Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. New LB Coach

New LB Coach

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Browns Board
23 Posts 11 Posters 1.9k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • WPB Dawg Fan W
    • 1k Posts
    • 0 Reputation
    W WPB Dawg Fan wrote on last edited by
    #7

    I am sure Brock Christopher wouldn't mind a Undrafted FA shot at the Browns either. He has been on the Big 12 All Honorable Mention 2 years in a row...he is a slightly undersized MLB and was arguably Mizzou's best defensive player.

    2007 - 7.5 TFL, 1.5 Sacks, 57 solos, 105 total tackles, 1 INT

    2008 - I know he had 3 INT's (1 for TD) but can't seem to find the overall stats.

    1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • YtownBrownsBacker Y
      • 2k Posts
      • 0 Reputation
      Y YtownBrownsBacker wrote on last edited by
      #8

      I like the fact that Mangini has brought in some college coaches and not just hired the same retreads that float anound the NFL for years. Sometimes you get guys that are very hungry to prove themselves.

      I hope he has made some solid choices.

      1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • JewDago J
        • 837 Posts
        • 0 Reputation
        J JewDago wrote on last edited by
        #9

        brock christopher in 2008: 105 tackles, 54 solo, 7.5 TFL (9 assist, 3 solo), 1 sack, 6 passes defensed, 2 QB hurries, 3 INT, one returned for a TD.

        can't really argue with his production, but i've got to wonder if he'll be able to bulk up to be anything more than DQ's backup. if so, he could be a nice addition. if not, well, i guess we could always use someone to back up DQ.

        W 1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • J JewDago

          brock christopher in 2008: 105 tackles, 54 solo, 7.5 TFL (9 assist, 3 solo), 1 sack, 6 passes defensed, 2 QB hurries, 3 INT, one returned for a TD.

          can't really argue with his production, but i've got to wonder if he'll be able to bulk up to be anything more than DQ's backup. if so, he could be a nice addition. if not, well, i guess we could always use someone to back up DQ.

          WPB Dawg Fan W
          • 1k Posts
          • 0 Reputation
          W WPB Dawg Fan wrote on last edited by
          #10

          @jewdago said:

          brock christopher in 2008: 105 tackles, 54 solo, 7.5 TFL (9 assist, 3 solo), 1 sack, 6 passes defensed, 2 QB hurries, 3 INT, one returned for a TD.

          can't really argue with his production, but i've got to wonder if he'll be able to bulk up to be anything more than DQ's backup. if so, he could be a nice addition. if not, well, i guess we could always use someone to back up DQ.

          Not bad for a guy expected to go as UFA.

          1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • Solon16 S
            • 2k Posts
            • 0 Reputation
            S Solon16 wrote on last edited by
            #11

            Lately there has been alot of buzz about moving William moore(mizz) to Linebacker.....don't think he'll fit in 3~4 , more of a tampa two LB if he does convert. depends how he does at the combine...

            Y 1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • Aloysius ?
              • Posts
              • 0 Reputation
              ? Aloysius wrote on last edited by
              #12
              Missouri has good prospects, great atmosphere

              The scouts just love going to Missouri’s pro day. They get lunch, the people are ultra friendly and it’s just a great stop. This year there are also several Tigers prospects worth watching. The offensive stars — QB Chase Daniel, TE Chase Coffman and WR Jeremy Maclin — will work out March 19, but a number of the defensive players ran drills.

              One player who performed really well was S William Moore. He looked good in his positional drills and was impressive overall. He measured in at 6-foot and a 1/2-inch, 221 pounds. He ran the 40-yard dash in 4.51 and 4.49 seconds and the three-cone drill in 6.94 seconds. He also posted a 10-foot, 6-inch broad jump.

              Defensive tackle Evander ‘Ziggy’ Hood kept his 40 time from the combine, but did do the other drills. He ran the short shuttle in 4.45 seconds and the three-cone drill in 7.32 seconds. He had 35 reps in the bench press, jumped 34 1/2 inches in the vertical and leaped 9-feet, 8-inches in the broad jump.

