Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Why u no WR?

Why u no WR?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Browns Board
64 Posts 27 Posters 2.8k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • wargograw W One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
    • 5k Posts
    • 363 Reputation
    W wargograw wrote on last edited by
    #33

    "This is a RB driven league"

    What league have you been watching?

    Tour2maT 1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • B BaconHound

      This is a RB driven league 😵

      To be successful you have to first and foremost control the line of scrimmage which I think the FO has tried their best to address.

      You also have to score points and again this season with a career back-up and no WR threat the Browns will have to be creative and I don't think they will pull it off. Again defenses will stack the box and press our either undersized or old and slow WRs.

      cambridgeho cambridgehoC Very Popular Reacting Well Dedicated Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
      • 2k Posts
      • 139 Reputation
      cambridgehoC cambridgeho wrote on last edited by
      #34

      @baconhound said:

      This is a RB driven league 😵

      To be successful you have to first and foremost control the line of scrimmage which I think the FO has tried their best to address.

      You also have to score points and again this season with a career back-up and no WR threat the Browns will have to be creative and I don't think they will pull it off. Again defenses will stack the box and press our either undersized or old and slow WRs.

      Hawkins will destroy teams this year. I will also bet we put Duke in the slot. Play action and screens, will be our bread and butter this year.

      1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • B BaconHound

        This is a RB driven league 😵

        To be successful you have to first and foremost control the line of scrimmage which I think the FO has tried their best to address.

        You also have to score points and again this season with a career back-up and no WR threat the Browns will have to be creative and I don't think they will pull it off. Again defenses will stack the box and press our either undersized or old and slow WRs.

        RoyceRolls R
        • 1k Posts
        • 345 Reputation
        R RoyceRolls wrote on last edited by
        #35

        @baconhound said:

        no WR threat.

        Lol wut?

        1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • thenew23 thenew23T
          • 2k Posts
          • 233 Reputation
          thenew23T thenew23 wrote on last edited by
          #36

          I posted this before. Here are our WR rankings from 2014... Not bad...

          Receiving stats:

          Drops %: 3.2 (tied 2nd);

          Yards per catch: 13.4 (1st);

          YAC per reception: 5.99(6th);

          Fumbles: 0 (1st)

          #Justsayin'
          B 1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • Mudfly MudflyM Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Dedicated One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
            • 7k Posts
            • 1k Reputation
            MudflyM Mudfly wrote on last edited by
            #37

            Taylor Gabriel......you'd think nobody even knows this guy is on our team.....Last year ranked #4 for rookie WR's, behind only Beckham, Evans and Landry....

            Last year was one of the highest touted WR classes ever......and he was #4 rated rookie(out of about 40+).....yet no one seems to think he did much?.....why isnt he getting more props?.....just kinda ho hum?.....

            Gabe =

            #11 in receptions.............yet wasn't even a starter

            #9 in yards.......................with so many fewer targets than the big names

            #2 in YAC @ 7.6..............Watkins= 5.2....Evans= 2.4......Beckham= 5.3

            #3 in YPC @ 16.7............Watkins=15.1..Evans=15.5....Beckham=14.3

            thenew23T 1 Reply Last reply
            👍
            Quote Reply
            • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
              • 64k Posts
              • 8k Reputation
              C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
              #38

              Nobody should underestimate the Browns this next season. Was Sipe a superstar

              qb?

              Nope. But they were a terrific football TEAM of guys who loved the game, and had

              a good solid locker room.

              1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • MudflyM Mudfly

                Taylor Gabriel......you'd think nobody even knows this guy is on our team.....Last year ranked #4 for rookie WR's, behind only Beckham, Evans and Landry....

                Last year was one of the highest touted WR classes ever......and he was #4 rated rookie(out of about 40+).....yet no one seems to think he did much?.....why isnt he getting more props?.....just kinda ho hum?.....

                Gabe =

                #11 in receptions.............yet wasn't even a starter

                #9 in yards.......................with so many fewer targets than the big names

                #2 in YAC @ 7.6..............Watkins= 5.2....Evans= 2.4......Beckham= 5.3

                #3 in YPC @ 16.7............Watkins=15.1..Evans=15.5....Beckham=14.3

                thenew23 thenew23T
                • 2k Posts
                • 233 Reputation
                thenew23T thenew23 wrote on last edited by
                #39

                @mudfly said:

                Taylor Gabriel......you'd think nobody even knows this guy is on our team.....Last year ranked #4 for rookie WR's, behind only Beckham, Evans and Landry....

