Skip to content

No ‘magic bullet’ in Obama housing relief plan

Political Discussion
66 13 4.5k
  • really legacy, fluxuating energy prices meaning oil is not one of the most dominant factors in our overall economy.... so when gas was 4.00 and oil was trading at 150 per barrel/plastics and oil based manufactured product pricing did not go up... trucking/transportation costs did not go up.... food costs did not go up... etc.. etc the following quarters of reported earnings to wall street were not down with a listed cause of increased manufacturing and transportation costs.. airlines did not increase fare.... travel was not depressed due to increased costs meaning even Vegas and other destination spots were not down in visiters and earnings... U.S. miliatary operating budgets did not increase due to increased transportation costs... The strategic reserve of oil must not exist for that vary reason... Spending contraction that is commonly and directly linked to consumer spending budgets on gasoline must all be a figment of my imagination..

    Your right call bs on a basic well known economic influence.

    @osusev said:

    really legacy, fluxuating energy prices meaning oil is not one of the most dominant factors in our overall economy.... so when gas was 4.00 and oil was trading at 150 per barrel/plastics and oil based manufactured product pricing did not go up... trucking/transportation costs did not go up.... food costs did not go up... etc.. etc the following quarters of reported earnings to wall street were not down with a listed cause of increased manufacturing and transportation costs.. airlines did not increase fare.... travel was not depressed due to increased costs meaning even Vegas and other destination spots were not down in visiters and earnings... U.S. miliatary operating budgets did not increase due to increased transportation costs... The strategic reserve of oil must not exist for that vary reason... Spending contraction that is commonly and directly linked to consumer spending budgets on gasoline must all be a figment of my imagination..

    Your right call bs on a basic well known economic influence.

    Please point to a single word in my post that would suggest the high cost of oil does not effect those who consume it. Holy shit.

    sev you get on these agendas where you just memory dump everything you know on a certain subject into a post without acknowledging any responses to anything you have written previously.

    Take off the blinders, re-read what I wrote, understand that I was merely talking about the actual cause for the artificially inflated cost of oil -and subsequently gas- (as opposed to your notion that Bush's War & "dismantled oversight that no longer exists" which is missing and isn't used anymore because it's not around.... 😕) and then post something intelligent on that response. Is this how you have conversations with people, using cue-cards & ignoring whatever they respond with? This is like those Mad Libs books from when I was a kid.

    No wonder we suck as a nation.

  • @westside-steve said:

    Nope.

    And it's pretty bad when even Obammy's acolytes can't come up with a better defense of this bill.

    And make no mistake; the market has plummeted since Dems took the houses but especially since Obammy has been the frontrunner and winner.

    We (Americans) have spent so much negative energy toward a few CEOs who make money when thier businesses fail (not unlike athletes and actors) that we'e cut off our noses to spite our collective face.

    WSS

    WSS[/b]

    LOL, I really find it quite compelling that people forget what happened before Obama took office.

    I wonder if there should be a study on how siding with a particular party will in fact have people subconsciously remember what they want to. That would be very interesting. Dude, please research before sounding like an idiot again. December 5th, the Dow was at 7,550 and at that point had the greatest volume decrease in history. Yes before Obama was in office.

    Please look at our country objectively people, you are going to ruin it.

    @kosar_for_president said:

    LOL, I really find it quite compelling that people forget what happened before Obama took office.

    So you keep harping on that.

    OK one of the biggest periods of growth in history UNTIL the Democrats took the houses.

    Correct?

    A stinking bailout bill that BOTH parties pused through and YES Bush signed it.

    Who here is pimping that?

    An automaker bailout that nobody wanted and voted against BUT too f*ckin' bad.

    Right?

    Of course seeing the great success of that (and Bush only got half Obammy still gets the other half) someone as clear thinking as you might be a little hesitant to burn 4 times that much on pork.

    No??

    I wonder if there should be a study on how siding with a particular party will in fact have people subconsciously remember what they want to. That would be very interesting. Dude, please research before sounding like an idiot again. December 5th, the Dow was at 7,550 and at that point had the greatest volume decrease in history. Yes before Obama was in office.

    2008?

    Who was president elect?

    Isn't the market reaction to that negative so far?

    Hmm we'd better research that huh?

