Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. If Shaun Rogers leaves...

If Shaun Rogers leaves...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Browns Board
21 Posts 14 Posters 2.1k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
    • 64k Posts
    • 8k Reputation
    C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
    #6

    If Raji's allegedly character issues are nothing to worry about... bringing in Raji and letting him play DE and spell Rodgers...

    would be a great move for the defensive line rotation. We'll see. With no trade down... it could be Raji or Orakpo - Mangini likes

    smash mouth football on the dline front seven.

    Figuring that Curry is not there.

    And with two picks now, in the fourth round, Sammie Lee Hill could also be nabbed for DE/NT. You could rotate the dline and keep

    them fresh.

    but if Rodgers DID want out... there are three teams going to the 3-4 this year...

    1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • hammertime hammertimeH Dedicated Conversation Starter Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later Very Popular
      • 4k Posts
      • 2k Reputation
      hammertimeH hammertime wrote on last edited by
      #7

      Come on now. Where is he going?

      And if he's going who can afford what we would get for him.

      😒 he'll be just fine when the dust settles- i hope

      guns don't kill kids-pitt bulls do.
      GipsG 1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • C CLEVELandMILIDH

        The only way we would trade Rogers is if a team game us 2 high draft picks and they paid his guaranteed money that we owe him.

        And they would have to pay Rogers a hugh contract considering hayesworth just got 41 million guarnteed. I cant see a team giving up that much for 1 player, and it wouldnt make sense to get rid of him for less

        NebBrownsFan N
        • 369 Posts
        • 0 Reputation
        N NebBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
        #8

        nmills said:

        The only way we would trade Rogers is if a team game us 2 high draft picks and they paid his guaranteed money that we owe him.

        And they would have to pay Rogers a hugh contract considering hayesworth just got 41 million guarnteed. I cant see a team giving up that much for 1 player, and it wouldnt make sense to get rid of him for less

        Browns would have to eat the portion of the guaranteed money that was spread over the contract. No way around that. It would only be offset by not paying his roster bonus or salary. Not sure when his 6 mill bonus is due.

        1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • hammertimeH hammertime

          Come on now. Where is he going?

          And if he's going who can afford what we would get for him.

          😒 he'll be just fine when the dust settles- i hope

          Gips GipsG
          • 3k Posts
          • 34 Reputation
          GipsG Gips wrote on last edited by Gips
          #9

          @hammertime said:

          Come on now. Where is he going?

          And if he's going who can afford what we would get for him.

          😒 he'll be just fine when the dust settles- i hope

          After haynesworths 100mil deal rogers could get a considerably bigger payday now..but i like you hope this gets settled and he stays here but now theres a potential character issue/fit that mankok may have a problem with..even though reports however describe rogers problem as a legit issue..

          We have been rebuilding since 1964, Why stop now? GO BROWNS!
          1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • Geech GeechG One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
            • 264 Posts
            • 0 Reputation
            GeechG Geech wrote on last edited by
            #10

            When this first broke earlier this week, all the reports indicated that the Browns would take a $9.2m cap hit to trade/release Rogers. That's utterly outrageous. It's ridiculous to take that kind of a hit for one player.

            I don't think he's going anywhere.

            -Al

            Y 1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • GeechG Geech

              When this first broke earlier this week, all the reports indicated that the Browns would take a $9.2m cap hit to trade/release Rogers. That's utterly outrageous. It's ridiculous to take that kind of a hit for one player.

              I don't think he's going anywhere.

              -Al

              YtownBrownsBacker Y
              • 2k Posts
              • 0 Reputation
              Y YtownBrownsBacker wrote on last edited by
              #11

              @geech said:

              When this first broke earlier this week, all the reports indicated that the Browns would take a $9.2m cap hit to trade/release Rogers. That's utterly outrageous. It's ridiculous to take that kind of a hit for one player.

              I don't think he's going anywhere.

              -Al

              I absolutely agree. Know both camps are backing off. I guarantee that if the Browns said "we want to compensate you with a better contract for the season you had" he would say it is all a misunderstanding and he loves the Browns and looks forward to playing for Mangini.

              1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • ? Guest

                ...how could Raji NOT be the pick?

                Perhaps this was Mangini's plan all along?? Keep in mind I love Rogers, but bringing in Raji as a replacement and no doubt gaining multiple high picks in the process wouldn't be terrible......

