Skip to content

Would a QB with this stat line interest you?

The Browns Board
43 14 1.5k
  • Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
    #31

    Just heard two names Farmer is pursuing are Glennon and Cousins.

    If the former, then jcam is up for Prophet of the Month.

    If the latter, then color me shocked as hell since we did not pull that trigger for young Shanny.

    On Foles...

    No offense, but y'all are thinking too small.

    Foles will not be available until after Chip is sure MM will be his. Then there will be other parties interested in Foles.

    If you want Nick, look at the Philly roster for player(s) in addition to Foles that would make you spend both our 1's. Three 1's would get Chip deep in the MM hunt.

  • Just heard two names Farmer is pursuing are Glennon and Cousins.

    If the former, then jcam is up for Prophet of the Month.

    If the latter, then color me shocked as hell since we did not pull that trigger for young Shanny.

    On Foles...

    No offense, but y'all are thinking too small.

    Foles will not be available until after Chip is sure MM will be his. Then there will be other parties interested in Foles.

    If you want Nick, look at the Philly roster for player(s) in addition to Foles that would make you spend both our 1's. Three 1's would get Chip deep in the MM hunt.

    W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by
    #32

    @tour2ma said:

    Just heard two names Farmer is pursuing are Glennon and Cousins.

    If the former, then jcam is up for Prophet of the Month.

    If the latter, then color me shocked as hell since we did not pull that trigger for young Shanny.

    On Foles...

    No offense, but y'all are thinking too small.

    Foles will not be available until after Chip is sure MM will be his. Then there will be other parties interested in Foles.

    If you want Nick, look at the Philly roster for player(s) in addition to Foles that would make you spend both our 1's. Three 1's would get Chip deep in the MM hunt.

    I heard the talk about Cousins and Glennon early yesterday on WKNR...

  • gftChrisG gftChris wrote on last edited by
    #33

    Cousins? Are we seriously still on this shit? It's been over 2 years since he had that one good game against us. If we were going to get him at any point it would have been last year with Shannahan. We didn't, and Cousins has done nothing interesting at all since.

    Glennon, maybe, but can we just let this Cousins thing die already?

  • MudflyM Mudfly wrote on last edited by
    #34

    Not high on the cousins idea, but would think Glennon is def worth a look.....

  • MasterDogM MasterDog wrote on last edited by MasterDog
    #35

    Anyone think we can get Brock Osweiler from Denver for a 3rd or 4th rounder?

    6'7" with a rocket arm.

    Sat behind Manning for 3 seasons in Denver. <---That's got to be worth something.

    This dude was hand picked by John Elway to take over Denver before Manning signed.

  • W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by Westside Steve
    #36

    so they would shit can him for a 3 or a 4 because........ ?

    (also brian hoyer sat behind tom brady for how long? )

    WSS

  • MasterDogM MasterDog wrote on last edited by MasterDog
    #37

    And Hoyer started off 9-5 as a starter before Gordon sh!tted our season away..... 😆

    You have better options out there without breaking the bank?

  • And Hoyer started off 9-5 as a starter before Gordon sh!tted our season away..... 😆

    You have better options out there without breaking the bank?

    W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by Westside Steve
    #38

    @masterdog said:

    And Hoyer started off 9-5 as a starter before Gordon sh!tted our season away..... 😆

    You have better options out there without breaking the bank?

    Gordon?

    Before the running game took a dump.

    like I said if he's the future of the denver broncos why would be dumped for a 3 or a 4?

    WSS

  • LogicIsForSquaresL LogicIsForSquares wrote on last edited by
    #39

    Denver is keeping Osweiler. Manning is going to be done after this upcoming season.

  • @masterdog said:

    And Hoyer started off 9-5 as a starter before Gordon sh!tted our season away..... 😆

    You have better options out there without breaking the bank?

    Gordon?

    Before the running game took a dump.

    like I said if he's the future of the denver broncos why would be dumped for a 3 or a 4?

    WSS

    MasterDogM MasterDog wrote on last edited by
    #40

    @westside-steve said:

    Gordon?

    Before the running game took a dump.

    like I said if he's the future of the denver broncos why would be dumped for a 3 or a 4?

    WSS

    Because Manning might stick around for another 2-3 years.

  • And Hoyer started off 9-5 as a starter before Gordon sh!tted our season away..... 😆

    You have better options out there without breaking the bank?

    Z Zombo wrote on last edited by
    #41

    @masterdog said:

    And Hoyer started off 9-5 as a starter before Gordon sh!tted our season away..... 😆

    You have better options out there without breaking the bank?

    I think Hoyer is still 10-6 as a Browns starter.

    That includes last year with no running game (Willis Mcgahee anyone?) and the breakdown of the run game after the Mack injury this year. Also includes most of the year without Cameron and Gordon and the absolute death that Gordon was when he returned.

    Hoyer had 11 TDs and 5 Ints before Gordon came back, 1 TDs and 8 Ints once he came back, of those INts, at least 5 or 6 (maybe more?)were targeted to Gordon who was either a) running the wrong route b ) making up his own route c) not paying attention or d) not giving the required effort on those passes

    Fuck Glennon and Cousins. Think they would go 10-6 with this team the past two years?

    I think of the QBs that are, or may be available, Foles and Bradford could be seen as upgrades over Hoyer, Sanchez and Locker could be seen as lateral moves with maybe more ceiling, these other guys ... I think it is taking a step back from Hoyer.

    Zombo

  • @masterdog said:

    And Hoyer started off 9-5 as a starter before Gordon sh!tted our season away..... 😆

    You have better options out there without breaking the bank?

    I think Hoyer is still 10-6 as a Browns starter.

    That includes last year with no running game (Willis Mcgahee anyone?) and the breakdown of the run game after the Mack injury this year. Also includes most of the year without Cameron and Gordon and the absolute death that Gordon was when he returned.

    Hoyer had 11 TDs and 5 Ints before Gordon came back, 1 TDs and 8 Ints once he came back, of those INts, at least 5 or 6 (maybe more?)were targeted to Gordon who was either a) running the wrong route b ) making up his own route c) not paying attention or d) not giving the required effort on those passes

    Fuck Glennon and Cousins. Think they would go 10-6 with this team the past two years?

    I think of the QBs that are, or may be available, Foles and Bradford could be seen as upgrades over Hoyer, Sanchez and Locker could be seen as lateral moves with maybe more ceiling, these other guys ... I think it is taking a step back from Hoyer.

    Zombo

    MasterDogM MasterDog wrote on last edited by MasterDog
    #42

    Zombo said:

    I think Hoyer is still 10-6 as a Browns starter.

    That includes last year with no running game (Willis Mcgahee anyone?) and the breakdown of the run game after the Mack injury this year. Also includes most of the year without Cameron and Gordon and the absolute death that Gordon was when he returned.

    Hoyer had 11 TDs and 5 Ints before Gordon came back, 1 TDs and 8 Ints once he came back, of those INts, at least 5 or 6 (maybe more?)were targeted to Gordon who was either a) running the wrong route b ) making up his own route c) not paying attention or d) not giving the required effort on those passes

    Zombo

    Good job on dissecting the numbers.

    No matter how you look at it, the return of Gordon played a major role in the past season's meltdown.

    And then you pour gasoline to the fire by starting Manziel in week 15.

  • Denver is keeping Osweiler. Manning is going to be done after this upcoming season.

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #43

    @logicisforsquares said:

    Denver is keeping Osweiler. Manning is going to be done after this upcoming season.

    Hell, Manning might be close to being done now. Maybe.