Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. RObert ROyal

RObert ROyal

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Browns Board
17 Posts 12 Posters 1.3k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ThaakT Thaak

    This is just a move for depth at TE, considering they only have an old Heiden with a bum knee and a young unproven Rucker.

    Legacy Fan Legacy FanL
    • 3k Posts
    • 197 Reputation
    Legacy FanL Legacy Fan wrote on last edited by
    #5

    @thaak said:

    This is just a move for depth at TE, considering they only have an old Heiden with a bum knee and a young unproven Rucker.

    S.T.inkins?

    Sure, luck means a lot in football. Not having a good quarterback is bad luck. -Don Shula
    S ThaakT 2 Replies Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • Gips GipsG
      • 3k Posts
      • 34 Reputation
      GipsG Gips wrote on last edited by
      #6

      Seems to have a good work ethic and nice size may be injury prone but tough..cant find much on him..

      CBSSports.com

      Bills to release TE Royal: Veteran tight end Robert Royal expects to be released by the Buffalo Bills on Thursday as part of the team's plan to free up salary-cap space, according to his agent. Signed by the Bills in free agency in 2006, Royal was scheduled to make just under $3 million over the final two years of his contract. Despite being nagged by injuries last season, the seven-year NFL veteran finished with career-highs in catches (33) and yards receiving (351) and scored one touchdown in 15 games, including seven starts.

      (Updated 02/26/2009).

      Fantasy Analysis

      Royal has never been even a decent stat producer, so Fantasy owners can continue to view him as nothing more than a one-week replacement off the waiver wire in the deepest of leagues.

      (Updated 02/26/2009).

      No information available at this time.

      Royal expects to be released by Buffalo on Thursday.

      02/26/2009

      Advice

      Royal's agent, Rick Smith, said the Bills were going to cut his client. Signed by the Bills in free agency in 2006, Royal was scheduled to make just under $3 million over the final two years of his contract. Despite being nagged by injuries last season, the seven-year NFL veteran finished with career-highs in catches (33) and yards receiving (351) and scored one touchdown in 15 games, including seven starts.

      Bills to release TE Royal: Veteran tight end Robert Royal expects to be released by the Buffalo Bills on Thursday as part of the team's plan to free up salary-cap space, according to his agent. Signed by the Bills in free agency in 2006, Royal was scheduled to make just under $3 million over the final two years of his contract. Despite being nagged by injuries last season, the seven-year NFL veteran finished with career-highs in catches (33) and yards receiving (351) and scored one touchdown in 15 games, including seven starts.

      (Updated 02/26/2009).

      We have been rebuilding since 1964, Why stop now? GO BROWNS!
      1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • Legacy FanL Legacy Fan

        @thaak said:

        This is just a move for depth at TE, considering they only have an old Heiden with a bum knee and a young unproven Rucker.

        S.T.inkins?

        Solon16 S
        • 2k Posts
        • 0 Reputation
        S Solon16 wrote on last edited by
        #7

        @legacy-fan said:

        S.T.inkins?

        Dinkins was cut!

        ThaakT 1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • 585Dawg 5
          • 117 Posts
          • 1 Reputation
          5 585Dawg wrote on last edited by
          #8

          I'm from Rochester, about an hour east of buffalo.. so I hear and see everything about the bills.. royal blows big time. He is in NO WAY an upgrade over dinkins.. should have kept dinkins if they were going to do this. at least dinkins is decent on special teams. or they should have kept winslow! i personally would have kept winslow for at least one more year.

          Y Oldcrow1945O 2 Replies Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • 5 585Dawg

            I'm from Rochester, about an hour east of buffalo.. so I hear and see everything about the bills.. royal blows big time. He is in NO WAY an upgrade over dinkins.. should have kept dinkins if they were going to do this. at least dinkins is decent on special teams. or they should have kept winslow! i personally would have kept winslow for at least one more year.

