Skip to content

Will Daven Holly ever play on the field as a Brown again?

The Browns Board
18 10 1.5k
  • the dude had one year of play and got torched nonstop. he managed 5 picks due largely to the sheer volume of passes being directed his way all season long--he's still a pro and managed to catch a few inaccurate ones--but for the most part his play is well below average.

    his main saving grace was having ralph brown as a teammate to help shift some of the focus off his own personal suck. now he's damaged goods, personally i say stick a fork in him.

    he couldn't even maintain professionalism on a phone call w/ shaun smith on Andre Knott's Red Zone show.

    anyone willing to put stock in him for this season?

    Poll results from the old forum

    Will Daven Holly play on the field as a Brown in '09?

    • YES!!: 19 votes
    • no: 7 votes
    • who?: 0 votes
    FlugelF Flugel wrote on last edited by
    #8

    @sisky-fringo said:

    the dude had one year of play and got torched nonstop.

    REALLY Sisky? I actually LOVED his skills. Great ability to stay on the hip, used the sidelines masterfully and when he DID get beat - I saw him swatting away the ball at the last second. I'm not gonna say I saw Pro Bowl level; BUT considering our anemic pass rush and inability to get off the field - he was our best corner in 2007.

    I think he'd make an ideal 3rd corner for us right now. Hear me out. Anthony Henry is a TERRIBLE starting corner but as our 3rd corner when we had Jamir Miller's pass rush - he gave us 10 INTs right? Pass rush helps more than you can imagine. In fact, in 2001 - we led the entire conference in INTs with an average bunch in the secondary. I'll put Holly's skills up against anyone from that secondary we had in 2001.

    - Tom F.

  • PlaygroundLegendP PlaygroundLegend wrote on last edited by
    #9

    I see Holly Playing Nickel.... I hate repeating myself, but Im sick of all the B-mac hate once again.... I see people saying he aint a starter on other threads and Im beginning to think theyre Retarded... If you watch a game you will see that he has way more talent than Wright...

    B-mac seems like a man coverage corner, and Wright is a zone corner... seing as how B-mac plays physical and has great recovery speed, whereas wright gives every reciever a 10 yard cushion

    Anyway.... Any CB at this point will be better than Cousin... what a bad signing that was

  • I see Holly Playing Nickel.... I hate repeating myself, but Im sick of all the B-mac hate once again.... I see people saying he aint a starter on other threads and Im beginning to think theyre Retarded... If you watch a game you will see that he has way more talent than Wright...

    B-mac seems like a man coverage corner, and Wright is a zone corner... seing as how B-mac plays physical and has great recovery speed, whereas wright gives every reciever a 10 yard cushion

    Anyway.... Any CB at this point will be better than Cousin... what a bad signing that was

    T Tobalaz wrote on last edited by
    #10

    @playgroundlegend said:

    I see Holly Playing Nickel.... I hate repeating myself, but Im sick of all the B-mac hate once again.... I see people saying he aint a starter on other threads and Im beginning to think theyre Retarded... If you watch a game you will see that he has way more talent than Wright...

    B-mac seems like a man coverage corner, and Wright is a zone corner... seing as how B-mac plays physical and has great recovery speed, whereas wright gives every reciever a 10 yard cushion

    Anyway.... Any CB at this point will be better than Cousin... what a bad signing that was

    I loved B-mac's aggression but it's a double edged sword.

    It puts him in a position to both make a big play and to have a big play made on him, you know, the old sink or swim thing.

    Honestly I'd think B-mac's skills would make him shine in a #3 spot where he was more free to hawk than as a #2 to Wright.

    But....

    For right now I'd take Wright, McDonald and Holly as we build up the rest of the D's more glaring weaknesses.

    Face it, with as bad as our pass rush was last season it wouldn't matter WHO was out there.

    Oh, let's not forget the Giants won a Superbowl with 2 rookie corners because the opposing qb wasn't given enough time to let his recievers get open. Behold the power of pass rush.

  • @playgroundlegend said:

    I see Holly Playing Nickel.... I hate repeating myself, but Im sick of all the B-mac hate once again.... I see people saying he aint a starter on other threads and Im beginning to think theyre Retarded... If you watch a game you will see that he has way more talent than Wright...

    B-mac seems like a man coverage corner, and Wright is a zone corner... seing as how B-mac plays physical and has great recovery speed, whereas wright gives every reciever a 10 yard cushion

    Anyway.... Any CB at this point will be better than Cousin... what a bad signing that was

    I loved B-mac's aggression but it's a double edged sword.

    It puts him in a position to both make a big play and to have a big play made on him, you know, the old sink or swim thing.

    Honestly I'd think B-mac's skills would make him shine in a #3 spot where he was more free to hawk than as a #2 to Wright.

    But....

    For right now I'd take Wright, McDonald and Holly as we build up the rest of the D's more glaring weaknesses.

    Face it, with as bad as our pass rush was last season it wouldn't matter WHO was out there.

    Oh, let's not forget the Giants won a Superbowl with 2 rookie corners because the opposing qb wasn't given enough time to let his recievers get open. Behold the power of pass rush.

    HowieDawgH HowieDawg wrote on last edited by HowieDawg
    #11

    @tobalaz said:

    I loved B-mac's aggression but it's a double edged sword.

    It puts him in a position to both make a big play and to have a big play made on him, you know, the old sink or swim thing.

    Honestly I'd think B-mac's skills would make him shine in a #3 spot where he was more free to hawk than as a #2 to Wright.

    But....

    For right now I'd take Wright, McDonald and Holly as we build up the rest of the D's more glaring weaknesses.

