Skip to content
The Browns Board
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. It's Hoyer

It's Hoyer

The Browns Board
314 59 11.9k

  • The pedophilia homoeroticism continues for manziel. I'm just amazed, and extemely creeped out, when I read these comments.

  • hoortaH hoorta

    @everlastingxxx said:

    Pettine has compassion towards Hoyer. Yes or no? If you think his relationship with Brian has nothing to do with this decision then you are either naive or being intellectually dishonest. I also noted that Manziel is a risk. You conveniently deleted that from my original quote.

    Pettine also noted the decision was very close and that they are considering a Johnny package for this week.

    Yes i have followed the Browns all season. I have watched all the games, i have watched some games multiple times. Not sure why you keep questioning me on that.

    Pettine did the very unusual of polling the vets- like Joe Thomas, besides consulting with Shanny, Lougans, and maybe even Haslam what the Browns should do. I totally agree Manziel is a weapon- use him somehow Sunday.

    @texasag1969 said:

    BH now knows that not only is his position on the line, but his multiyear, bigger bucks contract as well. The best don't cave so if he plays well (even in a loss) then he shows he can handle it all and the Browns have their QB. But he plays them right out of the playoffs because he screws the pooch, it's all over and back to holding JM's famous non-existent clipboard.

    Yup.

    @walterwhite said:

    Let's make a prediction, how long does Hoyer last in this game?

    I think Indy goes up 21-0, Hoyer is pulled at halftime and The Browns lose 35-17 after it's too late.

    21? try 10 if Hoyer is playing poorly.

    @ballpeen said:

    Come on man, don't sound like a idiot....you sound like a fan boy. I'll bet you a box of doughnuts ri8ght now Hoyer isn't on the team next year.

    I am talking jelly and cream fill doughnuts, not just you basic glazed

    I'll up it to a bottle of wine 'Peen- you didn't say starter.

    @aggie-brown-fan said:

    He accomplished more on one possession than Hoyer did last week. Were all you Manziel haters even able to cheer when he lead that td drive?

    I said to myself, well gee, a nice drive against a prevent victory defense. Sort of a lukewarm, well nice enough, but we're still gonna lose this game.

    And his second drive? Well- he just looked like Hoyer. Don't make excuses "he wasn't ready". That's BS. If the exact same had happened to Hoyer on the bad snap you would have been all over Brian's case- for sure. That's a problem I have with Manzealot tunnel vision. Johnny turns the second drive into another TD, well, now we're talking.

    If you get the feeling I'm not easily impressed anymore by ONE series, you'd be 100% correct.

    @hoorta said:

    Pettine did the very unusual of polling the vets- like Joe Thomas, besides consulting with Shanny, Lougans, and maybe even Haslam what the Browns should do. I totally agree Manziel is a weapon- use him somehow Sunday.

    My thoughts as well. Pettine said "we're not a QB-centric offense".

    Now will JM be assigned just to do trick plays as we saw earlier in the season, or some actual QB-time?

    W tiamat63T 2 Replies

  • I get the feeling Pettine is just playing it safe by starting hoyer. Franchises don't become successful by playing it safe. Does anyone really think the browns would win a playoff game with hoyer?

    :neutral_face:
    tiamat63T A hoortaH Tour2maT 4 Replies
  • WalterWhiteW WalterWhite

    @upper-lip said:

    Like I've already said on here, Cleveland has the dumbest, most irrational sports fan base in nation

    and with that comment you prove what a fuckwit you are.

    Cleveland has the most passionate fan base in all of professional sports, especially football you arrogant elitist twat.

    @walterwhite said:

    and with that comment you prove what a fuckwit you are.

    Cleveland has the most passionate fan base in all of professional sports, especially football you arrogant elitist twat.

    Cleveland does have a passionate fanbase. But he's right, a good half of it is comprised of Retards and assholes. Nobody's eats their own quite like Cleveland fans.

  • P Pumpkin Eater

    I get the feeling Pettine is just playing it safe by starting hoyer. Franchises don't become successful by playing it safe. Does anyone really think the browns would win a playoff game with hoyer?

    @pumpkin-eater said:

    I get the feeling Pettine is just playing it safe by starting hoyer. Franchises don't become successful by playing it safe. Does anyone really think the browns would win a playoff game with hoyer?

