Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Mike Pettine speaks...

Mike Pettine speaks...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Browns Board
33 Posts 16 Posters 1.5k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Tour2ma Tour2maT In Memoriam Dedicated Conversation Starter Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done Very Popular
    • 30k Posts
    • 6k Reputation
    Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by Tour2ma
    #7

    We went through this last year when we could not be forced to do the show (1st year HC exemption). I don't think we have any exeptions that apply this year.

    Here are the exemptions from last year. It's still the list as far as I know:

    1. Teams that have appeared on Hard Knocks in the last 10 years.

    2. Teams with new head coaches.

    3. Teams that have made the playoffs in either of the last two years.

    http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/10/10/most-teams-will-be-exempt-from-hard-knocks-requirement/

    This year we can "turn it down" as a first pass response, but if no one else volunteers, then we can be forced to do the show.

    "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
    R 1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • Tour2maT Tour2ma

      We went through this last year when we could not be forced to do the show (1st year HC exemption). I don't think we have any exeptions that apply this year.

      Here are the exemptions from last year. It's still the list as far as I know:

      1. Teams that have appeared on Hard Knocks in the last 10 years.

      2. Teams with new head coaches.

      3. Teams that have made the playoffs in either of the last two years.

      http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/10/10/most-teams-will-be-exempt-from-hard-knocks-requirement/

      This year we can "turn it down" as a first pass response, but if no one else volunteers, then we can be forced to do the show.

      RoyceRolls R
      • 1k Posts
      • 345 Reputation
      R RoyceRolls wrote on last edited by
      #8

      @tour2ma said:

      We went through this last year when we could not be forced to do the show (1st year HC exemption). I don't think we have any exeptions that apply this year.

      Here are the exemptions from last year. It's still the list as far as I know:

      1. Teams that have appeared on Hard Knocks in the last 10 years.

      2. Teams with new head coaches.

      3. Teams that have made the playoffs in either of the last two years.

      http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/10/10/most-teams-will-be-exempt-from-hard-knocks-requirement/

      This year we can "turn it down" as a first pass response, but if no one else volunteers, then we can be forced to do the show.

      That leaves 9 eligible teams: Giants, Redskins, Browns, Texans, Jaguars, Titans, Vikings, Buccaneers and Rams.

      The Redskins would be one of the teams that could possibly compete with the Browns in terms of QB drama with the RGknee debacle currently going on.

      The Buccaneers would be another interesting option, but if no one volunteers, the Browns will most likely be forced to do the damn thing.

      http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/eye-on-football/24939058/redskins-giants-among-9-nfl-teams-eligible-for-2015-hard-knocks

      The GipperT 1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • R RoyceRolls

        @tour2ma said:

        We went through this last year when we could not be forced to do the show (1st year HC exemption). I don't think we have any exeptions that apply this year.

        Here are the exemptions from last year. It's still the list as far as I know:

        1. Teams that have appeared on Hard Knocks in the last 10 years.

        2. Teams with new head coaches.

        3. Teams that have made the playoffs in either of the last two years.

        http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/10/10/most-teams-will-be-exempt-from-hard-knocks-requirement/

        This year we can "turn it down" as a first pass response, but if no one else volunteers, then we can be forced to do the show.

        That leaves 9 eligible teams: Giants, Redskins, Browns, Texans, Jaguars, Titans, Vikings, Buccaneers and Rams.

        The Redskins would be one of the teams that could possibly compete with the Browns in terms of QB drama with the RGknee debacle currently going on.

        The Buccaneers would be another interesting option, but if no one volunteers, the Browns will most likely be forced to do the damn thing.

        http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/eye-on-football/24939058/redskins-giants-among-9-nfl-teams-eligible-for-2015-hard-knocks

        The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
        • 57k Posts
        • 4k Reputation
        The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
        #9

        @roycerolls said:

        That leaves 9 eligible teams: Giants, Redskins, Browns, Texans, Jaguars, Titans, Vikings, Buccaneers and Rams.