                Last year was one of the highest touted WR classes ever......and he was #4 rated rookie(out of about 40+).....yet no one seems to think he did much?.....why isnt he getting more props?.....just kinda ho hum?.....

                Gabe =

                #11 in receptions.............yet wasn't even a starter

                #9 in yards.......................with so many fewer targets than the big names

                #2 in YAC @ 7.6..............Watkins= 5.2....Evans= 2.4......Beckham= 5.3

                #3 in YPC @ 16.7............Watkins=15.1..Evans=15.5....Beckham=14.3

                Only 1 TD... I think that's the number that stands out...

                #Justsayin'
                MudflyM 1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • thenew23T thenew23

                  @mudfly said:

                  Taylor Gabriel......you'd think nobody even knows this guy is on our team.....Last year ranked #4 for rookie WR's, behind only Beckham, Evans and Landry....

                  Last year was one of the highest touted WR classes ever......and he was #4 rated rookie(out of about 40+).....yet no one seems to think he did much?.....why isnt he getting more props?.....just kinda ho hum?.....

                  Gabe =

                  #11 in receptions.............yet wasn't even a starter

                  #9 in yards.......................with so many fewer targets than the big names

                  #2 in YAC @ 7.6..............Watkins= 5.2....Evans= 2.4......Beckham= 5.3

                  #3 in YPC @ 16.7............Watkins=15.1..Evans=15.5....Beckham=14.3

                  Only 1 TD... I think that's the number that stands out...

                  Mudfly MudflyM Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Dedicated One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                  • 7k Posts
                  • 1k Reputation
                  MudflyM Mudfly wrote on last edited by
                  #40

                  @thenew23 said:

                  Only 1 TD... I think that's the number that stands out...

                  Yep....thats the one that sticks out.....figured someone would point it out.....though, I will defend that with the fact that he was rarely used as a red zone receiver....(and, at 5-8", probably not gonna be anytime soon)......

                  In the end, #4 overall is #4 overall, which represents not just yards...or total catches...or number of TD's......but the whole package....

                  Hoping to see him break a few more long ones this year....as last year, he got free several times and Hoyer just couldnt get him the ball.....

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • W wargograw

                    "This is a RB driven league"

                    What league have you been watching?

                    Tour2ma Tour2maT In Memoriam Dedicated Conversation Starter Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done Very Popular
                    • 30k Posts
                    • 6k Reputation
                    Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
                    #41

                    Yep... too small and raw to separate in the compacted field and did not have a QB that could capitalize on his speed... A combo that is bound to suppress the TD total.

                    @wargograw said:

                    "This is a RB driven league"

                    What league have you been watching?

                    I'm going to go with sarcasm... especially with the 😵 ...

                    "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
                    1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • thenew23T thenew23

                      I posted this before. Here are our WR rankings from 2014... Not bad...

                      Receiving stats:

                      Drops %: 3.2 (tied 2nd);

                      Yards per catch: 13.4 (1st);

                      YAC per reception: 5.99(6th);

                      Fumbles: 0 (1st)

                      BaconHound B One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                      • 5k Posts
                      • 306 Reputation
                      B BaconHound wrote on last edited by
                      #42

                      @thenew23 said:

                      I posted this before. Here are our WR rankings from 2014... Not bad...

                      Receiving stats:

                      Drops %: 3.2 (tied 2nd);

                      Yards per catch: 13.4 (1st);

                      YAC per reception: 5.99(6th);

                      Fumbles: 0 (1st)

                      How about Receptions, Yards and TDs?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply
                      • Riffer X Riffer XR Very Popular Conversation Starter Reacting Well Dedicated Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                        • 3k Posts
                        • 127 Reputation
                        Riffer XR Riffer X wrote on last edited by
                        #43

                        If you have a good oline and can run the football, the WRs do not have to be studs. They need to do their jobs, meaning running good routes, not taking plays off, blocking, and most importantly, catching the ball when it is thrown to them. A little YAC doesn't hurt either. Last year, the Browns rotated guys in and out quite a bit keeping them fresh too.

                        We had things functioning just fine until Gordon came back playing half ass backyard football and the shit hit the fan.This corps is probably the best we have had since the return depth wise. Great slot guys in Hawk and little Gabriel, good size and enough speed with Bowe and Hartline and some developmental guys starting with Mayle. If Benji is your sixth WR on the roster, you have some pretty good depth.

