Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Adams retained

Adams retained

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Browns Board
11 Posts 7 Posters 1.1k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ballpeen ballpeenB Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
    • 9k Posts
    • 2k Reputation
    ballpeenB ballpeen wrote on last edited by ballpeen
    #1

    Cleveland Browns re-sign safety Mike Adams

    by Mary Kay Cabot / Plain Dealer Reporter

    Thursday March 05, 2009, 8:47 PM

    File PhotoSean Jones is scheduled to visit the Eagles on Friday.

    The Browns re-signed safety Mike Adams to a three-year deal Thursday, his agent Peter Schaffer said. A source said it's a $4.1 million deal.

    Adams had also visited the Packers and Patriots.

    Originally signed by the Browns as a free agent in April 2007, Adams started five games for the Browns last season and played in 14.

    With fellow free-agent safety Sean Jones visiting the Eagles Friday, Adams becomes a leading candidate for a starting safety job. Last season, he started the opener in place of Brodney Pool (concussion) and the next four games in place of Jones, who underwent arthroscopic knee surgery.

    He finished the season with 42 tackles, two interceptions and one fumble recovery.

    Adams (5-11, 195), is a sixth-year pro who was originally signed as an undrafted rookie free agent by San Francisco in 2004 out of Delaware. Adams, also a key special teams player, finished second on the team in 2007 with 18 special teams tackles.

    If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.
    1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • Gips GipsG
      • 3k Posts
      • 34 Reputation
      GipsG Gips wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Adams at worst is a dependable backup he didnt quit last season and he played hard when he was called on its good to have him back...im hoping jones comes back too but i wouldnt bank on it..

      We have been rebuilding since 1964, Why stop now? GO BROWNS!
      1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • onefellswoop7 onefellswoop7O
        • 195 Posts
        • 0 Reputation
        onefellswoop7O onefellswoop7 wrote on last edited by
        #3

        He is solid and versatile depth. He's a better backup safety but he played the nickel fairly well last year when called on.

        I'm very up in the air about brining Jones back. Not quite sure who we could get if he doesn't come back though? I think some type of change needs to happen in the secondary. Wright and McDonald are set (maybe BMAC gets moved to nickel...but, I still think he will keep getting better)...maybe something new at the safety spot, I dunno?

        Pressure up front will DEFINITELY help these guys.

        ? 1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • onefellswoop7O onefellswoop7

          He is solid and versatile depth. He's a better backup safety but he played the nickel fairly well last year when called on.

          I'm very up in the air about brining Jones back. Not quite sure who we could get if he doesn't come back though? I think some type of change needs to happen in the secondary. Wright and McDonald are set (maybe BMAC gets moved to nickel...but, I still think he will keep getting better)...maybe something new at the safety spot, I dunno?

          Pressure up front will DEFINITELY help these guys.

          AdaM ?
          • Posts
          • 0 Reputation
          ? AdaM wrote on last edited by
          #4

          @onefellswoop7 said:

          He is solid and versatile depth. He's a better backup safety but he played the nickel fairly well last year when called on.

          I'm very up in the air about brining Jones back. Not quite sure who we could get if he doesn't come back though? I think some type of change needs to happen in the secondary. Wright and McDonald are set (maybe BMAC gets moved to nickel...but, I still think he will keep getting better)...maybe something new at the safety spot, I dunno?

          Pressure up front will DEFINITELY help these guys.

          I wonder if the signing has anything to do with Mangini wanting to test Cribbs at safety?

          P 1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • ? Guest

            @onefellswoop7 said:

            He is solid and versatile depth. He's a better backup safety but he played the nickel fairly well last year when called on.

            I'm very up in the air about brining Jones back. Not quite sure who we could get if he doesn't come back though? I think some type of change needs to happen in the secondary. Wright and McDonald are set (maybe BMAC gets moved to nickel...but, I still think he will keep getting better)...maybe something new at the safety spot, I dunno?

            Pressure up front will DEFINITELY help these guys.

            I wonder if the signing has anything to do with Mangini wanting to test Cribbs at safety?

            philbert79 P
            • 83 Posts
            • 4 Reputation
            P philbert79 wrote on last edited by
            #5

            AdaM said:

            I wonder if the signing has anything to do with Mangini wanting to test Cribbs at safety?

            I certainly would like to see that. I think the WildDawg/flash packages are done. Defenses are pretty smart and pretty fast. None of the teams that ran that offense went very far into the playoffs.

            Sean Jones is a good player, and I wouldn't mind seeing him back. I just don't think he's the big-hitter the browns need. JC might give them that.

            1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • onefellswoop7 onefellswoop7O
              • 195 Posts
              • 0 Reputation
              onefellswoop7O onefellswoop7 wrote on last edited by
              #6

              @inspecta said:

              I can't lie I would be sad to see Jones go, but like somebody said this could set the stage for Cribbs playing saftey.

              How good though could he be at playing saftey his first year? Could he digest the playbook?

