Skip to content

Obamao quietly preparing new voter demographic, and electoral crisis

Political Discussion
38 7 798
  • Cal, what will be scary after Obama gets out of office?

  • Cal, what will be scary after Obama gets out of office?

    @logicisforsquares said:

    Cal, what will be scary after Obama gets out of office?

    Hilary

  • I hope, nothing. Libs were "frightened" at the evil spectre of

    Bush and Cheney.

    Outraged by their outing of Plame, cia non-agent.

    Terrified of the possible loss of their freedoms by the Patriot Act.

    But Bush and Cheney ACTED against terrorism. They NEVER did the outing of Plame.

    The Patriot Act didn't bother me much - we had to find and stop terrorists.

    And the national debt? OMG - how DARE we have THAT MUCH DEBT on OUR CHILDREN's BACKS !

    Now? Silence. And we have a pres who is encouaging an illegal alien rampage, who authorized "Fast and Furious"

    to frame American citizen gun owners for those guns they intentionally gave out to drug cartels (but it failed -

    we found out), covered up, still, Benghazi, refused to admit we are threatened by terrorism, ran up the debt more,

    and again and again makes Cloward-Piven a justified guess at his intentions via his actions, used the IRS to target

    conservative groups, the list goes on and on and on.

    Concerning enough that I post it here on the politics board? Sure. How am I supposed to know what will be concerning

    after Buttock Obamebola is gone? You tell me for sure who will be pres, and I'll take a few guesses.

  • Now the machines are turning rep votes into dems - in Maryland.

    http://baltimore.cbslocal.com/2014/10/28/ballot-switch-claims/

  • Getting bad. the marxist dems have now set the stage to never lose

    power, by corrupting the electoral process.

    They've simply be demanding that illegals come here....

    so they can get the vote and it's all over.

  • I'll say it again..

    Keep your powder dry..

    It's coming

  • I'll sell you some doomsday seeds. Only $49.95. They're a steal!

  • I'll sell you some doomsday seeds. Only $49.95. They're a steal!

    @mld-woody said:

    I'll sell you some doomsday seeds. Only $49.95. They're a steal!

    But plant them quick because global warming is going to destroy the earth in the next few years... Of course by then there will be nowhere to spend 49 bucks on anything else so what the hell?

    😁

    WSS

  • libs and their their hysteria. it's what they do.

  • @mld-woody said:

    I'll sell you some doomsday seeds. Only $49.95. They're a steal!

    But plant them quick because global warming is going to destroy the earth in the next few years... Of course by then there will be nowhere to spend 49 bucks on anything else so what the hell?

    😁

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    But plant them quick because global warming is going to destroy the earth in the next few years... Of course by then there will be nowhere to spend 49 bucks on anything else so what the hell?

    😁

    WSS

    Really, a few years? Who said that?

  • @westside-steve said:

    But plant them quick because global warming is going to destroy the earth in the next few years... Of course by then there will be nowhere to spend 49 bucks on anything else so what the hell?

    😁

    WSS

    Really, a few years? Who said that?

    @mld-woody said:

    Really, a few years? Who said that?

    Al Gore, the self appointed spokesperson for the man-made global warming movement.

    I realized you were probably only in grade school and don't really follow this shit carefully anyway but it's been decades since the guy warned that it could happen in 5 to 15 years. We are at least past due for disaster. I'm not accusing you of making that statement Am I? You might think it's ridiculous too but since I don't want to put words in your mouth....

    WSS

  • And back to Al Gore, as always. A politician didn't get something right about a scientific issue? I'm shocked.

    And in terms of disaster, no the world hasn't boiled, but we've seen a good deal of extreme weather, a lot more in the past 20 years than before.

  • And back to Al Gore, as always. A politician didn't get something right about a scientific issue? I'm shocked.

    And in terms of disaster, no the world hasn't boiled, but we've seen a good deal of extreme weather, a lot more in the past 20 years than before.

    @gftchris said:

    And back to Al Gore, as always. A politician didn't get something right about a scientific issue? I'm shocked.

    And in terms of disaster, no the world hasn't boiled, but we've seen a good deal of extreme weather, a lot more in the past 20 years than before.

    Well Mr Gore by no means did the research himself. His opinions and campaign were all based on scientific consensus of the left at the time. I assume it still is. He is only a spokesperson and, in my opinion, a paid shill for the global warming people. I realize some of you get upset when his name is mentioned but he was merely spouting the party line for what I assume were fairly respected scientists.

    WSS

  • (PS when I say the left I mean that it is usually the left that support that theory, not that these scientists are particularly biased in their conclusions even though since that's where the money comes from it must be considered a possibility)

  • He first started his global warming kick over 20 years ago, in the early 90s. We know a lot more about it now than then, and nobody is saying armageddon is coming within a decade.

    But again, much more extreme weather - like the polar vortex from last winter, for example, and the droughts in California that seem to have been ongoing for a year or more, causing crop failures and wildfires.

    "This is the way the world ends: Not with a bang but a whimper."

  • Spin it anyway you like. Not a big deal and yes things change like the wind.

    Fact is the Woodman asked me who said that. And I say it was Al Gore and whatever respected group of scientists he was fronting for decades ago which is a fair statement. If that is all been discredited now great. In another 20 years? Who can tell?

    WSS

  • Spin it anyway you like. Not a big deal and yes things change like the wind.

    Fact is the Woodman asked me who said that. And I say it was Al Gore and whatever respected group of scientists he was fronting for decades ago which is a fair statement. If that is all been discredited now great. In another 20 years? Who can tell?

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    Spin it anyway you like. Not a big deal and yes things change like the wind.

    Fact is the Woodman asked me who said that. And I say it was Al Gore and whatever respected group of scientists he was fronting for decades ago which is a fair statement. If that is all been discredited now great. In another 20 years? Who can tell?

    WSS

    Theories get refined, not thrown out. We have a clearer idea now than 20 years ago.