Say Congress.....got a minute?
-
-
Excellent point.
-
Of course I would support those presidential powers if and when there is a president worthy of them.
And I don't discount the possibility that Obama's advisers might prompt him to do the right thing at some point and then I would not want Congress to slow or halt that decision whatever it may be.
As much as I dislike the Obama administration I also feel that the opposition does take the knee-jerk reaction too far sometimes.
WSS
-
I have grown skeptical of having a president worthy of those powers. And there is a lot of wisdom in giving Congress and not the executive branch war making powers.
This editorial by Rand Paul is not knee jerk in the least. And where Obama or people in his administration have chosen to insert themselves, especially in the middle east, the results have been disasterous.
-
I have grown skeptical of having a president worthy of those powers. And there is a lot of wisdom in giving Congress and not the executive branch war making powers.
This editorial by Rand Paul is not knee jerk in the least. And where Obama or people in his administration have chosen to insert themselves, especially in the middle east, the results have been disasterous.
I have grown skeptical of having a president worthy of those powers. And there is a lot of wisdom in giving Congress and not the executive branch war making powers.
This editorial by Rand Paul is not knee jerk in the least. And where Obama or people in his administration have chosen to insert themselves, especially in the middle east, the results have been disasterous.
If you give congress the powers, nothing will get done. Even on something like this where, judging by the comments from the conservative types where, there was widespread support, nothing has been agreed.
-
The constitution (I know, who follows it) very clearly gives war making power to Congress - and not the President. And the "get's stuff done" or "doesn't get stuff done" is a non sequitor to me.
Stuff I want to see done - Repeal of ACA
Repeal of 16th and 17th amendments
Repeal act that set House representation at 435 members, no matter the size of the population.
i could go on...
-
The constitution (I know, who follows it) very clearly gives war making power to Congress - and not the President. And the "get's stuff done" or "doesn't get stuff done" is a non sequitor to me.
Stuff I want to see done - Repeal of ACA
Repeal of 16th and 17th amendments
Repeal act that set House representation at 435 members, no matter the size of the population.
i could go on...
The constitution (I know, who follows it) very clearly gives war making power to Congress - and not the President. And the "get's stuff done" or "doesn't get stuff done" is a non sequitor to me.
Stuff I want to see done - Repeal of ACA
Repeal of 16th and 17th amendments
Repeal act that set House representation at 435 members, no matter the size of the population.
i could go on...
Agreed. 2 more words for ya:
TERM. LIMITS.
-
I have grown skeptical of having a president worthy of those powers. And there is a lot of wisdom in giving Congress and not the executive branch war making powers.
This editorial by Rand Paul is not knee jerk in the least. And where Obama or people in his administration have chosen to insert themselves, especially in the middle east, the results have been disasterous.
If you give congress the powers, nothing will get done. Even on something like this where, judging by the comments from the conservative types where, there was widespread support, nothing has been agreed.
If you give congress the powers, nothing will get done. Even on something like this where, judging by the comments from the conservative types where, there was widespread support, nothing has been agreed.
Dude, your government is ran by a bunch of fuckin blokes who still wear powered wigs and an 89 year old woman in a fucking flower hat.
-
If you give congress the powers, nothing will get done. Even on something like this where, judging by the comments from the conservative types where, there was widespread support, nothing has been agreed.
Dude, your government is ran by a bunch of fuckin blokes who still wear powered wigs and an 89 year old woman in a fucking flower hat.
Dude, your government is ran by a bunch of fuckin blokes who still wear powered wigs and an 89 year old woman in a fucking flower hat.
Well, 1 - they don't wear wigs; 2 - the queen has no input.
And still, they get a lot more done than the US government.
-
Dude, your government is ran by a bunch of fuckin blokes who still wear powered wigs and an 89 year old woman in a fucking flower hat.
Well, 1 - they don't wear wigs; 2 - the queen has no input.
And still, they get a lot more done than the US government.
Well, 1 - they don't wear wigs; 2 - the queen has no input.
And still, they get a lot more done than the US government.
Thats debatable. But they should since your country is tiny in comparison.
-
Thats debatable. But they should since your country is tiny in comparison.
It is indeed. But then we do have to deal with the EU.
-
If you give congress the powers, nothing will get done. Even on something like this where, judging by the comments from the conservative types where, there was widespread support, nothing has been agreed.
Dude, your government is ran by a bunch of fuckin blokes who still wear powered wigs and an 89 year old woman in a fucking flower hat.
Dude, your government is ran by a bunch of fuckin blokes who still wear powered wigs and an 89 year old woman in a fucking flower hat.
Powered wigs... you mean something like this? That'd be pretty cool...
-
Dude, your government is ran by a bunch of fuckin blokes who still wear powered wigs and an 89 year old woman in a fucking flower hat.
Well, 1 - they don't wear wigs; 2 - the queen has no input.
And still, they get a lot more done than the US government.
And still, they get a lot more done than the US government.
Then why is over 1/4 of London in complete poverty?
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better π
Register Login