The influence of arabic and Muslim movements... on the nazis
-
Having credible sources is middle school level stuff by the way. Try to keep up
Yeah, he's pretty bad at that. I've called him out plenty of times and he just doesn't seem to understand.
Now he will just post a list of 25 google results for the phrase "Muslims influence Nazis" or something. He won't read them all, and a portion won't even agree with him. The rest will be from anything but a valid source, and many will reference the same shitty source anyway.
-
LINK NAZI ALERT ^
who cares anyways? its fun to read the comments everyone has
even if it doesnt include a dissertation...
the links can and do help - but are not a deal breaker on the entertainment value of these boards
-
-
Oh fuck off cunt.
Wikipedia is pretty accurate minus the occasional trolls.
Wikipedia is indeed pretty accurate these days. That being said I'm not certain 'Zion Truth' and 'Billion Bibles' can be relied upon to truly give a bipartisan viewpoint.
-
Oh fuck off cunt.
Wikipedia is pretty accurate minus the occasional trolls.
Wikipedia is indeed pretty accurate these days. That being said I'm not certain 'Zion Truth' and 'Billion Bibles' can be relied upon to truly give a bipartisan viewpoint.
-
What's your idea of a legitimate source? I've seen people shit on Forbes. Newsweek. Time. Lulz the only legitimate source is the Huffington post. Lol.
Early man walked away as modern man took control. Their minds weren't all the same and to conquer was their goal. So He built his great empires and he slaughtered his own kind, and he died a confused man and killed himself in his own mind... -
What's your idea of a legitimate source? I've seen people shit on Forbes. Newsweek. Time. Lulz the only legitimate source is the Huffington post. Lol.
What's your idea of a legitimate source? I've seen people shit on Forbes. Newsweek. Time. Lutz the only legitimate source is the Huffington post. Lol.
Forbes is heavily right-wing. Legitimate source? Usually fact-oriented, so wikipedia, which tends to give you the facts and then a few theories if necessary. I tend to like BBC news, though there may be some confirmation bias in there as it tends to be left-leaning.
-
-
What's your idea of a legitimate source? I've seen people shit on Forbes. Newsweek. Time. Lulz the only legitimate source is the Huffington post. Lol.
What's your idea of a legitimate source? I've seen people shit on Forbes. Newsweek. Time. Lulz the only legitimate source is the Huffington post. Lol.
Website that don't have names that describe to you how they're going to spin the following info is a good start.
Generally, what references they use in their own article is a good place to start.
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody! -
-
and in case anyone was wondering if Cal got the comments about legitimate sources.....
-
http://islamicdangerhistory.blogspot.com/2008/09/moslim-brotherhood-nazi-connection.html
http://chinaconfidential.blogspot.com/2010/03/probing-history-of-muslim-nazi-alliance.html
http://www.aina.org/news/2007070595517.htm
https://islamonazism.wordpress.com/tag/hassan-al-banna/
http://chronicle.com/article/Hate-Radio-Nazi-Propaganda-in/49199/
-
http://jewishrefugees.blogspot.com/2011/02/brotherhoods-alliance-with-nazism-and.html
http://books.google.com/books/about/The_Nazi_Connection_to_Islamic_Terrorism.html?id=HGkthBwbNg8C
http://canadafreepress.com/2006/loftus101106.htm
http://www.bu.edu/historic/conference08/Herf.pdf
http://www.mideastweb.org/Middle-East-Encyclopedia/hassan_al-banna.htm
-
http://www.countercurrents.org/watzal270214.htm
http://greyfalcon.us/The%20Muslim%20Brotherhood.htm
http://jewishrefugees.blogspot.com/2012/02/mufti-and-hitlers-shared-aim-kill-jews.html
http://pamelageller.com/2013/12/muslim-leader-farouq-qaddoumi-we-supported-the-nazis-in-wwii.html/
http://pamelageller.com/2013/12/muslim-leader-farouq-qaddoumi-we-supported-the-nazis-in-wwii.html/
Muslim Leader Farouq Qaddoumi: “We Supported The Nazis In WWII” -
What's your idea of a legitimate source? I've seen people shit on Forbes. Newsweek. Time. Lutz the only legitimate source is the Huffington post. Lol.
Forbes is heavily right-wing. Legitimate source? Usually fact-oriented, so wikipedia, which tends to give you the facts and then a few theories if necessary. I tend to like BBC news, though there may be some confirmation bias in there as it tends to be left-leaning.
Forbes is heavily right-wing. Legitimate source? Usually fact-oriented, so wikipedia, which tends to give you the facts and then a few theories if necessary. I tend to like BBC news, though there may be some confirmation bias in there as it tends to be left-leaning.
Right wing? I'd say more business oriented.
WSS
-
Forbes is heavily right-wing. Legitimate source? Usually fact-oriented, so wikipedia, which tends to give you the facts and then a few theories if necessary. I tend to like BBC news, though there may be some confirmation bias in there as it tends to be left-leaning.
Right wing? I'd say more business oriented.
WSS
Right wing? I'd say more business oriented.
WSS
Business is inherently right wing.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login