Rumor: Browns interested in trading up for Mariota
-
I agree, 23...
If the FO thinks MM has the talent to make it, they have to go get him. There are really no "other" questions around him. But if they do, I wish I could see what they see.
Essentially they can create a 2014 reset by signing Hoyer and sitting another first-round rookie... or let the rook sit behind Shaw, if they think enough of Connor.
If we traded as much as it would take to land this guy, there is no way in hell he sits his rookie year...
And to be honest, given his skill-set, he seems like the kind of guy who could start right away. Not sure he'd be any less effective than Hoyer/Manziel/Shaw from day 1. Remember, it'll be a whole new offense for everybody to learn...
If we traded as much as it would take to land this guy, there is no way in hell he sits his rookie year...
And to be honest, given his skill-set, he seems like the kind of guy who could start right away. Not sure he'd be any less effective than Hoyer/Manziel/Shaw from day 1. Remember, it'll be a whole new offense for everybody to learn...
Ah, but you have to remember that our HC is allergic to rookie starters at QB...
- It takes a while for Mariota to get through his progressions when the first read is gone. Fortunately he has the mobility to extend plays and to keep his eyes downfield.
I watch MM and I do not see "read progressions"... I see scans for open receivers... same as I did JM. The extends bit is familiar as well.
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
Would this be bad?
I go back-and-forth with this one. If we think Mariota is the guy, don't we HAVE to utilize our resources to get him on the roster?
Really, what are our other options at QB?
Anything that won't take 3 first round picks
@junkyard-dawg said:
Chump Kelly is all hot and bothered over Marky Mark and wants to trade up to grab him, we can help them. Toss them a 2nd and a mid rounder for Nick Foles or even swap a 1st and give 'em a mid round pick. Grab Foles and let them blow their draft load on Mariotta. Use the rest of the draft on WR's and TE's for Foles to throw to.
this isn't happening. The Eagles don't have the ammunition, and the Browns would have to sell the ranch.
Id do both 1st rounders and next years 1st to go up and grab him.
That what it would take (at least) , and if you watched the National Championship game Mariota isn't worth it.
The Eagles don't have the ammunition, and the Browns would have to sell the ranch.
Sure they do... their ammo is simply not in the form of draft picks in hand. They have solid, first-round talent on the D-line and O-line plus an intriguing QB that would no longer be needed.
It's only a matter of how bad Chip might want his guy and whether their first-round roster talent is considered "untouchable"... and if he wants MM bad enough, no one will be untouchable.
The issue is that as of now, only a direct deal with TB, who likely takes a QB, assures Chip of getting MM. Any deal we might get in on has to be a 3-way and is not going to happen for a while... maybe not until Draft Day 1... after TB takes Jameis.
Good Lord we our the Cleveland Browns. I never want to even think again about giving up NEEDS over a 1st round QB. You people scare me more than Farmer and Haslem!! Look at our pass genius idea's of this at QB. God please Joe Montana was not Joe without a deep OL,TE, Backs and WR's that could block for him. A QB for now is a FA (and not Hoyer) or 5th round our later.. We have not even started fixing our D yet. It's like a city worker "we can't fix all these hole's over night"..
1. Hard to argue that QB is not THE position of need, let alone in competition with need.
2. On the O-side, we are closer to QB being the final piece than you are acknowledging. We have good, young RBs. We have good, young WRs. We have good TEs (not as young). We have a great starting O-line. You don't wait to upgrade "good" and you sure as hell do not wait for depth.
3. On the D-side, yes, there are pieces that are still needed, but none of those pieces directly jeopardize the well-being of any QB we invest in today the way an inadequate O-line would.
The timing is right. The question is: is the right QB prospect there?
-
It will cost too much to get him and i highly doubt the BUCS who also need a franchise QB will let him slip.
-
If we traded as much as it would take to land this guy, there is no way in hell he sits his rookie year...
And to be honest, given his skill-set, he seems like the kind of guy who could start right away. Not sure he'd be any less effective than Hoyer/Manziel/Shaw from day 1. Remember, it'll be a whole new offense for everybody to learn...
Ah, but you have to remember that our HC is allergic to rookie starters at QB...
- It takes a while for Mariota to get through his progressions when the first read is gone. Fortunately he has the mobility to extend plays and to keep his eyes downfield.
I watch MM and I do not see "read progressions"... I see scans for open receivers... same as I did JM. The extends bit is familiar as well.
Ah, but you have to remember that our HC is allergic to rookie starters at QB...