    Do you honestly believe this team would win a playoff game with Johnny given the current state of this team? Thought not....

  • P Pumpkin Eater

    I get the feeling Pettine is just playing it safe by starting hoyer. Franchises don't become successful by playing it safe. Does anyone really think the browns would win a playoff game with hoyer?

    @pumpkin-eater said:

    I get the feeling Pettine is just playing it safe by starting hoyer. Franchises don't become successful by playing it safe. Does anyone really think the browns would win a playoff game with hoyer?

    welp, at least you can bring up that question.

  • Good to see everyone lining up behind our starting QB.

    Go Browns...

    "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196

  • " If you get the feeling I'm not easily impressed anymore by ONE series, you'd be 100% correct."

    That's good because Hoyer will need a lot more than 1 good series to beat Indy.

  • tml1138T tml1138

    @hoorta said:

    Pettine did the very unusual of polling the vets- like Joe Thomas, besides consulting with Shanny, Lougans, and maybe even Haslam what the Browns should do. I totally agree Manziel is a weapon- use him somehow Sunday.

    My thoughts as well. Pettine said "we're not a QB-centric offense".

    Now will JM be assigned just to do trick plays as we saw earlier in the season, or some actual QB-time?

    @tml1138 said:

    My thoughts as well. Pettine said "we're not a QB-centric offense".

    Well goody. Procol Harum isn't a guitar centric band but it doesn't mean you want a guitar player who sucks...

    WSS

    www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons

  • A few years ago I thought the level of fan boy Retardation had reached it's apogee with the Quinn/Anderson debate, but I was wrong.

    At the start of the season I preferred Hoyer. Now? I prefer Just Win.

    Hope has two beautiful daughters: Their names are Anger and Courage. Anger that things are the way they are. Courage to make them the way they ought to be. - St. Augustine. Throughout the centuries there were men who took first steps down new roads armed with nothing but their vision. - Ayn Rand
  • ColumbusKingC ColumbusKing

    @falcon7 said:

    Even if magically Aaron Rodgers was now the Browns QB they have 1 win left MAX. So many other problems/injuries ect.

    You are insane! Of the 4 games left 3 are very winnable

    @columbusking said:

    You are insane! Of the 4 games left 3 are very winnable

    I'm insane? So you think 10-6 is likely? I count 1, unless the ratbird game is totally meaningless to them.

  • Every game, every week is winnable. We certainly should beat Carolina and no reason to think we won't beat Cincy at home either. Indy and Baltimore will be tough but you never know.

    S 1 Reply
  • upper lipU upper lip

    @the-cysko-kid said:

    Oh that's so awesome I'm sure everyone is as impressed as I am right now.

    I'm not trying to impress anyone. I couldn't give a shit. Walterwhites just a loser

    @upper-lip said:

    I'm not trying to impress anyone. I couldn't give a shit. Walterwhites just a loser

    Well we are in full agreement there

    Early man walked away as modern man took control. Their minds weren't all the same and to conquer was their goal. So He built his great empires and he slaughtered his own kind, and he died a confused man and killed himself in his own mind...
  • tml1138T tml1138

    @hoorta said:

    Pettine did the very unusual of polling the vets- like Joe Thomas, besides consulting with Shanny, Lougans, and maybe even Haslam what the Browns should do. I totally agree Manziel is a weapon- use him somehow Sunday.

    My thoughts as well. Pettine said "we're not a QB-centric offense".

    Now will JM be assigned just to do trick plays as we saw earlier in the season, or some actual QB-time?

    @tml1138 said:

    My thoughts as well. Pettine said "we're not a QB-centric offense".

    Now will JM be assigned just to do trick plays as we saw earlier in the season, or some actual QB-time?

    I like Pettine addressing this. It also raises the point of what an "QB-centric offense" is. Is it one where you have faith in your QB to sling it around 50 times a game?

    Those teams usually don't have quality defenses or running games to boot.

    Fact is, while the QB is the most important position on the field, he much like anyone else - needs support and production from the other 10 positions.

    I can't think of the last time a team won a SuperBowl with the QB literally carrying the offense. It just doesn't happen. Its too much for any one man.

    tml1138T 1 Reply

  • " I can't think of the last time a team won a SuperBowl with the QB literally carrying the offense. It just doesn't happen. Its too much for any one man."