    Please look at our country objectively people, you are going to ruin it.

    Is it objective to see that as soon as it became likely Obammy was going to win consumer confidence and the stock market crashed?

    Or what exactly?

    Is "change" all you want? Change for the worse?

    Well you have it.

    So back to your harangue.

    What is it that Bush did to cause the crash?

    List them and we'll see if we all agree and if we think Obammy's plan is the cure.

    WSS

  • @osusev said:

    choco you dont understand that volatile energy prices spiking artificially from envirement pressures in the middle east also from dismantled oversight that no longer exists causing massive problems for us?

    EVERYTHING in the U.S. is dependent upon transportation IE: OIL cost. The cascading costs that shrink profits from increased overhead related to gas/oil based product increases effects everything. That also takes money away from EVERY sector of our economy to be spent on increased transportation costs. Those obviously effect purchasing of any other products in lieu of being able to afford increased transportation/increased goods costs. That eventually spills toward market confidence at reduced profits and shrinking growth.....

    OIL/ENERGY is the lifeblood that fuels our consumption, it can also cause it to slowdown or stall which started last year depressing travel and purchase along with increasing food cost etc.

    You really need to take a basic Macro economics course or go get yourself a book.

    I call BS. I don't think the cost of oil has such a steep (in)elasticity curve as you may think. Not 4-5 months ago, we were treated with a real-life, honest-to-goodness example of what was artificially inflating the cost of gas at the pump. It sure as shit wasn't the cost of oil. Or the cost of refining said oil.

    As soon as the commodities traders ran out of credit to play with, the cost/price of oil (and subsequently gas at the pump) was cut in half. If you're Exxon (or anybody for that matter), you don't get to keep posting a new record profit every quarter because your operating costs are increasing. Come on, buddy.

    I'd suggest refreshing your own 101 before offering unsolicited 200-level reading advice.

    @legacy-fan said:

    I call BS. I don't think the cost of oil has such a steep (in)elasticity curve as you may think. Not 4-5 months ago, we were treated with a real-life, honest-to-goodness example of what was artificially inflating the cost of gas at the pump. It sure as shit wasn't the cost of oil. Or the cost of refining said oil.

    As soon as the commodities traders ran out of credit to play with, the cost/price of oil (and subsequently gas at the pump) was cut in half. If you're Exxon (or anybody for that matter), you don't get to keep posting a new record profit every quarter because your operating costs are increasing. Come on, buddy.

    I'd suggest refreshing your own 101 before offering unsolicited 200-level reading advice.

    What was that exactly? You called BS and stated you dont "Think" the cost of oil has such a steep curve...... IT DOES that is why it is a NATIONAL SECURITY ISSUE.

    My response was to Choco because he does not see how energy policy and problems with our middle east operations had a MAJOR impact on our economy and help push us toward a recession.

    I dont have blinders on, my "notion" is not mine. Have you listened to ANY economist talk about the massive drain on our system Iraq and Afghanistan is causing us and the MASSIVE overhaul of the European Union and U.S. of all regulatory agencies and controls on the securities sector?

    As for your response reread your exact quote in bold and what my discussion was with Choco.

  • @legacy-fan said:

    I call BS. I don't think the cost of oil has such a steep (in)elasticity curve as you may think. Not 4-5 months ago, we were treated with a real-life, honest-to-goodness example of what was artificially inflating the cost of gas at the pump. It sure as shit wasn't the cost of oil. Or the cost of refining said oil.

    As soon as the commodities traders ran out of credit to play with, the cost/price of oil (and subsequently gas at the pump) was cut in half. If you're Exxon (or anybody for that matter), you don't get to keep posting a new record profit every quarter because your operating costs are increasing. Come on, buddy.

    I'd suggest refreshing your own 101 before offering unsolicited 200-level reading advice.

    What was that exactly? You called BS and stated you dont "Think" the cost of oil has such a steep curve...... IT DOES that is why it is a NATIONAL SECURITY ISSUE.

    My response was to Choco because he does not see how energy policy and problems with our middle east operations had a MAJOR impact on our economy and help push us toward a recession.

    I dont have blinders on, my "notion" is not mine. Have you listened to ANY economist talk about the massive drain on our system Iraq and Afghanistan is causing us and the MASSIVE overhaul of the European Union and U.S. of all regulatory agencies and controls on the securities sector?