                Flugel FlugelF Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                • 11k Posts
                • 6k Reputation
                FlugelF Flugel wrote on last edited by Flugel
                #12

                mz. said:

                ...how could Raji NOT be the pick?

                Perhaps this was Mangini's plan all along?? Keep in mind I love Rogers, but bringing in Raji as a replacement and no doubt gaining multiple high picks in the process wouldn't be terrible......

                Rogers has been here all of about 365 days, which is about 1 day per pound. You gotta be kidding me if making the GNP for several small countries has him fussing like Jerry Ball already. Seems to me if CHARACTER is something we look for in draftees - don't you think it's something we should explore in who we sign for double digit millions?

                Understanding this, the hope is Shaun Rogers values the faith the Cleveland Browns have bestowed upon him. That's NOT an insult Mr Rogers. Let's face it, as good as Shaun is - he has horrible endurance because he could be in ALOT better shape. Truth is we need him for more than 50% of our defensive reps because we suck when he leaves the field. Therefore, I don't think there's anything wrong with a HC wanting Rogers to trim up and get into better shape in the offseason. If you're new to this franchise and you're reviewing film - wouldn't you want to know WHY Rogers misses so many snaps if he's not injured? Parcells used to piss off ALOT of his star players. He wonce gave LT 2 plane tickets - one for him to go to New Orleans and the other for him to give to Pat Swilling when the Giants were supposed to face Irv Panky one week. We don't RAC allowing Shaun Rogers to be Big Baby - we could prolly get more mileage out of Shaun if Manigini has him pissed enough to prefer to be THE man! We don't need a FRIEND for Shaun - we need him to be inshape enough to help us more than half the time.

                He's a VERY good NT; but we didn't win MORE games with him playing part time out there. I'm just sayin...

                - Tom F.

                I welcome the only Defensive Coordinator to earn a Superbowl Ring in New Orleans while understanding Revenge of the Nerds is a sequel. "Come get some!"
                B 1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • Mr. T Mr. TM
                  • 7k Posts
                  • 184 Reputation
                  Mr. TM Mr. T wrote on last edited by
                  #13

                  I would trade Fat Baby for a first and get Raji & Orakpo. atleast they will be appreciative.

                  Head or Gut?
                  1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • Aloysius ?
                    • Posts
                    • 0 Reputation
                    ? Aloysius wrote on last edited by
                    #14

                    As Cal said, the rumored character issues may not make Raji a Mangini type. If drugs were part of the reason Raji didn't play in '07, I can't see ManKok taking him at #5, even if Rogers is traded.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • Dacaddyman ?
                      • Posts
                      • 0 Reputation
                      ? Dacaddyman wrote on last edited by
                      #15

                      I always heard that building a great defense starts upfront. I know Rogers is a great NT but if Raji is a stud NT for years to come then I am all for drafting him at 5 even if it means getting rid of Rogers. Can't build a house without a solid foundation right?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply
                      • FlugelF Flugel

                        mz. said:

                        ...how could Raji NOT be the pick?

                        Perhaps this was Mangini's plan all along?? Keep in mind I love Rogers, but bringing in Raji as a replacement and no doubt gaining multiple high picks in the process wouldn't be terrible......

                        Rogers has been here all of about 365 days, which is about 1 day per pound. You gotta be kidding me if making the GNP for several small countries has him fussing like Jerry Ball already. Seems to me if CHARACTER is something we look for in draftees - don't you think it's something we should explore in who we sign for double digit millions?

                        Understanding this, the hope is Shaun Rogers values the faith the Cleveland Browns have bestowed upon him. That's NOT an insult Mr Rogers. Let's face it, as good as Shaun is - he has horrible endurance because he could be in ALOT better shape. Truth is we need him for more than 50% of our defensive reps because we suck when he leaves the field. Therefore, I don't think there's anything wrong with a HC wanting Rogers to trim up and get into better shape in the offseason. If you're new to this franchise and you're reviewing film - wouldn't you want to know WHY Rogers misses so many snaps if he's not injured? Parcells used to piss off ALOT of his star players. He wonce gave LT 2 plane tickets - one for him to go to New Orleans and the other for him to give to Pat Swilling when the Giants were supposed to face Irv Panky one week. We don't RAC allowing Shaun Rogers to be Big Baby - we could prolly get more mileage out of Shaun if Manigini has him pissed enough to prefer to be THE man! We don't need a FRIEND for Shaun - we need him to be inshape enough to help us more than half the time.

