Dimwit gun owner carries loaded AR-15 into Atlanta airport
-
Quote from the guy: "If you don't exercise your rights," he said, "the government doesn't have any hesitation to take them away."
I notice he's not exercising his right to do naked starjumps 24/7, or watch ballet every evening, or visit every place of worship in his town, or give a riveting rendition of The Raven at his local poetry open mic night. He's just doing it because he wants to feel like a big man and I can't get behind that.
-
I was considering a feeble application to "disturbing the peace",,,,
but as an ardent gun rights guy, this moron was completely irresponsible.
It's sickening to offend and scare people, especially in an airport, even when you have the "right".
Concealed carry would be fine with me, I don't like the idea of having to leave guns in cars
to be possibly stolen while you are in the airport or a store, etc.... The "you can't bring in your concealed carry into
this building" is counter productive to keeping guns out of the hands of those who should not
have them.
I imagine this jackwagon's action here, would give most gun owners a bit of a headache.
-
If you open carry a slung rifle, you need to be slapped around. It makes responsible gun owners look bad and scares people who were on the fence about the issue.
-
If you open carry a slung rifle, you need to be slapped around. It makes responsible gun owners look bad and scares people who were on the fence about the issue.
If you open carry a slung rifle, you need to be slapped around. It makes responsible gun owners look bad and scares people who were on the fence about the issue.
If all gun owners were sensible, there wouldn't be an issue.
-
If you open carry a slung rifle, you need to be slapped around. It makes responsible gun owners look bad and scares people who were on the fence about the issue.
If you open carry a slung rifle, you need to be slapped around. It makes responsible gun owners look bad and scares people who were on the fence about the issue.
exactly. I'd consider applying for a CCW but I don't want to be a part of this gun culture perpetuated by the assholes at the NRA who love cunts like this guy.
-
If you open carry a slung rifle, you need to be slapped around. It makes responsible gun owners look bad and scares people who were on the fence about the issue.
exactly. I'd consider applying for a CCW but I don't want to be a part of this gun culture perpetuated by the assholes at the NRA who love cunts like this guy.
exactly. I'd consider applying for a CCW but I don't want to be a part of this gun culture perpetuated by the assholes at the NRA who love cunts like this guy.
Or having to listen to one of your own call a responsible CCW gun owner such as yourself a cunt.
-
Say, Cleve - do you drive a car? You don't want to be in the same car culture as
some nutjob who runs over people in a crowd....
-
Say, Cleve - do you drive a car? You don't want to be in the same car culture as
some nutjob who runs over people in a crowd....
Say, Cleve - do you drive a car? You don't want to be in the same car culture as
some nutjob who runs over people in a crowd....
I understand both can kill, but one object was "specifically" designed to kill another living thing. There is no other reason for it to exist in this universe. Which one am I talking about? There's a difference. But yeah if everyone that drove a car was like these NRA whacks, I probably wouldn't drive.
-
Say, Cleve - do you drive a car? You don't want to be in the same car culture as
some nutjob who runs over people in a crowd....
Say, Cleve - do you drive a car? You don't want to be in the same car culture as
some nutjob who runs over people in a crowd....
Wow! You said something I can disagree with!
The car/gun analogy used by some of our fellow conservatives is wrong. The function of a car is for transportation. Thats what it was invented for. What a looney tune chooses to use it for is up to him.
The gun was invented for the purpose of killing.
The counter argument by well meaning conservatives that we should ban cars because people get killed is silly.
-
Say, Cleve - do you drive a car? You don't want to be in the same car culture as
some nutjob who runs over people in a crowd....
Wow! You said something I can disagree with!
The car/gun analogy used by some of our fellow conservatives is wrong. The function of a car is for transportation. Thats what it was invented for. What a looney tune chooses to use it for is up to him.
The gun was invented for the purpose of killing.
The counter argument by well meaning conservatives that we should ban cars because people get killed is silly.
Stuart said:
Wow! You said something I can disagree with!
The car/gun analogy used by some of our fellow conservatives is wrong. The function of a car is for transportation. Thats what it was invented for. What a looney tune chooses to use it for is up to him.
The gun was invented for the purpose of killing.
The counter argument by well meaning conservatives that we should ban cars because people get killed is silly.
Wow! You said something I can agree with!
-
I watched the documentary Mad Max and it taught me that cars are meant for killing and that transport is an added perk.
-
At least with open carry, the one benefit is I can immediately tell who is armed. CCW? Not so much.
-
I watched the documentary Mad Max and it taught me that cars are meant for killing and that transport is an added perk.
I watched the documentary Mad Max and it taught me that cars are meant for killing and that transport is an added perk.
ive been wanting to see this documentary as well, have heard many good things.
-
Say, Cleve - do you drive a car? You don't want to be in the same car culture as
some nutjob who runs over people in a crowd....
Wow! You said something I can disagree with!
The car/gun analogy used by some of our fellow conservatives is wrong. The function of a car is for transportation. Thats what it was invented for. What a looney tune chooses to use it for is up to him.
The gun was invented for the purpose of killing.
The counter argument by well meaning conservatives that we should ban cars because people get killed is silly.
Stuart said:
Wow! You said something I can disagree with!
The car/gun analogy used by some of our fellow conservatives is wrong. The function of a car is for transportation. Thats what it was invented for. What a looney tune chooses to use it for is up to him.
The gun was invented for the purpose of killing.
The counter argument by well meaning conservatives that we should ban cars because people get killed is silly.
Holy shit. Thank you.
I agree
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody! -
Say, Cleve - do you drive a car? You don't want to be in the same car culture as
some nutjob who runs over people in a crowd....
Wow! You said something I can disagree with!
The car/gun analogy used by some of our fellow conservatives is wrong. The function of a car is for transportation. Thats what it was invented for. What a looney tune chooses to use it for is up to him.
The gun was invented for the purpose of killing.
The counter argument by well meaning conservatives that we should ban cars because people get killed is silly.
Stuart said:
Wow! You said something I can disagree with!
Fascinating, does that happen often between your personalities?
-
Open carry is dangerous because you can mistake anything/anywhere as a deadly situation. I have a ccl, but I keep it under the seat 99% of the time. You have to be a real pussy or a real shady dude if you need one on you 24/7 anyway.
-
Stuart said:
Wow! You said something I can disagree with!
The car/gun analogy used by some of our fellow conservatives is wrong. The function of a car is for transportation. Thats what it was invented for. What a looney tune chooses to use it for is up to him.
The gun was invented for the purpose of killing.
The counter argument by well meaning conservatives that we should ban cars because people get killed is silly.
Holy shit. Thank you.
I agree
Holy shit. Thank you.
I agree
Wow! You said something I can agree with!
Haha, stick with me kids...your learnin'!
Test time!
The stupid analogy that liberals have used to rationalize Obamacare is that if you're forced by law to purchase auto insurance, then why shouldn't you be forced to buy health insurance.
Explain in a few sentences why that analogy is stupid...and I take away points for misspelling.
-
Stuart said:
Wow! You said something I can disagree with!
Fascinating, does that happen often between your personalities?
Fascinating, does that happen often between your personalities?
A flip flopping, double talking liberal making dual personality accusations. Funny.
-
Fascinating, does that happen often between your personalities?
A flip flopping, double talking liberal making dual personality accusations. Funny.
Stuart said:
A flip flopping, double talking liberal making dual personality accusations. Funny.
Is this stewie or cal? Was Cal watching the game while his effete sub persona was here posting?
-
yes, clevelarryfine, you are wrong again.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better π
Register Login