    As for your response reread your exact quote in bold and what my discussion was with Choco.

    @osusev said:

    As for your response reread your exact quote in bold and what my discussion was with Choco.

    Nevermind. That alone epitomizes the problem you have with any discussion on here. You did exactly what you are asking me to do:

    1. Read the 1st sentence of a post only.

    2. Hyperventilate.

    3. Memory dump.

    4. Repeat.

    Awesome.

  • @osusev said:

    really legacy, fluxuating energy prices meaning oil is not one of the most dominant factors in our overall economy.... so when gas was 4.00 and oil was trading at 150 per barrel/plastics and oil based manufactured product pricing did not go up... trucking/transportation costs did not go up.... food costs did not go up... etc.. etc the following quarters of reported earnings to wall street were not down with a listed cause of increased manufacturing and transportation costs.. airlines did not increase fare.... travel was not depressed due to increased costs meaning even Vegas and other destination spots were not down in visiters and earnings... U.S. miliatary operating budgets did not increase due to increased transportation costs... The strategic reserve of oil must not exist for that vary reason... Spending contraction that is commonly and directly linked to consumer spending budgets on gasoline must all be a figment of my imagination..

    Your right call bs on a basic well known economic influence.

    Please point to a single word in my post that would suggest the high cost of oil does not effect those who consume it. Holy shit.

    sev you get on these agendas where you just memory dump everything you know on a certain subject into a post without acknowledging any responses to anything you have written previously.

    Take off the blinders, re-read what I wrote, understand that I was merely talking about the actual cause for the artificially inflated cost of oil -and subsequently gas- (as opposed to your notion that Bush's War & "dismantled oversight that no longer exists" which is missing and isn't used anymore because it's not around.... 😕) and then post something intelligent on that response. Is this how you have conversations with people, using cue-cards & ignoring whatever they respond with? This is like those Mad Libs books from when I was a kid.

    No wonder we suck as a nation.

    @legacy-fan said:

    Please point to a single word in my post that would suggest the high cost of oil does not effect those who consume it. Holy shit.

    you asked this right? then I posted this qoute from you:

    I call BS. I don't think the cost of oil has such a steep (in)elasticity curve as you may think

    those are not related?

    this is all related to Choco who thinks that the middle east wars are unrelated to our current recession. I believe they are massively related and you called "bs" in the relation of fluxating energy prices due to instabilty we created in the middle east with Bush wars and rebuilding combined with dismantled oversight and regulation of energy traders outside of the U.S..

    You think it was just credit? They have had that credit for 15+ years but the ability to artificially manipulate prices without repercussions were new from the enron loop hole that was created. Yes credit is killing them anyways now in lieu of regulation and oversight but unless that is reestablished to close that loop hole they will just do it again once credit is flowing again.

  • @legacy-fan said:

    Please point to a single word in my post that would suggest the high cost of oil does not effect those who consume it. Holy shit.

    you asked this right? then I posted this qoute from you:

    I call BS. I don't think the cost of oil has such a steep (in)elasticity curve as you may think

    those are not related?

    this is all related to Choco who thinks that the middle east wars are unrelated to our current recession. I believe they are massively related and you called "bs" in the relation of fluxating energy prices due to instabilty we created in the middle east with Bush wars and rebuilding combined with dismantled oversight and regulation of energy traders outside of the U.S..

    You think it was just credit? They have had that credit for 15+ years but the ability to artificially manipulate prices without repercussions were new from the enron loop hole that was created. Yes credit is killing them anyways now in lieu of regulation and oversight but unless that is reestablished to close that loop hole they will just do it again once credit is flowing again.

    @osusev said:

    you asked this right? then I posted this qoute from you:

    I call BS. I don't think the cost of oil has such a steep (in)elasticity curve as you may think

    those are not related?

    this is all related to Choco who thinks that the middle east wars are unrelated to our current recession. I believe they are massively related and you called "bs" in the relation of fluxating energy prices due to instabilty we created in the middle east with Bush wars and rebuilding combined with dismantled oversight and regulation of energy traders outside of the U.S..