              Defensive end Stryker Sulak kept all of his combine numbers and did position drills.

              Linebacker Brock Christopher checked in at 6-1 5/8, 238 pounds. He ran the 40 in 4.92 and 4.93 seconds, the short shuttle in 4.34 seconds and the three-cone drill in 7.32 seconds, as well as having a 32-inch vertical jump, a 9-foot broad jump and 20 bench press reps.

              1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • mikebrancato M
                • 23 Posts
                • 0 Reputation
                M mikebrancato wrote on last edited by
                #13

                I like that we are adding college coaches to our staff. It maybe a sneaky way to get some gems.

                1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • YtownBrownsBacker Y
                  • 2k Posts
                  • 0 Reputation
                  Y YtownBrownsBacker wrote on last edited by
                  #14

                  Missouri is also where Youngstown's Brad Smith went to college and I know Mangini wants to bring him here. Smith is a converted QB much like Cribbs and ran the Jets version of the Flash package. Mangini was torn between making him a RB or WR. I don't think he is close to Cribbs as a special teamer but he is a more polished receiver. He runs very good routes and is a solid slot receiver.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • S Solon16

                    Lately there has been alot of buzz about moving William moore(mizz) to Linebacker.....don't think he'll fit in 3~4 , more of a tampa two LB if he does convert. depends how he does at the combine...

                    YtownBrownsBacker Y
                    • 2k Posts
                    • 0 Reputation
                    Y YtownBrownsBacker wrote on last edited by
                    #15

                    @solon16 said:

                    Lately there has been alot of buzz about moving William moore(mizz) to Linebacker.....don't think he'll fit in 3~4 , more of a tampa two LB if he does convert. depends how he does at the combine...

                    Moore's a SS and not a LB. He would be a great fit. As a rookie he would be a big upgrade from Jones at SS. He is just under 6'1" and weighs 221, had a good combine and is the top rated SS in the draft by most every site. He would be available in the 2nd round.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • Aloysius ?
                      • Posts
                      • 0 Reputation
                      ? Aloysius wrote on last edited by
                      #16

                      Ytown, Moore had a poor senior season and an even worse week at the Senior Bowl. As Mike Mayock reported, he looked so bad in Mobile that teams were talking about converting him to linebacker.

                      It could be that ankle and knee injuries were to blame for his bad season, but that's the same excuse people have made for Sean Jones' play.

                      Not sure he'd be a big upgrade.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply
                      • Aloysius ?
                        • Posts
                        • 0 Reputation
                        ? Aloysius wrote on last edited by
                        #17
                        The Columbia Tribune tracked Missouri's recent Pro Day, and commented on linebacker Brock Christopher's connection to new Browns LB coach Matt Eberflus:

                        If Christopher goes undrafted, you can bet someone will snap him up in free agency, especially with his ability to handle deep snaps. He’s not tremendously big, fast or athletic, but he’s smart and tough. He might not make millions, but he’ll be in someone’s camp in August. And I wouldn’t be surprised at all if he lands in Cleveland to play for new Browns linebackers coach Matt Eberflus, who told me last fall Christopher is good enough to make an NFL roster.

                        Good call, John.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Quote Reply
                        • ? Guest
                          Stryker Sulak would like to know when he should report to Browns training camp.
                          Aloysius ?
                          • Posts
                          • 0 Reputation
                          ? Aloysius wrote on last edited by
                          #18

                          Aloysius said:

                          Stryker Sulak would like to know when he should report to Browns training camp.

                          Apparently, this could still happen.

                          Raiders waive sixth-round pick

                          Posted by Mike Florio on July 13, 2009 4:53 PM

                          The Oakland Raiders have found a new way to avoid holdouts by rookie draft picks.

                          The solution? Cut them.

                          A league source tells us that the Raiders have waived defensive end Stryker Sulak, a sixth-round pick in the 2009 draft.

                          The formal designation was "waived/unsigned."