    Face it, with as bad as our pass rush was last season it wouldn't matter WHO was out there.

    Oh, let's not forget the Giants won a Superbowl with 2 rookie corners because the opposing qb wasn't given enough time to let his recievers get open. Behold the power of pass rush.

    I can't help but feel the same. Last season the DB's , all things considered from a dreadful / non existant pass rush and a bunch of sissy LBs who couldn't tackle a pregnant grandmother, had some pretty decent performances. I rate BMac and Wright can be outstanding on his day. Holly will be keen to impress upon the team he is a starter and I think that the area we all dreaded at the beginning of last season is not the main focus for despair this off season. I'd like to see some instinctive, mobile, athletic blood hungry LBs behind our DL. So yeah, I'd take Holly back.

  • @tobalaz said:

    I loved B-mac's aggression but it's a double edged sword.

    It puts him in a position to both make a big play and to have a big play made on him, you know, the old sink or swim thing.

    Honestly I'd think B-mac's skills would make him shine in a #3 spot where he was more free to hawk than as a #2 to Wright.

    But....

    For right now I'd take Wright, McDonald and Holly as we build up the rest of the D's more glaring weaknesses.

    Face it, with as bad as our pass rush was last season it wouldn't matter WHO was out there.

    Oh, let's not forget the Giants won a Superbowl with 2 rookie corners because the opposing qb wasn't given enough time to let his recievers get open. Behold the power of pass rush.

    I can't help but feel the same. Last season the DB's , all things considered from a dreadful / non existant pass rush and a bunch of sissy LBs who couldn't tackle a pregnant grandmother, had some pretty decent performances. I rate BMac and Wright can be outstanding on his day. Holly will be keen to impress upon the team he is a starter and I think that the area we all dreaded at the beginning of last season is not the main focus for despair this off season. I'd like to see some instinctive, mobile, athletic blood hungry LBs behind our DL. So yeah, I'd take Holly back.

    Y YtownBrownsBacker wrote on last edited by
    #12

    @howiedawg said:

    I can't help but feel the same. Last season the DB's , all things considered from a dreadful / non existant pass rush and a bunch of sissy LBs who couldn't tackle a pregnant grandmother, had some pretty decent performances. I rate BMac and Wright can be outstanding on his day. Holly will be keen to impress upon the team he is a starter and I think that the area we all dreaded at the beginning of last season is not the main focus for despair this off season. I'd like to see some instinctive, mobile, athletic blood hungry LBs behind our DL. So yeah, I'd take Holly back.

    McDonald was also the victim of lack of support from our safties. There were more then a few times that the team was playing a cover two and McDonald didn't get any help over the top. so, I think him and Wright both have potential to be very good starters. Holly is good covering the slot receiver but struggles in press coverage. He's probably better playing zone. I don't thin he has the upside of McDonald or Wright but I'd resign him for the right price. I certainly wouldn't overpay for him.

  • ? mz. wrote on last edited by
    #13
    Meanwhile, former Cleveland Browns cornerback Daven Holly began his visit with the Bucs Tuesday. Holly, 26, played in 29 games for the Browns in 2006-07, starting 18. But he suffered a season-ending knee injury last May during OTA's while competing for a jump ball with receiver Braylon Edwards.

    The 5-foot-10, 185-pound Holly had five interceptions in 2006, returning one for a touchdown.

    Holly was a seventh-round pick by the San Francisco 49ers in 2005 out of Cincinnati. He played three games for the Chicago Bears as a rookie.

    via here.

    We need to resign him IMO. If not, our depth is destroyed.

  • GipsG Gips wrote on last edited by
    #14

    I voted yes but it looks like there is little chance we are going to resign him....

  • ? mz. wrote on last edited by
    #15

    I'm just wondering how losing a 26 year old with promise in order to make room for a 31 year old retread qualifies as "rebuilding?"

    It seems as if we are taking 9 steps back to move 1 step forward.

  • nickersN nickers wrote on last edited by
    #16

    The more I read...the more frustrated I get and the more I hate this focking regime...pitiful...

  • I'm just wondering how losing a 26 year old with promise in order to make room for a 31 year old retread qualifies as "rebuilding?"

    It seems as if we are taking 9 steps back to move 1 step forward.

    Y YtownBrownsBacker wrote on last edited by
    #17

    mz. said:

    I'm just wondering how losing a 26 year old with promise in order to make room for a 31 year old retread qualifies as "rebuilding?"

    It seems as if we are taking 9 steps back to move 1 step forward.

    After making that statement can you tell us if Holly has fully rcovered from his knee injury?

    It's easy to make such statements and not know the facts. With all the comments in this thread, nobody here has a clue what Holly's health status is.

    Maybe you need to qualify your response and say if Holly is healthy and back to the form he was in 2007 then losing a 26 year old in order to make room for a 31 year old retread.................................

    So, let's give the new organization a break and see if they have a plan.

  • Y YtownBrownsBacker wrote on last edited by
    #18

    @inspecta said:

    Well if he passes is physical with the bucs then we know.

    I thought Mangini and co' aren't meeting with the team until the end of this month? If so how do they know about Holly's knee? it's not like they have practice to watch or anything.

    Mangini has met with every player that is working out in Berea. He can't force the other players to come in. I'm just saying, people are dissing Mangini and they don't know if Holly is healthy or not. Also, you got to realize that some players would rather move on. It takes two to sign a contract. Maybe he just wants to play in a city he is from or for a coach he knows.

    My point is you can't blame this staff without knowing the facts. There may be guys they like who aren't interested in the Browns and would like to move on. Maybe Holly doesn't think he can beat out McDonald and wants to look elsewhere.

    I don't know, do you?