    You think it was just credit? They have had that credit for 15+ years but the ability to artificially manipulate prices without repercussions were new from the enron loop hole that was created. Yes credit is killing them anyways now in lieu of regulation and oversight but unless that is reestablished to close that loop hole they will just do it again once credit is flowing again.

    Yes they're related. But again, i was referring to what affects the price of oil not how that price of oil effects those at the pump (even though we saw those effects 1st hand) or anybody else who consumes the oil. Of course they are affected by a changing price in a product they consume.

    My argument is that the price of oil is not as leveraged on the Iraq war as you would like to think. Which is why it was able to fall 50% in November while we are currently over there clusterfcuking our way through the desert. I'm saying that the 50% drop was the result of the commodities traders losing their play money to artifically manipulate the prices. Whether it's thanks to Enron or whomever, I don't care - it's still sticking it in our ass.

  • legacy i think we are actually on the same page. The traders utilizing free flowing credit were USING BS "tension" to artificially increase price of oil. The war was the perfect cover for any bs they were pulling thanks to the enron loophole they could artificially increase price by manipulating supply and use Iran/Iraq whatever to pull their crap.

    We are not in combat mode with Iraq and Afghanistan is a NATO (supposable) led issue, Iran is not be handled by Bush and his cronies (notice the last news of them testing a nuclear facility and no spikes or rhetoric from Obama's admin) combined with Credit dried up and oil is not spiking insanely.

    I think we can agree they are in general scumbags and criminals and the oil companies are also pretty much looters of the american consumer. Profits are still insane for exxon and their buddies.

  • legacy i think we are actually on the same page. The traders utilizing free flowing credit were USING BS "tension" to artificially increase price of oil. The war was the perfect cover for any bs they were pulling thanks to the enron loophole they could artificially increase price by manipulating supply and use Iran/Iraq whatever to pull their crap.

    We are not in combat mode with Iraq and Afghanistan is a NATO (supposable) led issue, Iran is not be handled by Bush and his cronies (notice the last news of them testing a nuclear facility and no spikes or rhetoric from Obama's admin) combined with Credit dried up and oil is not spiking insanely.

    I think we can agree they are in general scumbags and criminals and the oil companies are also pretty much looters of the american consumer. Profits are still insane for exxon and their buddies.

    @osusev said:

    legacy i think we are actually on the same page. The traders utilizing free flowing credit were USING BS "tension" to artificially increase price of oil. The war was the perfect cover for any bs they were pulling thanks to the enron loophole they could artificially increase price by manipulating supply and use Iran/Iraq whatever to pull their crap.

    We are not in combat mode with Iraq and Afghanistan is a NATO (supposable) Who supposes that?? led issue, Iran is not be handled by Bush and his cronies (notice the last news of them testing a nuclear facility and no spikes or rhetoric from Obama's admin) No rhetoric because there aren't plans to resist Iranian nukes. combined with Credit dried up and oil is not spiking insanely.

    I think we can agree they are in general scumbags and criminals and the oil companies are also pretty much looters of the american consumer. Profits are still insane for exxon and their buddies.

    Is there some reason one should be angry about any US corporation making profit?

    Seems like some would be overjoyed about the recent market losses.

    WSS

  • good god steve you know we are not in ACTIVE occupation combat mode, we are still hunting and fighting from time to time but there is a massive difference.

    I have zero problem with corps making money, energy just happens to be one of those NATIONAL SECURITY issue problems. price gouging and manipulation are still against federal and state laws. Do you have a problem with corps breaking laws brazenly?

  • good god steve you know we are not in ACTIVE occupation combat mode, we are still hunting and fighting from time to time but there is a massive difference.

    I have zero problem with corps making money, energy just happens to be one of those NATIONAL SECURITY issue problems. price gouging and manipulation are still against federal and state laws. Do you have a problem with corps breaking laws brazenly?

    @osusev said:

    good god steve you know we are not in ACTIVE occupation combat mode, we are still hunting and fighting from time to time but there is a massive difference.

    What are you talking about?

    I have zero problem with corps making money, energy just happens to be one of those NATIONAL SECURITY issue problems. price gouging and manipulation are still against federal and state laws. Do you have a problem with corps breaking laws brazenly?

    Depends on the corporation and what laws you're crying about.

    And whether or not I have a lot of that stock in my energy fund.

    WSS