                        I will take good, disciplined WRs any day and every day over some choads like Little, Morgan and Edwards etc.

                        Is a pig's ass pork?
                        VagitronV Tour2maT 2 Replies Last reply
                        👍
                        Quote Reply
                        • Mudfly MudflyM Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Dedicated One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                          • 7k Posts
                          • 1k Reputation
                          MudflyM Mudfly wrote on last edited by
                          #44

                          Id rather have 3 receivers with 700 yds each......than 1 with 1500 and 2 others with 300 ea......

                          A balanced/deeper team will always take you farther, than an unbalanced team with a few superstars......

                          B 1 Reply Last reply
                          Quote Reply
                          • PoeticGP PoeticG

                            This FO and the TEAM believes in Josh Gordon, even if some of you do not. I know that they've seen him abstain from weed for seasons, abstain from alcohol the whole season last year only to be suspended an entire year for a technicality. It's bullshit that they are riding his balls so hard. He's a good kid, he's very talented and he's going to be a Cleveland Brown for a long time. I believe in Gordon.

                            #1- Josh Gordon

                            #2- Dwayne Bowe/Brian Hartline

                            #3- Andrew Hawkins

                            #4- Taylor Gabriel/Travis Benjamin

                            There really isn't room for another receiver right now. So what Farmer says makes sense. I would have loved to add DGB to this group which I think would have put them over the top but it's whatever, I really like JG, Hawk, Gabe and Benji. Hawk and Gabe can really move. I love the shifty small WRs.

                            I had us taking Corey Grant in a lot of Mocks just because he's so fast and small(RB), but Farmer did one better by getting Duke Johnson- I love this little pitbull at RB. He's going to be exciting, he reminds me of Jerome Harrison.

                            The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
                            • 57k Posts
                            • 4k Reputation
                            The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
                            #45

                            @poeticg said:

                            This FO and the TEAM believes in Josh Gordon, even if some of you do not. I know that they've seen him abstain from weed for seasons, abstain from alcohol the whole season last year only to be suspended an entire year for a technicality. It's bullshit that they are riding his balls so hard. He's a good kid, he's very talented and he's going to be a Cleveland Brown for a long time. I believe in Gordon.

                            #1- Josh Gordon

                            #2- Dwayne Bowe/Brian Hartline

                            #3- Andrew Hawkins

                            #4- Taylor Gabriel/Travis Benjamin

                            There really isn't room for another receiver right now. So what Farmer says makes sense. I would have loved to add DGB to this group which I think would have put them over the top but it's whatever, I really like JG, Hawk, Gabe and Benji. Hawk and Gabe can really move. I love the shifty small WRs.

                            I had us taking Corey Grant in a lot of Mocks just because he's so fast and small(RB), but Farmer did one better by getting Duke Johnson- I love this little pitbull at RB. He's going to be exciting, he reminds me of Jerome Harrison.

                            You forgot about the guy we took in the 4th round...Mayles? Where does he fit in.

                            (as I noted elsewhere on this receiver thing....the Steelers best WR for years was a third round converted QB.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            Quote Reply
                            • MudflyM Mudfly

                              Id rather have 3 receivers with 700 yds each......than 1 with 1500 and 2 others with 300 ea......

                              A balanced/deeper team will always take you farther, than an unbalanced team with a few superstars......

                              BaconHound B One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                              • 5k Posts
                              • 306 Reputation
                              B BaconHound wrote on last edited by BaconHound
                              #46

                              @mudfly said:

                              Id rather have 3 receivers with 700 yds each......than 1 with 1500 and 2 others with 300 ea......

                              A balanced/deeper team will always take you farther, than an unbalanced team with a few superstars......

                              I agree Mud, the only issue with the current Browns is there is no threat. Doesn't have to be a name brand but a 6'3 215lb with 4.4 speed would really help. I like Mayle's size but 4.67 isn't enough speed. Jalen Strong was available at a reasonable position.

                              The GipperT 1 Reply Last reply
                              Quote Reply
                              • Mudfly MudflyM Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Dedicated One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                • 7k Posts
                                • 1k Reputation
                                MudflyM Mudfly wrote on last edited by
                                #47

                                I would only say that I think we got what we need and I have lots of confidence in our current group...(plus, Im another one that just doesn't believe WR's are that critical to invest big on them)......we have a couple big guys now that can go up for it....a few speedsters who can fly....some possession guys......really dont see the gaping hole or need for a mega receiver over other things....

