, why would Pioli want to take one of them?

    Curry's the closest thing to a sure bet in this draft. And if you've got a defense with a lot of holes, why wouldn't solidifying one of the ILB spots be a smart move?

    Legacy FanL Legacy Fan wrote on
    #8

    Aloysius said:

    Don't see why. It's one thing if you assume Raji's the guy, but his rumored character issues may not make him a "Patriot Way" type.

    There isn't a DE in the draft worth the 3rd pick in the draft, and the available OLB's are the same guys we don't seem to be comfortable taking at 5. If so, why would Pioli want to take one of them?

    Curry's the closest thing to a sure bet in this draft. And if you've got a defense with a lot of holes, why wouldn't solidifying one of the ILB spots be a smart move?

    I agree totally. This is horrible news (for those of us who want Curry).

    Sure, luck means a lot in football. Not having a good quarterback is bad luck. -Don Shula
Log in to reply