        Why in hell are these the "only eligible"?

        Only 8 teams have ever done the show. If you count the Browns out that would still leave 23 teams that have never done it.

        Do they only take teams with losing seasons? If so, why? That makes no sense

        The Redskins would be one of the teams that could possibly compete with the Browns in terms of QB drama with the RGknee debacle currently going on.

        The Buccaneers would be another interesting option, but if no one volunteers, the Browns will most likely be forced to do the damn thing.

        http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/eye-on-football/24939058/redskins-giants-among-9-nfl-teams-eligible-for-2015-hard-knocks

        1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
          • 57k Posts
          • 4k Reputation
          The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
          #10

          OK, having read the article I see that it says that any team that has made the playoffs the last two years, or that does not have a 1st year HC are exempt from appearing.

          My only question....what the fuck? I understand the new HC thing.....but to exempt teams that have made the playoffs? Why?

          What is the rationale. I see none other than it being arbitrary.

          Tim Couch Pulls OutT 1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • The GipperT The Gipper

            OK, having read the article I see that it says that any team that has made the playoffs the last two years, or that does not have a 1st year HC are exempt from appearing.

            My only question....what the fuck? I understand the new HC thing.....but to exempt teams that have made the playoffs? Why?

            What is the rationale. I see none other than it being arbitrary.

            Tim Couch Pulls Out Tim Couch Pulls OutT Very Popular Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
            • 8k Posts
            • 1k Reputation
            Tim Couch Pulls OutT Tim Couch Pulls Out wrote on last edited by
            #11

            @the-gipper said:

            OK, having read the article I see that it says that any team that has made the playoffs the last two years, or that does not have a 1st year HC are exempt from appearing.

            My only question....what the fuck? I understand the new HC thing.....but to exempt teams that have made the playoffs? Why?

            What is the rationale. I see none other than it being arbitrary.

            I'm sure partly because they'd want to avoid the minefield that would be "oh, we made the playoffs last year, then nothing changed and we missed the playoffs this year...it's Hard Knocks' fault!"

            I'm awesome, and I fuck dolphins. Ghoolie 12/2/2012: I have absolutely no skills, training or pride
            1 Reply Last reply
            👍
            Quote Reply
            • Opal312 Opal312O
              • 2k Posts
              • 100 Reputation
              Opal312O Opal312 wrote on last edited by
              #12

              I've no idea what hard knocks is because I never watch television. Did Roger Goodell make it mandatory? I hate Roger Goodell.

              DAMN THE TORPEDOES! FULL SPEED AHEAD!
              The GipperT 1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • Opal312O Opal312

                I've no idea what hard knocks is because I never watch television. Did Roger Goodell make it mandatory? I hate Roger Goodell.

                The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
                • 57k Posts
                • 4k Reputation
                The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
                #13

                @opal312 said:

                I've no idea what hard knocks is because I never watch television. Did Roger Goodell make it mandatory? I hate Roger Goodell.

                Well, I guess if the league can dictate how high a player can wear his socks, they can dictate this to their owners. Still, the method of choosing who is "eligible" is assinine.

                1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
                  • 64k Posts
                  • 8k Reputation
                  C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
                  #14

                  6) K - said it's possible we draft a Kicker Pettine

                  ************************

                  well...I wasn't completely goofy on my mock draft.

                  Nailed it.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • thenew23T thenew23

                    He said a lot of interesting things today...

                    1) D-line - Plans to move Phil Taylor to NT, said we can pencil in Taylor & Kitchen there. Said Starks can play all 3 spots, but is mostly a 3-tech DE. Said Hughes will be a 3- and 5-tech DE. He likes Shelton but said he'll probably be long gone by the time we pick

                    2) OLBs - As I said, he mentioned he could use A.Bryant as an OLB at times, and seems really high on Scott Solomon. Said he still wants to add a pass-rusher and the draft is deep at that position.