            YtownBrownsBacker Y
            • 2k Posts
            • 0 Reputation
            Y YtownBrownsBacker wrote on last edited by
            #9

            @585dawg said:

            I'm from Rochester, about an hour east of buffalo.. so I hear and see everything about the bills.. royal blows big time. He is in NO WAY an upgrade over dinkins.. should have kept dinkins if they were going to do this. at least dinkins is decent on special teams. or they should have kept winslow! i personally would have kept winslow for at least one more year.

            Winslow's body is breaking down and he wanted a long term contract. If you saw Dinkins as much as us you would want Royal over him also. Dinkins is fair at best on special teams and blocking, which used to be his strength, has deteriated in the last year. He wasn't worth keeping as a 3rd TE and you don't pay mega bucks in a long term contract for a guy that has severly bad knees and a bad shoulder. He speed was so hampered by his injuries that he had 7 offensive interference calls to try to get some separation from DBs.

            GipsG 1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • Y YtownBrownsBacker

              @585dawg said:

              I'm from Rochester, about an hour east of buffalo.. so I hear and see everything about the bills.. royal blows big time. He is in NO WAY an upgrade over dinkins.. should have kept dinkins if they were going to do this. at least dinkins is decent on special teams. or they should have kept winslow! i personally would have kept winslow for at least one more year.

              Winslow's body is breaking down and he wanted a long term contract. If you saw Dinkins as much as us you would want Royal over him also. Dinkins is fair at best on special teams and blocking, which used to be his strength, has deteriated in the last year. He wasn't worth keeping as a 3rd TE and you don't pay mega bucks in a long term contract for a guy that has severly bad knees and a bad shoulder. He speed was so hampered by his injuries that he had 7 offensive interference calls to try to get some separation from DBs.

              Gips GipsG
              • 3k Posts
              • 34 Reputation
              GipsG Gips wrote on last edited by Gips
              #10

              @ytownbrownsbacker said:

              Winslow's body is breaking down and he wanted a long term contract. If you saw Dinkins as much as us you would want Royal over him also. Dinkins is fair at best on special teams and blocking, which used to be his strength, has deteriated in the last year. He wasn't worth keeping as a 3rd TE and you don't pay mega bucks in a long term contract for a guy that has severly bad knees and a bad shoulder. He speed was so hampered by his injuries that he had 7 offensive interference calls to try to get some separation from DBs.

              Dinkins stinkins he got old fast in cleveland...honestly i would take almost anyone over dinkins..and even though winslow had great hands he had began his decline and wanted more money because he knows his playing days are limited in the end it was a great move by mankok..

              What could have been if kw2 hadnt had that motorcycle wreck..🙁

              We have been rebuilding since 1964, Why stop now? GO BROWNS!
              DieHardBrownsFanD 1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • GipsG Gips

                @ytownbrownsbacker said:

                Winslow's body is breaking down and he wanted a long term contract. If you saw Dinkins as much as us you would want Royal over him also. Dinkins is fair at best on special teams and blocking, which used to be his strength, has deteriated in the last year. He wasn't worth keeping as a 3rd TE and you don't pay mega bucks in a long term contract for a guy that has severly bad knees and a bad shoulder. He speed was so hampered by his injuries that he had 7 offensive interference calls to try to get some separation from DBs.

                Dinkins stinkins he got old fast in cleveland...honestly i would take almost anyone over dinkins..and even though winslow had great hands he had began his decline and wanted more money because he knows his playing days are limited in the end it was a great move by mankok..

                What could have been if kw2 hadnt had that motorcycle wreck..🙁

                DieHardBrownsFan DieHardBrownsFanD Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Collaborator Posting Machine First Post One Month Later Week One Done One Year In
                • 28k Posts
                • 6k Reputation
                DieHardBrownsFanD DieHardBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
                #11

                @gips said:

                Dinkins stinkins he got old fast in cleveland...honestly i would take almost anyone over dinkins..and even though winslow had great hands he had began his decline and wanted more money because he knows his playing days are limited in the end it was a great move by mankok..

                What could have been if kw2 hadnt had that motorcycle wreck..🙁

                I think he might have been as good as his old man.