                          So, basically, the Raiders have cut Sulak before his rookie training camp. Said the source, "I've never seen that happen before."

                          But the tactic is permitted. Teams are required only to tender one-year contracts for the rookie minimum to their draft picks. Even if the draft pick were to sign the one-year tender, the team would still have the ability to terminate the non-guaranteed deal.

                          Sulak was the 26th player picked in round six, and the 199th overall in the draft. The Raiders selected Sulak with a draft pick obtained from the Patriots.

                          The reason for the Raiders' decision to cut Sulak isn't known. Yet.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          Quote Reply
                          • Riffer X Riffer XR Very Popular Conversation Starter Reacting Well Dedicated Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                            • 3k Posts
                            • 127 Reputation
                            Riffer XR Riffer X wrote on last edited by
                            #19

                            He could have done something nobbish and it hasn't or won't be reported.

                            Is a pig's ass pork?
                            1 Reply Last reply
                            Quote Reply
                            • hammertime hammertimeH Dedicated Conversation Starter Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later Very Popular
                              • 4k Posts
                              • 2k Reputation
                              hammertimeH hammertime wrote on last edited by
                              #20

                              Maybe there is no appeal to play for the Raiders.

                              Even from a 6th rounders point of view.

                              Miss. and the Raiders don't sound like a good match.

                              guns don't kill kids-pitt bulls do.
                              1 Reply Last reply
                              Quote Reply
                              • Aloysius ?
                                • Posts
                                • 0 Reputation
                                ? Aloysius wrote on last edited by
                                #21

                                Doesn't sound like Sulak did anything wrong:

                                Aaron Wilson said:

                                Per our source, Sulak hasn't been in any kind of trouble that would have prompted this abrupt removal from the roster.

                                In fact, Sulak and his agent haven't been contacted by the Raiders at this point.

                                "Shocked is the best way to put it," the source said. "This is a good kid who plays football, hunts and fishes. This is very dysfunctional. I'm shocked that they didn't even call him to let him know or call his agent.

                                "It sounded like the minicamps went well and that he would have a chance to make the club. Of course, signing Greg Ellis might have made it tougher for him to make it. He'll go through the waiver system and see what happens."

                                The Raiders are crazy deep at defensive end, which could help explain why they cut him. But the funny thing is that wasn't even drafted to play end:

                                Jerry McDonald said:

                                When Sulak was drafted, Raiders coach Tom Cable said the plan was to play him as a strongside linebacker along with fourth-round pick Slade Norris.

                                However, during the mandatory minicamp and OTAs, Sulak was instead lined up exclusviely as a defensive end and was getting reps with the second and third teams.

                                I think the Raiders being a mess is the best explanation for this. I'd be all for giving Sulak a shot.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                Quote Reply
                                • hammertime hammertimeH Dedicated Conversation Starter Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later Very Popular
                                  • 4k Posts
                                  • 2k Reputation
                                  hammertimeH hammertime wrote on last edited by
                                  #22

                                  Its about normal for the Raiders. They continue to be a dysfunctional organization. Sulak could have a tough time making our roster also. Competition brings out the players best so he should get a shot somewhere.

                                  guns don't kill kids-pitt bulls do.
                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  Quote Reply
                                  • Aloysius ?
                                    • Posts
                                    • 0 Reputation
                                    ? Aloysius wrote on last edited by
                                    #23

                                    Today, the Patriots worked out Sulak. The Panthers will do the same later this week, and his agent claims that at least ten more teams are interested in the Missouri product.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    Quote Reply

                                    Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                    Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                    With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                    Register Login
                                    Reply
                                    • Reply as topic
                                    Log in to reply
                                    • Oldest to Newest
                                    • Newest to Oldest
                                    • Most Votes


                                    Theme
                                    • System
                                    • Light
                                    • Dark
                                    The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                                    The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                                    • First post
                                      Last post
                                    0
                                    • Forums
                                    • Recent
                                    • Popular
                                    • Users
                                    • Donate