                                I like what they are doing....If the ZBT regains it's form(and there's no reason it shouldn't) and the running game gets back on track, we have plenty of guys who can get open and some burners who can take it deep. Last year we had guys get open deep, fairly often, but didnt have QB who could get it there....not sure if we do now, we'll see.....but Id rather not invest in a WR until we do.......

                                People forget that just last year, when Mack was healthy and our running game was clicking.....we lead the league in avg per pass and had more long balls than anyone......and it was the system that made it work.....so, Id like to see if we can get back to that and see if we can be successful no matter who's in there, rather than just be dependent on some "star" receiver....

                                B 1 Reply Last reply
                                Quote Reply
                                • B BaconHound

                                  @mudfly said:

                                  Id rather have 3 receivers with 700 yds each......than 1 with 1500 and 2 others with 300 ea......

                                  A balanced/deeper team will always take you farther, than an unbalanced team with a few superstars......

                                  I agree Mud, the only issue with the current Browns is there is no threat. Doesn't have to be a name brand but a 6'3 215lb with 4.4 speed would really help. I like Mayle's size but 4.67 isn't enough speed. Jalen Strong was available at a reasonable position.

                                  The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
                                  • 57k Posts
                                  • 4k Reputation
                                  The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
                                  #48

                                  @baconhound said:

                                  I agree Mud, the only issue with the current Browns is there is no threat. Doesn't have to be a name brand but a 6'3 215lb with 4.4 speed would really help. I like Mayle's size but 4.67 isn't enough speed. Jalen Strong was available at a reasonable position.

                                  We have guys with speed....Hawkins/Benjamin.

                                  But speed isn't the absolute key ingredient to making a WR....unless we are talking about Mac Speedie. 😆

                                  Look at the list of HOF WRs. Except for Bob Hayes, few of them were the speediest cats around.

                                  Having Glue Finger (like Lavelli 😮 ) is every bit as important. And crisp route running....like Warfield...is every bit as important.

                                  And putting yourself into the right position ....like Gary Collins, and Cris Carter is every bit the crucial element as well.

                                  So, to me....having great hands, running crisp routes, knowing how to position yourself for the catch are probably more essential than speed.

                                  If this guy comes here and breaks Gary Collins record for career TD passes, we will all forget that he isn't Usain Bolt in pads and cleats.

                                  B 1 Reply Last reply
                                  Quote Reply
                                  • Riffer XR Riffer X

                                    If you have a good oline and can run the football, the WRs do not have to be studs. They need to do their jobs, meaning running good routes, not taking plays off, blocking, and most importantly, catching the ball when it is thrown to them. A little YAC doesn't hurt either. Last year, the Browns rotated guys in and out quite a bit keeping them fresh too.

                                    We had things functioning just fine until Gordon came back playing half ass backyard football and the shit hit the fan.This corps is probably the best we have had since the return depth wise. Great slot guys in Hawk and little Gabriel, good size and enough speed with Bowe and Hartline and some developmental guys starting with Mayle. If Benji is your sixth WR on the roster, you have some pretty good depth.

                                    I will take good, disciplined WRs any day and every day over some choads like Little, Morgan and Edwards etc.

                                    Vagitron VagitronV Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                    • 4k Posts
                                    • 301 Reputation
                                    VagitronV Vagitron wrote on last edited by Vagitron
                                    #49

                                    @riffer-x said:

                                    If you have a good oline and can run the football, the WRs do not have to be studs. They need to do their jobs, meaning running good routes, not taking plays off, blocking, and most importantly, catching the ball when it is thrown to them. A little YAC doesn't hurt either. Last year, the Browns rotated guys in and out quite a bit keeping them fresh too.

                                    We had things functioning just fine until Gordon came back playing half ass backyard football and the shit hit the fan.This corps is probably the best we have had since the return depth wise. Great slot guys in Hawk and little Gabriel, good size and enough speed with Bowe and Hartline and some developmental guys starting with Mayle. If Benji is your sixth WR on the roster, you have some pretty good depth.

                                    I will take good, disciplined WRs any day and every day over some choads like Little, Morgan and Edwards etc.

                                    Holy shit, not a name I expected to see. I also completely agree but was shocked the Browns waited so long to draft a receiver.
                                    AKA SNATCH98 or Rorbotron. The boards glorious admins decided to get cute and change my name to "homotron" Classy group of people. (Lost a bet with Columbus king and got banned for a month)
                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    Quote Reply
                                    • Riffer XR Riffer X

                                      If you have a good oline and can run the football, the WRs do not have to be studs. They need to do their jobs, meaning running good routes, not taking plays off, blocking, and most importantly, catching the ball when it is thrown to them. A little YAC doesn't hurt either. Last year, the Browns rotated guys in and out quite a bit keeping them fresh too.

