White Shroud Group Terrorizes the Terrorists
-
Why is this not being reported by mainstream American news outlets?
-
Why is this not being reported by mainstream American news outlets?
I did a search and included the names Fox and MSNBC with no hits.Why is this not being reported by mainstream American news outlets?
Odd.
I wouldn't be surprised if isis has enemies who are just as unsavory but still I think this is newsworthy.
WSS
-
Nothing regarding the queen of jordan as I linked to yesterday on fox or MSNBC either. It's as if mainstream media in american doesn't want you to know some things...
-
I wouldn't exactly call those two outlets the mainstream media.
But still...
WSS
-
Really? I thought they were. Who would you classify as mainstream then?
-
Its probably Arab propaganda.
-
-
Not saying you're wrong, just wondering who. Things that get posted here don't tend to be from mainstream sites, the only ones I'd really heard of outside are Fox, HuffPost and NBC. CBS?
-
Nothing regarding the queen of jordan as I linked to yesterday on fox or MSNBC either. It's as if mainstream media in american doesn't want you to know some things...
Nothing regarding the queen of jordan as I linked to yesterday on fox or MSNBC either. It's as if mainstream media in american doesn't want you to know some things...
There, fixed.
American mainstream media is not about reporting facts, it is about projecting a narrative that supports a particular agenda. -
who knows? Probably because most of the incendiary articles are covered in greater detail by certain news organizations.
The bias of the mainstream media is more subtle. One can count the number of articles about this story or that story look to see how many are favorable neutral or unfavorable and see where it is.
WSS
-
What is most interesting is the people who have been criticizing Arabs for supposedly not doing enough to fight back against terrorism will now see this kind of thing and call it "propaganda" or otherwise dismiss/discredit it, rather than be supportive of the very actions they said they wanted to see.
-
Still it's a pretty small story sir.
Even The New York Times mention called it a super secret organization. And just from the name and alternate names they don't exactly sound like a group looking to instill Jeffersonian democracy. I'm glad someone is standing up to Isis but remember there were people standing up to Kadafi who were no better.
WSS
-
Still it's a pretty small story sir.
Even The New York Times mention called it a super secret organization. And just from the name and alternate names they don't exactly sound like a group looking to instill Jeffersonian democracy. I'm glad someone is standing up to Isis but remember there were people standing up to Kadafi who were no better.
WSS
Still it's a pretty small story sir.
Even The New York Times mention called it a super secret organization. And just from the name and alternate names they don't exactly sound like a group looking to instill Jeffersonian democracy. I'm glad someone is standing up to Isis but remember there were people standing up to Kadafi who were no better.
WSS
I would like to see it become a big story that leads to more people like them signing up to fight Isis. As for the name, I'd hesitate to draw conclusions from it. This I think is more telling. Quoted from the story:
"Eighty per cent of the members of White Shroud did not take part in combat before (Islamic State) came. We trained them and they joined White Shroud because of the great oppression they felt after Islamic State took control,"
As for democracy, I think expectations must be tempered. Non-extremist dictators are preferable to religious zealots. Further insights about the group are here (apparently there are many others).
-
Well I for one am glad SOMEBODY is standing up for themselves there
-
In more 'Muslim-on-ISIS' news, Iran have, acting independently of the coalition, started bombing ISIS.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/dec/03/iran-bombs-isis-in-iraq-says-us
-
In more 'Muslim-on-ISIS' news, Iran have, acting independently of the coalition, started bombing ISIS.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/dec/03/iran-bombs-isis-in-iraq-says-us
In more 'Muslim-on-ISIS' news, Iran have, acting independently of the coalition, started bombing ISIS.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/dec/03/iran-bombs-isis-in-iraq-says-us
I like how both Iran and the USA both deny cooperation with the other.
-
In more 'Muslim-on-ISIS' news, Iran have, acting independently of the coalition, started bombing ISIS.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/dec/03/iran-bombs-isis-in-iraq-says-us
I like how both Iran and the USA both deny cooperation with the other.
I like how both Iran and the USA both deny cooperation with the other.
Yep, the US and Iran are so stubborn, Iraq is playing the peace-keeping intermediary. Let that sink in...
-
I like how both Iran and the USA both deny cooperation with the other.
Yep, the US and Iran are so stubborn, Iraq is playing the peace-keeping intermediary. Let that sink in...
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login