                    3) O-line - Said we could move Bitonio to RT (down the line) and he could even play C, and is interested in a developmental C since Mack's contract is up after this season

                    4) QB - said JF is doing well in rehab and expects him at OTAs. Also, said no private workout for Mariota b/c O'Connell is so familiar with him. Said trading up for QB is one of the few reasons to trade up... We held private workouts with a few QBs but he wouldn't release which ones

                    5) CB - likes what he hears about Gilbert's offseason and still sees him as a starter even with T.Williams on board. Said he could see K.Williams or Gilbert inside if T.Williams starts outside.

                    6) K - said it's possible we draft a Kicker

                    7) Said the team turned down Hard Knocks, said Manziel getting out of rehab is a factor in that decision

                    thenew23 thenew23T
                    • 2k Posts
                    • 233 Reputation
                    thenew23T thenew23 wrote on last edited by
                    #15

                    @thenew23 said:

                    He said a lot of interesting things today...

                    1) D-line - Plans to move Phil Taylor to NT, said we can pencil in Taylor & Kitchen there. Said Starks can play all 3 spots, but is mostly a 3-tech DE. Said Hughes will be a 3- and 5-tech DE. He likes Shelton but said he'll probably be long gone by the time we pick

                    2) OLBs - As I said, he mentioned he could use A.Bryant as an OLB at times, and seems really high on Scott Solomon. Said he still wants to add a pass-rusher and the draft is deep at that position.

                    With regard to the front 7, it looks like instead of re-stacking the deck, Pettine plans to shuffle the cards...

                    Starks Taylor D.Bryant

                    Winn Kitchen Hughes

                    Mingo Dansby Robertson Kruger

                    Solomon Carder Kirksey A.Bryant

                    Still looks like Kitchen and Solomon are the weak spots that could use upgraded, but I like moving Phil back to the NT. Horton used him there and Rubin as a DE, but when Pettine came in he switched them... I never understood that... Hopefully Phil can stay healthy and play well, especially on a contract year for him...

                    #Justsayin'
                    The GipperT 1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • thenew23T thenew23

                      He said a lot of interesting things today...

                      1) D-line - Plans to move Phil Taylor to NT, said we can pencil in Taylor & Kitchen there. Said Starks can play all 3 spots, but is mostly a 3-tech DE. Said Hughes will be a 3- and 5-tech DE. He likes Shelton but said he'll probably be long gone by the time we pick

                      2) OLBs - As I said, he mentioned he could use A.Bryant as an OLB at times, and seems really high on Scott Solomon. Said he still wants to add a pass-rusher and the draft is deep at that position.

                      3) O-line - Said we could move Bitonio to RT (down the line) and he could even play C, and is interested in a developmental C since Mack's contract is up after this season

                      4) QB - said JF is doing well in rehab and expects him at OTAs. Also, said no private workout for Mariota b/c O'Connell is so familiar with him. Said trading up for QB is one of the few reasons to trade up... We held private workouts with a few QBs but he wouldn't release which ones

                      5) CB - likes what he hears about Gilbert's offseason and still sees him as a starter even with T.Williams on board. Said he could see K.Williams or Gilbert inside if T.Williams starts outside.

                      6) K - said it's possible we draft a Kicker

                      7) Said the team turned down Hard Knocks, said Manziel getting out of rehab is a factor in that decision

                      thenew23 thenew23T
                      • 2k Posts
                      • 233 Reputation
                      thenew23T thenew23 wrote on last edited by
                      #16

                      @thenew23 said:

                      4) QB - said JF is doing well in rehab and expects him at OTAs. Also, said no private workout for Mariota b/c O'Connell is so familiar with him. Said trading up for QB is one of the few reasons to trade up... We held private workouts with a few QBs but he wouldn't release which ones

                      Also said Manziel should be given the chance to be "the guy" as long as he can get/stay on the field...