I watch MM and I do not see "read progressions"... I see scans for open receivers... same as I did JM. The extends bit is familiar as well.
He's tabbed his first read, then after that - yes, he does the 'scan' for open receivers. I'm surprised more of their slot dots haven't had their heads taken off on those shallow crossers.
I think we agree that you need to see more than "flashes" to be worth a first.
As for the whole "extends plays when they breakdown" thing... too deja vu for me...
Absolutely. I was merely playing devils advocate. There is more to like about MM this year than there was to like about Manziel this time last year. I still would not sink a high pick in either. Clearly the latter my opinion was vindicated on over the course of this season. As for plays breaking down, MM at least has the discipline to move to an open area in the pocket and look for his receivers. JM? Not so much.
-
MM was completely exposed against Ohio State in the title game.. he needs significant coaching up. Unlike JM, though, he probably will be able to handle it.
He's in no way a day1 all-pro.
-
MM was completely exposed against Ohio State in the title game.. he needs significant coaching up. Unlike JM, though, he probably will be able to handle it.
He's in no way a day1 all-pro.
MM was completely exposed against Ohio State in the title game.. he needs significant coaching up. Unlike JM, though, he probably will be able to handle it.
He's in no way a day1 all-pro.
In what way was he exposed?
Manziel was suppose to be all-world. Look how that turn out.
It's all about the characteristics of the individual.
-
Please god no.
-
I felt better about Manziel as a prospect than I do Mariota...and that's saying something. From a physical standpoint, Mariota is obviously better suited to make the transition. Same for mental makeup. From all accounts, Mariota is a great teammate and a humble individual. However, in basically every other aspect, he's risky.
For reasons that have been hashed and rehashed by Tour (and others), I'd have to definitely say no on Mariota.
Something about a guy from a high-powered offense that relied more often than not on pure speed differential for success is just scary. He's never really been behind in his life.
I'm awesome, and I fuck dolphins. Ghoolie 12/2/2012: I have absolutely no skills, training or pride -
I have been a Browns season ticket holder since 1999. So the Browns DO actually care what I think.
This made me lol . . .
-
Other than NT, what hole is there on our team that is anywhere near as glaring as our QB situation? And, isn't that the most important position in all of sports?
I'm not sold on trading 3 #1's for a guy, but if you really look at the talent on this team there aren't as many holes as some of you seem to conjure up.
I have no problem trading 3 #1s for a QB if you are certain he's the guy. For example, I'd give 3 #1s for Andrew Luck in a heartbeat, or Aaron Rodgers. So, if you have an absolute can't miss guy like Andrew Luck, then go for it - is Mariota or Winston that good? I'm not convinced.
I have no problem trading 3 #1s for a QB if you are certain he's the guy. For example, I'd give 3 #1s for Andrew Luck in a heartbeat, or Aaron Rodgers. So, if you have an absolute can't miss guy like Andrew Luck, then go for it - is Mariota or Winston that good? I'm not convinced.
I think the RG3 debacle has shown that trading 3 #1's is too risky. The Redskins not only hurt themselves at the QB position, but they also cost themselves other players who could have contributed. Prior to that draft, Luck, and RG3 were can't miss. Many of the "experts" said teams were fools for not moving up to get RG3. They said the Redskins "got their guy for the next 10 years". The problem is that the Redskins didn't have as good a team around RG3 as the Colts had.
Now I do believe the Browns are in a position to make a move for a QB. I didn't believe we were 2 years ago, but we might be now. I am not sold that our Dline is garbage, as 2 years ago they were our deepest position. We have other holes, but a good QB could have gotten us to 9-7 this year, maybe even 10-6. Next year will be tougher, but I think we are finally in a position to make that move. Just not for 3 #1's.
-
I felt better about Manziel as a prospect than I do Mariota...and that's saying something. From a physical standpoint, Mariota is obviously better suited to make the transition. Same for mental makeup. From all accounts, Mariota is a great teammate and a humble individual. However, in basically every other aspect, he's risky.
For reasons that have been hashed and rehashed by Tour (and others), I'd have to definitely say no on Mariota.
Something about a guy from a high-powered offense that relied more often than not on pure speed differential for success is just scary. He's never really been behind in his life.
Risky? Only if it doesn't work... I wanted no part of RG3. I tap danced when the Rams snubbed our then President Walrus.
But I'll tell you what... for a bargain basement asking price, I'd take a chance on him now.
I felt better about Manziel as a prospect than I do Mariota...and that's saying something. From a physical standpoint, Mariota is obviously better suited to make the transition. Same for mental makeup. From all accounts, Mariota is a great teammate and a humble individual. However, in basically every other aspect, he's risky.