                        He's a VERY good NT; but we didn't win MORE games with him playing part time out there. I'm just sayin...

                        - Tom F.

                        Beanpot B
                        • 704 Posts
                        • 7 Reputation
                        B Beanpot wrote on last edited by
                        #16

                        @flugel said:

                        Understanding this, the hope is Shaun Rogers values the faith the Cleveland Browns have bestowed upon him.

                        - Tom F.

                        Yeah Flugs, that's not gonna happen. I mean, I hope he appreciates the "faith" too, but that in one hand and the Haynesworth contract in the other is going to cause most sane people to flip over sideways. And not that it trumps the dollars or the faith, but the guy was pissed that his lady friend was let go from the PR department during the recent purge.

                        He's the least of our worries.

                        Beanpot

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Quote Reply
                        • YtownBrownsBacker Y
                          • 2k Posts
                          • 0 Reputation
                          Y YtownBrownsBacker wrote on last edited by
                          #17

                          PD is reporting that things have calmed down and Mangini and Rogers are scheduled to meet.

                          BTW the supposed snub was taht Rogers walked by Mangini, who had his back turned from him talking to Eric wedge. Mangini never saw him and didn't even know he was going to be there. That's from Terry Pluto.

                          So much for Mangini treating people like assholes

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          Quote Reply
                          • Aloysius ?
                            • Posts
                            • 0 Reputation
                            ? Aloysius wrote on last edited by
                            #18

                            Or, alternatively, one could read that as Mangini moving away from his previously asshole-ish stance. According to John Clayton, Mangini had been refusing to meet one on one with Rogers.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            Quote Reply
                            • listercat listercatL
                              • 588 Posts
                              • 6 Reputation
                              listercatL listercat wrote on last edited by
                              #19

                              If Sean Rogers leaves? Golden Corral loses 1/3 of its monthly cash flow

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              Quote Reply
                              • ballpeen ballpeenB Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                • 9k Posts
                                • 2k Reputation
                                ballpeenB ballpeen wrote on last edited by
                                #20

                                mikeyP72 said:

                                How serious is this really, blown out of proportion by Rodgers critics or what?

                                Just one of those "I heard" deals, but the word is it is blown out of proportion.

                                I just can't see how it could possibly be that big a deal. If it is, there are some real eggheads involved.

                                That is more like 7th grade, adolescent stuff.

                                If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.
                                1 Reply Last reply
                                Quote Reply
                                • Flugel FlugelF Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                  • 11k Posts
                                  • 6k Reputation
                                  FlugelF Flugel wrote on last edited by Flugel
                                  #21

                                  mikeyP72 said:

                                  How serious is this really, blown out of proportion by Rodgers critics or what?

                                  Actually, Roger was/is VERY well liked in here by the majority. The ONLY weakness I saw is I'd like to see him for more than 3 plays in a row (unless of course it's a 3 and out). I think Mangini wants him to have a little more endurance as well. One thing I read was Mangini wanted Rogers to lose a little weight; and Shaun has had a history gaining weight in the offseasons.

                                  The rumors didn't start in here - there were small blurbs in the press people are responding too. I'm not sure if those leaking the stories are more interested in making Rogers the bad guy or Mangini. It looks like they've been trying to paint Mangini as a real basterd since the moment the ink dried on his contract. RAC was everybody's friend and the same media types didn't like that either. Give Mangini a chance and if he wants less huffing and puffing from our only defensive superstar - he's on the right track.

                                  - Tom F.

                                  I welcome the only Defensive Coordinator to earn a Superbowl Ring in New Orleans while understanding Revenge of the Nerds is a sequel. "Come get some!"
                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  Quote Reply

                                  Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                  Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                  With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                  Register Login
                                  Reply
                                  • Reply as topic
                                  Log in to reply
                                  • Oldest to Newest
                                  • Newest to Oldest
                                  • Most Votes


                                  Theme
                                  • System
                                  • Light
                                  • Dark
                                  The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                                  The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  0
                                  • Forums
                                  • Recent
                                  • Popular
                                  • Users
                                  • Donate