                      #Justsayin'
                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply
                      • Flugel FlugelF Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                        • 11k Posts
                        • 6k Reputation
                        FlugelF Flugel wrote on last edited by Flugel
                        #17

                        Appreciate the update 23. Good stuff. Here's a link that captures a short press conference/interview with Pettine The Dawg today that hits on a few of the things you mentioned:

                        http://www.clevelandbrowns.com/media-center/videos/Pettine-Im-optimistic-Manziel-will-be-back-in-April/1774be15-52fe-4b5c-8022-c20af3b90b2e

                        I welcome the only Defensive Coordinator to earn a Superbowl Ring in New Orleans while understanding Revenge of the Nerds is a sequel. "Come get some!"
                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Quote Reply
                        • Tour2ma Tour2maT In Memoriam Dedicated Conversation Starter Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done Very Popular
                          • 30k Posts
                          • 6k Reputation
                          Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
                          #18

                          Do people seriously not understand that the Commissioner only enforces rules set by a majority of the owners?

                          "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
                          Tim Couch Pulls OutT 1 Reply Last reply
                          Quote Reply
                          • OldBrownsFan OldBrownsFanO
                            • 11k Posts
                            • 3k Reputation
                            OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
                            #19

                            Will any team volunteer to do the HBO show this year? Seems like there are a lot of downside to doing the show with the distraction. More so this year for the Browns with JM coming out of rehab. The owners may have voted on this but I don't like this set up. The Browns may be stuck with no choice but to have the HBO cameras if no other team volunteers.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            Quote Reply
                            • D Bone D BoneD Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                              • 8k Posts
                              • 3k Reputation
                              D BoneD D Bone wrote on last edited by D Bone
                              #20

                              The Browns will be on HBO.... Embrace it. I for one can't wait to get a look behind the curtain.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              Quote Reply
                              • Tour2maT Tour2ma

                                Do people seriously not understand that the Commissioner only enforces rules set by a majority of the owners?

                                Tim Couch Pulls Out Tim Couch Pulls OutT Very Popular Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                • 8k Posts
                                • 1k Reputation
                                Tim Couch Pulls OutT Tim Couch Pulls Out wrote on last edited by
                                #21

                                @tour2ma said:

                                Do people seriously not understand that the Commissioner only enforces rules set by a majority of the owners?

                                Blame Canada.

                                I'm awesome, and I fuck dolphins. Ghoolie 12/2/2012: I have absolutely no skills, training or pride
                                1 Reply Last reply
                                Quote Reply
                                • Tim Couch Pulls OutT Tim Couch Pulls Out

                                  @thenew23 said:

                                  He said a lot of interesting things today...

                                  1) D-line - Plans to move Phil Taylor to NT, said we can pencil in Taylor & Kitchen there. Said Starks can play all 3 spots, but is mostly a 3-tech DE. Said Hughes will be a 3- and 5-tech DE. He likes Shelton but said he'll probably be long gone by the time we pick

                                  2) OLBs - As I said, he mentioned he could use A.Bryant as an OLB at times, and seems really high on Scott Solomon. Said he still wants to add a pass-rusher and the draft is deep at that position.

                                  3) O-line - Said we could move Bitonio to RT (down the line) and he could even play C, and is interested in a developmental C since Mack's contract is up after this season

                                  4) QB - said JF is doing well in rehab and expects him at OTAs. Also, said no private workout for Mariota b/c O'Connell is so familiar with him. Said trading up for QB is one of the few reasons to trade up... We held private workouts with a few QBs but he wouldn't release which ones

                                  5) CB - likes what he hears about Gilbert's offseason and still sees him as a starter even with T.Williams on board. Said he could see K.Williams or Gilbert inside if T.Williams starts outside.

                                  6) K - said it's possible we draft a Kicker

                                  7) Said the team turned down Hard Knocks, said Manziel getting out of rehab is a factor in that decision

                                  Don't think they can technically turn down Hard Knocks this year, though. Pretty sure that they can be forced to do it.