For reasons that have been hashed and rehashed by Tour (and others), I'd have to definitely say no on Mariota.
Something about a guy from a high-powered offense that relied more often than not on pure speed differential for success is just scary. He's never really been behind in his life.
Rehash is what I do best...
MM vs. JM... hadn't thought in those terms...
Hard to say for sure given what has transpired in the past 10 (?) months, but I'm pretty sure I favor MM over a freshly declared JM.
Maturity and self-control (on-field) were my big JM concerns then. No such MM issues... just the opposite, MM seems too laid back to lead.
-
The only problem I see is, if you have a sure-thing QB like Luck, all 32 teams will clearly see that...if it's that solid. And in a situation like that, the first overall pick isn't going to give it up for anything, not if they need a QB. And this year, Tampa Bay is one of those teams. I don't think Indy would've given their spot up for Luck for anything. Actually, did anyone even try to deal with them on it?
Yes. We did.
But Holmgren, then the team president, had a higher target in that draft, someone he wanted more than RG3. And the Browns will face that player on Sunday: Indianapolis Colts quarterback Andrew Luck. Holmgren said in the past that at an owners' meeting, he approached the Colts and offered the Browns' entire draft to acquire the No. 1 pick so the Browns could take Luck.
The Colts declined. Quickly.
Ah yes. I forgot about that. I didn't know until I heard it here, well after the fact. I thought we only tried for RG3.
But there you go. They declined quickly on an offer of our entire draft. With two first round picks that year to boot.
-
I myself am not sold on him do n0t think id move up after him
-
Ugh
-
Good Lord we our the Cleveland Browns. I never want to even think again about giving up NEEDS over a 1st round QB. You people scare me more than Farmer and Haslem!! Look at our pass genius idea's of this at QB. God please Joe Montana was not Joe without a deep OL,TE, Backs and WR's that could block for him. A QB for now is a FA (and not Hoyer) or 5th round our later.. We have not even started fixing our D yet. It's like a city worker "we can't fix all these hole's over night"..
Other than NT, what hole is there on our team that is anywhere near as glaring as our QB situation? And, isn't that the most important position in all of sports?
I'm not sold on trading 3 #1's for a guy, but if you really look at the talent on this team there aren't as many holes as some of you seem to conjure up.
Other than NT, what hole is there on our team that is anywhere near as glaring as our QB situation? And, isn't that the most important position in all of sports?
I'm not sold on trading 3 #1's for a guy, but if you really look at the talent on this team there aren't as many holes as some of you seem to conjure up.
yes there are....we suck at rushing the qb....we suck at pressuring the qb....we still cannot stop the run...so for the most part, our lb's suck...what friggin games were you watching last yr....we cannot get off the field...you want me to keep going...
-
I'll continue to say this until the end of the draft, the Browns are not a Marcus Mariotta away from the playoffs. If he is somehow available at 12, take a chance, but do not mortgage the future for a guy who hasn't been asked to run an NFL style offense. I hope Farmer has learned from his mistakes.
-
Other than NT, what hole is there on our team that is anywhere near as glaring as our QB situation? And, isn't that the most important position in all of sports?
I'm not sold on trading 3 #1's for a guy, but if you really look at the talent on this team there aren't as many holes as some of you seem to conjure up.
yes there are....we suck at rushing the qb....we suck at pressuring the qb....we still cannot stop the run...so for the most part, our lb's suck...what friggin games were you watching last yr....we cannot get off the field...you want me to keep going...
yes there are....we suck at rushing the qb....we suck at pressuring the qb....we still cannot stop the run...so for the most part, our lb's suck...what friggin games were you watching last yr....we cannot get off the field...you want me to keep going...
Our LBs didn't suck but they were more pass coverage East-West guys. I do think we could use a tough ILB that would step up a hit somebody. Each year I'm hoping for that "Ray Lewis" type to put on the Cleveland Brown, problem is those guys don't happen very often.
-
No more trading up or down! I'm sick of it.
The Browns have done that so many times since their rebirth, and it has yet to work. Stand pat at #12 & 19, then a pick at #43, and it should be fine.
They screwed it up last year, I think they had 3 picks in the top 35, and we dealt it away. Trust the scouting department and draft the guys on your board as they fall, for once.
Karlis Missed -
we did have 3 picks in the top 35
started with #4 - 23 - 35
ended with 8 - 21- 35, plus an extra first & fourth this year
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login