Skip to content

Guess Who's alone at the Top?

The Browns Board
48 27 2.3k
  • Yep. And dont be surprised to see us let guys go who want top $ and would skew the salary structure. I see them spending the $ on core players like Mack or Thomas, but not so much on skill guys or older players. Example, I fully expect Ruben to be gone or forced to accept a MUCH lower contract. Bullychuck let's guys go all the time and another one just steps in. A consistent winner, with different players every year. And very few stars. And Brady is very good, but he's not the reason that team wins every year.

  • But they haven't won a SB in like 10 years! 😎

  • Yep. And dont be surprised to see us let guys go who want top $ and would skew the salary structure. I see them spending the $ on core players like Mack or Thomas, but not so much on skill guys or older players. Example, I fully expect Ruben to be gone or forced to accept a MUCH lower contract. Bullychuck let's guys go all the time and another one just steps in. A consistent winner, with different players every year. And very few stars. And Brady is very good, but he's not the reason that team wins every year.

    @manzier said:

    Yep. And dont be surprised to see us let guys go who want top $ and would skew the salary structure. I see them spending the $ on core players like Mack or Thomas, but not so much on skill guys or older players. Example, I fully expect Ruben to be gone or forced to accept a MUCH lower contract. Bullychuck let's guys go all the time and another one just steps in. A consistent winner, with different players every year. And very few stars. And Brady is very good, but he's not the reason that team wins every year.

    Rubin can go, and someone like Kitchen will step up and take his place.

  • But they haven't won a SB in like 10 years! 😎

    @tour2ma said:

    But they haven't won a SB in like 10 years! 😎

    Ironically, Je'rod Cherry was just on the radio saying how much this team reminds him of the 2001 Pats team. Really. Just now. And he is someone who was very close to that situation. . 😉

  • Yep. And dont be surprised to see us let guys go who want top $ and would skew the salary structure. I see them spending the $ on core players like Mack or Thomas, but not so much on skill guys or older players. Example, I fully expect Ruben to be gone or forced to accept a MUCH lower contract. Bullychuck let's guys go all the time and another one just steps in. A consistent winner, with different players every year. And very few stars. And Brady is very good, but he's not the reason that team wins every year.

    @manzier said:

    Yep. And dont be surprised to see us let guys go who want top $ and would skew the salary structure. I see them spending the $ on core players like Mack or Thomas, but not so much on skill guys or older players. Example, I fully expect Ruben to be gone or forced to accept a MUCH lower contract. Bullychuck let's guys go all the time and another one just steps in. A consistent winner, with different players every year. And very few stars. And Brady is very good, but he's not the reason that team wins every year.

    Hate to disappoint you but Brady is THE ONLY reason they win.. without him. that team would be a mere after thought.. Ive said it once.. I'll say it again.. Belichic was a big fat 0 before brady.. He'll return to being a big fat 0 after brady...

  • @manzier said:

    Yep. And dont be surprised to see us let guys go who want top $ and would skew the salary structure. I see them spending the $ on core players like Mack or Thomas, but not so much on skill guys or older players. Example, I fully expect Ruben to be gone or forced to accept a MUCH lower contract. Bullychuck let's guys go all the time and another one just steps in. A consistent winner, with different players every year. And very few stars. And Brady is very good, but he's not the reason that team wins every year.

    Hate to disappoint you but Brady is THE ONLY reason they win.. without him. that team would be a mere after thought.. Ive said it once.. I'll say it again.. Belichic was a big fat 0 before brady.. He'll return to being a big fat 0 after brady...

    @nickers said:

    Hate to disappoint you but Brady is THE ONLY reason they win.. without him. that team would be a mere after thought.. Ive said it once.. I'll say it again.. Belichic was a big fat 0 before brady.. He'll return to being a big fat 0 after brady...

    Matt Cassel's playing time/winning record with the Patriots says otherwise.

  • @nickers said:

    Hate to disappoint you but Brady is THE ONLY reason they win.. without him. that team would be a mere after thought.. Ive said it once.. I'll say it again.. Belichic was a big fat 0 before brady.. He'll return to being a big fat 0 after brady...

    Matt Cassel's playing time/winning record with the Patriots says otherwise.

    @logicisforsquares said:

    Matt Cassel's playing time/winning record with the Patriots says otherwise.

    Matt Cassel's 2008 run and Brady's 2007 run differ in the divisions they played. The Patriots 2007 schedule was one of the hardest schedules Ive seen a football team have to play, facing all the top defenses and teams in the league. 16-0.

    Cassel got different divisions and a cherry cake walk schedule, went 11-5, lost to everyone even remotely challenging, and failed to make the play offs or win the division.

    I don't think Belichick is nothing without Brady, but if Cassel played in 2007 the Patriots would of went like 3-13. lol

    Anyway, congrats on 1st

  • didn't bledsoe get them to the playoffs that first year brady came in?

  • didn't bledsoe get them to the playoffs that first year brady came in?

    @miktoxic said:

    didn't bledsoe get them to the playoffs that first year brady came in?

    He started just the first few games. Not sure exactly how many, but lost 2 of em if I remember correctly. Then Brady came in and they went on to finish at 10-5(ish) and , ultimately, win it all.

  • @miktoxic said:

    didn't bledsoe get them to the playoffs that first year brady came in?

    He started just the first few games. Not sure exactly how many, but lost 2 of em if I remember correctly. Then Brady came in and they went on to finish at 10-5(ish) and , ultimately, win it all.

    @manzier said:

    He started just the first few games. Not sure exactly how many, but lost 2 of em if I remember correctly. Then Brady came in and they went on to finish at 10-5(ish) and , ultimately, win it all.

    Two... and both were losses.

    Brady sat his rookie year and Bledsoe went down in 2nd game of Tom's sophomore season and finished 11-3 in the regular season and 3-0 in the playoffs as a starter.