                                  hoorta hoortaH Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                  • 20k Posts
                                  • 5k Reputation
                                  hoortaH hoorta wrote on last edited by
                                  #22

                                  @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

                                  Don't think they can technically turn down Hard Knocks this year, though. Pretty sure that they can be forced to do it.

                                  It will be a hard sell to Haslam & Pettine- if they tell Goodell they don't want the cameras on Johnny Rehab just yet.

                                  @the-gipper said:

                                  I'd bet they can turn them down. There are 31 other teams.....and only 9* have been on that show before. That means they have 22 other teams that have not done it. They can find one. Let the Steelers do it...or the Eagles or Redskins.....more intriguing story lines there.

                                  *Ravens, Cowboys, Chiefs, Bengals, Jets, Dolphins, Bengals again, Falcons.

                                  (so actually 23 other teams besides Browns and the above have not done it.)

                                  Yeah- teams that make the playoffs should be eligible. Heck, the NFL could tell HBO- "not this year" They won't I'm sure HBO pays them a healthy chunk of change.

                                  @d-bone said:

                                  The Browns will be on HBO.... Embrace it. I for one can't wait to get a look behind the curtain.

                                  You enjoy Real Housewives of Atlanta or Survivor too? If there's not a story- Create one.

                                  D BoneD 1 Reply Last reply
                                  Quote Reply
                                  • Westside Steve W Dedicated Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Conversation Starter Week One Done One Year In One Month Later Very Popular
                                    • 39k Posts
                                    • 9k Reputation
                                    W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by
                                    #23

                                    I sincerely doubt that the NFL controlled film will paint any team in a bad light. I think we are being pussies. why leave the perception of the team up to assholes like Jason LaCanfora?

                                    WSS

                                    www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons
                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    Quote Reply
                                    • miktoxic miktoxicM
                                      • 13k Posts
                                      • 1k Reputation
                                      miktoxicM miktoxic wrote on last edited by miktoxic
                                      #24

                                      so let's say the browns are forced to do it. manziel comes back to camp and it's the main plot line of the show. if manziel fizzles out under the pressure and even worse goes back to doing stupid stuff, would there be a basis for a lawsuit thrown at the browns, the nfl and HBO by a manziel camp stacked with high price lawyers, arguing some mental duress?

                                      i know the players are the 'property' of the team they play for but when did individual rights go out the window? doesn't each player have to sign off on this? anywhere else in america to be filmed the co. needs a waiver from each individual. what if manziel says no, don't film me?

                                      my concern isn't so much with the other players, it's with manziel. and for all those that want to give this guy another chance (hell, i'm on the bottom of that list) don't you think throwing hollywood back in front of this kid as soon as he steps out of rehab, a recipe for disaster?

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      Quote Reply
                                      • DieHardBrownsFan DieHardBrownsFanD Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Collaborator Posting Machine First Post One Month Later Week One Done One Year In
                                        • 28k Posts
                                        • 6k Reputation
                                        DieHardBrownsFanD DieHardBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
                                        #25

                                        NFL is entertainment. They make money off the show. Manziel seems to be the main attraction of the media. They want him to fuck up. I could see them making the Browns do it. Manziel is a commodity. If he falls off the wagon the media will eat it up. The NFL won't give a shit.

                                        "You planning on having a long relationship with that glass or are you going to drink it? Drink up, man. Maybe we can get another.” - Janis Joplin, 1970.
                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        Quote Reply
                                        • OldBrownsFan OldBrownsFanO
                                          • 11k Posts
                                          • 3k Reputation
                                          OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
                                          #26

                                          As a Browns fan I want what is best for the team. Pettine has already said he does not want the distraction of doing this show with JM just coming out of rehab. Will HBO honor that or force the Browns to do the show if no other team volunteers? We'll see. I just don't see HBO having the best interest of the Browns here.

                                          W 1 Reply Last reply
                                          Quote Reply

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Register Login
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          Theme
                                          • System
                                          • Light
                                          • Dark
                                          The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                                          The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Forums
                                          • Recent
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Donate