    Aaron Rodgers

    Drew Brees

    Peyton Manning

    Just to name a few.

    tiamat63T B 2 Replies
  • tiamat63T tiamat63

    @tml1138 said:

    My thoughts as well. Pettine said "we're not a QB-centric offense".

    Now will JM be assigned just to do trick plays as we saw earlier in the season, or some actual QB-time?

    I like Pettine addressing this. It also raises the point of what an "QB-centric offense" is. Is it one where you have faith in your QB to sling it around 50 times a game?

    Those teams usually don't have quality defenses or running games to boot.

    Fact is, while the QB is the most important position on the field, he much like anyone else - needs support and production from the other 10 positions.

    I can't think of the last time a team won a SuperBowl with the QB literally carrying the offense. It just doesn't happen. Its too much for any one man.

    @tiamat63 said:

    I like Pettine addressing this. It also raises the point of what an "QB-centric offense" is. Is it one where you have faith in your QB to sling it around 50 times a game?

    Those teams usually don't have quality defenses or running games to boot.

    Fact is, while the QB is the most important position on the field, he much like anyone else - needs support and production from the other 10 positions.

    I can't think of the last time a team won a SuperBowl with the QB literally carrying the offense. It just doesn't happen. Its too much for any one man.

    Right. But there are teams that heavily rely on them. Browns solid wins this year were truly a team effort. The Thursday night game in Cincy stands out.

  • Mark OM Mark O

    Every game, every week is winnable. We certainly should beat Carolina and no reason to think we won't beat Cincy at home either. Indy and Baltimore will be tough but you never know.

    @mark-o said:

    Every game, every week is winnable. We certainly should beat Carolina and no reason to think we won't beat Cincy at home either. Indy and Baltimore will be tough but you never know.

    Haloti Ngata could not have been suspended at a more convenient time. With him gone, establishing a running game will be easier, to say the least.

    I honestly believe that if we beat the Colts, we can take all 3 games after.

  • A Aggie Brown fan

    " I can't think of the last time a team won a SuperBowl with the QB literally carrying the offense. It just doesn't happen. Its too much for any one man."

    Aaron Rodgers

    Drew Brees

    Peyton Manning

    Just to name a few.

    @aggie-brown-fan said:

    " I can't think of the last time a team won a SuperBowl with the QB literally carrying the offense. It just doesn't happen. Its too much for any one man."

    Aaron Rodgers

    Drew Brees

    Peyton Manning

    Just to name a few.

    I'll address these in order.

    The previous Packer seasons were rather terrible until the 2nd rated defense and the emergence of James Starks and Brandon Jackson in the playoffs really put the Pack over the edge. Clearly Rodgers wasn't getting it done by his lonesome previously.

    Brees? Pretty much the same. The defense was opportunistic and decent in 2009 but Sean Payton finally going with a balanced attack (two RB's over a 600 yards including almost 800 yards of offense for Reggie Bush) was their big difference.

    Peyton might be your best example. But it still isn't enough. How many years previous after having a dominant offense (although, dominant over the lowly AFC South) did the Colts defense fail time and time again in the playoffs? Peyton couldn't keep up. Then by some miracle during the 06 run they decide "hey, maybe we should stop the run" and then be lucky enough to face a Rex Grossman led offense in the Super Bowl.

  • Again,

    "I can't think of the last time a team won a SuperBowl with the QB literally carrying the offense. It just doesn't happen. Its too much for any one man."

    You said nothing about defense in this quote. In the Super Bowl game itself, Aaron Rodgers carried the Packers offense. Wothout him, they lose.

  • A Aggie Brown fan

    Again,

    "I can't think of the last time a team won a SuperBowl with the QB literally carrying the offense. It just doesn't happen. Its too much for any one man."

    You said nothing about defense in this quote. In the Super Bowl game itself, Aaron Rodgers carried the Packers offense. Wothout him, they lose.

    @aggie-brown-fan said:

    Again,

    "I can't think of the last time a team won a SuperBowl with the QB literally carrying the offense. It just doesn't happen. Its too much for any one man."

    You said nothing about defense in this quote. In the Super Bowl game itself, Aaron Rodgers carried the Packers offense. Wothout him, they lose.

    go grow some weed or something. do this country a favor by your vast knowledge of agriculture and shut up about football cuz you know dick.

Log in to reply