              I dunno, it's a risk. But Cribbs is first and foremost a football player in the truest sense of the word, if anybody could make that change it's him

              I concur. It is exciting to think about but also a huge risk. If anyone can do it...Cribbs is the guy. If he became a good starting safety I guarantee his jersey sales become the highest of active Browns.

              1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • Riffer X Riffer XR Very Popular Conversation Starter Reacting Well Dedicated Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                • 3k Posts
                • 127 Reputation
                Riffer XR Riffer X wrote on last edited by
                #7

                I'm confused by all this Cribbs nonsense. Why in the hell do we want to take the ball out of the hands of our best playmaker and relegate him to try to learn and play one position?

                None of it makes sense to me, the dude has asthma and can only do so much. You tell me he really makes the switch to safety and he is no longer doing anything else, and that's only if he can make the switch if you know what I mean. I applaud your guys' thoughts on this, but I say hell no emphatically to this idea. It reeks of desperation.

                Is a pig's ass pork?
                ? 1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • Riffer XR Riffer X

                  I'm confused by all this Cribbs nonsense. Why in the hell do we want to take the ball out of the hands of our best playmaker and relegate him to try to learn and play one position?

                  None of it makes sense to me, the dude has asthma and can only do so much. You tell me he really makes the switch to safety and he is no longer doing anything else, and that's only if he can make the switch if you know what I mean. I applaud your guys' thoughts on this, but I say hell no emphatically to this idea. It reeks of desperation.

                  AdaM ?
                  • Posts
                  • 0 Reputation
                  ? AdaM wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  @riffer-x said:

                  I'm confused by all this Cribbs nonsense. Why in the hell do we want to take the ball out of the hands of our best playmaker and relegate him to try to learn and play one position?

                  None of it makes sense to me, the dude has asthma and can only do so much. You tell me he really makes the switch to safety and he is no longer doing anything else, and that's only if he can make the switch if you know what I mean. I applaud your guys' thoughts on this, but I say hell no emphatically to this idea. It reeks of desperation.

                  Cribbs isn't really much more dynamic on offense than any other player. (That we have seen so far).

                  I mean he can be used in gimmicks on offense but he's not even in there for more than 6 snaps a game..... Why in the world could he not continue to do that?

                  If he can take one back 100 yards to the house, he can play safety without his asthma acting up too bad. He was on the field for every offensive snap except punts in college.. its not like he can't breathe.

                  onefellswoop7O 1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • ? Guest

                    @riffer-x said:

                    I'm confused by all this Cribbs nonsense. Why in the hell do we want to take the ball out of the hands of our best playmaker and relegate him to try to learn and play one position?

                    None of it makes sense to me, the dude has asthma and can only do so much. You tell me he really makes the switch to safety and he is no longer doing anything else, and that's only if he can make the switch if you know what I mean. I applaud your guys' thoughts on this, but I say hell no emphatically to this idea. It reeks of desperation.

                    Cribbs isn't really much more dynamic on offense than any other player. (That we have seen so far).

                    I mean he can be used in gimmicks on offense but he's not even in there for more than 6 snaps a game..... Why in the world could he not continue to do that?

                    If he can take one back 100 yards to the house, he can play safety without his asthma acting up too bad. He was on the field for every offensive snap except punts in college.. its not like he can't breathe.

                    onefellswoop7 onefellswoop7O
                    • 195 Posts
                    • 0 Reputation
                    onefellswoop7O onefellswoop7 wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    AdaM said:

                    Cribbs isn't really much more dynamic on offense than any other player. (That we have seen so far).

                    I mean he can be used in gimmicks on offense but he's not even in there for more than 6 snaps a game..... Why in the world could he not continue to do that?

                    If he can take one back 100 yards to the house, he can play safety without his asthma acting up too bad. He was on the field for every offensive snap except punts in college.. its not like he can't breathe.

                    Yea. I mean, he played college QB and ran the ball just as much (if not more) than he threw. He can manage.

                    Fact of the matter is we need a guy of his energy and speed on the field more often. He is an average WR and we can easily find a KR or PR specialist to take some reps from him.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • Dacaddyman ?
                      • Posts
                      • 0 Reputation
                      ? Dacaddyman wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      @inspecta said:

                      I can't lie I would be sad to see Jones go, but like somebody said this could set the stage for Cribbs playing saftey.

                      How good though could he be at playing saftey his first year? Could he digest the playbook?

                      I dunno, it's a risk. But Cribbs is first and foremost a football player in the truest sense of the word, if anybody could make that change it's him

                      He used to be a Quarterback, the playbook should not be a problem. In fact he may become the quarterback of the defense much like russell was

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply
                      • mikebrancato M
                        • 23 Posts
                        • 0 Reputation
                        M mikebrancato wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        Cribbs=Reed=Polamalu=Maybe?..With Steptoe doing the returns?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Quote Reply

                        Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                        Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                        With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                        Register Login
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        Theme
                        • System
                        • Light
                        • Dark
                        The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                        The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Forums
                        • Recent
                        • Popular
                        • Users
                        • Donate