                                      We had things functioning just fine until Gordon came back playing half ass backyard football and the shit hit the fan.This corps is probably the best we have had since the return depth wise. Great slot guys in Hawk and little Gabriel, good size and enough speed with Bowe and Hartline and some developmental guys starting with Mayle. If Benji is your sixth WR on the roster, you have some pretty good depth.

                                      I will take good, disciplined WRs any day and every day over some choads like Little, Morgan and Edwards etc.

                                      Tour2ma Tour2maT In Memoriam Dedicated Conversation Starter Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done Very Popular
                                      • 30k Posts
                                      • 6k Reputation
                                      Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by Tour2ma
                                      #50

                                      @riffer-x said:

                                      If you have a good oline and can run the football, the WRs do not have to be studs. They need to do their jobs, meaning running good routes, not taking plays off, blocking, and most importantly, catching the ball when it is thrown to them.

                                      Added a touch of emphasis to a WR role needed by every running team. Hawk and Gabe were real gamers when it came to blocking last year.

                                      "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      Quote Reply
                                      • gumby73 gumby73G Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                        • 11k Posts
                                        • 4k Reputation
                                        gumby73G gumby73 wrote on last edited by gumby73
                                        #51

                                        Damn Shame, but Devon Smith maybe the Next Hines Ward , to blow somebody up on down field block, with no Cheap Shot Required...

                                        Browns & Buffett: Got to go fishin, Down to rock bottom again, with just a few Friends Team Brotherhood-"It's not about You,Me or I. It's about building We"..Hue Jackson
                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        Quote Reply
                                        • MudflyM Mudfly

                                          I would only say that I think we got what we need and I have lots of confidence in our current group...(plus, Im another one that just doesn't believe WR's are that critical to invest big on them)......we have a couple big guys now that can go up for it....a few speedsters who can fly....some possession guys......really dont see the gaping hole or need for a mega receiver over other things....

                                          I like what they are doing....If the ZBT regains it's form(and there's no reason it shouldn't) and the running game gets back on track, we have plenty of guys who can get open and some burners who can take it deep. Last year we had guys get open deep, fairly often, but didnt have QB who could get it there....not sure if we do now, we'll see.....but Id rather not invest in a WR until we do.......

                                          People forget that just last year, when Mack was healthy and our running game was clicking.....we lead the league in avg per pass and had more long balls than anyone......and it was the system that made it work.....so, Id like to see if we can get back to that and see if we can be successful no matter who's in there, rather than just be dependent on some "star" receiver....

                                          BaconHound B One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                          • 5k Posts
                                          • 306 Reputation
                                          B BaconHound wrote on last edited by
                                          #52

                                          @mudfly said:

                                          I would only say that I think we got what we need and I have lots of confidence in our current group...(plus, Im another one that just doesn't believe WR's are that critical to invest big on them)......we have a couple big guys now that can go up for it....a few speedsters who can fly....some possession guys......really dont see the gaping hole or need for a mega receiver over other things....

                                          I like what they are doing....If the ZBT regains it's form(and there's no reason it shouldn't) and the running game gets back on track, we have plenty of guys who can get open and some burners who can take it deep. Last year we had guys get open deep, fairly often, but didnt have QB who could get it there....not sure if we do now, we'll see.....but Id rather not invest in a WR until we do.......

                                          People forget that just last year, when Mack was healthy and our running game was clicking.....we lead the league in avg per pass and had more long balls than anyone......and it was the system that made it work.....so, Id like to see if we can get back to that and see if we can be successful no matter who's in there, rather than just be dependent on some "star" receiver....

                                          Just don't have anyone that poses a matchup problem and thus no threat to stretch the field or score in the redzone. Our burners are too small to get 50/50 balls and our bigger receivers can't run past anyone. I really don't think we needed a "Mega Receiver" but Strong would have been a viable inexpensive option. Before Mack got hurt we played one decent defense, the Ravens. I guess we can agree to disagree but if the team struggles to score points next year it will be on the passing game.

                                          MudflyM 1 Reply Last reply
                                          Quote Reply

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Register Login
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          Theme
                                          • System
                                          • Light
                                          • Dark
                                          The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                                          The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Forums
                                          • Recent
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Donate