Skip to content

Where the F is Crowell

The Browns Board
61 28 2.5k
  • Saving him for Thurs., at least that's my story for now. Fresh legs early and late in the game.

    Beat the f'ing Bengals.

  • Won't matter how fresh his legs are if the line can't run block.

  • Does anyone have any reliable info on Crowell? Why aren't we using our best running back? It's not like we don't need him.

  • All I've heard is part of it is his ball security issues. The coaches have said they decide who plays based on how they perform in practice (and apparently West has been tearing it up in practice), and according to Pettine, it's Montgomery, the RB coach, who determines the carries during the game.

  • I may be wrong as usual but I suspect we see his fresh legs at some point tonight. The Bengals run D has sucked over the last month, we need to take advantage. On a side note I ended up staying in Cincy tonight on the way home from TN. They dont seem to like it here in the bar when i say "here kitty kitty" and then bark loud in their faces haha

  • My hopes are that they have been saving him for TONIGHT. While that may be far fetched, I still believe they know who the best back is right now. If some holes can open tonight, I hope it's the Crow hittin' em. I like West and Tate a lot, but I feel as a though Crowell adds that real spark reminiscent of J Cribbs. Would be mind boggling to me if he doesn't get a boat load of action tonight.

  • suffering from a mean case of the fumbalitis.

  • Crow hits a hole with no dance moves.I don't think this new line can open one that quick. Our best back tandem is Crow and West,would love to see it if pettine stops luvin the player and start luvin the talent.

    @gumby73 said:

    Crow hits a hole with no dance moves.I don't think this new line can open one that quick. Our best back tandem is Crow and West,would love to see it if pettine stops luvin the player and start luvin the talent.

    You said a mouth full. With West and Crowell the one-two punch would wear a defense down.

  • Here's hoping Crowell has a good game and our running game comes back. I like all three and would use them. When you don't have a mobile quarterback you need the backs. Go Browns!!

  • Won't matter how fresh his legs are if the line can't run block.

    @tiamat63 said:

    Won't matter how fresh his legs are if the line can't run block.

    It apparently matters, he is ripping off chunk yardage. If he can protect the ball he is by far the best back we have period.

  • @tiamat63 said:

    Won't matter how fresh his legs are if the line can't run block.

    It apparently matters, he is ripping off chunk yardage. If he can protect the ball he is by far the best back we have period.

    @jcam222 said:

    It apparently matters, he is ripping off chunk yardage. If he can protect the ball he is by far the best back we have period.

    If...

    The line created creases, if not holes. All the backs performed well. None stood out on the stat sheet, but Crow is undeniably the flashiest runner, but the least complete.

    He's also still the #3...

  • Ben Tate looked slow in comparison to the Baby Backs. Crowell needs to develope ball security.

  • Ben Tate looked slow in comparison to the Baby Backs. Crowell needs to develope ball security.

    @mohican said:

    Ben Tate looked slow in comparison to the Baby Backs.

    On some plays... yes... but much has to do on whether there's somewhere to run. Case in point look at Tate's run near the goal line. Hit the middle hard and fast.

  • Our RB's are gonna be an issue next year. I don't see us able to keep all 3, which sucks...cause I have no idea who is the low man among them. It literally changes every week. All the guys looked pretty good last night, but then again our line utterly fisted the Bengals. West did look good though, 2nd straight game for him...maybe he's separating I dunno. Crowell looks wild to me, runs like he's gonna fall down at any minute. On some runs it's awesome, on others I think it fucks up his timing.

  • Our RB's are gonna be an issue next year. I don't see us able to keep all 3, which sucks...cause I have no idea who is the low man among them. It literally changes every week. All the guys looked pretty good last night, but then again our line utterly fisted the Bengals. West did look good though, 2nd straight game for him...maybe he's separating I dunno. Crowell looks wild to me, runs like he's gonna fall down at any minute. On some runs it's awesome, on others I think it fucks up his timing.

    @clevfan4life said:

    Our RB's are gonna be an issue next year. I don't see us able to keep all 3...

    Why not?

  • Our RB's are gonna be an issue next year. I don't see us able to keep all 3, which sucks...cause I have no idea who is the low man among them. It literally changes every week. All the guys looked pretty good last night, but then again our line utterly fisted the Bengals. West did look good though, 2nd straight game for him...maybe he's separating I dunno. Crowell looks wild to me, runs like he's gonna fall down at any minute. On some runs it's awesome, on others I think it fucks up his timing.

    @clevfan4life said:

    Our RB's are gonna be an issue next year. I don't see us able to keep all 3, which sucks...cause I have no idea who is the low man among them. It literally changes every week. All the guys looked pretty good last night, but then again our line utterly fisted the Bengals. West did look good though, 2nd straight game for him...maybe he's separating I dunno. Crowell looks wild to me, runs like he's gonna fall down at any minute. On some runs it's awesome, on others I think it fucks up his timing.

    Crowell is a UDFA, West a 3rd round pick....both will be under contract. The only "difficulty" could be Ben Tate because...perhaps....he will be a FA again. I am not sure of his contract status.....1 year deal only?

    I don't see it being a big issue. If Tate is not here, then the Browns go with West/Crowell. If he is here, there is no issue.

  • They are all under contract next year(Tate signed for 2 yrs).

  • They are all under contract next year(Tate signed for 2 yrs).

    @manzier said:

    They are all under contract next year(Tate signed for 2 yrs).

    Yup... thru 2015... and Crow thru 2016 and West thru 2017.

    Only issue I see is we do not have a "home run" threat on our roster. Plenty of quicks, but no burner that looks capable of taking it to the house.

    Similarly none appear to be true, "beast mode" types... with Crow coming the closest.

    All are kinda the same with differences in their make-up, but the differences are not so great that you could not throw a blanket over them.

  • Where is Crowell? In the end zone