                "You planning on having a long relationship with that glass or are you going to drink it? Drink up, man. Maybe we can get another.” - Janis Joplin, 1970.
                1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • Legacy FanL Legacy Fan

                  @thaak said:

                  This is just a move for depth at TE, considering they only have an old Heiden with a bum knee and a young unproven Rucker.

                  S.T.inkins?

                  Thaak ThaakT
                  • 1k Posts
                  • 26 Reputation
                  ThaakT Thaak wrote on last edited by
                  #12

                  @legacy-fan said:

                  S.T.inkins?

                  Dinkins' contract expired and the Browns are letting him test FA to create a market for his services. It is not unlikely that he could be back in a Browns Uniform, although if they sign Royal, don't count on it.

                  Legacy FanL 1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • S Solon16

                    @legacy-fan said:

                    S.T.inkins?

                    Dinkins was cut!

                    Thaak ThaakT
                    • 1k Posts
                    • 26 Reputation
                    ThaakT Thaak wrote on last edited by
                    #13

                    @solon16 said:

                    Dinkins was cut!

                    No he wasn't, his contract merely expired.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • ThaakT Thaak

                      @legacy-fan said:

                      S.T.inkins?

                      Dinkins' contract expired and the Browns are letting him test FA to create a market for his services. It is not unlikely that he could be back in a Browns Uniform, although if they sign Royal, don't count on it.

                      Legacy Fan Legacy FanL
                      • 3k Posts
                      • 197 Reputation
                      Legacy FanL Legacy Fan wrote on last edited by
                      #14

                      @thaak said:

                      Dinkins' contract expired and the Browns are letting him test FA to create a market for his services. It is not unlikely that he could be back in a Browns Uniform, although if they sign Royal, don't count on it.

                      Yeah I forgot he was a FA.. thanks.

                      Sure, luck means a lot in football. Not having a good quarterback is bad luck. -Don Shula
                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply
                      • Riffer X Riffer XR Very Popular Conversation Starter Reacting Well Dedicated Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                        • 3k Posts
                        • 127 Reputation
                        Riffer XR Riffer X wrote on last edited by
                        #15

                        Dinkins is a decent player but mistake prone. He gets too many ST's penalties and will drop one at any given time. His hands are there but he lacks concentration.

                        He's sort of a tease and it's probably best to move on without him. Hell, the last two camps they had pretty good TE's they cut.

                        Is a pig's ass pork?
                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Quote Reply
                        • 5 585Dawg

                          I'm from Rochester, about an hour east of buffalo.. so I hear and see everything about the bills.. royal blows big time. He is in NO WAY an upgrade over dinkins.. should have kept dinkins if they were going to do this. at least dinkins is decent on special teams. or they should have kept winslow! i personally would have kept winslow for at least one more year.

                          Oldcrow1945 Oldcrow1945O
                          • 1k Posts
                          • 0 Reputation
                          Oldcrow1945O Oldcrow1945 wrote on last edited by
                          #16

                          @585dawg said:

                          I'm from Rochester, about an hour east of buffalo.. so I hear and see everything about the bills.. royal blows big time. He is in NO WAY an upgrade over dinkins.. should have kept dinkins if they were going to do this. at least dinkins is decent on special teams. or they should have kept winslow! i personally would have kept winslow for at least one more year.

                          Have you ever really watched Dinkens on special teams? I don't know how many flags he got this year on special teams.

                          If Rucker would've stayed healthy he would've been gone last year.

                          Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote! - "Ben Franklin"
                          1 Reply Last reply
                          Quote Reply
                          • standish S
                            • 80 Posts
                            • 0 Reputation
                            S standish wrote on last edited by
                            #17

                            Theres only 2 barely decent tight ends on the market and id rather take Royal than L.J. "Stone Hands" Smith and we dont have enough picks this draft to waste on drafting another Tight End before finding out what we have in Rucker...

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            Quote Reply

                            Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                            Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                            With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                            Register Login
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            Theme
                            • System
                            • Light
                            • Dark
                            The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                            The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Forums
                            • Recent
                            • Popular
                            • Users
                            • Donate